Top

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Ultrasound | Review

Education in the placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters: a systematic review

Authors: Rasmus Jørgensen, Christian B. Laursen, Lars Konge, Pia Iben Pietersen

Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Placing a peripheral vein catheter can be challenging due to several factors, but using ultrasound as guidance increases the success rate. The purpose of this review is to investigate the knowledge already existing within the field of education in ultrasound-guided peripheral vein catheter placement and explore the efficacy and clinical impact of different types of education.

Methods

In accordance with PRISMA-guidelines, a systematic search was performed using three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL). Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts, subsequently full-text of the relevant articles. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias assessment tool and the New Ottawa scale.

Results

Of 3409 identified publications, 64 were included. The studies were different in target learners, study design, assessment tools, and outcome measures, which made direct comparison difficult. The studies addressed a possible effect of mastery learning and found e-learning and didactic classroom teaching to be equally effective.

Conclusion

Current studies suggest a potential benefit of ultrasound guided USG-PVC training on success rate, procedure time, cannulation attempts, and reducing the need for subsequent CVC or PICC in adult patients. An assessment tool with proven validity of evidence to ensure competence exists and education strategies like mastery learning, e-learning, and the usage of color Doppler show promising results, but an evidence-based USG-PVC-placement training program using these strategies combined is still warranted.

Available only for authorised users

Fields JM, Piela NE, Au AK, Ku BS. Risk factors associated with difficult venous access in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(10):1179–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.008.CrossRefPubMed

Pinto A, Pinto F, Faggian A, et al. Sources of error in emergency ultrasonography. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013;5(Suppl 1):S1–S.CrossRef

McMillan HJ, Writer H, Moreau KA, et al. Lumbar puncture simulation in pediatric residency training: improving procedural competence and decreasing anxiety. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0722-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Evans LV, Dodge KL, Shah TD, Kaplan LJ, Siegel MD, Moore CL, et al. Simulation training in central venous catheter insertion: improved performance in clinical practice. Acad Med. 2010;85(9):1462–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eac9a3.CrossRefPubMed

Madenci AL, Solis CV, de Moya MA. Central venous access by trainees: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of simulation to improve success rate on patients. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182a3df26.CrossRefPubMed

Pietersen PI, Madsen KR, Graumann O, Konge L, Nielsen BU, Laursen CB. Lung ultrasound training: a systematic review of published literature in clinical lung ultrasound training. Crit Ultrasound J. 2018;10(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-018-0103-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kahr Rasmussen N, Andersen TT, Carlsen J, et al. Simulation-based training of ultrasound-guided procedures in radiology - a systematic review. Ultraschall Med. 2019;40(5):584–602. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0896-2714.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005.CrossRefPubMed

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(oct18 2):d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

GA Wells, Shea, B, D O’Connell, J Peterson, V Welch, M Losos, P Tugwell. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp]. Accessed 13 Mar 2018.

11.

Osborn SR, Borhart J, Antonis MS. Medical students benefit from the use of ultrasound when learning peripheral IV techniques. Crit Ultrasound J. 2012;4(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2036-7902-4-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Edwards C, Jones J. Development and implementation of an ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter program for emergency nurses. J Emerg Nurs. 2018;44(1):33–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2017.07.009.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Ng C, Ng L, Kessler DO. Attitudes towards three ultrasound-guided vascular access techniques in a paediatric emergency department. Br J Nurs (Mark Allen Publishing). 2017;26(19):S26–s31. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.19.S26.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Adhikari S, Schmier C, Marx J. Focused simulation training: emergency department nurses’ confidence and comfort level in performing ultrasound-guided vascular access. J Vasc Access. 2015;16(6):515–20. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000436.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Breslin R, Collins K, Cupitt J. The use of ultrasound as an adjunct to peripheral venous cannulation by junior doctors in clinical practice. Med Teach. 2018;40(12):1275–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1428737.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Costantino TG, Kirtz JF, Satz WA. Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access vs. the external jugular vein as the initial approach to the patient with difficult vascular access. J Emerg Med. 2010;39(4):462–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.02.004.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Salleras-Duran L, Fuentes-Pumarola C, Bosch-Borras N, et al. Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheterization in emergency services. J Emerg Nurs. 2016;42(4):338–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2015.11.005.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Panebianco NL, Fredette JM, Szyld D, Sagalyn EB, Pines JM, Dean AJ. What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(12):1298–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00520.x.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Costantino TG, Parikh AK, Satz WA, Fojtik JP. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46(5):456–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.12.026.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Desai K, Vinograd AM, Abbadessa MKF, Chen AE. Longevity and complication rates of ultrasound guided versus traditional peripheral intravenous catheters in a pediatric emergency department. J Assoc Vasc Access. 2018;23(3):149–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.java.2018.06.002.CrossRef

