Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2019

01-08-2019 | KNEE

Triaxial accelerometer can quantify the Lachman test similarly to standard arthrometers

Authors: Federico Raggi, Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina, Cecilia Signorelli, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Luca Macchiarola, Ilaria Cucurnia, Matteo Romagnoli, Alberto Grassi, Stefano Zaffagnini

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the relationship between the KiRA triaxial accelerometer and the KT-1000 measurements in the intact, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient, and ACL reconstructed knee joint for the quantification of the Lachman test. Moreover, the intra- and inter-examiner repeatability of the KiRA device will be determined. It was hypothesized that the side-to-side difference of the anterior tibial translation as measured by the KiRA device would be equivalent to the one measured by the KT-1000 during the Lachman test.

Methods

Sixty patients were divided into three groups and have been prospectively included in the present study. Group_A composed of 20 patients with a diagnosis of an isolated ACL tear. Group_B composed of 20 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with a Single-Bundle Lateral Plasty (SBLP) technique with at least 20 years of follow-up. Group_C was the control group and included 20 patients with no history of ACL lesion. Lachman test has been performed at manual-maximum load on both sides, the involved and the contralateral and analyzed with the two different devices.

Results

The KiRA device in terms of side-to-side difference resulted not statistically different from the measurement of the KT-1000 arthrometer for the three study groups (n.s): Group_A: (4 ± 2 mm KiRA, 4 ± 2 mm KT1000), Group_B: (4 ± 2 mm KiRA, 4 ± 2 mm KT-1000), Group_C: (4 ± 2 mm KiRA, 4 ± 2 mm KT-1000), an excellent intra- (ICC = 0.88–0.89) and inter-examiner (ICC = 0.79) agreement was found for KiRA measurements.

Conclusion

The KiRA (I+, Italy) device offers a valid method to quantify the Lacham test.

