Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Cathryn Glazener, Lynda Constable, Christine Hemming, Suzanne Breeman, Andrew Elders, Kevin Cooper, Robert Freeman, Anthony R. B. Smith, Suzanne Hagen, Alison McDonald, Gladys McPherson, Isobel Montgomery, Mary Kilonzo, Dwayne Boyers, Beatriz Goulao, John Norrie

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

One in three women who have a prolapse operation will go on to have another operation, though not necessarily in the same compartment. Surgery can result in greater impairment of quality of life than the original prolapse itself (such as the development of new-onset urinary incontinence, or prolapse at a different site). Anterior and posterior prolapse surgery is most common (90 % of operations), but around 43 % of women also have a uterine (34 %) or vault (9 %) procedure at the same time. There is not enough evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to guide management of vault or uterine prolapse. The Vault or Uterine prolapse surgery Evaluation (VUE) study aims to assess the surgical management of upper compartment pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in terms of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and adverse events.

Methods/design

VUE is two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, RCTs (Uterine Trial and Vault Trial). Eligible for inclusion are women with vault or uterine prolapse: requiring a surgical procedure, suitable for randomisation and willing to be randomised. Randomisation will be computer-allocated separately for each trial, minimised on: requiring concomitant anterior and/or posterior POP surgery or not, concomitant incontinence surgery or not, age (under 60 years or 60 years and older) and surgeon. Participants will be randomly assigned, with equal probability to intervention or control arms in either the Uterine Trial or the Vault Trial. Uterine Trial participants will receive either a vaginal hysterectomy or a uterine preservation procedure. Vault Trial participants will receive either a vaginal sacrospinous fixation or an abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Participants will be followed up by postal questionnaires (6 months post surgery and 12 months post randomisation) and also reviewed in clinic 12 months post surgery. The primary outcome is the participant-reported Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) at 12 months post randomisation.

Discussion

Demonstrating the efficacy of vault and uterine prolapse surgeries is relevant not only to patients and clinicians but also to health care providers, both in the UK and globally.

Trial registration

Current controlled trials ISRCTN86784244 (assigned 19 October 2012), and the first subject was randomly assigned on 1 May 2013 
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.CrossRefPubMed Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardisation of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRefPubMed Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardisation of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hagen S, Glazener C, Sinclair L, Stark D, Bugge C. Psychometric properties of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score. BJOG. 2009;116:25–31.CrossRefPubMed Hagen S, Glazener C, Sinclair L, Stark D, Bugge C. Psychometric properties of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score. BJOG. 2009;116:25–31.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hagen S, Glazener C, Cook J, Herbison P, Toozs-Hobson P. Further properties of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score: minimally important change and test-retest reliability [abstract]. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:1055–6. Hagen S, Glazener C, Cook J, Herbison P, Toozs-Hobson P. Further properties of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score: minimally important change and test-retest reliability [abstract]. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:1055–6.
8.
go back to reference Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, Donovan J, on behalf of the ICIQ Advisory Board. The international consultation on incontinence modular questionnaire: www.iciq.net. J Urol. 2006;175:1063–6. Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, Donovan J, on behalf of the ICIQ Advisory Board. The international consultation on incontinence modular questionnaire: www.​iciq.​net. J Urol. 2006;175:1063–6.
9.
go back to reference Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4–20.PubMed Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4–20.PubMed
10.
go back to reference The EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health. Policy. 1990;16(3):199-208. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health. Policy. 1990;16(3):199-208.
11.
go back to reference Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Lee J, Swift SE, Cosson M, Deprest J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related to native tissue female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:515–26.CrossRefPubMed Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Lee J, Swift SE, Cosson M, Deprest J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related to native tissue female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:515–26.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:3–15.CrossRefPubMed Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:3–15.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting. Stat Med. 2000;21:2917–30.CrossRef Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting. Stat Med. 2000;21:2917–30.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Phillips Z, et al. A review of guidelines for good practice in modelling in economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1–172.CrossRef Phillips Z, et al. A review of guidelines for good practice in modelling in economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1–172.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hilton P. Long-term follow-up studies in pelvic floor dysfunction: the Holy Grail or a realistic aim? BJOG. 2008;115:135–43.CrossRefPubMed Hilton P. Long-term follow-up studies in pelvic floor dysfunction: the Holy Grail or a realistic aim? BJOG. 2008;115:135–43.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Cathryn Glazener
Lynda Constable
Christine Hemming
Suzanne Breeman
Andrew Elders
Kevin Cooper
Robert Freeman
Anthony R. B. Smith
Suzanne Hagen
Alison McDonald
Gladys McPherson
Isobel Montgomery
Mary Kilonzo
Dwayne Boyers
Beatriz Goulao
John Norrie
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1576-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Trials 1/2016 Go to the issue