21.

Shokoohi H, Boniface K, McCarthy M, Khedir al-tiae T, Sattarian M, Ding R, et al. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access program is associated with a marked reduction in central venous catheter use in noncritically ill emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(2):198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.09.016.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Duran-Gehring P, Bryant L, Reynolds JA, Aldridge P, Kalynych CJ, Guirgis FW. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter training results in physician-level success for emergency department technicians. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(11):2343–52. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.11059.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Durand-Bailloud L, Aho LS, Savoldelli G, Ecarnot F, Girard C, Benkhadra M. Non-dominant hand quicker to insert peripheral venous catheters under echographic guidance: a randomised trial. Anaesth, Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36(5):291–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2016.08.008.CrossRef

24.

Brannam L, Blaivas M, Lyon M, Flake M. Emergency nurses’ utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(12):1361–3. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.027.CrossRef

25.

Oliveira L, Lawrence M. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access program for emergency physicians, nurses, and corpsmen (technicians) at a military hospital. Mil Med. 2016;181(3):272–6. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00056.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Blaivas M, Lyon M. The effect of ultrasound guidance on the perceived difficulty of emergency nurse-obtained peripheral IV access. J Emerg Med. 2006;31(4):407–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.04.014.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Blick C, Vinograd A, Chung J, Nguyen E, Abbadessa MKF, Gaines S, et al. Procedural competency for ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter insertion for nurses in a pediatric emergency department. J Vasc Access. 2021;22(2):232–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729820937131.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Ballard HA, Tsao M, Robles A, et al. Use of a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum to improve ultrasound-guided vascular access skills of pediatric anesthesiologists. Paediatr Anaesth. 2020;30(11):1204–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.13953.

29.

Galen B, Baron S, Young S, Hall A, Berger-Spivack L, Southern W. Reducing peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters by training nurses in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;29(3):245–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009923.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Amick AE, Feinsmith SE, Davis EM, et al. Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Improves Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Skills of Practicing Nurses. Simul Healthc. 2021; Publish Ahead of Print.

31.

Kule A, Richards RA, Vazquez HM, et al. Medical Student Ultrasound-Guided Intravenous Catheter Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Overtraining in a Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Setting. Simul Healthc. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000554. Epub ahead of print.

32.

Bahl A, Pandurangadu AV, Tucker J, Bagan M. A randomized controlled trial assessing the use of ultrasound for nurse-performed IV placement in difficult access ED patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(10):1950–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.06.098.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Batten S, Pazdernik V, Schneider R, Kondrashova T. Interprofessional approach to learning vascular access with ultrasonography by medical students and nurses. Mo Med. 2020;117(5):450–6.PubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Clemmesen L, Knudsen L, Sloth E, et al. Dynamic needle tip positioning - ultrasound guidance for peripheral vascular access. A randomized, controlled and blinded study in phantoms performed by ultrasound novices. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33(7):E321–e5.CrossRef

35.

Tassone HM, Tayal VS, Weekes AJ, et al. Ultrasound-guided oblique approach for peripheral venous access in a phantom model. Crit Ultrasound J. 2012;4(1):14.CrossRef

36.

