Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Ultrasound | Study protocol

Protocol for Correcting Residual Errors with Spectral, ULtrasound, Traditional Speech therapy Randomized Controlled Trial (C-RESULTS RCT)

Authors: Tara McAllister, Jonathan L. Preston, Elaine R. Hitchcock, Jennifer Hill

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Speech sound disorder in childhood poses a barrier to academic and social participation, with potentially lifelong consequences for educational and occupational outcomes. While most speech errors resolve by the late school-age years, between 2 and 5% of speakers exhibit residual speech errors (RSE) that persist through adolescence or even adulthood. Previous findings from small-scale studies suggest that interventions incorporating visual biofeedback can outperform traditional motor-based treatment approaches for children with RSE, but this question has not been investigated in a well-powered randomized controlled trial.

Methods/design

This project, Correcting Residual Errors with Spectral, ULtrasound, Traditional Speech therapy Randomized Controlled Trial (C-RESULTS RCT), aims to treat 110 children in a parallel randomized controlled clinical trial comparing biofeedback and non-biofeedback interventions for RSE affecting the North American English rhotic sound /ɹ/. Eligible children will be American English speakers, aged 9–15 years, who exhibit RSE affecting /ɹ/ but otherwise show typical cognitive-linguistic and hearing abilities. Participants will be randomized, with stratification by site (Syracuse University or Montclair State University) and pre-treatment speech production ability, to receive either a motor-based treatment consistent with current best practices in speech therapy (40% of participants) or treatment incorporating visual biofeedback (60% of participants). Within the biofeedback condition, participants will be assigned in equal numbers to receive biofeedback in the form of a real-time visual display of the acoustic signal of speech or ultrasound imaging of the tongue during speech. The primary outcome measure will assess changes in the acoustics of children’s production of /ɹ/ during treatment, while a secondary outcome measure will use blinded listeners to evaluate changes in the perceived accuracy of /ɹ/ production after the completion of all treatment. These measures will allow the treatment conditions to be compared with respect to both efficacy and efficiency.

