Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Original Article

Tumor enucleation specimens of small renal tumors more frequently have a positive surgical margin than partial nephrectomy specimens, but this is not associated with local tumor recurrence

Authors: Lu Wang, Ian Hughes, Connor Snarskis, Helyn Alvarez, Jingyang Feng, Gopal N. Gupta, Maria M. Picken

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Approaches to nephron-sparing surgeries (NSS) of renal lesions include partial nephrectomy (PN) and tumor enucleation (TE). Our objective was to examine the pathology of the pseudocapsule and status of the surgical margin in small renal masses treated by NSS and to correlate these findings with the surgical and oncological outcomes. All consecutive renal TE and PN specimens obtained during the period between January 2012 and December 2014, of which clinical follow-up was available, were included in this study. Pathologic features and clinical data were reviewed and analyzed. A total of 117 NSS specimens (59 EN, 58 PN) were reviewed. Clear cell renal cell carcinomas and paraganglioma had the thickest pseudocapsules (0.36 mm), while angiomyolipomas did not form a well-defined pseudocapsule. Other tumors were intermediate in their characteristics. The positive margin rate for TE and PN was 17.2 and 0 %, respectively. Compared to PN, TE involved a significantly shorter procedure time, less blood loss, and fewer post-operative complications. None of the patients from either group was found to have a local recurrence after follow-up imaging. Although positive surgical margins were more frequently seen in TE specimens, local tumor recurrence was comparable to PN. Thus, TE is a reasonable choice for pT1 renal tumors, especially for those without a prominent infiltrative growth pattern.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A et al (2009) Practice guidelines Committee of the American Urological Association. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 182:1271–1279CrossRefPubMed Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A et al (2009) Practice guidelines Committee of the American Urological Association. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 182:1271–1279CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lesage K, Joniau S, Fransis K et al (2007) Comparison between open partial and radical nephrectomy for renal tumours: perioperative outcome and health-related quality of life. Eur Urol 51:614–620CrossRefPubMed Lesage K, Joniau S, Fransis K et al (2007) Comparison between open partial and radical nephrectomy for renal tumours: perioperative outcome and health-related quality of life. Eur Urol 51:614–620CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Carini M, Minervini A, Masieri L, Lapini A, Serni S (2006) Simple enucleation for the treatment of PT1a renal cell carcinoma: our 20-year experience. Eur Urol 50(6):1263–1268CrossRefPubMed Carini M, Minervini A, Masieri L, Lapini A, Serni S (2006) Simple enucleation for the treatment of PT1a renal cell carcinoma: our 20-year experience. Eur Urol 50(6):1263–1268CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lam JS, Shvarts O, Pantuck AJ (2004) Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 45:692–705CrossRefPubMed Lam JS, Shvarts O, Pantuck AJ (2004) Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 45:692–705CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Uzzo RG, Novick AC (2001) Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 166:6–18CrossRefPubMed Uzzo RG, Novick AC (2001) Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 166:6–18CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Patard J-J, Shvarts O, Lam JS et al (2004) Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol 171:2181–2185CrossRefPubMed Patard J-J, Shvarts O, Lam JS et al (2004) Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol 171:2181–2185CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Li QL, Guan HW, Zhang QP, Zhang LZ, Wang FP, Liu YJ (2003) Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less. Eur Urol 44(4):448–451CrossRefPubMed Li QL, Guan HW, Zhang QP, Zhang LZ, Wang FP, Liu YJ (2003) Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less. Eur Urol 44(4):448–451CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Maclennan GT, Goldman HB (2002) Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? J Urol 167:61–64CrossRefPubMed Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Maclennan GT, Goldman HB (2002) Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? J Urol 167:61–64CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Castilla EA, Liou LS, Abrahams NA et al (2002) Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 60:993–997CrossRefPubMed Castilla EA, Liou LS, Abrahams NA et al (2002) Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 60:993–997CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Li QL, Cheng L, Guan HW, Zhang Y, Wang FP, Song XS (2008) Safety and efficacy of mini-margin nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4-cm or less. Urology 71:924–927CrossRefPubMed Li QL, Cheng L, Guan HW, Zhang Y, Wang FP, Song XS (2008) Safety and efficacy of mini-margin nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4-cm or less. Urology 71:924–927CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Minervini A, di Cristofano C, Lapini A et al (2009) Histopathologicanalysis of peritumoral pseudocapsule and surgical margin status after tumor enucleation for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 55:1410–1418CrossRefPubMed Minervini A, di Cristofano C, Lapini A et al (2009) Histopathologicanalysis of peritumoral pseudocapsule and surgical margin status after tumor enucleation for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 55:1410–1418CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wang L, Feng J, Alvarez H, Snarskis C, Gupta G, Picken MM (2015) Critical histologic appraisal of the pseudocapsule of small renal tumors. Virchows Arch 467(3):311–317CrossRefPubMed Wang L, Feng J, Alvarez H, Snarskis C, Gupta G, Picken MM (2015) Critical histologic appraisal of the pseudocapsule of small renal tumors. Virchows Arch 467(3):311–317CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Steinbach F, Stockle M, Griesinger A, Stockel S, Stein R, Miller DP et al (1994) Multifocality in renal cell tumors: a retrospective analysis of 56 patients treated with radical ephrectomy. J Urol 152:1393–1396PubMed Steinbach F, Stockle M, Griesinger A, Stockel S, Stein R, Miller DP et al (1994) Multifocality in renal cell tumors: a retrospective analysis of 56 patients treated with radical ephrectomy. J Urol 152:1393–1396PubMed
15.
