Top

Published in:

01-09-2008 | Original Article

Two-year clinical performance of two one-step self-etching adhesives in the restoration of cervical lesions

Authors: A. Schattenberg, U. Werling, B. Willershausen, C.-P. Ernst

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 3/2008

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of two different one-step self-etching adhesives (Hybrid Bond/Sun Medical, Xeno III/Dentsply) in adhesive cervical resin composite restorations. In accordance with a split-mouth study design, 50 patients (57.3 ± 13.5) received at least one pair of restorations. In each of two comparable cervical cavities, either the adhesive systems Hybrid Bond or Xeno III was used with the resin composite Filtek Supreme (3M ESPE). After 6, 12 and 24 months, the restorations were scored according to the Ryge and California Dental Association criteria. After 2 years, the resulting scores (percent) of the Ryge evaluation for the groups Hybrid Bond/ Filtek Supreme and Xeno III/ Filtek Supreme were marginal integrity, Alpha (92/78), Bravo (8/2), Charlie (0/0) and Delta (0/10); anatomic form, Alpha (92/82), Bravo (8/8) and Charlie (0/10); secondary caries, Alpha (100/100) and Bravo (0/0); marginal discoloration, Alpha (80/84), Bravo (20/12), Charlie (0/0) and not available (0/4); color match, Oscar (39/47), Alpha (51/45), Bravo (10/4), Charlie (0/0) and not available (0/4); surface, Romeo (78/69), Sierra (22/22), Tango (0/0) and Victor (0/10); tooth vitality, Alpha (98/94), Bravo (2/6); and integrity of tooth, alpha 1 (96/96) and alpha 2 (4/4). After 2 years, all Hybrid Bond restorations were retained and showed clinically acceptable results, while five Xeno III restorations were lost in part or in toto. For marginal integrity, anatomic form and surface, significant differences (p < 0.05) were found but did not prove statistically significant after Bonferroni adjustment.

Abdalla AI, Garcia-Godoy F (2006) Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions. Am J Dent 5:289–292

Akimoto N, Takamizu M, Momoi Y (2007) 10-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive system. Oper Dent 1:3–10CrossRef

American Dental Association–Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment (2001) Revised American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. American Dental Association, Chicago. http://www.adafoundation.org/ada/seal/standards/guide_materials_adhesive.pdf

Atash R, Vanden Abbeele A (2005) Sealing ability and bond strength of four contemporary adhesives to enamel and to dentine. Eur J Paediatr Dent 4:185–190

Bayne SC (2007) Dental restorations for oral rehabilitation-testing of laboratory properties versus clinical performance for clinical decision making. J Oral Rehabil 12:921–932CrossRef

De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 1:39–49

Delfino CS, Duarte S Jr (2007) Effect of the composite surface sealant application moment on marginal sealing of compactable composite resin restoration. J Mater Sci Mater Med 12:2257–2261CrossRef

El-Araby AM, Talic YF, El-Araby AM (2007) The effect of thermocycling on the adhesion of self-etching adhesives on dental enamel and dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2:17–24

Ernst CP (2004) Positioning self etching adhesives: “versus” or “in addition to” phosphoric acid etching? J Esthet Restor Dent 16:57–69PubMedCrossRef

10.

Ernst CP (2006) Options for dentin bonding. J Esthet Restor Dent 2:61–67CrossRef

11.

Ernst C-P, Brandenbusch M, Meyer G, Canbek K, Gottschalk F, Willershausen B (2006) Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 10:119–125PubMedCrossRef

12.

Fagundes TC, Barata TJ, Bresciani E, Cefaly DF, Jorge MF, Navarro MF (2006) Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up. Clin Oral Investig 10:197–203PubMedCrossRef

13.

Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M (2001) “No-bottle” vs “multi-bottle” dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 5:373–380CrossRef

14.

Frankenberger R, Tay F (2005) Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restoration. Dent Mater 21:397–412PubMedCrossRef

15.

Feuerstein O, Matalon S, Slutzky H, Weiss EI (2007) Antibacterial properties of self-etching dental adhesive systems. J Am Dent Assoc 3:349–354

16.