Discussion

By conducting the first well-powered randomized controlled trial comparing treatment with and without biofeedback, this study aims to provide high-quality evidence to guide treatment decisions for children with RSE.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03737318, November 9, 2018.
Footnotes
1
Across all treatment conditions, the first treatment session in Phase 1 (Acquisition) will feature roughly 25 min of additional condition-specific training. For the MBT condition, this will consist of revisiting the content introduced during Dynamic Assessment (tongue shapes for /ɹ/, etc.) in greater detail.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hitchcock E, Harel D, McAllister BT. Social, emotional, and academic impact of residual speech errors in school-aged children: a survey study. Semin Speech Lang. 2015;36(4):283–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hitchcock E, Harel D, McAllister BT. Social, emotional, and academic impact of residual speech errors in school-aged children: a survey study. Semin Speech Lang. 2015;36(4):283–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Crowe Hall BJ. Attitudes of fourth and sixth graders towards peers with mild articulation disorders. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1991;22(1):334–40.CrossRef Crowe Hall BJ. Attitudes of fourth and sixth graders towards peers with mild articulation disorders. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1991;22(1):334–40.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference McCormack J, McLeod S, McAllister L, Harrison LJ. A systematic review of the association between childhood speech impairment and participation across the lifespan. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;11(2):155–70.CrossRef McCormack J, McLeod S, McAllister L, Harrison LJ. A systematic review of the association between childhood speech impairment and participation across the lifespan. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;11(2):155–70.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Felsenfeld S, Broen PA, McGue M. A 28-year follow-up of adults with a history of moderate phonological disorder: linguistic and personality results. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1992;35(5):1114–25.CrossRef Felsenfeld S, Broen PA, McGue M. A 28-year follow-up of adults with a history of moderate phonological disorder: linguistic and personality results. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1992;35(5):1114–25.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shriberg LD. Childhood speech sound disorders: from postbehaviorism to the postgenomic era. In: Paul R, Flipsen P, editors. Speech sound disorders in children. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2009. Shriberg LD. Childhood speech sound disorders: from postbehaviorism to the postgenomic era. In: Paul R, Flipsen P, editors. Speech sound disorders in children. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2009.
6.
go back to reference Culton GL. Speech disorders among college freshmen: a 13-year survey. J Speech Hear Disord. 1986;51(1):3–7.PubMedCrossRef Culton GL. Speech disorders among college freshmen: a 13-year survey. J Speech Hear Disord. 1986;51(1):3–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Flipsen P. Emergence and prevalence of persistent and residual speech errors. Semin Speech Lang. 2015;36(4):217–23.PubMedCrossRef Flipsen P. Emergence and prevalence of persistent and residual speech errors. Semin Speech Lang. 2015;36(4):217–23.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ruscello DM. Visual feedback in treatment of residual phonological disorders. J Commun Disord. 1995;28(4):279–302.PubMedCrossRef Ruscello DM. Visual feedback in treatment of residual phonological disorders. J Commun Disord. 1995;28(4):279–302.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Volin RA. A relationship between stimulability and the efficacy of visual biofeedback in the training of a respiratory control task. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1998;7(1):81–90.CrossRef Volin RA. A relationship between stimulability and the efficacy of visual biofeedback in the training of a respiratory control task. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1998;7(1):81–90.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McAllister Byun T, Hitchcock ER. Investigating the use of traditional and spectral biofeedback approaches to intervention for /r/ misarticulation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;21(3):207–21.CrossRef McAllister Byun T, Hitchcock ER. Investigating the use of traditional and spectral biofeedback approaches to intervention for /r/ misarticulation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;21(3):207–21.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference McAllister Byun T, Campbell H. Differential effects of visual-acoustic biofeedback intervention for residual speech errors. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10(567):1–17. McAllister Byun T, Campbell H. Differential effects of visual-acoustic biofeedback intervention for residual speech errors. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10(567):1–17.
12.
go back to reference McAllister BT. Efficacy of visual-acoustic biofeedback intervention for residual rhotic errors: a single-subject randomization study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(5):1175–93.CrossRef McAllister BT. Efficacy of visual-acoustic biofeedback intervention for residual rhotic errors: a single-subject randomization study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(5):1175–93.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Preston JL, McCabe P, Rivera-Campos A, Whittle JL, Landry E, Maas E. Ultrasound visual feedback treatment and practice variability for residual speech sound errors. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(6):2102–15.PubMedCrossRef Preston JL, McCabe P, Rivera-Campos A, Whittle JL, Landry E, Maas E. Ultrasound visual feedback treatment and practice variability for residual speech sound errors. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(6):2102–15.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Preston JL, Leece MC, Maas E. Motor-based treatment with and without ultrasound feedback for residual speech sound errors. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017;52(1):80–94.PubMedCrossRef Preston JL, Leece MC, Maas E. Motor-based treatment with and without ultrasound feedback for residual speech sound errors. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017;52(1):80–94.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Preston JL, McAllister T, Phillips E, Boyce S, Tiede M, Kim JS, et al. Remediating residual rhotic errors with traditional and ultrasound-enhanced treatment: a single-case experimental study. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28(3):1167–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Preston JL, McAllister T, Phillips E, Boyce S, Tiede M, Kim JS, et al. Remediating residual rhotic errors with traditional and ultrasound-enhanced treatment: a single-case experimental study. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28(3):1167–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference McAllister Byun T, Hitchcock ER, Swartz MT. Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(6):2116–30.CrossRef McAllister Byun T, Hitchcock ER, Swartz MT. Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(6):2116–30.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sugden E, Lloyd S, Lam J, Cleland J. Systematic review of ultrasound visual biofeedback in intervention for speech sound disorders. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019;54(5):705–28.PubMedCrossRef Sugden E, Lloyd S, Lam J, Cleland J. Systematic review of ultrasound visual biofeedback in intervention for speech sound disorders. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019;54(5):705–28.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hodges NJ, Franks IM. Learning a coordination skill: interactive effects of instruction and feedback. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;72(2):132–42.PubMedCrossRef Hodges NJ, Franks IM. Learning a coordination skill: interactive effects of instruction and feedback. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;72(2):132–42.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Maas E, Robin DA, Austermann Hula SN, Freedman SE, Wulf G, Ballard KJ, et al. Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17(3):277–98.PubMedCrossRef Maas E, Robin DA, Austermann Hula SN, Freedman SE, Wulf G, Ballard KJ, et al. Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17(3):277–98.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Van Riper C. Speech Correction: Principles and Methods, vol. 1. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1939. Van Riper C. Speech Correction: Principles and Methods, vol. 1. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1939.
