Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2014

01-07-2014 | Original Article

Treatment options for vertebral fractures an overview of different philosophies and techniques for vertebral augmentation

Authors: R. Bornemann, E. M. W. Koch, M. Wollny, R. Pflugmacher

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Special Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

For more than 30 years, minimally invasive surgical procedures have been available to stabilize the fractured vertebrae by cement augmentation leading to significant pain relief, a distinct improvement in quality of life and decreased mortality for patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. This overview article is designed to provide information on the wide range of augmentation methods previously tested and clinically applied in surgery in an attempt to compile the clinically relevant information on safety and efficacy in the published literature.

Method

Based on an extensive literature review on the topic of “vertebral fractures—surgical augmentation techniques” we summarized the results of published clinical trials and experimental testing which address clinically relevant questions. The selection of the publications in reference books and scientific journals covers the time period from the end of the 1970s until the present.

Results

The final selection of more than 50 publications with, in the opinion of the authors, clinically relevant data led to the following results, which can be of significance for clinical application. The prerequisites for the success of all augmentation methods include the earliest possible surgical intervention, optimal technical equipment and an experienced, interdisciplinary team, as well as thorough consideration of the situation of the individual patient. The selection of the material for vertebral augmentation depends on the surgical method. The material of choice remains polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and the best record of efficacy and safety is displayed by radiofrequency kyphoplasty with ultrahigh-viscosity cement. Regarding clinical efficacy and safety, there are many convincing documentations showing superiority of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in comparison with conservative therapeutic regimens. Initial results of clinical studies with additional implants indicate a trend toward further improvement in clinical success and suggest possible broader clinical possibilities of application.

Conclusion

Modern, minimally invasive augmentation techniques represent a real alternative to conservative treatment of patients with vertebral fractures. Further technical and clinical development in this area should aim at optimizing procedural safety while continuing to achieve comparably good results to current methods. Minimizing damage to the remaining trabecular structures as well as to adjacent vertebral disks and vertebrae should be paramount of importance.

