Published in:
01-10-2016 | Original Article
UltraPro Hernia System, Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein for primary inguinal hernia repair: 3-year outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial
Authors:
J. Magnusson, J. Nygren, U. O. Gustafsson, A. Thorell
Published in:
Hernia
|
Issue 5/2016
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
Chronic pain and discomfort are common after inguinal hernia repair (IHR). In this study, results from a 3-year follow-up from a randomized controlled study comparing three different mesh repairs for postoperative pain, discomfort, Quality of Life (QoL) and patient satisfaction are reported.
Methods
Between November 1, 2006 and January 31, 2009, 309 men, who underwent day surgery for primary unilateral inguinal hernia under local anesthesia, were randomized to three different mesh repairs; UltraPro Hernia System (U), Prolene Hernia System (P) and Lichtenstein procedure (L).
Results
Preoperatively, there were no differences between groups regarding demographics, symptoms, inguinal pain or QoL (SF-36 and a hernia-specific questionnaire). Operating time, postoperative pain, complications and time to full recovery were similar. At 36 months, 21 patients indicated pain [L, n = 6, P, n = 6 and U, n = 9; VAS (median (IQR)): L 0.4 (0.2–1.7), P 0.2 (0.1–2.3) and U 1.6 (0.7–4.6), p = ns]. Physical QoL was reduced in all groups before surgery and was similarly increased to normal levels after 3 months without further changes throughout the study. Although 92 % of participants were satisfied, sixteen percent reported any discomfort from the groin (ns between groups). Five recurrences were reported (L, n = 2, P, n = 1 and U, n = 2, p = ns).
Conclusions
After 3 years of follow-up, all three procedures provided equally good results regarding, pain, discomfort and QoL and could therefore be recommended for primary IHR in LA.