Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Ultrasound | Research article

Quality of consumer-oriented websites containing information about the second trimester ultrasound examination during pregnancy

Authors: Susanne Georgsson, Tommy Carlsson

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Providing information about prenatal tests is a clinical challenge and the public frequently accesses the Web to read pregnancy-related information. The overarching aim of this study was to investigate the quality of consumer-oriented websites addressing obstetric ultrasound examination in the second trimester of pregnancy.

Methods

Swedish websites were identified with Google, using 20 search strings and screening 400 hits (n = 71 included websites). Reliability and information about the examination were assessed with the DISCERN instrument, completeness was assessed according to national guidelines, and readability analyzed with the Readability Index. Popularity was determined with the ALEXA tool and search rank was determined according to Google hit lists.

Results

The mean total DISCERN score was 29.7/80 (SD 11.4), with > 50% having low quality for 15 of the 16 questions. The mean completeness score was 6.8/24 (SD 4.5). The Readability Index ranged between 22 and 63, with a mean of 42.7 (SD 6.8), indicating difficult readability. Weak and non-significant correlations were observed between ALEXA/search rank and the investigated quality variables, except for search rank and reliability.

Conclusions

The quality of consumer-oriented websites addressing the second trimester ultrasound examination is low. Health professionals need to discuss this with expectant parents considering undergoing the examination. There is a need for efforts that aim to improve the poor quality of online sources in the field of prenatal examinations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Crang-Svalenius E, Dykes A-K, Jörgensen C. Factors influencing informed choice of prenatal diagnosis: women’s feelings and attitudes. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1998;13:53–61.CrossRef Crang-Svalenius E, Dykes A-K, Jörgensen C. Factors influencing informed choice of prenatal diagnosis: women’s feelings and attitudes. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1998;13:53–61.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Garcia J, Bricker L, Henderson J, Martin M-A, Mugford M, Nielson J, et al. Women’s views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth. 2002;29:225–50.CrossRef Garcia J, Bricker L, Henderson J, Martin M-A, Mugford M, Nielson J, et al. Women’s views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth. 2002;29:225–50.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lalor JG, Devane D. Information, knowledge and expectations of the routine ultrasound scan. Midwifery. 2007;23:13–22.CrossRef Lalor JG, Devane D. Information, knowledge and expectations of the routine ultrasound scan. Midwifery. 2007;23:13–22.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Georgsson Ohman S, Waldenström U. Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:15–22.CrossRef Georgsson Ohman S, Waldenström U. Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:15–22.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wool C. Systematic review of the literature: parental outcomes after diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011;11:182–92.CrossRef Wool C. Systematic review of the literature: parental outcomes after diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011;11:182–92.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Green JM, Hewison J, Bekker HL, Bryant LD, Cuckle HS. Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(33):iii ix–x, 1–109.CrossRef Green JM, Hewison J, Bekker HL, Bryant LD, Cuckle HS. Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(33):iii ix–x, 1–109.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ternby E, Ingvoldstad C, Annerén G, Axelsson O. Midwives and information on prenatal testing with focus on Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:1202–7.CrossRef Ternby E, Ingvoldstad C, Annerén G, Axelsson O. Midwives and information on prenatal testing with focus on Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:1202–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ferm Widlund K, Gunnarsson C, Nordin K, Hansson MG. Pregnant women are satisfied with the information they receive about prenatal diagnosis, but are their decisions well informed? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:1128–32.CrossRef Ferm Widlund K, Gunnarsson C, Nordin K, Hansson MG. Pregnant women are satisfied with the information they receive about prenatal diagnosis, but are their decisions well informed? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:1128–32.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sayakhot P, Carolan-Olah M. Internet use by pregnant women seeking pregnancy-related information: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:65.CrossRef Sayakhot P, Carolan-Olah M. Internet use by pregnant women seeking pregnancy-related information: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:65.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Volkman JE, Luger TM, Harvey KLL, Hogan TP, Shimada SL, Amante D, et al. The National Cancer Institute’s health information National Trends Survey [HINTS]: a national cross-sectional analysis of talking to your doctor and other healthcare providers for health information. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:111.CrossRef Volkman JE, Luger TM, Harvey KLL, Hogan TP, Shimada SL, Amante D, et al. The National Cancer Institute’s health information National Trends Survey [HINTS]: a national cross-sectional analysis of talking to your doctor and other healthcare providers for health information. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:111.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Moreira MWL, Rodrigues JJPC, Korotaev V, Al-Muhtadi J, Kumar N. A comprehensive review on smart decision support systems for health care. IEEE Syst J. 2019;13:3536–45.CrossRef Moreira MWL, Rodrigues JJPC, Korotaev V, Al-Muhtadi J, Kumar N. A comprehensive review on smart decision support systems for health care. IEEE Syst J. 2019;13:3536–45.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Eysenbach G, Jadad AR. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the internet age. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3:E19.CrossRef Eysenbach G, Jadad AR. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the internet age. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3:E19.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa E-R. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2691–700.CrossRef Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa E-R. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2691–700.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:671–92.CrossRef Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:671–92.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Venot A, Burgun A, Quantin C. Medical informatics, e-health: fundamentals and applications. Paris: Springer; 2014.CrossRef Venot A, Burgun A, Quantin C. Medical informatics, e-health: fundamentals and applications. Paris: Springer; 2014.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rowlands S. Misinformation on abortion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16:233–40.CrossRef Rowlands S. Misinformation on abortion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16:233–40.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Swartzendruber A, Steiner RJ, Newton-Levinson A. Contraceptive information on pregnancy resource center websites: a statewide content analysis. Contraception. 2018;98(2):158–62. Swartzendruber A, Steiner RJ, Newton-Levinson A. Contraceptive information on pregnancy resource center websites: a statewide content analysis. Contraception. 2018;98(2):158–62.
