Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Imaging 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Ultrasound | Research

A predictive model for first-trimester pregnancy inception after IVF-ET based on multimodal ultrasound evaluation of endometrial receptivity

Authors: Jianmei Liao, Shuping Yang, Keyue Chen, Huijun Chen, Fan Jiang, Weina Zhang, Xuebin Wu

Published in: BMC Medical Imaging | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) is a commonly used assisted reproductive technology. Its success depends on many factors, including endometrial receptivity. Endometrial receptivity can be evaluated by ultrasound, endometrial biopsy, and magnetic resonance imaging. Compared with the latter two methods, ultrasound has the advantages of wide availability, non-invasiveness, and low cost. Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging examines endometrial thickness, morphology, and blood vessels, which are associated with the success of embryo implantation. However, there are no reports of endometrial receptivity assessment by 3D ultrasound. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate endometrial receptivity using 3D ultrasound and construct a predictive model for first-trimester pregnancy inception following IVF-ET.

Methods

We performed a prospective observational study on infertile women who underwent IVF-ET between December 2019 and February 2021. These women had 3D ultrasound evaluations, measuring endometrial thickness, volume, pattern, morphology, peristalsis, uterine artery blood flow index, sub-endometrial blood flow index, and distribution pattern. We recorded the occurrence of first-trimester pregnancies in these women. Using Akaike information criterion (AIC) and backward stepwise regression, a first-trimester pregnancy prediction model was constructed based on the minimum AIC value and validated internally and externally.

Results

111 women were enrolled, with 103 included in the analysis. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses showed that endometrial thickness and vascularization flow index (VFI) were independent factors associated with the occurrence of a pregnancy. The final prediction model corresponding to the minimum AIC value (65.166) was Y = − 6.131–0.182endometrial thickness + 0.542endometrial volume + 4.374VFI + 0.132age. In the test set, modeling cohort, and external validation cohort, the model showed satisfactory differentiation, with C index of 0.841 (95%CI 0.699–0.817), 0.727 (95%CI 0.619–0.815), and 0.745 (95%CI 0.671–0.840), respectively. The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit tests reported P = 0.865, 0.139, and 0.070, respectively, indicating a high agreement with the actual IVF-ET outcome. This model reached the highest diagnostic efficiency (sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 75%, Youden index 0.639) at a diagnostic cut-off value of ≥ 0.360.

