Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Ultrasound | Study protocol

The RECIPE study: reducing emergency Caesareans and improving the Primiparous experience: a blinded, prospective, observational study

Authors: Niamh C Murphy, Naomi Burke, Patrick Dicker, Fiona Cody, Etaoin Kent, Elizabeth C Tully, Fergal D Malone, Fionnuala M Breathnach

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The RECIPE study aims to validate a risk prediction model for intrapartum caesarean delivery which has been developed by our group. The Genesis study was a prospective observational study carried out by the Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium across 7 clinical centres in Ireland between October 2012 and June 2015. Genesis investigated a range of maternal and fetal parameters in a prospective blinded study of 2336 singleton pregnancies between 39 + 0–41 + 0 weeks’ gestational age. This resulted in the development of a risk prediction model for Caesarean Delivery in nulliparous women at term. The RECIPE study now proposes to provide external validation of this risk prediction tool.

Methods

In order to externally validate the model, we aim to include a centre which was not involved in the original study. We propose a trial of risk-assignment for intrapartum caesarean amongst nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy between 38 + 0 and 40 + 6 weeks’ gestational age who are planning a vaginal birth. Results of the risk prediction tool will be concealed from participants and from midwives and doctors providing labour care.. Participants will be invited for an ultrasound scan and delivery details will be collated postnatally. The principal aim of this study is to externally validate the risk prediction model. This prediction model holds the potential to accurately identify nulliparous women who are likely to achieve an uncomplicated vaginal birth and those at high prospect of requiring an unplanned caesarean delivery.

Discussion

Validation of the Genesis prediction model would enable more accurate counselling for women in the antenatal setting regarding their own likelihood of requiring an intrapartum Caesarean section. It would also provide valuable personalised information to women about the anticipated course of their own labour. We believe that this is an issue of national relevance that will impact positively on obstetric practice, and will positively empower women to make considered, personalised choices surrounding labour and delivery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Database OfEC-oaDHS. Health status database (online); 2016. Database OfEC-oaDHS. Health status database (online); 2016.
2.
go back to reference Health Do. Creating a better future together-National Maternity Strategy 2016–2026Health Do, editor; 2016. Health Do. Creating a better future together-National Maternity Strategy 2016–2026Health Do, editor; 2016.
3.
go back to reference Naomi Burke GB, Breathnach F, McAuliffe F, Morrison J, Turner M, Dornan S, et al. A fetal head circumference above the 90th centile is a significant risk factor for cesarean delivery and complicated labor: results from the prospective multi-center Genesis study. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;214(1):S197.CrossRef Naomi Burke GB, Breathnach F, McAuliffe F, Morrison J, Turner M, Dornan S, et al. A fetal head circumference above the 90th centile is a significant risk factor for cesarean delivery and complicated labor: results from the prospective multi-center Genesis study. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;214(1):S197.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Collins GS, Ogundimu EO, Altman DG. Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study. Stat Med. 2016;35(2):214–26.CrossRef Collins GS, Ogundimu EO, Altman DG. Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study. Stat Med. 2016;35(2):214–26.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW. Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation, and updating. New York: Springer; 2009.CrossRef Steyerberg EW. Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation, and updating. New York: Springer; 2009.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vergouwe Y, Nieboer D, Oostenbrink R, Debray TPA, Murray GD, Kattan MW, et al. A closed testing procedure to select an appropriate method for updating prediction models. Stat Med. 2017 Dec 10;36(28):4529–39.CrossRef Vergouwe Y, Nieboer D, Oostenbrink R, Debray TPA, Murray GD, Kattan MW, et al. A closed testing procedure to select an appropriate method for updating prediction models. Stat Med. 2017 Dec 10;36(28):4529–39.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kleinrouweler C, Cheong-See F, Collins G, Kwee A, Thangaratinam S, Khan K, et al. Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(1):79.CrossRef Kleinrouweler C, Cheong-See F, Collins G, Kwee A, Thangaratinam S, Khan K, et al. Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(1):79.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rasouli M, AtashSokhan G, Keramat A, Khosravi A, Fooladi E, Mousavi SA. The impact of motivational interviewing on participation in childbirth preparation classes and having a natural delivery: a randomised trial. BJOG. 2017;124(4):631–9.CrossRef Rasouli M, AtashSokhan G, Keramat A, Khosravi A, Fooladi E, Mousavi SA. The impact of motivational interviewing on participation in childbirth preparation classes and having a natural delivery: a randomised trial. BJOG. 2017;124(4):631–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The RECIPE study: reducing emergency Caesareans and improving the Primiparous experience: a blinded, prospective, observational study
Authors
Niamh C Murphy
Naomi Burke
Patrick Dicker
Fiona Cody
Etaoin Kent
Elizabeth C Tully
Fergal D Malone
Fionnuala M Breathnach
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03112-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue