Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Ultrasound | Research article

Ultrasonographic study of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester

Authors: Chunya Ji, Xiaoli Jiang, Linliang Yin, Xuedong Deng, Zhong Yang, Qi Pan, Jun Zhang, Qing Liang

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To establish reference ranges of fetal facial profile markers and study their correlations with crown-rump length (CRL) during the first trimester (11 ~ 13+ 6 weeks’ gestation) in a Chinese population.

Methods

Ultrasonographic images of measuring fetal nuchal translucency (NT) were retrospectively selected randomly in normal fetuses whose parents were both Chinese. The facial markers included inferior facial angle (IFA), maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle, facial maxillary angle (FMA) and profile line (PL) distance. These markers were measured through ViewPoint 6 software by two experienced sonographers.

Results

Three hundred and eighty fetuses were selected. The ICCs (95 % CI) of intra-operator 1 reproducibility of IFA, MNM angle, FMA, PL distance were 0.944 (0.886 ~ 0.973), 0.804 (0.629 ~ 0.902), 0.834 (0.68 ~ 0.918) and 0.935 (0.868 ~ 0.969), respectively. The ICCs (95 % CI) of intra-operator 2 reproducibility of IFA, MNM angle, FMA, PL distance were 0.931 (0.857 ~ 0.967), 0.809 (0.637 ~ 0.904), 0.786 (0.600 ~ 0.892) and 0.906 (0.813 ~ 0.954), respectively. The ICCs (95 % CI) of inter-operator reproducibility of IFA, MNM angle, FMA, PL distance were 0.885 (0.663 ~ 0.953), 0.829 (0.672 ~ 0.915), 0.77 (0.511 ~ 0.891) and 0.844 (0.68 ~ 0.925), respectively. The average ± SD of IFA, MNM angle, FMA and PL distance were 80.2°±7.25°, 4.17°±1.19°, 75.36°±5.31°, 2.78 ± 0.54 mm, respectively. IFA and PL distance significantly decreased with CRL, while MNM angle and FMA significantly increased with CRL.

