Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurosurgical Review 1/2020

01-02-2020 | Trigeminal Neuralgia | Short Review

Teflon™ or Ivalon®: a scoping review of implants used in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

Authors: Elliot Pressman, R. Tushar Jha, Gleb Zavadskiy, Jay I. Kumar, Harry van Loveren, Jamie J. van Gompel, Siviero Agazzi

Published in: Neurosurgical Review | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is characterized by jolts of pain along the distribution of the trigeminal nerve. If patients fail conservative management, microvascular decompression (MVD) is the next step in treatment. MVD is largely done by placing implant pads between the nerve and compressing vessels. We conducted a literature review to assess effectiveness and safety of Teflon™ and Ivalon® sponges for treatment of TN with MVD.

Methods

In January 2019, PubMed was searched for manuscripts published in English using permutations of “Microvascular decompression”, “Teflon”, “Ivalon”, “Granuloma”, “Polytetrafluoroethylene”, “Trigeminal Neuralgia”, and “Exploration”. Success and relapse rates, causes of relapse, and complication rates were analyzed. We analyzed for relationships with ANCOVA at an alpha threshold of .05.

Results

Thirty-six studies representing 4273 patients fit inclusion criteria. Twenty-five dealt with initial MVD, 12 with re-do MVD. Initial MVD initial success rates were 85% in patients receiving Teflon™ (57–100%*) and 91% in patients receiving Ivalon® (79–100%*). Recurrence rates were 12% in Teflon™ patients (0*–30%) and 9.1% in Ivalon® patients (0*–19%). In patients with relapses, implants were the cause in 49% of Teflon™ patients (0*–100%*) and 50% of Ivalon® patients (0*–100%*). Complication rates for patients receiving Teflon™ were 12% (0*–34%) and 19% for patients receiving Ivalon® (0*–40%).

