Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Triage | Research

Development of a machine learning-based acuity score prediction model for virtual care settings

Authors: Justin N. Hall, Ron Galaev, Marina Gavrilov, Shawn Mondoux

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Healthcare is increasingly digitized, yet remote and automated machine learning (ML) triage prediction systems for virtual urgent care use remain limited. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) is the gold standard triage tool for in-person care in Canada. The current work describes the development of a ML-based acuity score modelled after the CTAS system.

Methods

The ML-based acuity score model was developed using 2,460,109 de-identified patient-level encounter records from three large healthcare organizations (Ontario, Canada). Data included presenting complaint, clinical modifiers, age, sex, and self-reported pain. 2,041,987 records were high acuity (CTAS 1–3) and 416,870 records were low acuity (CTAS 4–5). Five models were trained: decision tree, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, gradient boosting regressor, and neural net. The outcome variable of interest was the acuity score predicted by the ML system compared to the CTAS score assigned by the triage nurse.

Results

Gradient boosting regressor demonstrated the greatest prediction accuracy. This final model was tuned toward up triaging to minimize patient risk if adopted into the clinical context. The algorithm predicted the same score in 47.4% of cases, and the same or more acute score in 95.0% of cases.

Conclusions

The ML algorithm shows reasonable predictive accuracy and high predictive safety and was developed using the largest dataset of its kind to date. Future work will involve conducting a pilot study to validate and prospectively assess reliability of the ML algorithm to assign acuity scores remotely.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Hamm JM, Greene C, Sweeney M, et al. Telemedicine in the emergency department in the era of COVID-19: front-line experience from 2 institutions. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020;1(6):1630–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hamm JM, Greene C, Sweeney M, et al. Telemedicine in the emergency department in the era of COVID-19: front-line experience from 2 institutions. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020;1(6):1630–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Zachrison KS, Boggs KM, Hayden EM, Espinola JA, Carmago CA Jr. Understanding barriers to telemedicine implementation in rural emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(3):392–9.CrossRefPubMed Zachrison KS, Boggs KM, Hayden EM, Espinola JA, Carmago CA Jr. Understanding barriers to telemedicine implementation in rural emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(3):392–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Innes GD, Sivilotti MLA, Ovens H, McLelland K, Dukelow A, Kwok E, et al. Emergency overcrowding and access block: a smaller problem than we think. CJEM. 2019;21(2):177–85.CrossRefPubMed Innes GD, Sivilotti MLA, Ovens H, McLelland K, Dukelow A, Kwok E, et al. Emergency overcrowding and access block: a smaller problem than we think. CJEM. 2019;21(2):177–85.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Morley C, Unwin M, Peterson GM, Stankovoch J, Kinsman L. Emergency department crowding: a systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0203316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morley C, Unwin M, Peterson GM, Stankovoch J, Kinsman L. Emergency department crowding: a systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0203316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Kelen G, Peterson S, Pronovost P. In the name of patient safety, let’s burden the emergency department more. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67:737–40.CrossRefPubMed Kelen G, Peterson S, Pronovost P. In the name of patient safety, let’s burden the emergency department more. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67:737–40.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Bokhari F, Guo Y, Goyal H. Prolonged length of stay in the emergency department and increased risk of hospital mortality in patients with sepsis requiring ICU admission. Emerg Med J. 2019;36(2):82–7.PubMed Zhang Z, Bokhari F, Guo Y, Goyal H. Prolonged length of stay in the emergency department and increased risk of hospital mortality in patients with sepsis requiring ICU admission. Emerg Med J. 2019;36(2):82–7.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hall JN, Ackery AD, Dainty KN, Gill PS, Lim R, Masood S, et al. Designs, facilitators, barriers, and lessons learned during the implementation of emergency department led virtual urgent care programs in Ontario, Canada. Front Digit Health. 2022;4:946734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hall JN, Ackery AD, Dainty KN, Gill PS, Lim R, Masood S, et al. Designs, facilitators, barriers, and lessons learned during the implementation of emergency department led virtual urgent care programs in Ontario, Canada. Front Digit Health. 2022;4:946734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Goldthorpe J, Walsh T, Tickle M, Birch S, Hill H, Sanders C et al. (2018). Efficiency of remote clinical triage. An evaluation of a referral management and triage system for oral surgery referrals from primary care dentists: a mixed-methods study. NIHR Journals Library. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481958/ Goldthorpe J, Walsh T, Tickle M, Birch S, Hill H, Sanders C et al. (2018). Efficiency of remote clinical triage. An evaluation of a referral management and triage system for oral surgery referrals from primary care dentists: a mixed-methods study. NIHR Journals Library. https://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​books/​NBK481958/​
18.