Conclusions

It was feasible to measure fetal facial markers during the first trimester. In Chinese population, the reference ranges of IFA, MNM angle, FMA and PL distance were 80.2°±7.25°, 4.17°±1.19°, 75.36°±5.31°, 2.78 ± 0.54 mm, respectively, and the measurements were found to correlate with CRL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bromley B, Benacerraf BR. Fetal micrognathia: associated anomalies and outcome. J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13:529–33.CrossRef Bromley B, Benacerraf BR. Fetal micrognathia: associated anomalies and outcome. J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13:529–33.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cao Y, Li Z, Rosenfeld JA, et al. Contribution of genomic copy-number variations in prenatal oral clefts: a multicenter cohort study. Genet Med. 2016;18:1052–5.CrossRef Cao Y, Li Z, Rosenfeld JA, et al. Contribution of genomic copy-number variations in prenatal oral clefts: a multicenter cohort study. Genet Med. 2016;18:1052–5.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Otto C, Platt LD. Fetal growth and development. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1991;18:907–31.PubMed Otto C, Platt LD. Fetal growth and development. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1991;18:907–31.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Vayna AM, Veduta A, Duta S, et al. Diagnosis of Fetal Structural Anomalies at 11 to 14 Weeks. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37:2063–73.CrossRef Vayna AM, Veduta A, Duta S, et al. Diagnosis of Fetal Structural Anomalies at 11 to 14 Weeks. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37:2063–73.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Souka AP, Pilalis A, Kavalakis I, et al. Screening for major structural abnormalities at the 11- to 14-week ultrasound scan. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:393–6.CrossRef Souka AP, Pilalis A, Kavalakis I, et al. Screening for major structural abnormalities at the 11- to 14-week ultrasound scan. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:393–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.2013;41:102–13. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.2013;41:102–13.
7.
go back to reference Rotten D, Levaillant JM, Martinez H, et al. The fetal mandible: a 2D and 3D sonographic approach to the diagnosis of retrognathia and micrognathia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:122–30.CrossRef Rotten D, Levaillant JM, Martinez H, et al. The fetal mandible: a 2D and 3D sonographic approach to the diagnosis of retrognathia and micrognathia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:122–30.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference de Jong-Pleij EA, Ribbert LS, Manten GT, et al. Maxilla-nasion-mandible angle: a new method to assess profile anomalies in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:562–9.CrossRef de Jong-Pleij EA, Ribbert LS, Manten GT, et al. Maxilla-nasion-mandible angle: a new method to assess profile anomalies in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:562–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bakker M, Pace M, de Jong-Pleij E, et al. Prenasal Thickness, Prefrontal Space Ratio and Other Facial Profile Markers in First-Trimester Fetuses with Aneuploidies, Cleft Palate, and Micrognathia. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;43:231–40.CrossRef Bakker M, Pace M, de Jong-Pleij E, et al. Prenasal Thickness, Prefrontal Space Ratio and Other Facial Profile Markers in First-Trimester Fetuses with Aneuploidies, Cleft Palate, and Micrognathia. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;43:231–40.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lu J, Sahota DS, Poon LC, et al. Objective assessment of the fetal facial profile at second and third trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39:107–15.CrossRef Lu J, Sahota DS, Poon LC, et al. Objective assessment of the fetal facial profile at second and third trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39:107–15.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dagklis T, Borenstein M, Peralta CF, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of mid-facial hypoplasia in fetuses with trisomy 21 at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:261–5.CrossRef Dagklis T, Borenstein M, Peralta CF, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of mid-facial hypoplasia in fetuses with trisomy 21 at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:261–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Serville F, Battin J, Leng JJ, et al. [Neck edema. An echographic sign of trisomy 21 in pregnancy]. Arch Fr Pediatr. 1986;43:487–8.PubMed Serville F, Battin J, Leng JJ, et al. [Neck edema. An echographic sign of trisomy 21 in pregnancy]. Arch Fr Pediatr. 1986;43:487–8.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Yazdi B, Sonek J, Oettling C, et al. Prefrontal space ratio in second- and third-trimester screening for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:262–6.CrossRef Yazdi B, Sonek J, Oettling C, et al. Prefrontal space ratio in second- and third-trimester screening for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:262–6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nicolaides KH, Salvesen DR, Snijders RJ, et al. Fetal facial defects: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993;8:1–9.CrossRef Nicolaides KH, Salvesen DR, Snijders RJ, et al. Fetal facial defects: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993;8:1–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Maarse W, Rozendaal AM, Pajkrt E, et al. A systematic review of associated structural and chromosomal defects in oral clefts: when is prenatal genetic analysis indicated?. J Med Genet.2012;49:490–8. Maarse W, Rozendaal AM, Pajkrt E, et al. A systematic review of associated structural and chromosomal defects in oral clefts: when is prenatal genetic analysis indicated?. J Med Genet.2012;49:490–8.
17.