Conclusion

Teflon™ and Ivalon® are two materials used in MVD for TN. It is an effective treatment with long-term symptom relief and recurrence rates of 1–5% each year. Ivalon® has been used less than Teflon™ though is associated with similar success rates and similar complication rates.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Ashkan K, Marsh H (2004) Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in the elderly: a review of the safety and efficacy. Neurosurgery 55:840–848 discussion 848-850CrossRefPubMed Ashkan K, Marsh H (2004) Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in the elderly: a review of the safety and efficacy. Neurosurgery 55:840–848 discussion 848-850CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Broggi G, Ferroli P, Franzini A, Servello D, Dones I (2000) Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: comments on a series of 250 cases, including 10 patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68:59–64CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Broggi G, Ferroli P, Franzini A, Servello D, Dones I (2000) Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: comments on a series of 250 cases, including 10 patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68:59–64CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Chen J, Lee S, Lui T, Yeh Y, Chen T, Tzaan W (2000) Teflon granuloma after microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Surg Neurol 53:281–287CrossRefPubMed Chen J, Lee S, Lui T, Yeh Y, Chen T, Tzaan W (2000) Teflon granuloma after microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Surg Neurol 53:281–287CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cho DY, Chang CG, Wang YC, Wang FH, Shen CC, Yang DY (1994) Repeat operations in failed microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 35:665–669 discussion 669-670CrossRefPubMed Cho DY, Chang CG, Wang YC, Wang FH, Shen CC, Yang DY (1994) Repeat operations in failed microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 35:665–669 discussion 669-670CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference El-Garem HF, Badr-El-Dine M, Talaat AM, Magnan J (2002) Endoscopy as a tool in minimally invasive trigeminal neuralgia surgery. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society. American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 23:132–135CrossRef El-Garem HF, Badr-El-Dine M, Talaat AM, Magnan J (2002) Endoscopy as a tool in minimally invasive trigeminal neuralgia surgery. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society. American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 23:132–135CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Goya T, Wakisaka S, Kinoshita K (1990) Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia with special reference to delayed recurrence. Neurol Med Chir 30:462–467CrossRef Goya T, Wakisaka S, Kinoshita K (1990) Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia with special reference to delayed recurrence. Neurol Med Chir 30:462–467CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jannetta PJ, Bissonette DJ (1985) Management of the failed patient with trigeminal neuralgia. Clin Neurosurg 32:334–347PubMed Jannetta PJ, Bissonette DJ (1985) Management of the failed patient with trigeminal neuralgia. Clin Neurosurg 32:334–347PubMed
23.
go back to reference Katusic S, Williams DB, Beard CM, Bergstralh EJ, Kurland LT (1991) Epidemiology and clinical features of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: similarities and differences, Rochester, Minnesota, 1945-1984. Neuroepidemiology 10:276–281. https://doi.org/10.1159/000110284 CrossRefPubMed Katusic S, Williams DB, Beard CM, Bergstralh EJ, Kurland LT (1991) Epidemiology and clinical features of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: similarities and differences, Rochester, Minnesota, 1945-1984. Neuroepidemiology 10:276–281. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000110284 CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Liao JJ, Cheng WC, Chang CN, Yang JT, Wei KC, Hsu YH, Lin TK (1997) Reoperation for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression. Surg Neurol 47:562–568 discussion 568-570CrossRefPubMed Liao JJ, Cheng WC, Chang CN, Yang JT, Wei KC, Hsu YH, Lin TK (1997) Reoperation for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression. Surg Neurol 47:562–568 discussion 568-570CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Matsushima T, Yamaguchi T, Inoue TK, Matsukado K, Fukui M (2000) Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression using an interposing technique. Teflon felt adhesion and the sling retraction technique. Acta Neurochir 142:557–561CrossRefPubMed Matsushima T, Yamaguchi T, Inoue TK, Matsukado K, Fukui M (2000) Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression using an interposing technique. Teflon felt adhesion and the sling retraction technique. Acta Neurochir 142:557–561CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Oiwa Y, Nakai K, Takayama M, Naka D, Itakura T (2004) Microvascular decompression of cranial nerves using sheets of a dural substitute--technical note. Neurol Med Chir 44:94–100 discussion 100-101CrossRef Oiwa Y, Nakai K, Takayama M, Naka D, Itakura T (2004) Microvascular decompression of cranial nerves using sheets of a dural substitute--technical note. Neurol Med Chir 44:94–100 discussion 100-101CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rath SA, Klein HJ, Richter HP (1996) Findings and long-term results of subsequent operations after failed microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 39:933–938 discussion 938-940PubMed Rath SA, Klein HJ, Richter HP (1996) Findings and long-term results of subsequent operations after failed microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 39:933–938 discussion 938-940PubMed
33.
go back to reference Sindou M, Leston J, Howeidy T, Decullier E, Chapuis F (2006) Micro-vascular decompression for primary Trigeminal Neuralgia (typical or atypical). Long-term effectiveness on pain; prospective study with survival analysis in a consecutive series of 362 patients. Acta Neurochir 148:1235–1245; discussion 1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-006-0809-2 CrossRefPubMed Sindou M, Leston J, Howeidy T, Decullier E, Chapuis F (2006) Micro-vascular decompression for primary Trigeminal Neuralgia (typical or atypical). Long-term effectiveness on pain; prospective study with survival analysis in a consecutive series of 362 patients. Acta Neurochir 148:1235–1245; discussion 1245. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00701-006-0809-2 CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Siwawetpikul P, Leing-Udom A (2016) A "Reposition Technique" Microvascular Decompression in Trigeminal Neuralgia: Clinical Outcomes and Complications. J Med Assoc Thai = Chotmaihet thangphaet 99(Suppl 3):S39–S46PubMed Siwawetpikul P, Leing-Udom A (2016) A "Reposition Technique" Microvascular Decompression in Trigeminal Neuralgia: Clinical Outcomes and Complications. J Med Assoc Thai = Chotmaihet thangphaet 99(Suppl 3):S39–S46PubMed
Metadata
Title
Teflon™ or Ivalon®: a scoping review of implants used in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia
Authors
Elliot Pressman
R. Tushar Jha
Gleb Zavadskiy
Jay I. Kumar
Harry van Loveren
Jamie J. van Gompel
Siviero Agazzi
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Neurosurgical Review / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0344-5607
Electronic ISSN: 1437-2320
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01187-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Neurosurgical Review 1/2020 Go to the issue