Reeves T, Morrison D, Altmiller G. A nurse-led ultrasound-enhanced vascular access preservation program. Am J Nurs. 2017;117(12):56–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000527490.24610.51.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Slomer A, Chenkin J. Does test-enhanced learning improve success rates of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous insertion? A randomized controlled trial. AEM Educ Train. 2017;1(4):310–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10044.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Chenkin J, Lee S, Huynh T, Bandiera G. Procedures can be learned on the web: a randomized study of ultrasound-guided vascular access training. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(10):949–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00231.x.CrossRef

39.

Davis J, Faust T, Tajani A, Bates A, Jarriel J, Au A, et al. A randomized study of training with large versus small vessel size on successful ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access. J Vasc Access. 2017;18(2):163–6. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000645.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Gardecki J, Hughes LP, Zakaria S, et al. Use of the color Doppler twinkle artifact for teaching ultrasound guided peripheral vascular access. J Vasc Access. 2020;22:1129729820959907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729820959907. Epub ahead of print.

41.

Anderson AP, Taroc AM, Wang X, Beardsley E, Solari P, Klein EJ. Ultrasound guided peripheral IV placement: an observational study of the learning curve in pediatric patients. J Vasc Access. 2021:112972982098795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729820987958.

42.

Stolz LA, Cappa AR, Minckler MR, Stolz U, Wyatt RG, Binger CW, et al. Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement. J Vasc Access. 2016;17(4):366–70. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000574.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Ault MJ, Tanabe R, Rosen BT. Peripheral intravenous access using ultrasound guidance: defining the learning curve. J Assoc Vasc Access. 2015;20(1):32–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.java.2014.10.012.CrossRef

44.

Griffiths J, Carnegie A, Kendall R, Madan R. A randomised crossover study to compare the cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches to ultrasound-guided peripheral venepuncture in a model. Crit Ultrasound J. 2017;9(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0064-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Erickson CS, Liao MM, Haukoos JS, Douglass E, DiGeronimo M, Christensen E, et al. Ultrasound-guided small vessel cannulation: long-axis approach is equivalent to short-axis in novice sonographers experienced with landmark-based cannulation. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15(7):824–30. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.9.22404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Stone MB, Moon C, Sutijono D, Blaivas M. Needle tip visualization during ultrasound-guided vascular access: short-axis vs long-axis approach. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28(3):343–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2008.11.022.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Good RJ, Rothman KK, Ackil DJ, Kim JS, Orsborn J, Kendall JL. Hand motion analysis for assessment of nursing competence in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement. J Vasc Access. 2019;20(3):301–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729818804997.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Thorn S, Aagaard Hansen M, Sloth E, Knudsen L. Guidance markers increase the accuracy of simulated ultrasound-guided vascular access: an observational cohort study in a phantom. J Vasc Access. 2017;18(1):73–8. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000614.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Fürst RV, Polimanti AC, Galego SJ, et al. Ultrasound-guided vascular access simulator for medical training: proposal of a simple, economic and effective model. World J Surg. 2017;41(3):681–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3757-x.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Leung KY, Mok KL, Yuen CK, Wong YT, Kan PG. Evaluation of a commercial phantom and pork meat model for simulation based training of ultrasound guided intravenous catheterisation. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2016;23(3):153–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/102490791602300304.CrossRef

51.

Vitto MJ, Myers M, Vitto CM, Evans DP. Perceived difficulty and success rate of standard versus ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous cannulation in a novice study group: a randomized crossover trial. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(5):895–8. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.06057.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Feinsmith S, Huebinger R, Pitts M, et al. Outcomes of a simplified ultrasound-guided intravenous training course for emergency nurses. J Emerg Nurs. 2018;44(2):169–75.e2.CrossRef

53.

Moore C. An emergency department nurse-driven ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous line program. J Assoc Vasc Access. 2013;18(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.java.2012.12.001.CrossRef

54.