go back to reference Calzolari E, Pierini A, Astolfi G, et al. Associated anomalies in multi-malformed infants with cleft lip and palate: An epidemiologic study of nearly 6 million births in 23 EUROCAT registries. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A:528–37.CrossRef Calzolari E, Pierini A, Astolfi G, et al. Associated anomalies in multi-malformed infants with cleft lip and palate: An epidemiologic study of nearly 6 million births in 23 EUROCAT registries. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A:528–37.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sun Y, Zhang L, Dong D, et al. First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 via an individualized nomogram. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;21. Sun Y, Zhang L, Dong D, et al. First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 via an individualized nomogram. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;21.
19.
go back to reference Morimoto N, Ogihara N, Katayama K, et al. Three-dimensional ontogenetic shape changes in the human cranium during the fetal period. J Anat. 2008;212:627–35.CrossRef Morimoto N, Ogihara N, Katayama K, et al. Three-dimensional ontogenetic shape changes in the human cranium during the fetal period. J Anat. 2008;212:627–35.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Som PM, Naidich TP. Illustrated review of the embryology and development of the facial region, part 2: Late development of the fetal face and changes in the face from the newborn to adulthood. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:10–8.CrossRef Som PM, Naidich TP. Illustrated review of the embryology and development of the facial region, part 2: Late development of the fetal face and changes in the face from the newborn to adulthood. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:10–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Merz E, Abramovicz J, Baba K, et al. 3D imaging of the fetal face - recommendations from the International 3D Focus Group. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:175–82.CrossRef Merz E, Abramovicz J, Baba K, et al. 3D imaging of the fetal face - recommendations from the International 3D Focus Group. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:175–82.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Luedders DW, Bohlmann MK, Germer U, et al. Fetal micrognathia: objective assessment and associated anomalies on prenatal sonogram. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:146–51.CrossRef Luedders DW, Bohlmann MK, Germer U, et al. Fetal micrognathia: objective assessment and associated anomalies on prenatal sonogram. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:146–51.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tekesin I, Graupner O. Measurement of inferior facial angle and prefrontal space ratio in first trimester fetuses with aneuploidies: a retrospective study. J Perinat Med. 2019;47:969–78.CrossRef Tekesin I, Graupner O. Measurement of inferior facial angle and prefrontal space ratio in first trimester fetuses with aneuploidies: a retrospective study. J Perinat Med. 2019;47:969–78.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Orzechowski M, Knafel A, Banas T, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of inferior facial angle (IFA) in a population of normal fetuses at 11–13 weeks (+ 6 days) gestation. Przegl Lek. 2017;74:8–12.PubMed Orzechowski M, Knafel A, Banas T, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of inferior facial angle (IFA) in a population of normal fetuses at 11–13 weeks (+ 6 days) gestation. Przegl Lek. 2017;74:8–12.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Vos FI, de Jong-Pleij EA, Bakker M, et al. Facial profile markers in second- and third-trimester fetuses with trisomy 18. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:66–72.CrossRef Vos FI, de Jong-Pleij EA, Bakker M, et al. Facial profile markers in second- and third-trimester fetuses with trisomy 18. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:66–72.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Vos FI, De Jong-Pleij EA, Bakker M, et al. Trends in Serial Measurements of Ultrasound Markers in Second and Third Trimester Down Syndrome Fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38:48–54.CrossRef Vos FI, De Jong-Pleij EA, Bakker M, et al. Trends in Serial Measurements of Ultrasound Markers in Second and Third Trimester Down Syndrome Fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38:48–54.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ko HS, Lee UY, Choi SK, et al. Craniofacial inclination at 14 to 39 weeks’ gestation in normal Korean fetuses. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:569–76.CrossRef Ko HS, Lee UY, Choi SK, et al. Craniofacial inclination at 14 to 39 weeks’ gestation in normal Korean fetuses. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:569–76.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference de Jong-Pleij EA, Ribbert LS, Pistorius LR, et al. The fetal profile line: a proposal for a sonographic reference line to classify forehead and mandible anomalies in the second and third trimester. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32:797–802.CrossRef de Jong-Pleij EA, Ribbert LS, Pistorius LR, et al. The fetal profile line: a proposal for a sonographic reference line to classify forehead and mandible anomalies in the second and third trimester. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32:797–802.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Alphonse J, Cox J, Clarke JL, et al. Frontomaxillary facial angle measurement at 11–14 weeks: assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement in 2D and 3D imaging. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2013;34:90–5.CrossRef Alphonse J, Cox J, Clarke JL, et al. Frontomaxillary facial angle measurement at 11–14 weeks: assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement in 2D and 3D imaging. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2013;34:90–5.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Alphonse J, Cox J, Clarke JL, et al. Frontomaxillary facial angle measurement in trisomy 21 and euploid fetuses: two- and three-dimensional assessment during routine first trimester screening. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36:183–9.CrossRef Alphonse J, Cox J, Clarke JL, et al. Frontomaxillary facial angle measurement in trisomy 21 and euploid fetuses: two- and three-dimensional assessment during routine first trimester screening. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36:183–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ultrasonographic study of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester
Authors
Chunya Ji
Xiaoli Jiang
Linliang Yin
Xuedong Deng
Zhong Yang
Qi Pan
Jun Zhang
Qing Liang
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03813-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021 Go to the issue