21.
go back to reference Van Riper C. Speech Correction: Principles and Methods, vol. 9. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1996. Van Riper C. Speech Correction: Principles and Methods, vol. 9. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1996.
22.
go back to reference Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.CrossRefPubMed Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.PubMedCrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Wechsler D. Wechsler abbreviated scales of intelligence. 2nd ed. San Antonio: Pearson; 2011. Wechsler D. Wechsler abbreviated scales of intelligence. 2nd ed. San Antonio: Pearson; 2011.
26.
go back to reference Wiig E, Semel E, Secord W. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals—fifth edition (CELF-5). Bloomington: Pearson; 2013. Wiig E, Semel E, Secord W. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals—fifth edition (CELF-5). Bloomington: Pearson; 2013.
27.
go back to reference Goldman R, Fristoe M. Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation. 3rd ed. Bloomington: Pearson; 2015. Goldman R, Fristoe M. Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation. 3rd ed. Bloomington: Pearson; 2015.
28.
go back to reference Shriberg LD, Lohmeier HL, Campbell TF, Dollaghan CA, Green JR, Moore CA. A nonword repetition task for speakers with misarticulations: the syllable repetition task (SRT). J Speech Lang Hear Res JSLHR. 2009;52(5):1189–212.PubMedCrossRef Shriberg LD, Lohmeier HL, Campbell TF, Dollaghan CA, Green JR, Moore CA. A nonword repetition task for speakers with misarticulations: the syllable repetition task (SRT). J Speech Lang Hear Res JSLHR. 2009;52(5):1189–212.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bowers L, Huisingh R. Linguisystems articulation test. East Moline: Linguisystems, Inc; 2011. Bowers L, Huisingh R. Linguisystems articulation test. East Moline: Linguisystems, Inc; 2011.
30.
go back to reference Thoonen G, Maassen B, Gabreels F, Schreuder R, de Swart B. Towards a standardised assessment procedure for developmental apraxia of speech. Eur J Disord Commun. 1997;32(1):37–60.PubMedCrossRef Thoonen G, Maassen B, Gabreels F, Schreuder R, de Swart B. Towards a standardised assessment procedure for developmental apraxia of speech. Eur J Disord Commun. 1997;32(1):37–60.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Thoonen G, Maassen B, Gabreels F, Schreuder R. Validity of maximum performance tasks to diagnose motor speech disorders in children. Clin Linguist Phon. 1999;13(1):1–23.CrossRef Thoonen G, Maassen B, Gabreels F, Schreuder R. Validity of maximum performance tasks to diagnose motor speech disorders in children. Clin Linguist Phon. 1999;13(1):1–23.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Miccio AW. Clinical problem solving: assessment of phonological disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2002;11(3):221–9.CrossRef Miccio AW. Clinical problem solving: assessment of phonological disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2002;11(3):221–9.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Klein HB, McAllister Byun T, Davidson L, Grigos MI. A multidimensional investigation of children’s /r/ productions: perceptual, ultrasound, and acoustic measures. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22(3):540–53.PubMedCrossRef Klein HB, McAllister Byun T, Davidson L, Grigos MI. A multidimensional investigation of children’s /r/ productions: perceptual, ultrasound, and acoustic measures. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22(3):540–53.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference McAllister Byun T, Hitchcock E, Ortiz J. Challenge-R; 2014. McAllister Byun T, Hitchcock E, Ortiz J. Challenge-R; 2014.
36.
go back to reference Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004;36(2):212–24.PubMedCrossRef Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004;36(2):212–24.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Rvachew S, Brosseau-Lapré F. Developmental phonological disorders: foundations of clinical practice. San Diego: Plural Pub; 2012. Rvachew S, Brosseau-Lapré F. Developmental phonological disorders: foundations of clinical practice. San Diego: Plural Pub; 2012.
38.
go back to reference Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. 6.1.06; 2019. Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. 6.1.06; 2019.
40.
go back to reference Campbell H, Harel D, Hitchcock E, McAllister Byun, T. Selecting an acoustic correlate for automated measurement of American English rhotic production in children. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;20(6):635-43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Campbell H, Harel D, Hitchcock E, McAllister Byun, T. Selecting an acoustic correlate for automated measurement of American English rhotic production in children. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;20(6):635-43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Dugan SH, Silbert N, McAllister T, Preston JL, Sotto C, Boyce SE. Modelling category goodness judgments in children with residual sound errors. Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(4):295–315.PubMedCrossRef Dugan SH, Silbert N, McAllister T, Preston JL, Sotto C, Boyce SE. Modelling category goodness judgments in children with residual sound errors. Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(4):295–315.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference McAllister Byun T, Halpin PF, Szeredi D. Online crowdsourcing for efficient rating of speech: a validation study. J Commun Disord. 2015;53:70–83.PubMedCrossRef McAllister Byun T, Halpin PF, Szeredi D. Online crowdsourcing for efficient rating of speech: a validation study. J Commun Disord. 2015;53:70–83.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference McAllister Byun T, Harel D, Halpin PF, Szeredi D. Deriving gradient measures of child speech from crowdsourced ratings. J Commun Disord. 2016;64:91–102.PubMedCrossRef McAllister Byun T, Harel D, Halpin PF, Szeredi D. Deriving gradient measures of child speech from crowdsourced ratings. J Commun Disord. 2016;64:91–102.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Muraki E. A generalized partial credit model. In: Linden WJ, Hambleton RK, editors. Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer; 1997. p. 153–64.CrossRef Muraki E. A generalized partial credit model. In: Linden WJ, Hambleton RK, editors. Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer; 1997. p. 153–64.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference McAllister Byun T, Campbell H, Carey H, Liang W, Park TH, Svirsky M. Enhancing intervention for residual rhotic errors via app-delivered biofeedback: a case study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(6S):1810–7.CrossRef McAllister Byun T, Campbell H, Carey H, Liang W, Park TH, Svirsky M. Enhancing intervention for residual rhotic errors via app-delivered biofeedback: a case study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(6S):1810–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Protocol for Correcting Residual Errors with Spectral, ULtrasound, Traditional Speech therapy Randomized Controlled Trial (C-RESULTS RCT)
Authors
Tara McAllister
Jonathan L. Preston
Elaine R. Hitchcock
Jennifer Hill
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-1941-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pediatrics 1/2020 Go to the issue