Summary

Options for the treatment of vertebral fractures: Reductions in bone density and pathological changes in bone structure are associated with an elevated risk of fractures, which can lead to decisive functional impairment, pain, and a host of further comorbidities. Vertebral augmentation can be considered as an alternative conservative treatment, in order to achieve immediate and lasting pain relief as well as improvement in functional impairment. To achieve greater safety, instrumentation for transpedicular access and incorporation of radiopacifiers in PMMA for vertebroplasty were developed in mid-eighties. Balloon kyphoplasty was introduced in the end nineties, and results of prospective, randomized clinical studies have confirmed the safety and efficacy; the destruction of the remaining native spongiosa structures during balloon expansion is viewed as a disadvantage of this method. The two step method of cavity creation followed by cement delivery known as kyphoplasty has been further refined and developed by and varied by technology/procedural developments. This includes most the radiofrequency kyphoplasty (DFINE Inc., San Jose, CA, USA), in which ultrahigh-viscosity cement is delivered at a controlled delivery rate, following producing a bone sparing size and side specific cavity which minimizes loss of spongiosa, allowing for mechanical stability upon interdigitation of cement into that remaining trabecular bone. This combination has been shown to preserve vertebral structures and reduces the risk of leakages. Finally, systems have been available in which cement augmentation of implants to enhance mechanical stability of the implants or the overall fracture is constructed by load sharing.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Felsenberg D, Silman AJ, Lunt M et al (2002) For the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) Group. Incidence of vertebral fracture in Europe. J Bone Miner 17:716–724CrossRef Felsenberg D, Silman AJ, Lunt M et al (2002) For the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) Group. Incidence of vertebral fracture in Europe. J Bone Miner 17:716–724CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L et al (1999) Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 159:1215–1220PubMedCrossRef Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L et al (1999) Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 159:1215–1220PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Denisson E, Cooper C (2002) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Horm Res 54 (Suppl)1:58–63 Denisson E, Cooper C (2002) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Horm Res 54 (Suppl)1:58–63
4.
go back to reference Bartel R (2008) Osteoporose—Prävention, Diagnostik, Therapie 4. Auflage, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart Bartel R (2008) Osteoporose—Prävention, Diagnostik, Therapie 4. Auflage, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
5.
go back to reference Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsmann PB (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15(4):721–739PubMedCrossRef Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsmann PB (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15(4):721–739PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Habermann B, Kurth AA (2012) Die Problematik einer Fraktur unter osteoporotischen Stoffwechselbedingungen—in Orthopädische Osteologie (Andreas A Kurth und Mitarbeiter) UNI-MED Verlag AG s, pp 16–25 Habermann B, Kurth AA (2012) Die Problematik einer Fraktur unter osteoporotischen Stoffwechselbedingungen—in Orthopädische Osteologie (Andreas A Kurth und Mitarbeiter) UNI-MED Verlag AG s, pp 16–25
7.
go back to reference Resch H, Muschitz C (2008) Drug therapy in osteoporosis in balloon kyphoplasty. In: Becker S, Ogon M (eds) Balloon kyphoplasty. Springer, Wien, pp 49–72 Resch H, Muschitz C (2008) Drug therapy in osteoporosis in balloon kyphoplasty. In: Becker S, Ogon M (eds) Balloon kyphoplasty. Springer, Wien, pp 49–72
8.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006) Balloon kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures JPG 166: 2006 Publications.nice.org.uk National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006) Balloon kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures JPG 166: 2006 Publications.nice.org.uk
9.
go back to reference Kaufman TJ, Jensen ME, Schweikert PA et al (2001) Age of fracture and clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Am J Neuroradiol 22(10):1860–1863 Kaufman TJ, Jensen ME, Schweikert PA et al (2001) Age of fracture and clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Am J Neuroradiol 22(10):1860–1863
10.
go back to reference Baraud G, Steffe T, Heini P (2004) Injection biomechanics of bone cements used in vertebroplasty. Biomed Mater Eng 14:487–504 Baraud G, Steffe T, Heini P (2004) Injection biomechanics of bone cements used in vertebroplasty. Biomed Mater Eng 14:487–504
11.
go back to reference Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P et al (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. Radiol Clin North Am 36(3):533–546PubMedCrossRef Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P et al (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. Radiol Clin North Am 36(3):533–546PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Scoville WB, Palmer AH, Samra K, Chon G (1967) The use of acrylic plastic for vertebral replacement or fixation in metastatic disease. J Neurosurg 27:274–279PubMedCrossRef Scoville WB, Palmer AH, Samra K, Chon G (1967) The use of acrylic plastic for vertebral replacement or fixation in metastatic disease. J Neurosurg 27:274–279PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kustuik JP, Errico TJ, Gleason TF (1986) Techniques of internal fixation for degenarative conditions of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 203:219–231 Kustuik JP, Errico TJ, Gleason TF (1986) Techniques of internal fixation for degenarative conditions of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 203:219–231