18.
go back to reference Eriksson C, Skinstad M, Georgsson S, Carlsson T. Quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2019;16:172.CrossRef Eriksson C, Skinstad M, Georgsson S, Carlsson T. Quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2019;16:172.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Burkell J. Health information seals of approval: what do they signify? Inf Commun Soc. 2004;7:491–509.CrossRef Burkell J. Health information seals of approval: what do they signify? Inf Commun Soc. 2004;7:491–509.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mercer MB, Agatisa PK, Farrell RM. What patients are reading about noninvasive prenatal testing: an evaluation of internet content and implications for patient-centered care. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:986–93.CrossRef Mercer MB, Agatisa PK, Farrell RM. What patients are reading about noninvasive prenatal testing: an evaluation of internet content and implications for patient-centered care. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:986–93.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Skirton H, Goldsmith L, Jackson L, Lewis C, Chitty LS. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: a systematic review of internet advertising to potential users by commercial companies and private health providers. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:1167–75.CrossRef Skirton H, Goldsmith L, Jackson L, Lewis C, Chitty LS. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: a systematic review of internet advertising to potential users by commercial companies and private health providers. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:1167–75.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Farrell RM, Agatisa PK, Mercer M, Coleridge MB. Online direct-to-consumer messages about non-invasive prenatal genetic testing. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2015;1:88–97.CrossRef Farrell RM, Agatisa PK, Mercer M, Coleridge MB. Online direct-to-consumer messages about non-invasive prenatal genetic testing. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2015;1:88–97.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rew L, Saenz A, Walker LO. A systematic method for reviewing and analysing health information on consumer-oriented websites. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(9):2218–26. Rew L, Saenz A, Walker LO. A systematic method for reviewing and analysing health information on consumer-oriented websites. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(9):2218–26.
25.
go back to reference Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ. 2002;324:573–7.CrossRef Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ. 2002;324:573–7.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Fiksdal AS, Kumbamu A, Jadhav AS, Cocos C, Nelsen LA, Pathak J, et al. Evaluating the process of online health information searching: a qualitative approach to exploring consumer perspectives. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e224.CrossRef Fiksdal AS, Kumbamu A, Jadhav AS, Cocos C, Nelsen LA, Pathak J, et al. Evaluating the process of online health information searching: a qualitative approach to exploring consumer perspectives. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e224.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Feufel MA, Stahl SF. What do web-use skill differences imply for online health information searches? J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e87.CrossRef Feufel MA, Stahl SF. What do web-use skill differences imply for online health information searches? J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e87.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference McCool ME, Wahl J, Schlecht I, Apfelbacher C. Evaluating written patient information for eczema in German: comparing the reliability of two instruments, DISCERN and EQIP. PloS One. 2015;10:e0139895.CrossRef McCool ME, Wahl J, Schlecht I, Apfelbacher C. Evaluating written patient information for eczema in German: comparing the reliability of two instruments, DISCERN and EQIP. PloS One. 2015;10:e0139895.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Björnsson CH. Läsbarhet [readability]. Stockholm: Liber; 1968. Björnsson CH. Läsbarhet [readability]. Stockholm: Liber; 1968.
32.
go back to reference Carlsson T, Bergman G, Melander Marttala U, Wadensten B, Mattsson E. Information following a diagnosis of congenital heart defect: experiences among parents to prenatally diagnosed children. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117995.CrossRef Carlsson T, Bergman G, Melander Marttala U, Wadensten B, Mattsson E. Information following a diagnosis of congenital heart defect: experiences among parents to prenatally diagnosed children. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117995.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Carlsson T, Bergman G, Wadensten B, Mattsson E. Experiences of informational needs and received information following a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36:515–22.CrossRef Carlsson T, Bergman G, Wadensten B, Mattsson E. Experiences of informational needs and received information following a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36:515–22.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Andersson I-M, Christensson K, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Experiences, feelings and thoughts of women undergoing second trimester medical termination of pregnancy. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115957.CrossRef Andersson I-M, Christensson K, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Experiences, feelings and thoughts of women undergoing second trimester medical termination of pregnancy. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115957.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Paasche-Orlow MK, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nielsen-Bohlman LT, Rudd RR. The prevalence of limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:175–84.CrossRef Paasche-Orlow MK, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nielsen-Bohlman LT, Rudd RR. The prevalence of limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:175–84.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Bantan N, Abenhaim HA. Vaginal births after caesarean: what does Google think about it? Women Birth. 2015;28:21–4.CrossRef Bantan N, Abenhaim HA. Vaginal births after caesarean: what does Google think about it? Women Birth. 2015;28:21–4.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Mueller J, Jay C, Harper S, Davies A, Vega J, Todd C. Web use for symptom appraisal of physical health conditions: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e202.CrossRef Mueller J, Jay C, Harper S, Davies A, Vega J, Todd C. Web use for symptom appraisal of physical health conditions: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e202.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Website quality indicators for consumers. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e55.CrossRef Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Website quality indicators for consumers. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e55.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quality of consumer-oriented websites containing information about the second trimester ultrasound examination during pregnancy
Authors
Susanne Georgsson
Tommy Carlsson
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02897-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue