Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Original Article

Trends in utilization and perioperative outcomes in live donor nephrectomies: a multi-surgical discipline analysis

Authors: Olamide O. Omidele, Natan Davoudzadeh, Milan Shah, Nir Tomer, Michael Palese

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

We aim to analyze the trends in donor nephrectomy (DN) across three surgical disciplines—urology, general surgery, and transplant surgery, specifically to analyze the surgical techniques and perioperative outcomes.

Materials and methods

We reviewed all live DN reported in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database of New York State (NYS) from 1995 to 2015. Surgeons were grouped in their respective disciplines using their state license number and the American Medical Association masterfile. We analyzed the volume of DN performed by each group along with how the surgical approach is, such as open, laparoscopic or robotic. Perioperative outcomes assessed were length of stay (LOS), 30-day and 90-day readmission rates, and complication rates

Results

A total of 6803 DN were performed with urologists, transplant surgeons and general surgeons accounting for 42%, 29%, and 29% of them, respectively. Urologists performed a higher case volume with a mean surgical volume of 17.4 ± 6.5 per year (p < 0.0001). During the study period, case volumes for urologists and transplant surgeons trended upward, while those for general surgeons trended downward. Urologists also utilized a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) such as laparoscopy or robotic approach in a higher percentage of their cases (p < 0.0001). Regarding perioperative outcomes, general surgeons had a higher mean LOS (p < 0.0001), while transplant surgeons had higher rates of 30-day and 90-day readmission rates (p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates following DN among the groups.

Conclusion

Urologists remain vital members of the renal transplantation team as they perform a majority of DN in NYS and are increasingly achieving them via an MIS approach when compared to their general and transplant surgery counterparts. Perioperative outcomes are similar amongst all disciplines; however, general surgeons have higher mean LOS, while transplant surgeons have higher readmission rates.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Novick AC, Flechner S (1988) The integration of clinical renal transplantation into urology residency training. J Urol 139(3):568–569CrossRef Novick AC, Flechner S (1988) The integration of clinical renal transplantation into urology residency training. J Urol 139(3):568–569CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Navarrete RV (1998) Re: the current level of involvement of urological trainees and faculty in clinical kidney transplantation in the United States and Canada. J Urol 159(2):513CrossRef Navarrete RV (1998) Re: the current level of involvement of urological trainees and faculty in clinical kidney transplantation in the United States and Canada. J Urol 159(2):513CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mcgregor T, Bjazevic J, Patel P, Koulack J (2016) Changing of the guard? A glance at the surgical representation in the Canadian renal transplantation community. Can Urol Assoc J 10(1–2):E7–E11CrossRef Mcgregor T, Bjazevic J, Patel P, Koulack J (2016) Changing of the guard? A glance at the surgical representation in the Canadian renal transplantation community. Can Urol Assoc J 10(1–2):E7–E11CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yuan H, Liu L, Zheng S et al (2013) The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis. Transplant Proc 45(1):65–76CrossRef Yuan H, Liu L, Zheng S et al (2013) The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis. Transplant Proc 45(1):65–76CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Li J, Wang G, Zhu T, Sun L, Xu M, Rong R (2008) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparative study with conventional open donor nephrectomy in a single Chinese center. Transplant Proc 40(10):3362–3364CrossRef Li J, Wang G, Zhu T, Sun L, Xu M, Rong R (2008) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparative study with conventional open donor nephrectomy in a single Chinese center. Transplant Proc 40(10):3362–3364CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Leventhal JR, Deeik RK, Joehl RJ et al (2000) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy—is it safe? Transplantation 70(4):602–606CrossRef Leventhal JR, Deeik RK, Joehl RJ et al (2000) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy—is it safe? Transplantation 70(4):602–606CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mansour AM, El-Nahas AR, Ali-El-Dein B et al (2017) Enhanced recovery open vs laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Urology 110:98–103CrossRef Mansour AM, El-Nahas AR, Ali-El-Dein B et al (2017) Enhanced recovery open vs laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Urology 110:98–103CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yang A, Barman N, Chin E et al (2018) Robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of perioperative course and postoperative outcome after 1 year. J Robot Surg 12(2):343–350CrossRef Yang A, Barman N, Chin E et al (2018) Robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of perioperative course and postoperative outcome after 1 year. J Robot Surg 12(2):343–350CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cohen AJ, Williams DS, Bohorquez H et al (2015) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: decreasing length of stay. Ochsner J 15(1):19–24PubMedPubMedCentral Cohen AJ, Williams DS, Bohorquez H et al (2015) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: decreasing length of stay. Ochsner J 15(1):19–24PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Laplace B, Ladriere M, Claudon M, Eschwege P, Kessler M, Hubert J (2014) Robotic assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: preoperative assessment and results of 100 cases. Prog Urol 24(5):288–293CrossRef Laplace B, Ladriere M, Claudon M, Eschwege P, Kessler M, Hubert J (2014) Robotic assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: preoperative assessment and results of 100 cases. Prog Urol 24(5):288–293CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chung E, Grant AB, Hibberd AD, Sprott P (2007) Why potential live renal donors prefer laparoscopic nephrectomy: a survey of live donor attitudes. BJU Int 100(6):1344–1346CrossRef Chung E, Grant AB, Hibberd AD, Sprott P (2007) Why potential live renal donors prefer laparoscopic nephrectomy: a survey of live donor attitudes. BJU Int 100(6):1344–1346CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Choi SW, Kim KS, Kim S et al (2014) Hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a matched-cohort comparison over 10 yr at a single institute. Clin Transplant 28(11):1287–1293CrossRef Choi SW, Kim KS, Kim S et al (2014) Hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a matched-cohort comparison over 10 yr at a single institute. Clin Transplant 28(11):1287–1293CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Friedersdorff F, Werthemann P, Cash H et al (2013) Outcomes after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: comparison of two laparoscopic surgeons with different levels of expertise. BJU Int 111(1):95–100CrossRef Friedersdorff F, Werthemann P, Cash H et al (2013) Outcomes after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: comparison of two laparoscopic surgeons with different levels of expertise. BJU Int 111(1):95–100CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bhattu AS, Ganpule A, Sabnis RB, Murali V, Mishra S, Desai M (2015) Robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized comparative study. J Endourol 29(12):1334–1340CrossRef Bhattu AS, Ganpule A, Sabnis RB, Murali V, Mishra S, Desai M (2015) Robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized comparative study. J Endourol 29(12):1334–1340CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tsoulfas G, Agorastou P, Ko DS et al (2017) Laparoscopic vs open donor nephrectomy: lessons learnt from single academic center experience. World J Nephrol 6(1):45–52CrossRef Tsoulfas G, Agorastou P, Ko DS et al (2017) Laparoscopic vs open donor nephrectomy: lessons learnt from single academic center experience. World J Nephrol 6(1):45–52CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trends in utilization and perioperative outcomes in live donor nephrectomies: a multi-surgical discipline analysis
Authors
Olamide O. Omidele
Natan Davoudzadeh
Milan Shah
Nir Tomer
Michael Palese
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2559-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

World Journal of Urology 10/2019 Go to the issue