Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 4/2020

01-08-2020 | Triage | Original Article

Terror and disaster surgical care: training experienced trauma surgeons in decision making for a MASCAL situation with a tabletop simulation game

Authors: Gerhard Achatz, Benedikt Friemert, Heiko Trentzsch, Marzellus Hofmann, Markus Blätzinger, Simone Hinz-Bauer, Thomas Paffrath, Axel Franke, Dan Bieler, The Deployment, Disaster, Tactical Surgery Working Group of the German Trauma Society

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mass-casualty incidents, especially in connection with a terrorist attack, can quickly overwhelm the capacities of receiving hospitals. After a mass-casualty terrorist incident, patients often arrive at hospitals in an uncoordinated manner on account of the chaotic situation. Many patients leave the incident site and refer themselves to hospitals independently. Hospital decision makers must, therefore, be able to make quick decisions on diagnostic procedures and treatment for every individual patient and, at the same time, take into consideration available resources. They require decision criteria and aids to properly manage such scenarios.

Materials and methods

As part of the preparation of the Terror and Disaster Surgical Care (TDSC®) course, we developed a tabletop simulation game based on a comprehensive and structured review of the literature, the opinions of renowned experts, and the results of specialised conferences. This tabletop simulation game is played four times during each TDSC® course.

Results

Our analysis involved 264 of 465 course–participants from 2017 to 2019 and showed that the overall evaluation was very good and that participants grew more positive about the tabletop simulation game during the course. The tabletop simulation game received an average rating of 1.53 (1 = very good, 6 = insufficient). This rating remained consistently high over 19 courses.

Discussion

Hospital decision makers must respond to mass-casualty terrorist situations in a defined tactical and strategic approach. Rapid decisions must be made that take into account the special situation and available capacities and resources to maximise the number of survivors even though individual patients may have a poorer functional outcome. As part of the TDSC® course, the tabletop simulation game teaches high-level decision-making algorithms and prepares key hospital personnel for such situations.
Literature
1.
Friemert B, et al. Treatment strategies for mass casualty incidents and terrorist attacks in trauma and vascular surgery: presentation of a treatment concept. Chirurg. 2017;88(10):856–62.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Franke A, et al. Preclinical and intrahospital management of mass casualties and terrorist incidents. Chirurg. 2017;88(10):830–40.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Franke A, et al. The first aid and hospital treatment of gunshot and blast injuries. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(14):237–43.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
von Lubken F, et al. Update on gunshot wounds to extremities. Unfallchirurg. 2018;121(1):59–72.CrossRef
5.
de Ceballos JP, et al. 11 March 2004: the terrorist bomb explosions in Madrid, Spain–an analysis of the logistics, injuries sustained and clinical management of casualties treated at the closest hospital. Crit Care. 2005;9(1):104–11.PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
Franke A, et al. ATLS(R) and TDSC(R): how it fits together: a treatment concept for mass casualty and terrorist-related mass casualty situations, life-threatening and special scenarios. Unfallchirurg. 2019;5:1.
8.
Gauthier A, et al. Board games for health: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Games Health J. 2019;8(2):85–100.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Bratton SR, Rhine D, Jones TL. The efficacy of play therapy with children: a meta-analytic review of treatment outcomes. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2005;36:376–90.CrossRef
10.
Wilde J. The effects of the Let’s Get Rational board game on rational thinking, depression, and self-acceptance in adolescents. J Ration Cogn Ther. 1994;12:189–96.CrossRef
11.
Bochennek K, et al. More than mere games: a review of card and board games for medical education. Med Teach. 2007;29(9):941–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Burke B. Gamify: how gamification motivates people to do extraordinary things. Brookline, MA: Bibliomotion; 2014.
13.
Sailer MH, Mayr JU, Mandl SKH. How gamification motivates: an experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;69:371–80.CrossRef
14.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25(1):54–67.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Tepe A. Games as a teaching method in social science education. Curr Issu. 2017;10(4):241–9.
17.
Lennquist Montan K, et al. Development and evaluation of a new simulation model for interactive training of the medical response to major incidents and disasters. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014;40(4):429–43.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Sailer M, Hense J, Mandl H, Klevers M. Psychological perspectives on motivation through gamification. Inter Design Arch J. 2013;19:28–37.
19.
Werbach K, Hunter D. For the win: how game thinking can revolutionize your business 2012. Philadelphia: Wharton Digital Press; 2012.
20.
Burguillo JC. Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance. Comput Educ. 2010;55(2):566–75.CrossRef
21.
Sailer M. Die Wirkung von Gamification auf Motivation und Leistung: Empirische Studien im Kontext manueller Arbeitsprozesse. Wiesbaden: Springer; 2016.CrossRef
22.
Metadata
Title
Terror and disaster surgical care: training experienced trauma surgeons in decision making for a MASCAL situation with a tabletop simulation game
Authors
Gerhard Achatz
Benedikt Friemert
Heiko Trentzsch
Marzellus Hofmann
Markus Blätzinger
Simone Hinz-Bauer
Thomas Paffrath
Axel Franke
Dan Bieler
The Deployment, Disaster, Tactical Surgery Working Group of the German Trauma Society
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords
Triage
Care
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01441-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 4/2020 Go to the issue

Original Article

Clinical and radiological short-term outcomes of pubic symphysis diastasis treated with modified pedicle screw–rod fixation

Letter to the Editor

The psycho-emotional impact of COVID-19 on surgical staff working in emergency departments

Original Article

Specificities of terrorist attacks: organisation of the in-hospital patient-flow and treatment strategies

Original Article

Early cranioplasty associated with a lower rate of post-traumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury

Original Article

Evaluation of the Terror and Disaster Surgical Care course

Original Article

Optic nerve sheath diameter on facial CT: a tool to predict traumatic brain injury