Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer 2/2010

Open Access 01-04-2010 | Original Article

Ultrasound findings and histological features of ductal carcinoma in situ detected by ultrasound examination alone

Authors: Ayumi Izumori, Koji Takebe, Akira Sato

Published in: Breast Cancer | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the increasing use of high-resolution ultrasound (US) examination, many breast carcinomas that cannot be identified by mammography (MMG) alone have been detected. Many of these carcinomas are ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and small-sized invasive carcinomas. Until date, DCISs have often been described as palpable masses with calcifications on MMG, but what are the characteristics of DCISs that are detectable by US alone?

Methods

One hundred fifty cases with DCIS that we experienced at our clinic from 2003 to 2007 were classified into 47 cases (echo group) diagnosed by US alone and 103 cases (MMG/PE group) diagnosed by MMG or clinically.

Results

US findings of the echo group showed cystic or solid lesions in 37 cases (79%). The mean age of the echo group was significantly higher than that of the MMG/PE group (59.6 vs. 51.2 years; P < 0.01). Tumor sizes detected by US were 5.7 + 2.8 and 11.5 + 10.8 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. The tumor sizes of the echo group were, therefore, approximately half that of the MMG/PE group. Extensive intraductal components were significantly fewer in the echo group, and tumor grades of the echo group were significantly low (Van Nuys classification). In the echo group, all cases with a tumor size <5 mm were grade 1 by Van Nuys classification. In addition, cases with ≥5 mm tumor size had a significantly lower tumor grade in the echo group than in the MMG/PE group.

Conclusions

Cystic or solid lesions accounted for approximately 80% of US findings of DCISs detected by US alone, and most were similar to benign forms. Moreover, most DCISs detected by US alone were localized and of low grade (Van Nuys classification).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buchberger W, Dekoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dunser M. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast:clinical significance and diagnostic workup. Am Roentgenol. 1999;173:921–7. Buchberger W, Dekoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dunser M. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast:clinical significance and diagnostic workup. Am Roentgenol. 1999;173:921–7.
2.
go back to reference Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Dunser M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions:Detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000;21:325–36.CrossRefPubMed Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Dunser M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions:Detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000;21:325–36.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. Cancer. 1995;76:626–30.CrossRefPubMed Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. Cancer. 1995;76:626–30.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schoonjans JM. Sonographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with ultasonographycaly guided large core needle biopsy. J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19:449–57.PubMed Schoonjans JM. Sonographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with ultasonographycaly guided large core needle biopsy. J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19:449–57.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Sickles EA. Sonographic detectability of breast calcifications. Proc SPIE. 1983;419:51–2. Sickles EA. Sonographic detectability of breast calcifications. Proc SPIE. 1983;419:51–2.
6.
go back to reference Moon WK, Myung JS. US of ductal carcinoma in situ. RadioGraphics. 2002;22:269–80.PubMed Moon WK, Myung JS. US of ductal carcinoma in situ. RadioGraphics. 2002;22:269–80.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Koji T, Ayumi I, Naomi Y. Oue approach for breast cancer screening using both mammography and echoreaphy, with special reference to detection of nonpalpable minute invasive cancer.(in Japanese with English abstract) J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2007;16:60–5. Koji T, Ayumi I, Naomi Y. Oue approach for breast cancer screening using both mammography and echoreaphy, with special reference to detection of nonpalpable minute invasive cancer.(in Japanese with English abstract) J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2007;16:60–5.
8.
go back to reference Melvin JS, David NP, James RW, William J, et al. Prognistic classification of ductal carcinoma-in situ. LANCET. 1995;345:1154–7. Melvin JS, David NP, James RW, William J, et al. Prognistic classification of ductal carcinoma-in situ. LANCET. 1995;345:1154–7.
9.
go back to reference Frykberg ER. An overview of the history and epidemiology of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast J. 1997;3:227.CrossRef Frykberg ER. An overview of the history and epidemiology of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast J. 1997;3:227.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schnitt SJ, Silen W, Sadowsky NL, Connolly JL. Ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) of the breast. N Engl J. 1988;318:898–903.CrossRef Schnitt SJ, Silen W, Sadowsky NL, Connolly JL. Ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) of the breast. N Engl J. 1988;318:898–903.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dershaw DD. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic finings and clinical implications. Radiology. 1989;170:411–5.PubMed Dershaw DD. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic finings and clinical implications. Radiology. 1989;170:411–5.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Stomper PC. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 case with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1989;172:235–41.PubMed Stomper PC. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 case with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1989;172:235–41.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ikeda DM, Anderson I. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances. Radiology. 1989;172:661–6.PubMed Ikeda DM, Anderson I. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances. Radiology. 1989;172:661–6.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Orel SG, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology. 1997;202:413–20.PubMed Orel SG, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology. 1997;202:413–20.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Holland R, Peterse JL, Millis PR. Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1994;11:167–80.PubMed Holland R, Peterse JL, Millis PR. Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1994;11:167–80.PubMed
16.
go back to reference chen S-C, cheung Y-C. Sonographic differentiation of invasive and intraductal carcinomas of the breast. Br J Radiol. 2003;76:600–4.CrossRefPubMed chen S-C, cheung Y-C. Sonographic differentiation of invasive and intraductal carcinomas of the breast. Br J Radiol. 2003;76:600–4.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, Berliere M. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR. 2003;180:1675–9.PubMed Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, Berliere M. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR. 2003;180:1675–9.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Thomas M, Jacob l, Jeffrey H. Occult cancer in women with dense breast:detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology. 1998;207:191–9. Thomas M, Jacob l, Jeffrey H. Occult cancer in women with dense breast:detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology. 1998;207:191–9.
19.
go back to reference Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH. A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer. 1996;77:2267–74.CrossRefPubMed Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH. A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer. 1996;77:2267–74.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lagios MD, Margolin FR, Rose MR. Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer. 1989;63:618–24.CrossRefPubMed Lagios MD, Margolin FR, Rose MR. Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer. 1989;63:618–24.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Ultrasound findings and histological features of ductal carcinoma in situ detected by ultrasound examination alone
Authors
Ayumi Izumori
Koji Takebe
Akira Sato
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Breast Cancer / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0134-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Breast Cancer 2/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine