Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Interventional

Typical exposure parameters, organ doses and effective doses for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: Comparison of Monte Carlo simulations and direct measurements with an anthropomorphic phantom

Authors: Monika Foerth, Michael C. Seidenbusch, Mojtaba Sadeghi-Azandaryani, Ursula Lechel, Karla Maria Treitl, Marcus Treitl

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Radiation exposure of patients during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures ranks in the upper sector of medical exposure. Thus, estimation of radiation doses achieved during EVAR is of great importance.

Material and methods

Organ doses (OD) and effective doses (ED) administered to 17 patients receiving EVAR were determined (1) from the exposure parameters by performing Monte Carlo simulations in mathematical phantoms and (2) by measurements with thermoluminescent dosimeters in a physical anthropomorphic phantom.

Results

The mean fluoroscopy time was 26 min, the mean dose area product was 24995 cGy cm2. The mean ED was 34.8 mSv, ODs up to 626 mSv were found. Whereas digital subtraction angiographies (DSA) and fluoroscopies each contributed about 50 % to the cumulative ED, the ED rates of DSAs were found to be ten times higher than those of fluoroscopies. Doubling of the field size caused an ED rate enhancement up to a factor of 3.

Conclusion

EVAR procedures cause high radiation exposure levels that exceed the values published thus far. As a consequence, (1) DSAs should be only performed when necessary and with a low image rate, (2) fluoroscopies should be kept as short as possible, and (3) field sizes should be minimized.