14.
go back to reference Cibulski GR (1989) Methodes of surgical stabilization for metastatic disease of the spine. Neurosurgery 25:240–252CrossRef Cibulski GR (1989) Methodes of surgical stabilization for metastatic disease of the spine. Neurosurgery 25:240–252CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Galipert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, La Gars D (1987) Preliminary note of the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 33:166–168 Galipert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, La Gars D (1987) Preliminary note of the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 33:166–168
16.
go back to reference Déramond H, Daasson R, Galibert P (1989) Percutaneous vertebroplasty with acrylic cement in the treatment of aggressive spinal angiomas. Rachis 177:467–472 Déramond H, Daasson R, Galibert P (1989) Percutaneous vertebroplasty with acrylic cement in the treatment of aggressive spinal angiomas. Rachis 177:467–472
17.
go back to reference Lapras C, Mottolese C, Deruty R et al (1989) Percutaneous injection of methyl-metacrylate in osteoporosis and severe vertebral osteolysis (Galibert's technic). Ann Chir 43(5):371–376PubMed Lapras C, Mottolese C, Deruty R et al (1989) Percutaneous injection of methyl-metacrylate in osteoporosis and severe vertebral osteolysis (Galibert's technic). Ann Chir 43(5):371–376PubMed
18.
go back to reference Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM et al (1997) Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate in vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 18(10):1897–1904PubMed Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM et al (1997) Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate in vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 18(10):1897–1904PubMed
19.
go back to reference Cotton A, Dewatre F, Cortet B et al (1996) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma. Radiology 2000(2):525–535 Cotton A, Dewatre F, Cortet B et al (1996) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma. Radiology 2000(2):525–535
20.
go back to reference Watts NB, Harris ST, Genant HK (2001) Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporos Int 12:429–437PubMedCrossRef Watts NB, Harris ST, Genant HK (2001) Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporos Int 12:429–437PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Heini PF, Walchli B, Berlemann U (2000) Percutaneus transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: operative technique and early results. Eur Spine J 9:445–450PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Heini PF, Walchli B, Berlemann U (2000) Percutaneus transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: operative technique and early results. Eur Spine J 9:445–450PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Guyot LL, Balahadra R, Fessler RD (2005) Mechanisms of pain relief following vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. In: Resnick DR, Garfin SR (eds) Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty. Thieme Medical Publishers Inc. New York, Stuttgart, pp 10–13 Guyot LL, Balahadra R, Fessler RD (2005) Mechanisms of pain relief following vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. In: Resnick DR, Garfin SR (eds) Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty. Thieme Medical Publishers Inc. New York, Stuttgart, pp 10–13
23.
go back to reference Venmans A, Klazen CA, Lohle PN (2010) Percutaneous vertebroplasty and pulmonary cement embolism: results from Vertos II. Am J Neuroradiol 31:1451–1453PubMedCrossRef Venmans A, Klazen CA, Lohle PN (2010) Percutaneous vertebroplasty and pulmonary cement embolism: results from Vertos II. Am J Neuroradiol 31:1451–1453PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bohner M, Gasser B, Baroud G, Heini P (2003) Theoretical and experimental model to describe the injection of a polymethylmethacrylate cement into a porous structure. Biomaterials 24(16):2721–2730PubMedCrossRef Bohner M, Gasser B, Baroud G, Heini P (2003) Theoretical and experimental model to describe the injection of a polymethylmethacrylate cement into a porous structure. Biomaterials 24(16):2721–2730PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR et al (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 361(6):557–568PubMedCrossRef Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR et al (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 361(6):557–568PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
go back to reference Baerlocher MO, Munk PL, Liu DM et al (2010) Clinical utility of vertebroplasty. Need for better evidence. Radiology 255(3):669–674PubMedCrossRef Baerlocher MO, Munk PL, Liu DM et al (2010) Clinical utility of vertebroplasty. Need for better evidence. Radiology 255(3):669–674PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Brook AL, Miller TS, Nolan T et al (2009) Vertebral augmentation with a flexible curved needle. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20(4):553–555CrossRef Brook AL, Miller TS, Nolan T et al (2009) Vertebral augmentation with a flexible curved needle. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20(4):553–555CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Becker S (2008) The technique of balloon kyphoplasty. In: Becker S, Ogon M (eds) Balloon kyphoplasty. Springer, Wien, pp 49–72CrossRef Becker S (2008) The technique of balloon kyphoplasty. In: Becker S, Ogon M (eds) Balloon kyphoplasty. Springer, Wien, pp 49–72CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ledlie JT, Renfro M (2003) Balloon kyphoplasty: 1-year outcomes in vertebral body height of vertebral compression fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18:24–29CrossRef Ledlie JT, Renfro M (2003) Balloon kyphoplasty: 1-year outcomes in vertebral body height of vertebral compression fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18:24–29CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sandhu FA, Thompson BG, Perez-Cruet MJ et al (2005) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: an overview. In: Resnick DK, Garfin SG (eds) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Thieme medical Publishers, Inc, New York, pp 1–9 Sandhu FA, Thompson BG, Perez-Cruet MJ et al (2005) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: an overview. In: Resnick DK, Garfin SG (eds) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Thieme medical Publishers, Inc, New York, pp 1–9
