Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Ultrasound | Research

Maternal health care professionals’ experiences and views on the use of obstetric ultrasound in Rwanda: A cross-sectional study

Authors: Ingrid Mogren, Joseph Ntaganira, Jean Paul Semasaka Sengoma, Sophia Holmlund, Rhonda Small, Lan Pham Thi, Hussein Lesio Kidanto, Matilda Ngarina, Cecilia Bergström, Kristina Edvardsson

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study, undertaken in Rwanda, aimed to investigate health professionals’ experiences and views on the following topics: current clinical guidelines for ultrasound from second trimester at the clinic, regional and national levels, and adherence to clinical guidelines; medically indicated ultrasound examinations; non-medical use of ultrasound including ultrasounds on maternal request; commercialisation of ultrasound; the value of ultrasound in relation to other clinical examinations in pregnancy; and ultrasound and medicalisation of pregnancy.

Methods

A cross-sectional design was adopted. Health professionals providing antenatal care and delivery services to pregnant women in 108 health facilities were invited to complete a survey, which was developed based on the results of earlier qualitative studies undertaken as part of the CROss Country Ultrasound Study (CROCUS).

Results

Nine hundred and seven health professionals participated: obstetricians/gynecologists (3.2%,) other physicians (24.5%), midwives (29.7%) and nurses (42.7%). Few physicians reported the existence of clinical guidelines at clinic, regional or national levels in Rwanda, and guidelines were moderately adhered to. Three obstetric ultrasound examinations were considered medically indicated in an uncomplicated pregnancy. Most participants (73.0%) were positive about obstetric ultrasound examinations on maternal request. Commercialisation was not considered a problem, and the majority (88.5%) agreed that ultrasound had contributed to medicalisation of pregnancy.

Conclusions

Findings indicate that clinical guidelines for the use of obstetric ultrasound are limited in Rwanda. Non-medically indicated obstetric ultrasound was not considered a current problem at any level of the healthcare system. The positive attitude to obstetric ultrasound examinations on maternal request may contribute to further burden on a maternal health care system with limited resources. It is essential that limited obstetric ultrasound resources are allocated where they are most beneficial, and clearly stated medical indications would likely facilitate this.
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO. recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. WHO. recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
2.
go back to reference Department of Health. Clinical practice guidelines: pregnancy care. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2018. Department of Health. Clinical practice guidelines: pregnancy care. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2018.
3.
go back to reference Committee on Practice Bulletins. Obstetrics and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 175: Ultrasound in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(6):241–56.CrossRef Committee on Practice Bulletins. Obstetrics and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 175: Ultrasound in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(6):241–56.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies: Clinical guideline [CG62]. NICE; 2020. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies: Clinical guideline [CG62]. NICE; 2020.
6.
go back to reference Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD007529.PubMed Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD007529.PubMed
16.
go back to reference WHO. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990–2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. WHO. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990–2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
17.
go back to reference Rwanda National Institute of Statistics. Demographic and Health Survey 2019/2020. NISR; 2020. Rwanda National Institute of Statistics. Demographic and Health Survey 2019/2020. NISR; 2020.
21.
go back to reference Edvardsson K, Graner S, Thi LP, Ahman A, Small R, Lalos A, et al. 'Women think pregnancy management means obstetric ultrasound': Vietnamese obstetricians' views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy. Glob Health Action. 2015;8(1):28405.CrossRef Edvardsson K, Graner S, Thi LP, Ahman A, Small R, Lalos A, et al. 'Women think pregnancy management means obstetric ultrasound': Vietnamese obstetricians' views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy. Glob Health Action. 2015;8(1):28405.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Maternal health care professionals’ experiences and views on the use of obstetric ultrasound in Rwanda: A cross-sectional study
Authors
Ingrid Mogren
Joseph Ntaganira
Jean Paul Semasaka Sengoma
Sophia Holmlund
Rhonda Small
Lan Pham Thi
Hussein Lesio Kidanto
Matilda Ngarina
Cecilia Bergström
Kristina Edvardsson
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06758-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue