Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 6/2012

01-08-2012 | Original Article

Ultrasound assessment of transversus abdominis muscle contraction ratio during abdominal hollowing: a useful tool to distinguish between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls?

Authors: N. Pulkovski, A. F. Mannion, F. Caporaso, V. Toma, D. Gubler, D. Helbling, H. Sprott

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Spine stabilisation exercises, in which patients are taught to preferentially activate the transversus abdominus (TrA) during “abdominal hollowing” (AH), are a popular treatment for chronic low back pain (cLBP). The present study investigated whether performance during AH differed between cLBP patients and controls to an extent that would render it useful diagnostic tool. 50 patients with cLBP (46.3 ± 12.5 years) and 50 healthy controls (43.6 ± 12.7 years) participated in this case–control study. They performed AH in hook-lying. Using M-mode ultrasound, thicknesses of TrA, and obliquus internus and externus were determined at rest and during 5 s AH (5 measures each body side). The TrA contraction-ratio (TrA-CR) (TrA contracted/rest) and the ability to sustain the contraction [standard deviation (SD) of TrA thickness during the stable phase of the hold] were investigated. There were no significant group differences for the absolute muscle thicknesses at rest or during AH, or for the SD of TrA thickness. There was a small but significant difference between the groups for TrA-CR: cLBP 1.35 ± 0.14, controls 1.44 ± 0.24 (p < 0.05). However, Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) analysis revealed a poor and non-significant ability of TrA-CR to discriminate between cLBP patients and controls on an individual basis (ROC area under the curve, 0.60 [95% CI 0.495; 0.695], p = 0.08). In the patient group, TrA-CR showed a low but significant correlation with Roland Morris score (Spearman Rho = 0.328; p = 0.02). In conclusion, the difference in group mean values for TrA-CR was small and of uncertain clinical relevance. Moreover, TrA-CR showed a poor ability to discriminate between control and cLBP subjects on an individual basis. We conclude that the TrA-CR during abdominal hollowing does not distinguish well between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Allison GT, Kendle K, Roll S, Schupelius J, Scott Q, Panizza J (1998) The role of the diaphragm during abdominal hollowing exercises. Aust J Physiother 44:95–102PubMed Allison GT, Kendle K, Roll S, Schupelius J, Scott Q, Panizza J (1998) The role of the diaphragm during abdominal hollowing exercises. Aust J Physiother 44:95–102PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bergmark A (1989) Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 230:1–54PubMed Bergmark A (1989) Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 230:1–54PubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Bunce SM, Hough AD, Moore AP (2004) Measurement of abdominal muscle thickness using M-mode ultrasound imaging during functional activities. Man Ther 9:41–44PubMedCrossRef Bunce SM, Hough AD, Moore AP (2004) Measurement of abdominal muscle thickness using M-mode ultrasound imaging during functional activities. Man Ther 9:41–44PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bunce SM, Moore AP, Hough AD (2002) M-mode ultrasound: a reliable measure of transversus abdominis thickness? Clin Biomech 17:315–317CrossRef Bunce SM, Moore AP, Hough AD (2002) M-mode ultrasound: a reliable measure of transversus abdominis thickness? Clin Biomech 17:315–317CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cairns MC, Harrison K, Wright C (2000) Pressure biofeedback: a useful tool in the quantification of abdominal muscle dysfunction? Physiotherapy 86:127–138CrossRef Cairns MC, Harrison K, Wright C (2000) Pressure biofeedback: a useful tool in the quantification of abdominal muscle dysfunction? Physiotherapy 86:127–138CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Critchley DJ, Coutts FJ (2002) Abdominal muscle function in chronic low back pain patients. Physiotherapy 88:322–332CrossRef Critchley DJ, Coutts FJ (2002) Abdominal muscle function in chronic low back pain patients. Physiotherapy 88:322–332CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eliasson K, Elfving B, Nordgren B, Mattsson E (2008) Urinary incontinence in women with low back pain. Man Ther 13:206–212PubMedCrossRef Eliasson K, Elfving B, Nordgren B, Mattsson E (2008) Urinary incontinence in women with low back pain. Man Ther 13:206–212PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Exner V, Keel P (2000) Erfassung der Behinderung bei Patienten mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen. Schmerz 14:392–400PubMedCrossRef Exner V, Keel P (2000) Erfassung der Behinderung bei Patienten mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen. Schmerz 14:392–400PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Hodges PW (2004) Changes in recruitment of the abdominal muscles in people with low back pain: ultrasound measurement of muscle activity. Spine 29:2560–2566PubMedCrossRef Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Hodges PW (2004) Changes in recruitment of the abdominal muscles in people with low back pain: ultrasound measurement of muscle activity. Spine 29:2560–2566PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Herbert RD, Refshauge K (2006) Specific stabilisation exercise for spinal and pelvic pain: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 52:79–88PubMedCrossRef Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Herbert RD, Refshauge K (2006) Specific stabilisation exercise for spinal and pelvic pain: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 52:79–88PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gorbet N, Selkow NM, Hart JM, Saliba S (2010) No difference in transverse abdominis activation ratio between healthy and asymptomatic low back pain patients during therapeutic exercise. Rehabil Res Pract 2010:Article ID 459738. doi:10.1155/2010/459738 Gorbet N, Selkow NM, Hart JM, Saliba S (2010) No difference in transverse abdominis activation ratio between healthy and asymptomatic low back pain patients during therapeutic exercise. Rehabil Res Pract 2010:Article ID 459738. doi:10.​1155/​2010/​459738
13.
go back to reference Han TS, Schouten JS, Lean ME, Seidell JC (1997) The prevalence of low back pain and associations with body fatness, fat distribution and height. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 21:600–607PubMedCrossRef Han TS, Schouten JS, Lean ME, Seidell JC (1997) The prevalence of low back pain and associations with body fatness, fat distribution and height. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 21:600–607PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Henry SM, Westervelt KC (2005) The use of real-time ultrasound feedback in teaching abdominal hollowing exercises to healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:338–345PubMed Henry SM, Westervelt KC (2005) The use of real-time ultrasound feedback in teaching abdominal hollowing exercises to healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:338–345PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hides J, Wilson S, Stanton W, McMahon S, Keto H, McMahon K, Bryant M, Richardson C (2006) An MRI investigation into the function of the transversus abdominis muscle during “drawing-in” of the abdominal wall. Spine 31:E175–E178PubMedCrossRef Hides J, Wilson S, Stanton W, McMahon S, Keto H, McMahon K, Bryant M, Richardson C (2006) An MRI investigation into the function of the transversus abdominis muscle during “drawing-in” of the abdominal wall. Spine 31:E175–E178PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hodges P, Richardson C, Jull G (1996) Evaluation of the relationship between laboratory and clinical tests of transversus abdominis function. Physiother Res Int 1:30–40PubMedCrossRef Hodges P, Richardson C, Jull G (1996) Evaluation of the relationship between laboratory and clinical tests of transversus abdominis function. Physiother Res Int 1:30–40PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hodges PW, Pengel LH, Herbert RD, Gandevia SC (2003) Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging. Muscle Nerve 27:682–692PubMedCrossRef Hodges PW, Pengel LH, Herbert RD, Gandevia SC (2003) Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging. Muscle Nerve 27:682–692PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hodges PW, Richardson C (1998) Delayed postural contraction of transversus abdominis in low back pain associated with movement of the lower limb. J Spin Disord 11:46–56 Hodges PW, Richardson C (1998) Delayed postural contraction of transversus abdominis in low back pain associated with movement of the lower limb. J Spin Disord 11:46–56
19.
go back to reference Hodges PW, Richardson CA (1996) Inefficient muscular stabilisation of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine 21:2640–2650PubMedCrossRef Hodges PW, Richardson CA (1996) Inefficient muscular stabilisation of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine 21:2640–2650PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kermode F (2004) Benefits of utilizing real-time ultrasound imaging in the rehabilitation of the lumbar spine stabilizing muscles following low back injury in the elite athlete: a singe case study. Phys Ther Sport 5:13–16CrossRef Kermode F (2004) Benefits of utilizing real-time ultrasound imaging in the rehabilitation of the lumbar spine stabilizing muscles following low back injury in the elite athlete: a singe case study. Phys Ther Sport 5:13–16CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kiesel KB, Uhl T, Underwood FB, Nitz AJ (2008) Rehabilitative ultrasound measurement of select trunk muscle activation during induced pain. Man Ther 13:132–138PubMedCrossRef Kiesel KB, Uhl T, Underwood FB, Nitz AJ (2008) Rehabilitative ultrasound measurement of select trunk muscle activation during induced pain. Man Ther 13:132–138PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Mattacola CG, Nitz AJ, Malone TR (2007) A comparison of select trunk muscle thickness change between subjects with low back pain classified in the treatment-based classification system and asymptomatic controls. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37:596–607PubMed Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Mattacola CG, Nitz AJ, Malone TR (2007) A comparison of select trunk muscle thickness change between subjects with low back pain classified in the treatment-based classification system and asymptomatic controls. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37:596–607PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kriese M, Clijsen R, Taeymans J, Cabri J (2010) Segmental stabilization in low back pain: a systematic review. Sportverletz Sportschaden 24:17–25PubMedCrossRef Kriese M, Clijsen R, Taeymans J, Cabri J (2010) Segmental stabilization in low back pain: a systematic review. Sportverletz Sportschaden 24:17–25PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Leboeuf-Yde C, Kyvik KO, Bruun NH (1999) Low back pain and lifestyle. Part II–obesity. Information from a population-based sample of 29,424 twin subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:779–783 (discussion 774–783)CrossRef Leboeuf-Yde C, Kyvik KO, Bruun NH (1999) Low back pain and lifestyle. Part II–obesity. Information from a population-based sample of 29,424 twin subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:779–783 (discussion 774–783)CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Gubler D, Gorelick M, O’Riordan D, Loupas T, Schenk P, Gerber H, Sprott H (2008) Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: an assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 17:494–501PubMedCrossRef Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Gubler D, Gorelick M, O’Riordan D, Loupas T, Schenk P, Gerber H, Sprott H (2008) Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: an assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 17:494–501PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Toma V, Sprott H (2008) Abdominal muscle size and symmetry at rest and during abdominal hollowing exercises in healthy control subjects. J Anat 213:173–182PubMedCrossRef Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Toma V, Sprott H (2008) Abdominal muscle size and symmetry at rest and during abdominal hollowing exercises in healthy control subjects. J Anat 213:173–182PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference McMeeken JM, Beith ID, Newham DJ, Milligan P, Critchley DJ (2004) The relationship between EMG and change in thickness of transversus abdominis. Clin Biomech 19:337–342CrossRef McMeeken JM, Beith ID, Newham DJ, Milligan P, Critchley DJ (2004) The relationship between EMG and change in thickness of transversus abdominis. Clin Biomech 19:337–342CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mew R (2009) Comparison of changes in abdominal muscle thickness between standing and crook lying during active abdominal hollowing using ultrasound imaging. Man Ther 14:690–695PubMedCrossRef Mew R (2009) Comparison of changes in abdominal muscle thickness between standing and crook lying during active abdominal hollowing using ultrasound imaging. Man Ther 14:690–695PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Misuri G, Colagrande S, Gorini M, Iandelli I, Mancini M, Duranti R, Scano G (1997) In vivo ultrasound assessment of respiratory function of abdominal muscles in normal subjects. Eur Respir J 10:2861–2867PubMedCrossRef Misuri G, Colagrande S, Gorini M, Iandelli I, Mancini M, Duranti R, Scano G (1997) In vivo ultrasound assessment of respiratory function of abdominal muscles in normal subjects. Eur Respir J 10:2861–2867PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Neumann P, Gill V (2002) Pelvic floor and abdominal muscle interaction: EMG activity and intra-abdominal pressure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:125–132PubMedCrossRef Neumann P, Gill V (2002) Pelvic floor and abdominal muscle interaction: EMG activity and intra-abdominal pressure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:125–132PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference O’Sullivan PB (2000) Lumbar segmental ‘instability’: clinical presentation and specific stabilizing exercise management. Man Ther 5:2–12PubMedCrossRef O’Sullivan PB (2000) Lumbar segmental ‘instability’: clinical presentation and specific stabilizing exercise management. Man Ther 5:2–12PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Panjabi MM (1992) The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord 5:390–397PubMedCrossRef Panjabi MM (1992) The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord 5:390–397PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Pulkovski N, Sprott H, Michel B, Gubler D, Mannion AF (2005) Do low back pain patients with unilateral symptoms show side differences in deep abdominal muscle function? In: 11th World Congress on Pain, Sydney, Australia Pulkovski N, Sprott H, Michel B, Gubler D, Mannion AF (2005) Do low back pain patients with unilateral symptoms show side differences in deep abdominal muscle function? In: 11th World Congress on Pain, Sydney, Australia
34.
go back to reference Rackwitz B, de Bie R, Limm H, von Garnier K, Ewert T, Stucki G (2006) Segmental stabilizing exercises and low back pain. What is the evidence? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 20:553–567PubMedCrossRef Rackwitz B, de Bie R, Limm H, von Garnier K, Ewert T, Stucki G (2006) Segmental stabilizing exercises and low back pain. What is the evidence? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 20:553–567PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Richardson C, Jull G, Hodges P, Hides J (1999) Therapeutic exercise for spinal segmental stabilization in low back pain: scientific basis and clinical approach. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh Richardson C, Jull G, Hodges P, Hides J (1999) Therapeutic exercise for spinal segmental stabilization in low back pain: scientific basis and clinical approach. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
36.
go back to reference Richardson CA, Jull GA (1995) Muscle control–pain control. What exercises would you prescribe? Man Ther 1:2–10PubMedCrossRef Richardson CA, Jull GA (1995) Muscle control–pain control. What exercises would you prescribe? Man Ther 1:2–10PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144PubMedCrossRef Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sapsford RR, Hodges PW, Richardson CA, Cooper DH, Markwell SJ, Jull GA (2001) Co-activation of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles during voluntary exercises. Neurourol Urodyn 20:31–42PubMedCrossRef Sapsford RR, Hodges PW, Richardson CA, Cooper DH, Markwell SJ, Jull GA (2001) Co-activation of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles during voluntary exercises. Neurourol Urodyn 20:31–42PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Storheim K, Bo K, Pederstad O, Jahnsen R (2002) Intra-tester reproducibility of pressure biofeedback in measurement of transversus abdominis function. Physiother Res Int 7:239–249PubMedCrossRef Storheim K, Bo K, Pederstad O, Jahnsen R (2002) Intra-tester reproducibility of pressure biofeedback in measurement of transversus abdominis function. Physiother Res Int 7:239–249PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Teyhen DS (2006) Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging symposium. San Antonio 36:A1–A3 Teyhen DS (2006) Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging symposium. San Antonio 36:A1–A3
41.
go back to reference Teyhen DS, Miltenberger CE, Deiters HM, Del Toro YM, Pulliam JN, Childs JD, Boyles RE, Flynn TW (2005) The use of ultrasound imaging of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in subjects with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:346–355PubMed Teyhen DS, Miltenberger CE, Deiters HM, Del Toro YM, Pulliam JN, Childs JD, Boyles RE, Flynn TW (2005) The use of ultrasound imaging of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in subjects with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:346–355PubMed
42.
go back to reference Teyhen DS, Williamson JN, Carlson NH, Suttles ST, O’Laughlin SJ, Whittaker JL, Goffar SL, Childs JD (2009) Ultrasound characteristics of the deep abdominal muscles during the active straight leg raise test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:761–767PubMedCrossRef Teyhen DS, Williamson JN, Carlson NH, Suttles ST, O’Laughlin SJ, Whittaker JL, Goffar SL, Childs JD (2009) Ultrasound characteristics of the deep abdominal muscles during the active straight leg raise test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:761–767PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Urquhart DM, Barker PJ, Hodges PW, Story IH, Briggs CA (2005) Regional morphology of the transversus abdominis and obliquus internus and externus abdominis muscles. Clin Biomech 20:233–241CrossRef Urquhart DM, Barker PJ, Hodges PW, Story IH, Briggs CA (2005) Regional morphology of the transversus abdominis and obliquus internus and externus abdominis muscles. Clin Biomech 20:233–241CrossRef
44.
go back to reference von Garnier K, Koveker K, Rackwitz B, Kober U, Wilke S, Ewert T, Stucki G (2009) Reliability of a test measuring transversus abdominis muscle recruitment with a pressure biofeedback unit. Physiotherapy 95:8–14CrossRef von Garnier K, Koveker K, Rackwitz B, Kober U, Wilke S, Ewert T, Stucki G (2009) Reliability of a test measuring transversus abdominis muscle recruitment with a pressure biofeedback unit. Physiotherapy 95:8–14CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ultrasound assessment of transversus abdominis muscle contraction ratio during abdominal hollowing: a useful tool to distinguish between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls?
Authors
N. Pulkovski
A. F. Mannion
F. Caporaso
V. Toma
D. Gubler
D. Helbling
H. Sprott
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1707-8

Other articles of this Special Issue 6/2012

European Spine Journal 6/2012 Go to the issue