Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2012

01-10-2012 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Type of axial analgesia does not influence time to vaginal delivery in a Proportional Hazards Model

Authors: Javier Pascual-Ramírez, Javier Haya, Faustino Pérez-López, Silvia Gil Trujillo

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To create a Proportional Hazards Model of prospective factors associated with time-to-vaginal-delivery (TTVD).

Methods

We analyzed a group of 144 women undergoing childbirth who received one out of two possible axial analgesia techniques, to find-out factors associated with TTVD. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either a levobupivacaine labor epidural (bolus concentration 0.25 % or less; infusion concentration 0.125 % or less) or a combined spinal–epidural procedure (morphine 0.20 mg, fentanyl 25 µg and hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.5 mg as spinal components) for labor analgesia. The factors initially chosen were: mother age, height and weight, parity, gestational age, newborn weight, type of labor, analgesic procedure, levobupivacaine and fentanyl doses, Bromage scale, pain Numeric Rating Scale, and a satisfaction interview. Cesarean section was the censored variable in our model. A systematic multivariate Cox regression was performed.

Results

Our Final Model stated that nulliparous women had 2.5 times more chances of having longer TTVD than primiparous (p < 0.001, CI 1.76–3.8), and 3.4 times more (p = 0.015, CI 1.27–9.25) than multiparous. Women with oxytocin-augmented labor had 2.05 times more chances (p = 0.001, CI 1.31–3.22) of having longer TTVD than patients without oxytocin. An induced partum had 3.8 times more chances (p < 0.001, CI 2.09–6.8) of having longer TTVD compared to a spontaneous partum.