32.
go back to reference Lieberman ICH, Dudeny S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G (2001) Initial outcome and efficacy of kyphoplasty in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 26:1631–1638PubMedCrossRef Lieberman ICH, Dudeny S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G (2001) Initial outcome and efficacy of kyphoplasty in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 26:1631–1638PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Wong WH, Reiley MA, Garfin SR (2000) Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty. J Women′s Imaging 2:117–124 Wong WH, Reiley MA, Garfin SR (2000) Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty. J Women′s Imaging 2:117–124
34.
go back to reference Gaitanis IN, Hadjipavlou AG, Katonis P et al (2005) Balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of pathological vertebral compressive fractures. Eur Spine J 14(3):250–260PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Gaitanis IN, Hadjipavlou AG, Katonis P et al (2005) Balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of pathological vertebral compressive fractures. Eur Spine J 14(3):250–260PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Garfin SR, Buckley RA, Ledlie J (2006) Balloon kyphoplasty for symptomatic vertebral body compression fractures results in rapid, significant, and sustained improvements in back pain, function, and quality of life for elderly patients. Spine 31(19):2213–2220PubMedCrossRef Garfin SR, Buckley RA, Ledlie J (2006) Balloon kyphoplasty for symptomatic vertebral body compression fractures results in rapid, significant, and sustained improvements in back pain, function, and quality of life for elderly patients. Spine 31(19):2213–2220PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Pflugmacher R, Kandziora F, Schroeder R et al (2005) Vertebroplastie und Kyphoplastie bei osteoporotischen Wirbelkörperfrakturen—Eine prospektive Analyse der Einjahresergebnisse. Fortschr Röntgenstr 177:1670–1676CrossRef Pflugmacher R, Kandziora F, Schroeder R et al (2005) Vertebroplastie und Kyphoplastie bei osteoporotischen Wirbelkörperfrakturen—Eine prospektive Analyse der Einjahresergebnisse. Fortschr Röntgenstr 177:1670–1676CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Taylor RS, Taylor RJ, Fritzell P (2006) Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: a comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety. Spine 1, 31 (23):2747–2755 Taylor RS, Taylor RJ, Fritzell P (2006) Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: a comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety. Spine 1, 31 (23):2747–2755
38.
go back to reference Pflugmacher R, Bornemann R, Koch EMW et al (2012) Vergleichende Befunderhebungen der Ballon-Kyphoplastie bei Patienten mit Wirbelkörper-Frakturen infolge von Osteoporose, Metastasen und Myelomen. Z Orthop u Unfallchirurgie 150:198–204 Pflugmacher R, Bornemann R, Koch EMW et al (2012) Vergleichende Befunderhebungen der Ballon-Kyphoplastie bei Patienten mit Wirbelkörper-Frakturen infolge von Osteoporose, Metastasen und Myelomen. Z Orthop u Unfallchirurgie 150:198–204
39.
go back to reference Bouza C, Lopez T, Agro A et al (2006) Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. Eur Spine J 15(7):1050–1067PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bouza C, Lopez T, Agro A et al (2006) Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. Eur Spine J 15(7):1050–1067PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Wardlaw D, Cummings STR, Van Meirhaeghe J et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE). Lancet 373:1016–1024PubMedCrossRef Wardlaw D, Cummings STR, Van Meirhaeghe J et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE). Lancet 373:1016–1024PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Oberkircher L, Krüger A, Bliemel C et al (2011) Zementinterdigitation und Knochenzement-Interface unterschiedlicher Wirbelkörperaugmentationsverfahren. Osteoporose Rheuma aktuell 1:12–14 Oberkircher L, Krüger A, Bliemel C et al (2011) Zementinterdigitation und Knochenzement-Interface unterschiedlicher Wirbelkörperaugmentationsverfahren. Osteoporose Rheuma aktuell 1:12–14
42.
go back to reference Becker S, Dabirrhamani D, Hogg M et al (2011) Disadvantages of balloon kyphoplasty with PMMA—A clinical and biomechanical statement. J Miner Stoffwechs 18(1):9–12 Becker S, Dabirrhamani D, Hogg M et al (2011) Disadvantages of balloon kyphoplasty with PMMA—A clinical and biomechanical statement. J Miner Stoffwechs 18(1):9–12
43.
go back to reference Dalton B, Kohm A, Miller L et al (2012) Radiofrequency-targeted vertebral augmentation versus traditional balloon kyphoplasty: radiographic and morphologic outcomes of an ex vivo biomechanical pilot study. Clin Interv Aging 7:525–531PubMedCentralPubMed Dalton B, Kohm A, Miller L et al (2012) Radiofrequency-targeted vertebral augmentation versus traditional balloon kyphoplasty: radiographic and morphologic outcomes of an ex vivo biomechanical pilot study. Clin Interv Aging 7:525–531PubMedCentralPubMed
44.
