Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 5/2007

01-05-2007 | Original Article

Trunk biomechanical models based on equilibrium at a single-level violate equilibrium at other levels

Authors: N. Arjmand, A. Shirazi-Adl, M. Parnianpour

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Accurate estimation of muscle forces in various occupational tasks is critical for a reliable evaluation of spinal loads and subsequent assessment of risk of injury and management of back disorders. The majority of biomechanical models of multi-segmental spine estimate muscle forces and spinal loads based on the balance of net moments at a single level with no consideration for the equilibrium at remaining levels. This work aimed to quantify the extent of equilibrium violation and alterations in estimations when such models are performed at different levels. Results are compared with those of kinematics-driven model that satisfies equilibrium at all levels and EMG data. Regardless of the method used (optimization or EMG-assisted), single-level free body diagram models yielded estimations that substantially altered depending on the level considered (i.e., level dependency). Equilibrium of net moment was also grossly violated at remaining levels with the error increasing in more demanding tasks. These models may, however, be used to estimate spinal compression forces.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A (2005) Biomechanics of lumbar posture in static lifting tasks. Spine 30:2637–2648PubMedCrossRef Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A (2005) Biomechanics of lumbar posture in static lifting tasks. Spine 30:2637–2648PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A (2006a) Sensitivity of kinematics-based model predictions to optimization criteria in static lifting tasks. Med Eng Phys 28:504–514CrossRef Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A (2006a) Sensitivity of kinematics-based model predictions to optimization criteria in static lifting tasks. Med Eng Phys 28:504–514CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A (2006b) Model and in vivo studies on human trunk load partitioning and stability in isometric forward flexions. J Biomech 39:510–521CrossRef Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A (2006b) Model and in vivo studies on human trunk load partitioning and stability in isometric forward flexions. J Biomech 39:510–521CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A, Bazrgari B (2006c) Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks. Clin Biomech 21:668–675CrossRef Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A, Bazrgari B (2006c) Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks. Clin Biomech 21:668–675CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bogduk N, Macintosh JE, Pearcy MJ (1992) A universal model of the lumbar back muscles in the upright position. Spine 17:897–913PubMedCrossRef Bogduk N, Macintosh JE, Pearcy MJ (1992) A universal model of the lumbar back muscles in the upright position. Spine 17:897–913PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cholewicki J, McGill SM, Norman RW (1995) Comparison of muscle forces and joint load from an optimization and EMG assisted lumbar spine model: towards development of a hybrid approach. J Biomech 28:321–331PubMedCrossRef Cholewicki J, McGill SM, Norman RW (1995) Comparison of muscle forces and joint load from an optimization and EMG assisted lumbar spine model: towards development of a hybrid approach. J Biomech 28:321–331PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Davis J, Kaufman KR, Lieber RL (2003) Correlation between active and passive isometric force and intramuscular pressure in the isolated rabbit tibialis anterior muscle. J Biomech 36:505–512PubMedCrossRef Davis J, Kaufman KR, Lieber RL (2003) Correlation between active and passive isometric force and intramuscular pressure in the isolated rabbit tibialis anterior muscle. J Biomech 36:505–512PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference El-Rich M, Shirazi-Adl A, Arjmand N (2004) Muscle activity, internal loads and stability of the human spine in standing postures: combined model-in vivo studies. Spine 29:2633–2642PubMedCrossRef El-Rich M, Shirazi-Adl A, Arjmand N (2004) Muscle activity, internal loads and stability of the human spine in standing postures: combined model-in vivo studies. Spine 29:2633–2642PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Granata KP, Lee PE, Franklin TC (2005) Co-contraction recruitment and spinal load during isometric trunk flexion and extension. Clin Biomech 20:1029–1037CrossRef Granata KP, Lee PE, Franklin TC (2005) Co-contraction recruitment and spinal load during isometric trunk flexion and extension. Clin Biomech 20:1029–1037CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Guzik DC, Keller TS, Szpalski M, Park JH, Spengler DM (1996) A biomechanical model of the lumbar spine during upright isometric flexion, extension