go back to reference Kletscher BA, Qian J, Bostwick DG, Andrews PE, Zincke H (1995) Prospective analysis of multifocality in renal cell carcinoma: influence of histological pattern, grade, number, size, volume and deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy. J Urol 153:904–906CrossRefPubMed Kletscher BA, Qian J, Bostwick DG, Andrews PE, Zincke H (1995) Prospective analysis of multifocality in renal cell carcinoma: influence of histological pattern, grade, number, size, volume and deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy. J Urol 153:904–906CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Gohji K, Hara I, Gotoh A, Eto H, Miyake H, Sugiyama T et al (1998) Multifocal renal cell carcinoma in Japanese patients with tumors with maximal diameter of 50 mm or less. J Urol 159:1144–1147CrossRefPubMed Gohji K, Hara I, Gotoh A, Eto H, Miyake H, Sugiyama T et al (1998) Multifocal renal cell carcinoma in Japanese patients with tumors with maximal diameter of 50 mm or less. J Urol 159:1144–1147CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gupta GN, Boris RS, Campbell SC, Zhang Z (2015) Tumor enucleation for sporadic localized kidney cancer: pro and con. J Urol 194(3):623–625CrossRefPubMed Gupta GN, Boris RS, Campbell SC, Zhang Z (2015) Tumor enucleation for sporadic localized kidney cancer: pro and con. J Urol 194(3):623–625CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Eble JN, Egevad L, Epstein JI, Grignon D, Hes O, Moch H, Montironi R, Tickoo SK, Zhou M, Argani P, ISUP Renal Tumor Panel (2013) The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver classification of renal neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 37(10):1469–1489CrossRefPubMed Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Eble JN, Egevad L, Epstein JI, Grignon D, Hes O, Moch H, Montironi R, Tickoo SK, Zhou M, Argani P, ISUP Renal Tumor Panel (2013) The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver classification of renal neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 37(10):1469–1489CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Edge SBBD, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual 7th edition, 7th edn. Springer, Chicago Edge SBBD, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual 7th edition, 7th edn. Springer, Chicago
20.
go back to reference Humphrey PA (2014) Grading renal cell carcinoma: the International Society of Urological Pathology grading system. J Urol 191(3):798–799CrossRefPubMed Humphrey PA (2014) Grading renal cell carcinoma: the International Society of Urological Pathology grading system. J Urol 191(3):798–799CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lau W, Blute ML, Zincke H Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy versus elective nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: evidence for increased renal failure rate on long term follow-up (>10 years). J Urol 2000 163(Suppl):153 abstract no. 681 Lau W, Blute ML, Zincke H Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy versus elective nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: evidence for increased renal failure rate on long term follow-up (>10 years). J Urol 2000 163(Suppl):153 abstract no. 681
22.
go back to reference Poppel HV, Joniau S (2007) How important are surgical margins in nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol Suppl 6:533–539CrossRef Poppel HV, Joniau S (2007) How important are surgical margins in nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol Suppl 6:533–539CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sprenkle PC, Power N, Ghoneim T, Touijer KA, Dalbagni G, Russo P, Coleman JA (2012) Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4-7 centimeters. Eur Urol 61(3):593–599CrossRefPubMed Sprenkle PC, Power N, Ghoneim T, Touijer KA, Dalbagni G, Russo P, Coleman JA (2012) Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4-7 centimeters. Eur Urol 61(3):593–599CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Chen XS, Zhang ZT, Du J, Bi XC, Sun G, Yao X (2012) Optimal surgical margin in nephron-sparing surgery for T1b renal cell carcinoma. Urology 79(4):836–839CrossRefPubMed Chen XS, Zhang ZT, Du J, Bi XC, Sun G, Yao X (2012) Optimal surgical margin in nephron-sparing surgery for T1b renal cell carcinoma. Urology 79(4):836–839CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, Reuter VE, Ulbright TM (2016) The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part A: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol 70(1):93–105CrossRefPubMed Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, Reuter VE, Ulbright TM (2016) The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part A: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol 70(1):93–105CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kwon EO, Carver BS, Snyder ME et al (2007) Impact of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumours. BJU Int 99:286–289CrossRefPubMed Kwon EO, Carver BS, Snyder ME et al (2007) Impact of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumours. BJU Int 99:286–289CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC et al (2008) Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 179:2158–2163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC et al (2008) Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 179:2158–2163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Antic T, Taxy J (2015) Partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: lack of correlation between margin status and local recurrence. Am J Clin Pathol 143:645–651CrossRefPubMed Antic T, Taxy J (2015) Partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: lack of correlation between margin status and local recurrence. Am J Clin Pathol 143:645–651CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Carini M, Minervini A, Lapini A, Masieri L, Serni S (2006) Simple enucleation for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm in greatest dimension: progression and long-term survival. J Urol 175:2022–2026CrossRefPubMed Carini M, Minervini A, Lapini A, Masieri L, Serni S (2006) Simple enucleation for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm in greatest dimension: progression and long-term survival. J Urol 175:2022–2026CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Minervini A, Serni S, Tuccio A et al (2011) Local recurrence after tumour enucleation for renal cell carcinoma with no ablation of the tumour bed: results of a prospective single-centre study. BJU Int 107:1394–1399CrossRefPubMed Minervini A, Serni S, Tuccio A et al (2011) Local recurrence after tumour enucleation for renal cell carcinoma with no ablation of the tumour bed: results of a prospective single-centre study. BJU Int 107:1394–1399CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Tumor enucleation specimens of small renal tumors more frequently have a positive surgical margin than partial nephrectomy specimens, but this is not associated with local tumor recurrence
Authors
Lu Wang
Ian Hughes
Connor Snarskis
Helyn Alvarez
Jingyang Feng
Gopal N. Gupta
Maria M. Picken
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-2031-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Virchows Archiv 1/2017 Go to the issue