Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Article

Treatment results for lumbar epidural lipomatosis: Does fat matter?

Authors: Simon Heinrich Bayerl, Malte Dinkelbach, Petra Heiden, Vincent Prinz, Tobias Finger, Peter Vajkoczy

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The lumbar epidural lipomatosis (LEL) is a rare disease that can cause sciatic pain syndrome or neurological deficits comparable to symptoms caused by a classical spinal canal stenosis. In severe cases surgical decompression was conducted. However, the outcome after decompressive surgery has only been investigated in small case series. In this study we compared the outcome of LEL patients after microsurgery with the outcome of patients with classical spinal stenosis (CSS).

Methods

Patients with LEL (n = 38) and patients with CSS (n = 51), who received microsurgical decompression, were followed in a prospective observational study for 3 years. The clinical results including the Oswestry Disability Index, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS), Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Short Form-36 Score and the Walking Distance were analysed and compared between both groups.

Results

Patients with LEL improved significantly after microsurgical decompression in a 3-year follow-up concerning back pain, leg pain and pain-associated disability equal to patients with CSS (NRSback_LEL_preop. = 6.4; NRSback_CSS_preop. = 6.3; NRSback_LEL_3-years = 3.2; NRSback_CSS_3-years = 3.6; NRSleg_LEL_preop. = 6.3; NRSleg_CSS_preop. = 6.5; NRSleg_LEL_3-years = 2.5; NRSleg_CSS_3-years = 2.9; ODILEL_preop. = 52.7; ODICSS_preop = 51.8; ODILEL_3-years = 32.3; ODICSS_3-years = 27.6). The microsurgical decompression had a positive effect on the health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction was high in both groups (LEL group—71%, CSS group—69%).

Conclusions

LEL can influence the quality of life dramatically and cause a high degree of disability. A surgical decompression is a safe and effective procedure with a good clinical outcome comparable to the results in patients with an osteoligamentous spinal stenosis. Therefore, microsurgical decompression can be recommended in patients with LEL if conservative treatment fails.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
9.
go back to reference Lee M, Lekias J, Gubbay SS, Hurst PE (1975) Spinal cord compression by extradural fat after renal transplantation. Med J Aust 1:201–203 Lee M, Lekias J, Gubbay SS, Hurst PE (1975) Spinal cord compression by extradural fat after renal transplantation. Med J Aust 1:201–203
10.
go back to reference Badami JP, Hinck VC (1982) Symptomatic deposition of epidural fat in a morbidly obese woman. Am J Neuroradiol 3:664–665PubMed Badami JP, Hinck VC (1982) Symptomatic deposition of epidural fat in a morbidly obese woman. Am J Neuroradiol 3:664–665PubMed
18.
go back to reference Fogel GR, Cunningham PY, Esses SI (2005) Spinal epidural lipomatosis: case reports, literature review and meta-analysis. Spine J 5:202–211CrossRef Fogel GR, Cunningham PY, Esses SI (2005) Spinal epidural lipomatosis: case reports, literature review and meta-analysis. Spine J 5:202–211CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Treatment results for lumbar epidural lipomatosis: Does fat matter?
Authors
Simon Heinrich Bayerl
Malte Dinkelbach
Petra Heiden
Vincent Prinz
Tobias Finger
Peter Vajkoczy
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5771-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

European Spine Journal 1/2019 Go to the issue