and lateral bending. Spine 21:427–433PubMedCrossRef Guzik DC, Keller TS, Szpalski M, Park JH, Spengler DM (1996) A biomechanical model of the lumbar spine during upright isometric flexion, extension and lateral bending. Spine 21:427–433PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marras WS, Parakkat J, Chany AM, Yang G, Burr D, Lavender SA (2005) Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration and work experience. Clin Biomech 21:345–352CrossRef Marras WS, Parakkat J, Chany AM, Yang G, Burr D, Lavender SA (2005) Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration and work experience. Clin Biomech 21:345–352CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Marras WS, Granata KP (1997) The development of an EMG-assisted model to assess spine loading during whole-body free-dynamic lifting. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 7:259–268PubMedCrossRef Marras WS, Granata KP (1997) The development of an EMG-assisted model to assess spine loading during whole-body free-dynamic lifting. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 7:259–268PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference McGill SM (1992) A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending. J Biomech 25:395–414PubMedCrossRef McGill SM (1992) A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending. J Biomech 25:395–414PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference McGill SM, Norman RW (1986) Partitioning of the L4–L5 dynamic moment into disc, ligamentous and muscular components during lifting. Spine 11:666–678PubMedCrossRef McGill SM, Norman RW (1986) Partitioning of the L4–L5 dynamic moment into disc, ligamentous and muscular components during lifting. Spine 11:666–678PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Parnianpour M, Wang JL, Shirazi-Adl A, Sparto P, Wilke HJ (1997) The effect of variations in trunk models in predicting muscle strength and spinal loads. J Musculoskelet Res 1:55–69CrossRef Parnianpour M, Wang JL, Shirazi-Adl A, Sparto P, Wilke HJ (1997) The effect of variations in trunk models in predicting muscle strength and spinal loads. J Musculoskelet Res 1:55–69CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pearsall DJ (1994) Segmental inertial properties of the human trunk as determined from computer tomography and magnetic resonance imagery. PhD thesis, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario Pearsall DJ (1994) Segmental inertial properties of the human trunk as determined from computer tomography and magnetic resonance imagery. PhD thesis, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario
17.
go back to reference Reeves NP, Cholewicki J (2003) Modeling the human lumbar spine for assessing spinal loads, stability and risk of injury. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 31:73–139PubMedCrossRef Reeves NP, Cholewicki J (2003) Modeling the human lumbar spine for assessing spinal loads, stability and risk of injury. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 31:73–139PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schultz AB, Andersson GB, Haderspeck K, Ortengren R, Nordin M, Bjork R (1982) Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists. J Biomech 15:669–675PubMedCrossRef Schultz AB, Andersson GB, Haderspeck K, Ortengren R, Nordin M, Bjork R (1982) Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists. J Biomech 15:669–675PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse M (1995) Lumbar spine maximum efforts and muscle recruitment patterns predicted by a model with multijoint muscles and joints with stiffness. J Biomech 28:173–186PubMedCrossRef Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse M (1995) Lumbar spine maximum efforts and muscle recruitment patterns predicted by a model with multijoint muscles and joints with stiffness. J Biomech 28:173–186PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Takashima ST, Singh SP, Haderspeck KA, Schultz AB (1979) A model for semi-quantitative studies of muscle actions. J Biomech 12:929–939PubMedCrossRef Takashima ST, Singh SP, Haderspeck KA, Schultz AB (1979) A model for semi-quantitative studies of muscle actions. J Biomech 12:929–939PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference van Dieen JH, Kingma I, Van der Bug P (2003) Evidence for a role of antagonistic cocontraction in controlling trunk stiffness during lifting. J Biomech 36:1829–1836PubMedCrossRef van Dieen JH, Kingma I, Van der Bug P (2003) Evidence for a role of antagonistic cocontraction in controlling trunk stiffness during lifting. J Biomech 36:1829–1836PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trunk biomechanical models based on equilibrium at a single-level violate equilibrium at other levels
Authors
N. Arjmand
A. Shirazi-Adl
M. Parnianpour
Publication date
01-05-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0263-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

European Spine Journal 5/2007 Go to the issue