Key Points

• During endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) considerable patient doses are achieved.
• For each EVAR procedure organ (OD) and effective (ED) doses were determined.
• The mean ED was 34.8 mSv, the highest OD was 626 mSv.
• Number of DSAs, fluoroscopy durations and field sizes should be minimized.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Drexler G, Panzer W, Petoussi N, Zankl M (1993) Effective dose – how effective for patients? Radiat Environ Biophys 32:209–290PubMedCrossRef Drexler G, Panzer W, Petoussi N, Zankl M (1993) Effective dose – how effective for patients? Radiat Environ Biophys 32:209–290PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zankl M (1998) Methods for assessing organ doses using computational models. Radiat Prot Dosim 80:207–212CrossRef Zankl M (1998) Methods for assessing organ doses using computational models. Radiat Prot Dosim 80:207–212CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Servomaa A, Tapiovaara M (1998) Organ dose calculation in medical X-ray examinations by the program PCXMC. Radiat Prot Dosim 80:213–219CrossRef Servomaa A, Tapiovaara M (1998) Organ dose calculation in medical X-ray examinations by the program PCXMC. Radiat Prot Dosim 80:213–219CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tapiovaara M, Lakkisto M, Servomaa A (1997) PCXMC. A PC-based Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical X-ray examinations. Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety, Säteilyturvakeskus (STUK), Report STUK A-139 Tapiovaara M, Lakkisto M, Servomaa A (1997) PCXMC. A PC-based Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical X-ray examinations. Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety, Säteilyturvakeskus (STUK), Report STUK A-139
5.
go back to reference ATOM Dosimetry Phantoms (2011) Whole body dose – organ dose – therapeutic radiation. Publication ATOM PB 061811, Norfolk, Virginia, USA: CIRS Computerized Imaging Reference Systems Inc ATOM Dosimetry Phantoms (2011) Whole body dose – organ dose – therapeutic radiation. Publication ATOM PB 061811, Norfolk, Virginia, USA: CIRS Computerized Imaging Reference Systems Inc
7.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 60 International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 60
8.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 103 International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 103
9.
go back to reference Cristy M (1980) Mathematical phantoms representing children of various ages for use in estimates of internal dose. Oak Ridge Laboratory, NUREG/CR-1159, ORNL/NUREG/TM-367 Cristy M (1980) Mathematical phantoms representing children of various ages for use in estimates of internal dose. Oak Ridge Laboratory, NUREG/CR-1159, ORNL/NUREG/TM-367
10.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (1975) Report of the task group on reference man: anatomical, physiological and metabolic characteristics. Pergamon Press, ICRP Publication 23, Oxford International Commission on Radiological Protection (1975) Report of the task group on reference man: anatomical, physiological and metabolic characteristics. Pergamon Press, ICRP Publication 23, Oxford
11.
go back to reference Seidenbusch MC, Regulla DF, Schneider K (2008) Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 2: the PAEDOS algorithm for computer-assisted dose reconstruction in pediatric radiology and results for x-ray examinations of the skull. Fortschr Roentgenstr 180:522–539CrossRef Seidenbusch MC, Regulla DF, Schneider K (2008) Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 2: the PAEDOS algorithm for computer-assisted dose reconstruction in pediatric radiology and results for x-ray examinations of the skull. Fortschr Roentgenstr 180:522–539CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Birch R, Marshall M (1979) Computation of bremsstrahlung x-ray spectra and comparison with spectra measured with a Ge(Li) detector. Phys Med Biol 24:505–517PubMedCrossRef Birch R, Marshall M (1979) Computation of bremsstrahlung x-ray spectra and comparison with spectra measured with a Ge(Li) detector. Phys Med Biol 24:505–517PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference European Commission (2000) Recommendations for patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology using TLD. Report EUR 19604 EN European Commission (2000) Recommendations for patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology using TLD. Report EUR 19604 EN
15.
go back to reference Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ (2010) Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology 254:326–341PubMedCrossRef Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ (2010) Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology 254:326–341PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hymes SR, Strom EA, Fife C (2006) Radiation dermatitis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment 2006. J Am Acad Dermatol 54:28–46PubMedCrossRef Hymes SR, Strom EA, Fife C (2006) Radiation dermatitis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment 2006. J Am Acad Dermatol 54:28–46PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Geijer H, Larzon T, Popek R, Beckman KW (2005) Radiation exposure in stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Radiol 78:906–912PubMedCrossRef Geijer H, Larzon T, Popek R, Beckman KW (2005) Radiation exposure in stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Radiol 78:906–912PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Weerakkody RA, Walsh R, Cousins C, Goldstone KE, Tang TY, Gaunt ME (2008) Radiation exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 95:699–702PubMedCrossRef Weerakkody RA, Walsh R, Cousins C, Goldstone KE, Tang TY, Gaunt ME (2008) Radiation exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 95:699–702PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kalef-Ezra JA, Karavasilis S, Ziogas D, Dristiliaris D, Michalis LK, Matsagas M (2009) Radiation burden of patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 49:283–287PubMedCrossRef Kalef-Ezra JA, Karavasilis S, Ziogas D, Dristiliaris D, Michalis LK, Matsagas M (2009) Radiation burden of patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 49:283–287PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jones C, Badger SA, Boyd CS, Soong CV (2010) The impact of radiation dose exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair on patient safety. J Vasc Surg 52:298–302PubMedCrossRef Jones C, Badger SA, Boyd CS, Soong CV (2010) The impact of radiation dose exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair on patient safety. J Vasc Surg 52:298–302PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Badger SA, Jones C, Boyd CS, Soong CV (2010) Determinants of radiation exposure during EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40:320–325PubMedCrossRef Badger SA, Jones C, Boyd CS, Soong CV (2010) Determinants of radiation exposure during EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40:320–325PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Molyvda-Athanasopoulou E, Karlatira M, Gotzamani-Psarrakou A, Koulouris C, Siountas A (2011) Radiation exposure to patients and radiologists during interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosim 147:86–89CrossRef Molyvda-Athanasopoulou E, Karlatira M, Gotzamani-Psarrakou A, Koulouris C, Siountas A (2011) Radiation exposure to patients and radiologists during interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosim 147:86–89CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Thakor AS, Winterbottom A, Mercuri M, Cousins C, Gaunt ME (2011) The radiation burden from increasingly complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Insights Imaging 2:699–704PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Thakor AS, Winterbottom A, Mercuri M, Cousins C, Gaunt ME (2011) The radiation burden from increasingly complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Insights Imaging 2:699–704PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fossaceca R, Brambilla M, Guzzardi G et al (2012) The impact of radiological equipment on patient radiation exposure during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Eur Radiol 22:2424–2431PubMedCrossRef Fossaceca R, Brambilla M, Guzzardi G et al (2012) The impact of radiological equipment on patient radiation exposure during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Eur Radiol 22:2424–2431PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Howells P, Eaton R, Patel AS, Taylor P, Modarai B (2012) Risk of radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:393–397PubMedCrossRef Howells P, Eaton R, Patel AS, Taylor P, Modarai B (2012) Risk of radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:393–397PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Walsh C, O’Callaghan A, Moore D et al (2012) Measurement and optimization of patient radiation doses in endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:534–539PubMedCrossRef Walsh C, O’Callaghan A, Moore D et al (2012) Measurement and optimization of patient radiation doses in endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:534–539PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mohapatra A, Greenberg RK, Mastracci TM, Eagleton MG, Thornsberry B (2013) Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 58:702–709PubMedCrossRef Mohapatra A, Greenberg RK, Mastracci TM, Eagleton MG, Thornsberry B (2013) Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 58:702–709PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2000) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP Publication 85 International Commission on Radiological Protection (2000) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP Publication 85
29.
go back to reference Koenig TR, Wolff D, Mettler FA (2001) Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 1, characteristics of radiation injury. AJR 177:3–11PubMedCrossRef Koenig TR, Wolff D, Mettler FA (2001) Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 1, characteristics of radiation injury. AJR 177:3–11PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Staton RJ, Pazik FD, Nipper JC, Williams JL, Bolch WE (1991) A comparison of newborn stylized and tomographic models for dose assessment in paediatric radiology. Phys Med Biol 48:805–820CrossRef Staton RJ, Pazik FD, Nipper JC, Williams JL, Bolch WE (1991) A comparison of newborn stylized and tomographic models for dose assessment in paediatric radiology. Phys Med Biol 48:805–820CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Typical exposure parameters, organ doses and effective doses for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: Comparison of Monte Carlo simulations and direct measurements with an anthropomorphic phantom
Authors
Monika Foerth
Michael C. Seidenbusch
Mojtaba Sadeghi-Azandaryani
Ursula Lechel
Karla Maria Treitl
Marcus Treitl
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3673-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

European Radiology 9/2015 Go to the issue