Conclusion

Parity, labor augmentation, induction of labor and fetal weight determine TTVD; axial analgesia-related factors do not contribute to the model.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Friedman E (1954) The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 68:1568–1575PubMed Friedman E (1954) The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 68:1568–1575PubMed
2.
go back to reference Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK (2002) Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:824–828PubMedCrossRef Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK (2002) Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:824–828PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Debiec J, Conell-Price J, Evansmith J, Shafer LS, Flood P (2009) Mathematical modeling of the pain and progress of the first stage of nulliparous labor. Anesthesiology 111:1093–1110PubMedCrossRef Debiec J, Conell-Price J, Evansmith J, Shafer LS, Flood P (2009) Mathematical modeling of the pain and progress of the first stage of nulliparous labor. Anesthesiology 111:1093–1110PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RMD, Howell CJ (2005) Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4 Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RMD, Howell CJ (2005) Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4
5.
go back to reference Hawkins JL, Arens JF, Bucklin BA et al. for the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia (2007) Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesiology 106:843–863 Hawkins JL, Arens JF, Bucklin BA et al. for the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia (2007) Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesiology 106:843–863
6.
go back to reference Pascual-Ramírez J, Haya J, Perez-Lopez F, Gil-Trujillo S, Garrido-Esteban RA, Bernal G (2011) Effect of combined spinal–epidural analgesia versus epidural analgesia on labor and delivery duration. Int J Gynecol Obstet 114(3):246–250CrossRef Pascual-Ramírez J, Haya J, Perez-Lopez F, Gil-Trujillo S, Garrido-Esteban RA, Bernal G (2011) Effect of combined spinal–epidural analgesia versus epidural analgesia on labor and delivery duration. Int J Gynecol Obstet 114(3):246–250CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wang F, Shen X, Guo X, Peng Y, Gu X (2009) Epidural analgesia in the latent phase of labor and the risk of cesarean delivery: a five-year randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 111:871–880PubMedCrossRef Wang F, Shen X, Guo X, Peng Y, Gu X (2009) Epidural analgesia in the latent phase of labor and the risk of cesarean delivery: a five-year randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 111:871–880PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Abouleish E, Rawal N, Shaw J, Rashad MN, Lorenz T (1990) Subarachnoid morphine prolongs labor compared to epidural bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 70:S4CrossRef Abouleish E, Rawal N, Shaw J, Rashad MN, Lorenz T (1990) Subarachnoid morphine prolongs labor compared to epidural bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 70:S4CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Culha HT, Ozdamar D, Toker K, Solak M (2007) The effects of various doses of intrathecal morphine in addition with ropivacaine in combined spinal-epidural technique for labour analgesia. Agri. 19:16–23PubMed Culha HT, Ozdamar D, Toker K, Solak M (2007) The effects of various doses of intrathecal morphine in addition with ropivacaine in combined spinal-epidural technique for labour analgesia. Agri. 19:16–23PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hess PH, Vasudevan A, Snowman C, Pratt SD (2003) Small dose bupivacaine–fentanyl spinal analgesia combined with morphine for labor. Anesth Analg 97:247–252PubMedCrossRef Hess PH, Vasudevan A, Snowman C, Pratt SD (2003) Small dose bupivacaine–fentanyl spinal analgesia combined with morphine for labor. Anesth Analg 97:247–252PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Simmons SW, Cyna AM, Dennis AT, Hughes D (2007) Combined spinal–epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3 Simmons SW, Cyna AM, Dennis AT, Hughes D (2007) Combined spinal–epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3
12.
go back to reference Tsen LC, Thue B, Datta S, Segal S (1999) Is combined spinal–epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? Anesthesiology 91:920–925PubMedCrossRef Tsen LC, Thue B, Datta S, Segal S (1999) Is combined spinal–epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? Anesthesiology 91:920–925PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bhagwat AG, Dua CK, Saxena KN, Srinivasan S, Dua K (2008) Comparison of combined spinal epidural technique and low dose epidural technique in progress of labour. Indian J Anaesth 52:282–287 Bhagwat AG, Dua CK, Saxena KN, Srinivasan S, Dua K (2008) Comparison of combined spinal epidural technique and low dose epidural technique in progress of labour. Indian J Anaesth 52:282–287
14.
go back to reference Dunn SM, Connelly NR, Steinberg RB, Lewis TJ, Bazzell M, Klatt JL et al (1998) Intrathecal sufentanil versus epidural lidocaine with epinephrine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 87:331–335PubMed Dunn SM, Connelly NR, Steinberg RB, Lewis TJ, Bazzell M, Klatt JL et al (1998) Intrathecal sufentanil versus epidural lidocaine with epinephrine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 87:331–335PubMed
15.
go back to reference Roux M, Wattrisse G, Tai RB, Dufossez F, Krivosic-Horber R (1999) Analgesie obstetricale: analgesie peridurale versis analgesie rachidienne et peridurale combine. Annales Francaises d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation 18:487–498PubMedCrossRef Roux M, Wattrisse G, Tai RB, Dufossez F, Krivosic-Horber R (1999) Analgesie obstetricale: analgesie peridurale versis analgesie rachidienne et peridurale combine. Annales Francaises d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation 18:487–498PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wong CA, Scavone BM, Paceman AM, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Diaz NT et al (2005) The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med 352:655–665PubMedCrossRef Wong CA, Scavone BM, Paceman AM, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Diaz NT et al (2005) The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med 352:655–665PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nesheim BI (1988) Duration of labor. An analysis of influencing factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67:121–124PubMedCrossRef Nesheim BI (1988) Duration of labor. An analysis of influencing factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67:121–124PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Savitz DA, Siega-Riz AM (2004) Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 104:943–951PubMedCrossRef Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Savitz DA, Siega-Riz AM (2004) Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 104:943–951PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vahratian A, Hoffman MK, Troendle JF, Zhang J (2006) The influence of parity on course of labor in a contemporary population. Birth Issues Perinatal care 33:1–12 Vahratian A, Hoffman MK, Troendle JF, Zhang J (2006) The influence of parity on course of labor in a contemporary population. Birth Issues Perinatal care 33:1–12
Metadata
Title
Type of axial analgesia does not influence time to vaginal delivery in a Proportional Hazards Model
Authors
Javier Pascual-Ramírez
Javier Haya
Faustino Pérez-López
Silvia Gil Trujillo
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2360-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2012 Go to the issue