Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 12/2020

01-12-2020 | Original Paper

Tuberosity union in patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a technical note and exploratory analysis

Authors: Florian Hess, Laurent Bohnert, Laurenz Jaberg, JoEllen Welter, Hans-Christoph Pape, Andrea Sireus

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to treat complex humerus fractures is increasing, especially in older, osteoporotic patients. Refixation and tuberosity healing are needed to achieve an optimal range of motion (ROM), external rotation, active forward elevation, and patient satisfaction. Proper healing has been reported, however, in only 40–84% of cases. Our study’s aim was to describe a simple, reproducible fixation technique designed to improve tuberosity healing.

Methods

We included 30 patients with acute proximal humerus fractures undergoing RSA (Global Unite Reverse Fracture, DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA) with tuberosity reattachment. The humerus stem was cemented in 24 cases. A standardized suture technique with two fiber tapes was used to reattach tuberosities. Clinical and radiological parameters, which were collected one year post-operatively, included ROM, pain level, Constant scores, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and tuberosity healing.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 79.3 years (± 7; range 65–92), and the tuberosity healing rate was 90.0% (27 of 30). Two patients showed migration (one nonunion, one malunion), and another had complete resorption after an initial period of proper healing. Radiolucent lines around the humerus stem occurred in one case, and three patients had scapular notching. The mean SSV was 86% (± 11; range 60–100), the Constant score was 72 (± 10.3; range 48–92), the active forward flexion was 140° (± 14.3; range 115–165), and external rotation was 23° (± 16.5; range 0–50).

Conclusions

This reattachment technique, which is simple and reproducible, achieved a higher tuberosity healing rate than previously published rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baron JA, Barrett JA, Karagas MR (1996) The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone 18(3 Suppl):209S–213SCrossRef Baron JA, Barrett JA, Karagas MR (1996) The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone 18(3 Suppl):209S–213SCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J, Kniffin W, Malenka D, Mayor M, Keller RB (1996) Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 7(6):612–618CrossRef Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J, Kniffin W, Malenka D, Mayor M, Keller RB (1996) Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 7(6):612–618CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kruithof RN, Formijne Jonkers HA, van der Ven DJC, van Olden GDJ, Timmers TK (2017) Functional and quality of life outcome after non-operatively managed proximal humeral fractures. Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 18(4):423–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-017-0468-5CrossRef Kruithof RN, Formijne Jonkers HA, van der Ven DJC, van Olden GDJ, Timmers TK (2017) Functional and quality of life outcome after non-operatively managed proximal humeral fractures. Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 18(4):423–430. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10195-017-0468-5CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Reitman RD, Kerzhner E (2011) Reverse shoulder arthoplasty as treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Am J Orthop 40(9):458–461PubMed Reitman RD, Kerzhner E (2011) Reverse shoulder arthoplasty as treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Am J Orthop 40(9):458–461PubMed
19.
go back to reference Torrens C, Alentorn-Geli E, Mingo F, Gamba C, Santana F (2018) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of acute complex proximal humeral fractures: influence of greater tuberosity healing on the functional outcomes. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 26(1):2309499018760132. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018760132CrossRef Torrens C, Alentorn-Geli E, Mingo F, Gamba C, Santana F (2018) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of acute complex proximal humeral fractures: influence of greater tuberosity healing on the functional outcomes. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 26(1):2309499018760132. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​2309499018760132​CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American 52(6):1077–1089CrossRef Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American 52(6):1077–1089CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British 86(3):388–395. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14024CrossRef Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British 86(3):388–395. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1302/​0301-620x.​86b3.​14024CrossRef
35.
Metadata
Title
Tuberosity union in patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a technical note and exploratory analysis
Authors
Florian Hess
Laurent Bohnert
Laurenz Jaberg
JoEllen Welter
Hans-Christoph Pape
Andrea Sireus
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04831-3

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

International Orthopaedics 12/2020 Go to the issue