Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2023

08-08-2022 | Trisomy 21 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Late amniocentesis: better late than never? A single referral centre experience

Authors: Akshatha Sharma, Anita Kaul

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Several congenital abnormalities present late in pregnancy necessitating invasive testing to rule out genetic/infectious causes at late gestation. Not many studies have described the indications/safety of a late gestation amniocentesis.

Methods

All records of amniocentesis performed beyond 24 weeks were reviewed and evaluated for indications, positive yield and complications.

Results

About 187 women had an amniocentesis after 24 weeks for various indications with CNS abnormalities being the commonest. The total yield of positive findings was 14.60% (22/150; excluding 2 VOUS). CNS, multiple system involvement and skeletal system anormalities yielded maximum results. About 32.05% abnormalities could have potentially been detected at the time of a routine anomaly scan. Amongst all the deliveries, 2.1%  delivered spontaneously within a week of the procedure and about 5.4% delivered spontaneously within a month of the procedure.

Conclusion

The study emphasises the need for additional accreditation (FMF, ISUOG) of sonographers to ensure the detection of anomalies at the routine 18–20 weeks scan. Inspite of a normal mid-trimester scan, central nervous system and gastrointestinal abnormalities presented more commonly after 24 weeks. The high positive yield in our study highlights the importance of testing even in late pregnancy beyond the legal age of termination. The test could clearly stratify the pregnancies with a poor outcome whilst reassuring the others. The procedure itself did not lead to a neonatal death due to prematurity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G et al (2015) Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 45(1):16–26CrossRefPubMed Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G et al (2015) Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 45(1):16–26CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Malinger G, Lerman-Sagie T, Watemberg N et al (2002) A normal second-trimester ultrasound does not exclude intracranial structural pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 20(1):51–56CrossRefPubMed Malinger G, Lerman-Sagie T, Watemberg N et al (2002) A normal second-trimester ultrasound does not exclude intracranial structural pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 20(1):51–56CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021. The Gazette of India, No. 8 of 2021 The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021. The Gazette of India, No. 8 of 2021
5.
go back to reference Geffen KT, Ben-Zvi O, Weitzner O et al (2017) The yield and complications of amniocentesis performed after 24 weeks of gestation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296(1):69–77CrossRefPubMed Geffen KT, Ben-Zvi O, Weitzner O et al (2017) The yield and complications of amniocentesis performed after 24 weeks of gestation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296(1):69–77CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Daum H, David AB, Nadjari M et al (2019) The impact of late amniocentesis in the modern genomic technologies era. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 53:676–685CrossRefPubMed Daum H, David AB, Nadjari M et al (2019) The impact of late amniocentesis in the modern genomic technologies era. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 53:676–685CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference O’Donoghue K, Giorgi L, Pontello V et al (2007) Amniocentesis in the third trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 27:1000–1004CrossRefPubMed O’Donoghue K, Giorgi L, Pontello V et al (2007) Amniocentesis in the third trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 27:1000–1004CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Drummond CL, Molina-Gomes D, Senat MV (2003) Fetal karyotyping after 28 weeks of gestation for late ultrasound findings in a low risk population. Prenat Diagn 23:1068–1072CrossRefPubMed Drummond CL, Molina-Gomes D, Senat MV (2003) Fetal karyotyping after 28 weeks of gestation for late ultrasound findings in a low risk population. Prenat Diagn 23:1068–1072CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bardin R (2018) Eran Hadara,*, lylach haizler-cohen, rinat gabbay-benziv, et al cytogenetic analysis in fetuses with late onset abnormal sonographic findings. J Perinat Med 46(9):975–982CrossRefPubMed Bardin R (2018) Eran Hadara,*, lylach haizler-cohen, rinat gabbay-benziv, et al cytogenetic analysis in fetuses with late onset abnormal sonographic findings. J Perinat Med 46(9):975–982CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ficara A, Syngelaki A, Hammami A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH (2020) Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35–37 weeks’ gestation in diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 55(1):75–80CrossRefPubMed Ficara A, Syngelaki A, Hammami A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH (2020) Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35–37 weeks’ gestation in diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 55(1):75–80CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gagnon S, Fraser W, Fouquette B et al (1992) Nature and frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings: an analysis of 117 cases with review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 12:9–18CrossRefPubMed Gagnon S, Fraser W, Fouquette B et al (1992) Nature and frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings: an analysis of 117 cases with review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 12:9–18CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Borrell A, Grande M (2017) Eva meler joan sabrià; genomic microarray in fetuses with early growth restriction: a multicenter study. Fetal Diagn Ther 42:174–180CrossRefPubMed Borrell A, Grande M (2017) Eva meler joan sabrià; genomic microarray in fetuses with early growth restriction: a multicenter study. Fetal Diagn Ther 42:174–180CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference O’Donoghue K, Giorgi L (2007) Valentina pontello; amniocentesis in the third trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 27:1000–1004CrossRefPubMed O’Donoghue K, Giorgi L (2007) Valentina pontello; amniocentesis in the third trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 27:1000–1004CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Michael C (2002) Gordon, komal narula, richard o’shaughnessy, et al; complications of third-trimester amniocentesis using continuous ultrasound guidance. Obstet Gynecol 99(2):255–259 Michael C (2002) Gordon, komal narula, richard o’shaughnessy, et al; complications of third-trimester amniocentesis using continuous ultrasound guidance. Obstet Gynecol 99(2):255–259
15.
go back to reference Hodor JG, Poggi SH, Spong CY (2006) Risk of third-trimester amniocentesis a case-control study. Am J Perinatol 23(3):177–180CrossRefPubMed Hodor JG, Poggi SH, Spong CY (2006) Risk of third-trimester amniocentesis a case-control study. Am J Perinatol 23(3):177–180CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Toutain J, Lemaire-Coustel MA, Begorre M et al (2012) Proportion of parents agreeing to delay fetal karyotyping until the third trimester of pregnancy in cases with an indication. Fetal Diagn Ther 31:115–121CrossRefPubMed Toutain J, Lemaire-Coustel MA, Begorre M et al (2012) Proportion of parents agreeing to delay fetal karyotyping until the third trimester of pregnancy in cases with an indication. Fetal Diagn Ther 31:115–121CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gabbay R, Yogev Y, Melamed N et al (2012) Pregnancy outcome after third trimester amniocentesis: a single center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25(6):666–668CrossRef Gabbay R, Yogev Y, Melamed N et al (2012) Pregnancy outcome after third trimester amniocentesis: a single center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25(6):666–668CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Picone O, Senat M-V, Rosenblatt J, Audibert F, Tachdjian G (2008) Rene frydman; fear of pregnancy loss and fetal karyotyping: a place for third-trimester amniocentesis? Fetal Diagn Ther 23:30–35CrossRefPubMed Picone O, Senat M-V, Rosenblatt J, Audibert F, Tachdjian G (2008) Rene frydman; fear of pregnancy loss and fetal karyotyping: a place for third-trimester amniocentesis? Fetal Diagn Ther 23:30–35CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Salomon J, Sotiriadis A, Wulff CB, Odibo A, Akolekar R (2019) Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 54(4):442–451CrossRefPubMed Salomon J, Sotiriadis A, Wulff CB, Odibo A, Akolekar R (2019) Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 54(4):442–451CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Late amniocentesis: better late than never? A single referral centre experience
Authors
Akshatha Sharma
Anita Kaul
Publication date
08-08-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06662-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2023 Go to the issue