Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2023

07-09-2022 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Trial of labor following cesarean in preterm deliveries: success rates and maternal and neonatal outcomes: a multicenter retrospective study

Authors: Reut Rotem, Ayala Hirsch, Moshe Barg, Pnina Mor, Rachel Michaelson-Cohen, Misgav Rottenstreich

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 3/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) among parturients attempting preterm trial of labor following a cesarean delivery (TOLAC) vs. term TOLAC.

Methods

A multicenter historic cohort study was conducted at two university-affiliated centers between August 2005 and March 2021. Parturients in their second delivery, attempting TOLAC after a single low segment transverse cesarean delivery were included. We retrospectively examined computerized medical records of all preterm (< 37 weeks) and term (37–42 weeks) births. Multifetal gestations and postterm deliveries (≥ 42 weeks) were excluded. A univariate analysis was conducted, followed by a multivariate analysis.

Results

4865 second deliveries following previous cesarean were identified: 212 (4.4%) preterm and 4653 (95.6%) term. Hypertensive disorders, diabetes and fertility treatments were significantly more prevalent in the preterm group. VBAC rate was significantly lower in preterm group (57.5 vs 79.7%., p < 0.01), including both spontaneous and vaginal-assisted deliveries. In multivariate analysis, preterm TOLAC was independently associated with TOLAC failure [adjusted odds ratio 2.24, [95% confidence interval 1.62–3.09]. Overall, maternal outcomes were favorable. Rates of uterine rupture, re-laparotomy and postpartum hemorrhage were comparable between groups. Neonatal outcomes were less favorable among the preterm group; however, preterm vs. term TOLAC was not associated with low 5 min Apgar score (aOR 1.76, 95% CI 0.92–3.40).

Conclusion

In our study, VBAC rates were lower in preterm compared to term deliveries. Maternal outcomes were comparable. Neonatal outcomes were less favorable in the preterm group, more likely due to prematurity than delivery mode.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ et al (2006) Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Am Coll Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1226–1232CrossRef Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ et al (2006) Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Am Coll Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1226–1232CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ et al (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351:25CrossRef Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ et al (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351:25CrossRef
20.
31.
go back to reference Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics (2019) Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician–gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 133(76):168–186 Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics (2019) Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician–gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 133(76):168–186
Metadata
Title
Trial of labor following cesarean in preterm deliveries: success rates and maternal and neonatal outcomes: a multicenter retrospective study
Authors
Reut Rotem
Ayala Hirsch
Moshe Barg
Pnina Mor
Rachel Michaelson-Cohen
Misgav Rottenstreich
Publication date
07-09-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06746-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2023 Go to the issue