go back to reference Elgeti F, Marnitz T, Kröncke TJ et al (2010) Radiofrequenzkyphoplastie (RFK)—Kyphoplastie mit ultrahochviskösem Zement. Fortsch Röntgenstr 182:1–3CrossRef Elgeti F, Marnitz T, Kröncke TJ et al (2010) Radiofrequenzkyphoplastie (RFK)—Kyphoplastie mit ultrahochviskösem Zement. Fortsch Röntgenstr 182:1–3CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Bornemann R, Hanna M, Kabir K et al (2012) Continuing conservative care versus crossover to radiofrequency kyphoplasty: a comparative effectiveness study on the treatment of vertebral body fractures. Eur Spine J 21:930–936PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bornemann R, Hanna M, Kabir K et al (2012) Continuing conservative care versus crossover to radiofrequency kyphoplasty: a comparative effectiveness study on the treatment of vertebral body fractures. Eur Spine J 21:930–936PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Pflugmacher R, Bornemann R, Koch EM et al (2012) Comparison of clinical and radiological data in the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using radiofrequency kyphoplasty or balloon kyphoplasty. Z Orthop Unfallchir 150:56–61 Pflugmacher R, Bornemann R, Koch EM et al (2012) Comparison of clinical and radiological data in the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using radiofrequency kyphoplasty or balloon kyphoplasty. Z Orthop Unfallchir 150:56–61
47.
go back to reference Mattyasovszky S, Kafchitsas K, Kurth AA Osteoporotische Wirbelkörperfrakturen—gezielte, kontrollierte Behandlung mit der Radiofrequenz (RF)-Kyphoplastie. In: Kurth AA (ed) Orthopädische Osteologie. Uni-Med Verlag Bremen1. Aufl., pp 85–89 Mattyasovszky S, Kafchitsas K, Kurth AA Osteoporotische Wirbelkörperfrakturen—gezielte, kontrollierte Behandlung mit der Radiofrequenz (RF)-Kyphoplastie. In: Kurth AA (ed) Orthopädische Osteologie. Uni-Med Verlag Bremen1. Aufl., pp 85–89
48.
go back to reference Licht AW, Kramer W (2012) Radiofrequenz-Kyphoplastie (DFine) versus konventionelle Ballon-Kyphoplastie (Medtronic)—Eine prospektive Studie zur Effektivität und Sicherheit Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Berlin Licht AW, Kramer W (2012) Radiofrequenz-Kyphoplastie (DFine) versus konventionelle Ballon-Kyphoplastie (Medtronic)—Eine prospektive Studie zur Effektivität und Sicherheit Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Berlin
49.
go back to reference Mostertz R (2012) Behandlung einer 3.1 Fraktur des LWK 1 mit lateraler Hinterwandbeteiligung mittels Radiofrequenz-(RF-)Kyphoplastie—Osteoporose und Rheuma aktuell Sonderheft. pp 82–84 Mostertz R (2012) Behandlung einer 3.1 Fraktur des LWK 1 mit lateraler Hinterwandbeteiligung mittels Radiofrequenz-(RF-)Kyphoplastie—Osteoporose und Rheuma aktuell Sonderheft. pp 82–84
50.
go back to reference Drahten C (2012) Radiofrequenz-Kyphoplastie bei Pinzer-Fraktur (LWK 3) eines multimorbiden Patienten Eine Fall-Beschreibung—Osteoporose und Rheuma aktuell Sonderheft. pp 90–94 Drahten C (2012) Radiofrequenz-Kyphoplastie bei Pinzer-Fraktur (LWK 3) eines multimorbiden Patienten Eine Fall-Beschreibung—Osteoporose und Rheuma aktuell Sonderheft. pp 90–94
52.
go back to reference Fürderer S, Anders M, Schwindling B et al (2002) Vertebral body stenting. A method for repositioning and augmenting vertebral compression fractures. Orthopäde 31(4):356–361PubMedCrossRef Fürderer S, Anders M, Schwindling B et al (2002) Vertebral body stenting. A method for repositioning and augmenting vertebral compression fractures. Orthopäde 31(4):356–361PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Rotter R, Martin H, Fuerderer S et al (2010) Vertebral body stenting: a new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty. Eur Spine J 19(6):916–923PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Rotter R, Martin H, Fuerderer S et al (2010) Vertebral body stenting: a new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty. Eur Spine J 19(6):916–923PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Korovessis P, Repantis T, Miller LE, Block JE (2011) Initial clinical experience with a novel vertebral augmentation system for treatment of symptomatic vertebral compression fractures: a case series of 26 consecutive patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2:206–211CrossRef Korovessis P, Repantis T, Miller LE, Block JE (2011) Initial clinical experience with a novel vertebral augmentation system for treatment of symptomatic vertebral compression fractures: a case series of 26 consecutive patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2:206–211CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Endres S, Badura A (2012) Shield kyphoplasty through a unipedicular approach compared to vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty in osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture: a prospective randomized study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(3):334–340PubMedCrossRef Endres S, Badura A (2012) Shield kyphoplasty through a unipedicular approach compared to vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty in osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture: a prospective randomized study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(3):334–340PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Röllinghoff M, Zarghooni K, Zeh A et al (2012) Is there a stable vertebral height restoration with the new radiofrequency kyphoplasty? A clinical and radiological study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. doi:10.1007/s00590-012-1026-8 PubMed Röllinghoff M, Zarghooni K, Zeh A et al (2012) Is there a stable vertebral height restoration with the new radiofrequency kyphoplasty? A clinical and radiological study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. doi:10.​1007/​s00590-012-1026-8 PubMed
Metadata
Title
Treatment options for vertebral fractures an overview of different philosophies and techniques for vertebral augmentation
Authors
R. Bornemann
E. M. W. Koch
M. Wollny
R. Pflugmacher
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue Special Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1257-3

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2014

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2014 Go to the issue