Primdahl SC, Todsen T, Clemmesen L, Knudsen L, Weile J. Rating scale for the assessment of competence in ultrasound-guided peripheral vascular access - a Delphi consensus study. J Vasc Access. 2016;17(5):440–5. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000581.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Jung CF, Breaud AH, Sheng AY, Byrne MW, Muruganandan KM, Dhanani M, et al. Delphi method validation of a procedural performance checklist for insertion of an ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(11):2227–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.08.006.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Primdahl SC, Weile J, Clemmesen L, Madsen KR, Subhi Y, Petersen P, et al. Validation of the peripheral ultrasound-guided vascular access rating scale. Medicine. 2018;97(2):e9576. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009576.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Blaivas M, Brannam L, Fernandez E. Short-axis versus long-axis approaches for teaching ultrasound-guided vascular access on a new inanimate model. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(12):1307–11. https://doi.org/10.1197/S1069-6563(03)00534-7.CrossRef

58.

Chinnock B, Thornton S, Hendey GW. Predictors of success in nurse-performed ultrasound-guided cannulation. J Emerg Med. 2007;33(4):401–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.02.027.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Mahler SA, Wang H, Lester C, Skinner J, Arnold TC, Conrad SA. Short- vs long-axis approach to ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access: a prospective randomized study. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(9):1194–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2010.07.015.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Oakley E, Wong AM. Ultrasound-assisted peripheral vascular access in a paediatric ED. Emerg Med Aust. 2010;22(2):166–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01281.x.CrossRef

61.

Bauman M, Braude D, Crandall C. Ultrasound-guidance vs. standard technique in difficult vascular access patients by ED technicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27(2):135–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.005.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Partovi-Deilami K, Nielsen JK, Moller AM, Nesheim SS, Jorgensen VL. Effect of ultrasound-guided placement of difficult-to-place peripheral venous catheters: a prospective study of a training program for nurse anesthetists. AANA J. 2016;84(2):86–92.PubMed

63.

Doniger SJ, Ishimine P, Fox JC, Kanegaye JT. Randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement versus traditional techniques in difficult-access pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009;25(3):154–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e31819a8946.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Sou V, McManus C, Mifflin N, Frost SA, Ale J, Alexandrou E. A clinical pathway for the management of difficult venous access. BMC Nurs. 2017;16(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-017-0261-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Bridey C, Thilly N, Lefevre T, Maire-Richard A, Morel M, Levy B, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus landmark approach for peripheral intravenous access by critical care nurses: a randomised controlled study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e020220. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Maiocco G, Coole C. Use of ultrasound guidance for peripheral intravenous placement in difficult-to-access patients: advancing practice with evidence. J Nurs Care Qual. 2012;27(1):51–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0b013e31822b4537.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Gopalasingam N, Thomsen AE, Folkersen L, et al. A successful model to learn and implement ultrasound-guided venous catheterization in apheresis. J Clin Apher. 2017;32(6):437–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.21533.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Carter T, Conrad C, Wilson JL, et al. Ultrasound guided intravenous access by nursing versus resident staff in a community based teaching hospital: a “noninferiority” trial. Emerg Med Int. 2015;2015:563139.CrossRef

69.

Bair AE, Rose JS, Vance CW, Andrada-Brown E, Kuppermann N. Ultrasound-assisted peripheral venous access in young children: a randomized controlled trial and pilot feasibility study. West J Emerg Med. 2008;9(4):219–24.PubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Schoenfeld E, Shokoohi H, Boniface K. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access in the emergency department: patient-centered survey. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(4):475–7. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.3.1920.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

71.

Vinograd AM, Zorc JJ, Dean AJ, Abbadessa MKF, Chen AE. First-attempt success, longevity, and complication rates of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34(6):376–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001063.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Dargin JM, Rebholz CM, Lowenstein RA, Mitchell PM, Feldman JA. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheter survival in ED patients with difficult access. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2008.09.001.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Blick C, Vinograd A, Chung J, et al. Procedural competency for ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter insertion for nurses in a pediatric emergency department. J Vasc Access. 2021;22(2):232–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729820937131. Epub 2020 Jun 27.