go back to reference Beveridge R, Ducharme J, Janes L, Beaulieu S, Walter S. Reliability of the canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(2):155–9.CrossRefPubMed Beveridge R, Ducharme J, Janes L, Beaulieu S, Walter S. Reliability of the canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(2):155–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Manos D, Petrie DA, Beveridge RC, Walter S, Ducharme J. Inter-observer agreement using the canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale. CJEM. 2002;4(1):16–22.CrossRefPubMed Manos D, Petrie DA, Beveridge RC, Walter S, Ducharme J. Inter-observer agreement using the canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale. CJEM. 2002;4(1):16–22.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference McLeod S, McCarron J, Ahmed T, Grewal K, Mittman N, Scott S, et al. Interrater reliability, accuracy, and triage time pre- and post-implementation of a real-time electronic triage decision-support tool. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(4):524–31.CrossRefPubMed McLeod S, McCarron J, Ahmed T, Grewal K, Mittman N, Scott S, et al. Interrater reliability, accuracy, and triage time pre- and post-implementation of a real-time electronic triage decision-support tool. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(4):524–31.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kobeissi MM, Ruppert SD. Remove patient triage: shifting toward safer telehealth practice. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2022;34(3):444–51.CrossRef Kobeissi MM, Ruppert SD. Remove patient triage: shifting toward safer telehealth practice. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2022;34(3):444–51.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Grafstein E, Bullard MJ, Warren D, Unger B, the CTAS National Working Group. (2008). Revision of the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List Version 1.1. CJEM, 10(2):151–161. Grafstein E, Bullard MJ, Warren D, Unger B, the CTAS National Working Group. (2008). Revision of the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List Version 1.1. CJEM, 10(2):151–161.
32.
go back to reference Cotton R, Drew R, Douma M, O’Dochartaigh D, Keddie C, Muncaster K, et al. An analysis of individual and departmental triage variances to identify, quantify, and improve markers of triage nurse accuracy. Can J Emerg Nurs. 2020;44(2):19–20.CrossRef Cotton R, Drew R, Douma M, O’Dochartaigh D, Keddie C, Muncaster K, et al. An analysis of individual and departmental triage variances to identify, quantify, and improve markers of triage nurse accuracy. Can J Emerg Nurs. 2020;44(2):19–20.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Alshaibi S, AlBassri T, AlQeulfie S, Philip W, Alharthy N. Pediatric triage variations among nurses, pediatric and emergency residents using the canadian triage and acuity scale. BMC Emerg Med. 2021;21(1):146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alshaibi S, AlBassri T, AlQeulfie S, Philip W, Alharthy N. Pediatric triage variations among nurses, pediatric and emergency residents using the canadian triage and acuity scale. BMC Emerg Med. 2021;21(1):146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Mistry B, De Ramirez SS, Kelen G, Schmitz PSK, Balhara KS, Levin S, et al. Accuracy and reliability of emergency department triage using the emergency Severity Index: an international multicentre assessment. Ann Emerg Med. 71;5:581–7. Mistry B, De Ramirez SS, Kelen G, Schmitz PSK, Balhara KS, Levin S, et al. Accuracy and reliability of emergency department triage using the emergency Severity Index: an international multicentre assessment. Ann Emerg Med. 71;5:581–7.
35.
go back to reference Dallaire C, Poitras J, Aubin K, Lavoie A, Moore L. Emergency department triage: do experienced nurses agree on triage scores? J Emerg Med. 2012;42(6):736–40.CrossRefPubMed Dallaire C, Poitras J, Aubin K, Lavoie A, Moore L. Emergency department triage: do experienced nurses agree on triage scores? J Emerg Med. 2012;42(6):736–40.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Jorsboe H, Schroder M, Barylak MK, Anderson P. Inter-observer variation in the triage-process. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18(1):P16.CrossRefPubMedCentral Jorsboe H, Schroder M, Barylak MK, Anderson P. Inter-observer variation in the triage-process. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18(1):P16.CrossRefPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Gravel J, Grouin S, Manzano S, Arsenault M, Amre D. Interrater reliability between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(12):1262–7.CrossRefPubMed Gravel J, Grouin S, Manzano S, Arsenault M, Amre D. Interrater reliability between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(12):1262–7.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Dong SL, Bullard MJ, Meurer DP, Blitz S, Holroyd BR, Rowe BH. The effect of training on nurse agreement using an electronic triage system. CJEM. 2007;9(4):260–6.CrossRefPubMed Dong SL, Bullard MJ, Meurer DP, Blitz S, Holroyd BR, Rowe BH. The effect of training on nurse agreement using an electronic triage system. CJEM. 2007;9(4):260–6.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Kovacs M, Campbell S. L031: triage drift: variation in application of the canadian triage acuity scale between triage nurses compared to triage paramedics in response to overcrowding pressures in the emergency department. CJEM. 2020;22(S1):18.CrossRef Kovacs M, Campbell S. L031: triage drift: variation in application of the canadian triage acuity scale between triage nurses compared to triage paramedics in response to overcrowding pressures in the emergency department. CJEM. 2020;22(S1):18.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference McLeod S, Grewal K, Thompson C, Thabane L, Borgundvaag B, Ovens H, et al. Influence of electronic triage decision-support on hospital admission, left without being seen and time to physician initial assessment in the emergency department. CJEM. 2021;23(2):214–8.CrossRefPubMed McLeod S, Grewal K, Thompson C, Thabane L, Borgundvaag B, Ovens H, et al. Influence of electronic triage decision-support on hospital admission, left without being seen and time to physician initial assessment in the emergency department. CJEM. 2021;23(2):214–8.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Tahayori B, Chini-Foroush N, Akhlaghi H. Advanced natural language processing technique to predict patient disposition based on emergency triage notes. Emerg Med Australas. 2020;33(3):480–4.CrossRef Tahayori B, Chini-Foroush N, Akhlaghi H. Advanced natural language processing technique to predict patient disposition based on emergency triage notes. Emerg Med Australas. 2020;33(3):480–4.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Rendell K, Koprinska I, Kyme A, Ebker-White AA, Dinh MM. The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START2) using machine learning techniques to support disposition decision-making. Emerg Med Australas. 2019;31(3):429–35.CrossRefPubMed Rendell K, Koprinska I, Kyme A, Ebker-White AA, Dinh MM. The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START2) using machine learning techniques to support disposition decision-making. Emerg Med Australas. 2019;31(3):429–35.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development of a machine learning-based acuity score prediction model for virtual care settings
Authors
Justin N. Hall
Ron Galaev
Marina Gavrilov
Shawn Mondoux
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Triage
Care
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02307-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2023 Go to the issue