Level of evidence

II.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anderson AF, Lipscomb AB (1989) Preoperative instrumented testing of anterior and posterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 17:387–392CrossRefPubMed Anderson AF, Lipscomb AB (1989) Preoperative instrumented testing of anterior and posterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 17:387–392CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Balasch H, Schiller M, Friebel H, Hoffmann F (1999) Evaluation of anterior knee joint instability with the Rolimeter. A test in comparison with manual assessment and measuring with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:204–208CrossRefPubMed Balasch H, Schiller M, Friebel H, Hoffmann F (1999) Evaluation of anterior knee joint instability with the Rolimeter. A test in comparison with manual assessment and measuring with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:204–208CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:267–288CrossRefPubMed Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:267–288CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Boyer P, Djian P, Christel P, Paoletti X, Degeorges R (2004) Reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer (Medmetric) for measuring anterior knee laxity: comparison with Telos in 147 knees. Rev Chir Orthopédique Réparatrice Appar Mot 90:757–764CrossRef Boyer P, Djian P, Christel P, Paoletti X, Degeorges R (2004) Reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer (Medmetric) for measuring anterior knee laxity: comparison with Telos in 147 knees. Rev Chir Orthopédique Réparatrice Appar Mot 90:757–764CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR (2009) The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 37:890–897CrossRefPubMed Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR (2009) The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 37:890–897CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SA (1981) Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic 86:127–137PubMed Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SA (1981) Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic 86:127–137PubMed
7.
go back to reference Collette M, Courville J, Forton M, Gagnière B (2012) Objective evaluation of anterior knee laxity; comparison of the KT-1000 and GNRB® arthrometers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2233–2238CrossRefPubMed Collette M, Courville J, Forton M, Gagnière B (2012) Objective evaluation of anterior knee laxity; comparison of the KT-1000 and GNRB® arthrometers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2233–2238CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726CrossRefPubMed Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference van Eck CF, Loopik M, van den Bekerom MP, Fu FH, Kerkhoffs GMMJ (2013) Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of instrumented knee laxity tests. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1989–1997CrossRefPubMed van Eck CF, Loopik M, van den Bekerom MP, Fu FH, Kerkhoffs GMMJ (2013) Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of instrumented knee laxity tests. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1989–1997CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Graham GP, Johnson S, Dent CM, Fairclough JA (1991) Comparison of clinical tests and the KT1000 in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Br J Sports Med 25:96–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Graham GP, Johnson S, Dent CM, Fairclough JA (1991) Comparison of clinical tests and the KT1000 in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Br J Sports Med 25:96–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Hanten WP, Pace MB (1987) Reliability of measuring anterior laxity of the knee joint using a knee ligament arthrometer. Phys Ther 67:357–359CrossRefPubMed Hanten WP, Pace MB (1987) Reliability of measuring anterior laxity of the knee joint using a knee ligament arthrometer. Phys Ther 67:357–359CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Highgenboten CL, Jackson A, Meske NB (1989) Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons. Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Sports Med 17:743–746CrossRefPubMed Highgenboten CL, Jackson A, Meske NB (1989) Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons. Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Sports Med 17:743–746CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Holt MD, Fairclough JA (1995) The KT-1000 arthrometer: is it accurate? The Knee 2:59CrossRef Holt MD, Fairclough JA (1995) The KT-1000 arthrometer: is it accurate? The Knee 2:59CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hrubesch R, Rangger C, Reichkendler M, Sailer RF, Gloetzer W, Eibl G (2000) Comparison of score evaluations and instrumented measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:850–856CrossRefPubMed Hrubesch R, Rangger C, Reichkendler M, Sailer RF, Gloetzer W, Eibl G (2000) Comparison of score evaluations and instrumented measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:850–856CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hyder N, Bollen SR, Sefton G, Swann AC (1997) Correlation between Arthrometric evaluation of knees using KT 1000 and Telos stress radiography and functional outcome following ACL reconstruction. Knee 4:121–124CrossRef Hyder N, Bollen SR, Sefton G, Swann AC (1997) Correlation between Arthrometric evaluation of knees using KT 1000 and Telos stress radiography and functional outcome following ACL reconstruction. Knee 4:121–124CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Johnson DS, Smith RB (2001) Outcome measurement in the ACL deficient knee—what’s the score? Knee 8:51–57CrossRefPubMed Johnson DS, Smith RB (2001) Outcome measurement in the ACL deficient knee—what’s the score? Knee 8:51–57CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Lopomo N, Signorelli C, Bonanzinga T, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Visani A, Zaffagnini S (2012) Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:713–717CrossRefPubMed Lopomo N, Signorelli C, Bonanzinga T, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Visani A, Zaffagnini S (2012) Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:713–717CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lopomo N, Zaffagnini S, Signorelli C, Bignozzi S, Giordano G, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Visani A (2012) An original clinical methodology for non-invasive assessment of pivot-shift test. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 15:1323–1328CrossRefPubMed Lopomo N, Zaffagnini S, Signorelli C, Bignozzi S, Giordano G, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Visani A (2012) An original clinical methodology for non-invasive assessment of pivot-shift test. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 15:1323–1328CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Malcom LL, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R (1985) The measurement of anterior knee laxity after ACL reconstructive surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 196:35–41 Malcom LL, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R (1985) The measurement of anterior knee laxity after ACL reconstructive surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 196:35–41
21.
go back to reference Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Iacono F, Neri MP, Loreti I, Petitto A (1998) Arthroscopic intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gracilis and semitendinosus tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:68–75CrossRefPubMed Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Iacono F, Neri MP, Loreti I, Petitto A (1998) Arthroscopic intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gracilis and semitendinosus tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:68–75CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Miura K, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Tsukada H, Toh S (2010) Intraoperative comparison of knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee and contralateral stable knee using navigation system. Arthroscopy 26:1203–1211CrossRefPubMed Miura K, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Tsukada H, Toh S (2010) Intraoperative comparison of knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee and contralateral stable knee using navigation system. Arthroscopy 26:1203–1211CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Temponi EF, de Carvalho Júnior LH, Sonnery-Cottet B, Chambat P (2015) Partial tearing of the anterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment. Rev Bras Ortop 50:9–15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Temponi EF, de Carvalho Júnior LH, Sonnery-Cottet B, Chambat P (2015) Partial tearing of the anterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment. Rev Bras Ortop 50:9–15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Wiertsema SH, van Hooff HJA, Migchelsen L. Steultjens A MPM (2008) Reliability of the KT1000 arthrometer and the Lachman test in patients with an ACL rupture. Knee 15:107–110CrossRefPubMed Wiertsema SH, van Hooff HJA, Migchelsen L. Steultjens A MPM (2008) Reliability of the KT1000 arthrometer and the Lachman test in patients with an ACL rupture. Knee 15:107–110CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Wroble RR, Van Ginkel LA, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Shaffer BL (1990) Repeatability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in a normal population. Am J Sports Med 18:396–399CrossRefPubMed Wroble RR, Van Ginkel LA, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Shaffer BL (1990) Repeatability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in a normal population. Am J Sports Med 18:396–399CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Zaffagnini S, Lopomo N, Signorelli C, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bonanzinga T, Grassi A, Raggi F, Visani A, Marcacci M (2014) Inertial sensors to quantify the pivot shift test in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Joints 2:124–129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zaffagnini S, Lopomo N, Signorelli C, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bonanzinga T, Grassi A, Raggi F, Visani A, Marcacci M (2014) Inertial sensors to quantify the pivot shift test in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Joints 2:124–129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Zaffagnini S, Lopomo N, Signorelli C, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bonanzinga T, Grassi A, Visani A, Marcacci M (2013) Innovative technology for knee laxity evaluation: clinical applicability and reliability of inertial sensors for quantitative analysis of the pivot-shift test. Clin Sports Med 32:61–70CrossRefPubMed Zaffagnini S, Lopomo N, Signorelli C, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bonanzinga T, Grassi A, Visani A, Marcacci M (2013) Innovative technology for knee laxity evaluation: clinical applicability and reliability of inertial sensors for quantitative analysis of the pivot-shift test. Clin Sports Med 32:61–70CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Zaffagnini S, Signorelli C, Grassi A, Yue H, Raggi F, Urrizola F, Bonanzinga T, Marcacci M (2016) Assessment of the pivot shift using inertial sensors. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9:160–163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zaffagnini S, Signorelli C, Grassi A, Yue H, Raggi F, Urrizola F, Bonanzinga T, Marcacci M (2016) Assessment of the pivot shift using inertial sensors. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9:160–163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Martelli S, Imakiire N, Lopomo N, Marcacci M (2006) New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(9):811–816CrossRefPubMed Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Martelli S, Imakiire N, Lopomo N, Marcacci M (2006) New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(9):811–816CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP (2006) Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(11):1060–1069CrossRefPubMed Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP (2006) Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(11):1060–1069CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Triaxial accelerometer can quantify the Lachman test similarly to standard arthrometers
Authors
Federico Raggi
Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina
Cecilia Signorelli
Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli
Luca Macchiarola
Ilaria Cucurnia
Matteo Romagnoli
Alberto Grassi
Stefano Zaffagnini
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5306-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2019 Go to the issue