Hannig M, Bott B (2000) Randschlussverhalten von plastischen zahnfarbenen Füllungen in dentinbegrenzten Klasse-II-Kavitäten. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 55:134–138

17.

Hannig M, Grafe A, Atalay S, Bott B (2004) Microleakage and SEM evaluation of fissure sealants placed by use of self-etching priming agents. J Dent 1:75–81CrossRef

18.

Hanning M, Reinhardt KH, Bott B (2001) Composite-to-dentin bond strength, micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations using self-etching primers. Oper Dent 26:157–165

19.

Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Koike T, Yukitani W, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S, Fujishima A (1999) Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding system. Oper Dent 24:323–330PubMed

20.

Hayashi M, Wilson NH (2003) Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity. Oper Dent 6:681–688

21.

Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze S, Mjör I, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98–FDI World Dental Federation Study Design (Part 1) and Criteria for Evaluation (Part 2) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. Clin Oral Investig 11:5–33PubMedCrossRef

22.

Kaaden C, Powers JM, Friedl KH, Schmalz G (2002) Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dental hard tissues. Clin Oral Investig 3:155–160CrossRef

23.

Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Hoffmann M, Endo T, Komatsu M (2006) Relationship between degree of polymerization and enamel bonding strength with self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 4:211–216

24.

Kersten S, Lutz F, Besek M (1999) Zahnfarbene adhäsive Füllungen im Seitenzahnbereich. Zürich Eigenverlag PPK

25.

Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore K (2000) Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 13:101–104PubMed

26.

Pelka M, Dettenhofer G, Reinelt C, Krämer N, Petschelt A (1994) Validität und Reliabilität klinischer Kriterien für adhäsive Inlaysysteme. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 49:921–925

27.

Ryge G, Snyder M (1973) Evaluation of the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 87:369–377PubMed

28.

Ryge G (1980) Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 30:347–358PubMed

29.

Schirrmeister JF, Huber K, Hellwig E, Hahn P (2006) Two-year evaluation of a new nano-ceramic restorative material. Clin Oral Investig 10:18–186CrossRef

30.

Stansbury JW (2000) Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerization. J Esthet Dent 12:300–308PubMedCrossRef

31.

Strydom C (2005) Self-etching adhesives: review of adhesion to tooth structure part II. SADJ 60(8):10–13

32.

Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Wilder AD, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC (2001) Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years. J Am Dent Assoc 8:1117–1123

33.

Takahashi A, Sato Y, Uno S, Pereira PN, Sano H (2002) Effects of mechanical properties of adhesive resins on bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 18:263–268PubMedCrossRef

34.

Thomsen KB, Peutzfeldt A (2007) Resin composites: strength of the bond to dentin versus mechanical properties. Clin Oral Investig 1:45–49CrossRef

35.

Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 84:183–188PubMedCrossRef

36.

Van Meerbeck B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1998) The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26:1–20CrossRef

37.

Van Meerbeck B, de Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue M, Vargas P, Vijay P, van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2004) Adhäsion an Schmelz und Dentin. Aktueller Stand und zukünftige Aufgaben, Teil 2. Ästhetische Zahnmedizin 7:95

38.

Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M (2005) A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater 4:375–83

39.

Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K (2005) Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 24:1–13PubMed

40.

Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley D (1998) Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent 26:609–616PubMedCrossRef

Title: Two-year clinical performance of two one-step self-etching adhesives in the restoration of cervical lesions
Authors: A. Schattenberg
U. Werling
B. Willershausen
C.-P. Ernst
Publication date: 01-09-2008
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0193-9

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Two-year clinical performance of two one-step self-etching adhesives in the restoration of cervical lesions

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Dental fluorosis prevalence and severity using Dean’s index based on six teeth and on 28 teeth

Effect of food preservatives on in situ biofilm formation

Evaluation of selective caries removal in deciduous teeth by a fluorescence feedback-controlled Er:YAG laser in vivo

Modeling mucosal dimensions after implantation of a bio-absorbable membrane for surgical root coverage

Clinical evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix/cell-binding peptide (P-15) in the treatment of human infrabony defects

Temperature rise during polymerization of three different provisional materials