Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Emergency Medicine 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Triage | Research article

Live video from bystanders’ smartphones to medical dispatchers in real emergencies

Authors: Gitte Linderoth, Freddy Lippert, Doris Østergaard, Annette K. Ersbøll, Christian S. Meyhoff, Fredrik Folke, Helle C. Christensen

Published in: BMC Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Medical dispatchers have limited information to assess the appropriate emergency response when citizens call the emergency number. We explored whether live video from bystanders’ smartphones changed emergency response and was beneficial for the dispatcher and caller.

Methods

From June 2019 to February 2020, all medical dispatchers could add live video to the emergency calls at Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services, Denmark. Live video was established with a text message link sent to the caller’s smartphone using GoodSAM®. To avoid delayed emergency response if the video transmission failed, the medical dispatcher had to determine the emergency response before adding live video to the call. We conducted a cohort study with a historical reference group. Emergency response and cause of the call were registered within the dispatch system. After each video, the dispatcher and caller were given a questionnaire about their experience.

Results

Adding live video succeeded in 838 emergencies (82.2% of attempted video transmissions) and follow-up was possible in 700 emergency calls. The dispatchers’ assessment of the patients’ condition changed in 51.1% of the calls (condition more critical in 12.9% and less critical in 38.2%), resulting in changed emergency response in 27.5% of the cases after receiving the video (OR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.30–1.91) compared to calls without video. Video was added more frequently in cases with sick children or unconscious patients compared with normal emergency calls. The dispatcher recognized other or different disease/trauma in 9.9% and found that patient care, such as the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, obstructed airway or position of the patient, improved in 28.4% of the emergencies. Only 111 callers returned the questionnaire, 97.3% of whom felt that live video should be implemented.

Conclusions

It is technically feasible to add live video to emergency calls. The medical dispatcher’s perception of the patient changed in about half of cases. The odds for changing emergency response were 58% higher when video was added to the call. However, use of live video is challenging with the existing dispatch protocols, and further implementation science is necessary.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dispatcher-Directed RT, CPR. An all-ages strategy to improve cardiac arrest survival. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e000942. Dispatcher-Directed RT, CPR. An all-ages strategy to improve cardiac arrest survival. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e000942.
3.
go back to reference Rajan S, Wissenberg M, Folke F, Hansen SM, Gerds TA, Kragholm K, et al. Association of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival According to ambulance response times after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2016;134:2095–104.CrossRef Rajan S, Wissenberg M, Folke F, Hansen SM, Gerds TA, Kragholm K, et al. Association of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival According to ambulance response times after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2016;134:2095–104.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ignatowicz A, Atherton H, Bernstein CJ, Bryce C, Court R, Sturt J, et al. Internet videoconferencing for patient–clinician consultations in long-term conditions: a review of reviews and applications in line with guidelines and recommendations. Digit Health. 2019;5:205520761984583. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619845831.CrossRef Ignatowicz A, Atherton H, Bernstein CJ, Bryce C, Court R, Sturt J, et al. Internet videoconferencing for patient–clinician consultations in long-term conditions: a review of reviews and applications in line with guidelines and recommendations. Digit Health. 2019;5:205520761984583. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​2055207619845831​.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ecker H, Wingen S, Hamacher S, Lindacher F, Böttiger BW, Wetsch WA. Evaluation of CPR quality via smartphone with a video livestream – a study in a metropolitan area. Prehospital Emergency Care 2020;0:1–11. Ecker H, Wingen S, Hamacher S, Lindacher F, Böttiger BW, Wetsch WA. Evaluation of CPR quality via smartphone with a video livestream – a study in a metropolitan area. Prehospital Emergency Care 2020;0:1–11.
27.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Shaw S, Wherton J, Vijayaraghavan S, Morris J, Bhattacharya S, et al. Real-world implementation of video outpatient consultations at macro, Meso, and micro levels: mixed-method study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:150.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Shaw S, Wherton J, Vijayaraghavan S, Morris J, Bhattacharya S, et al. Real-world implementation of video outpatient consultations at macro, Meso, and micro levels: mixed-method study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:150.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Papoutsi C. Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement. BMJ. 2019;365. Greenhalgh T, Papoutsi C. Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement. BMJ. 2019;365.
Metadata
Title
Live video from bystanders’ smartphones to medical dispatchers in real emergencies
Authors
Gitte Linderoth
Freddy Lippert
Doris Østergaard
Annette K. Ersbøll
Christian S. Meyhoff
Fredrik Folke
Helle C. Christensen
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-227X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00493-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Emergency Medicine 1/2021 Go to the issue