Conclusions

The predictive model based on endometrial receptivity evaluations by 3D ultrasound had high diagnostic efficiency and could be a simple and effective tool to predict first-trimester pregnancy inception after IVF-ET.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9: e1001356.CrossRef Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9: e1001356.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yoshinaga K. Uterine receptivity for blastocyst implantation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;541:424–31.CrossRef Yoshinaga K. Uterine receptivity for blastocyst implantation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;541:424–31.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Martins RS, Oliani AH, Oliani DV, de Oliveira JM. Continuous endometrial volumetric analysis for endometrial receptivity assessment on assisted reproductive technology cycles. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:663.CrossRef Martins RS, Oliani AH, Oliani DV, de Oliveira JM. Continuous endometrial volumetric analysis for endometrial receptivity assessment on assisted reproductive technology cycles. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:663.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Neykova K, Tosto V, Giardina I, Tsibizova V, Vakrilov G. Endometrial receptivity and pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;35:1–15. Neykova K, Tosto V, Giardina I, Tsibizova V, Vakrilov G. Endometrial receptivity and pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;35:1–15.
5.
go back to reference Moustafa S, Young SL. Diagnostic and therapeutic options in recurrent implantation failure. F1000Res. 2020;9. Moustafa S, Young SL. Diagnostic and therapeutic options in recurrent implantation failure. F1000Res. 2020;9.
6.
go back to reference Meylaerts LJ, Wijnen L, Ombelet W, Bazot M, Vandersteen M. Uterine junctional zone thickness in infertile women evaluated by MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45:926–36.CrossRef Meylaerts LJ, Wijnen L, Ombelet W, Bazot M, Vandersteen M. Uterine junctional zone thickness in infertile women evaluated by MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45:926–36.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Arya S, Kupesic PS. Preimplantation 3D ultrasound: current uses and challenges. J Perinat Med. 2017;45:745–58.CrossRef Arya S, Kupesic PS. Preimplantation 3D ultrasound: current uses and challenges. J Perinat Med. 2017;45:745–58.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bergin K, Eliner Y, Duvall DW Jr, Roger S, Elguero S, Penzias AS, et al. The use of propensity score matching to assess the benefit of the endometrial receptivity analysis in frozen embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:396–403.CrossRef Bergin K, Eliner Y, Duvall DW Jr, Roger S, Elguero S, Penzias AS, et al. The use of propensity score matching to assess the benefit of the endometrial receptivity analysis in frozen embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:396–403.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fornazari VAV, Vayego SA, Szejnfeld D, Szejnfeld J, Goldman SM. Functional magnetic resonance imaging for clinical evaluation of uterine contractility. Einstein. 2018;16:eMD3863.CrossRef Fornazari VAV, Vayego SA, Szejnfeld D, Szejnfeld J, Goldman SM. Functional magnetic resonance imaging for clinical evaluation of uterine contractility. Einstein. 2018;16:eMD3863.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Raine-Fenning N, Campbell B, Collier J, Brincat M, Johnson I. The reproducibility of endometrial volume acquisition and measurement with the VOCAL-imaging program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:69–75.CrossRef Raine-Fenning N, Campbell B, Collier J, Brincat M, Johnson I. The reproducibility of endometrial volume acquisition and measurement with the VOCAL-imaging program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:69–75.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ijland MM, Evers JL, Dunselman GA, van Katwijk C, Lo CR, Hoogland HJ. Endometrial wavelike movements during the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:746–9.CrossRef Ijland MM, Evers JL, Dunselman GA, van Katwijk C, Lo CR, Hoogland HJ. Endometrial wavelike movements during the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:746–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vergani P, Roncaglia N, Andreotti C, Arreghini A, Teruzzi M, Pezzullo JC, et al. Prognostic value of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses delivered near term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:932–6.CrossRef Vergani P, Roncaglia N, Andreotti C, Arreghini A, Teruzzi M, Pezzullo JC, et al. Prognostic value of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses delivered near term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:932–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Maged AM, Kamel AM, Abu-Hamila F, Elkomy RO, Ohida OA, Hassan SM, et al. The measurement of endometrial volume and sub-endometrial vascularity to replace the traditional endometrial thickness as predictors of in-vitro fertilization success. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35:949–54.CrossRef Maged AM, Kamel AM, Abu-Hamila F, Elkomy RO, Ohida OA, Hassan SM, et al. The measurement of endometrial volume and sub-endometrial vascularity to replace the traditional endometrial thickness as predictors of in-vitro fertilization success. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35:949–54.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shui X, Yu C, Li J, Jiao Y. Development and validation of a pregnancy prediction model based on ultrasonographic features related to endometrial receptivity. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13:6156–65.PubMedPubMedCentral Shui X, Yu C, Li J, Jiao Y. Development and validation of a pregnancy prediction model based on ultrasonographic features related to endometrial receptivity. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13:6156–65.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Nakashima A, Komesu I, Sakumoto T, Hamakawa H, Terada Y, Takayama H, et al. Study of uterine kinetics in nonpregnant women using cine-mode magnetic resonance imaging. Reprod Med Biol. 2019;18:370–7.CrossRef Nakashima A, Komesu I, Sakumoto T, Hamakawa H, Terada Y, Takayama H, et al. Study of uterine kinetics in nonpregnant women using cine-mode magnetic resonance imaging. Reprod Med Biol. 2019;18:370–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kim A, Young Lee J, Il Ji Y, Hyeog Lee H, Sil Lee E, Yeol Kim H, et al. Do endometrial movements affect the achievement of pregnancy during intrauterine insemination? Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;8:399–408.PubMedPubMedCentral Kim A, Young Lee J, Il Ji Y, Hyeog Lee H, Sil Lee E, Yeol Kim H, et al. Do endometrial movements affect the achievement of pregnancy during intrauterine insemination? Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;8:399–408.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Opmeer BC, et al. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:530–41.CrossRef Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Opmeer BC, et al. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:530–41.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sardana D, Upadhyay AJ, Deepika K, Pranesh GT, Rao KA. Correlation of subendometrial-endometrial blood flow assessment by two-dimensional power Doppler with pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014;7:130–5.CrossRef Sardana D, Upadhyay AJ, Deepika K, Pranesh GT, Rao KA. Correlation of subendometrial-endometrial blood flow assessment by two-dimensional power Doppler with pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014;7:130–5.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schild RL, Holthaus S, d’Alquen J, Fimmers R, Dorn C, van Der Ven H, et al. Quantitative assessment of subendometrial blood flow by three-dimensional-ultrasound is an important predictive factor of implantation in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:89–94.CrossRef Schild RL, Holthaus S, d’Alquen J, Fimmers R, Dorn C, van Der Ven H, et al. Quantitative assessment of subendometrial blood flow by three-dimensional-ultrasound is an important predictive factor of implantation in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:89–94.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wang L, Qiao J, Li R, Zhen X, Liu Z. Role of endometrial blood flow assessment with color Doppler energy in predicting pregnancy outcome of IVF-ET cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:122.CrossRef Wang L, Qiao J, Li R, Zhen X, Liu Z. Role of endometrial blood flow assessment with color Doppler energy in predicting pregnancy outcome of IVF-ET cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:122.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dziak JJ, Coffman DL, Lanza ST, Li R, Jermiin LS. Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria. Brief Bioinform. 2020;21:553–65.CrossRef Dziak JJ, Coffman DL, Lanza ST, Li R, Jermiin LS. Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria. Brief Bioinform. 2020;21:553–65.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A predictive model for first-trimester pregnancy inception after IVF-ET based on multimodal ultrasound evaluation of endometrial receptivity
Authors
Jianmei Liao
Shuping Yang
Keyue Chen
Huijun Chen
Fan Jiang
Weina Zhang
Xuebin Wu
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2342
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00863-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Medical Imaging 1/2022 Go to the issue