74.

Bortman J, Mahmood F, Mitchell J, Feng R, Baribeau Y, Wong V, et al. Ultrasound-guided intravenous line placement course for certified registered nurse anesthetists: a necessary next step. AANA J. 2019;87(4):269–75.PubMed

75.

Kaganovskaya M, Wuerz L. Development of an educational program using ultrasonography in vascular access for nurse practitioner students. Br J Nurs (Mark Allen Publishing). 2021;30(2):S34–s42. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.2.S34.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Khamis NN, Satava RM, Alnassar SA, Kern DE. A stepwise model for simulation-based curriculum development for clinical skills, a modification of the six-step approach. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):279–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4206-x.CrossRefPubMed

77.

Bjerrum F, Thomsen ASS, Nayahangan LJ, Konge L. Surgical simulation: current practices and future perspectives for technical skills training. Med Teach. 2018;40(7):668–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1472754.CrossRefPubMed

78.

Nayahangan LJ, Stefanidis D, Kern DE, Konge L. How to identify and prioritize procedures suitable for simulation-based training: experiences from general needs assessments using a modified Delphi method and a needs assessment formula. Med Teach. 2018;40(7):676–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1472756.CrossRefPubMed

79.

Bessmann EL, Ostergaard HT, Nielsen BU, et al. Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: a Delphi-based general needs assessment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63(6):720–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13344.CrossRefPubMed

80.

Ahern M, Mallin MP, Weitzel S, Madsen T, Hunt P. Variability in ultrasound education among emergency medicine residencies. West J Emerg Med. 2010;11(4):314–8.PubMedPubMedCentral

81.

Clayton MJ. Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educ Psychol. 1997;17(4):373–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401.CrossRef

82.

Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as sceintific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol. 1995;50(9):741–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741.CrossRef

83.

Downing SM. Validity: On the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003;37(9):830–7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x.

84.

Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R. Mastery learning for health professionals using technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1178–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829a365d.CrossRefPubMed

85.

Brydges R, Butler D. A reflective analysis of medical education research on self-regulation in learning and practice. Med Educ. 2012;46(1):71–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04100.x.

86.

Brydges R, Carnahan H, Rose D, et al. Comparing self-guided learning and educator-guided learning formats for simulation-based clinical training. Journal of advanced nursing. 2010;66(8):1832–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05338.x.

87.

Snyder CW, Vandromme MJ, Tyra SL, et al. Effects of virtual reality simulator training method and observational learning on surgical performance. World J Surg. 2011;35(2):245–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0861-1.

88.

Lee TD, White MA, Carnahan H. On the role of knowledge of results in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 1990;22(2):191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1990.10735510.CrossRefPubMed

89.

Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Heniford BT, Scott DJ. Limited feedback and video tutorials optimize learning and resource utilization during laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery. 2007;142(2):202–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.03.009.CrossRefPubMed

90.

Kirkpatrick D, Kirkpatrick J. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006.

91.

van Loon FHJ, Buise MP, Claassen JJF, Dierick-van Daele ATM, Bouwman ARA. Comparison of ultrasound guidance with palpation and direct visualisation for peripheral vein cannulation in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(2):358–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.047.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Education in the placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters: a systematic review
Authors: Rasmus Jørgensen
Christian B. Laursen
Lars Konge
Pia Iben Pietersen
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keywords: Ultrasound
Ultrasound
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1757-7241
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00897-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Education in the placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters: a systematic review

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go?

Learning about stress from building, drilling and flying: a scoping review on team performance and stress in non-medical fields

Incidence of delayed bleeding in patients on antiplatelet therapy after mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Out-of-hospital resuscitation of a 3 month old boy presenting with recurrent ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest: a case report

Do team and task performance improve after training situation awareness? A randomized controlled study of interprofessional intensive care teams

Correction to: CPR with restricted patient access using alternative rescuer positions: a randomised cross-over manikin study simulating the CPR scenario after avalanche burial