Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Thoracic Oncology

Transthoracic Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy: Current Trends

Authors: Carrie E. Ryan, MS, Alessandro Paniccia, MD, Robert A. Meguid, MD, MPH, Martin D. McCarter, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Leaks from intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis are thought to be associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality than leaks from cervical anastomosis. We challenge this assumption and hypothesize that there is no significant difference in mortality based on the location of the esophagogastric anastomosis.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase databases on all studies published from January 2000 to June 2015, comparing transthoracic (TTE) and transhiatal (THE) esophagectomies. Studies using jejunal or colonic interposition were excluded. Outcomes analyzed were leak rate, leak-associated mortality, overall 30-day mortality, and overall morbidity. Meta-analyses were performed using Mantel–Haenszel statistical analyses on studies reporting leak rates of both approaches. Nominal data are presented as frequency and interquartile range (IQR); measures of the association between treatments and outcomes are presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval.

Results

Twenty-one studies (3 randomized controlled trials) were analyzed comprising of 7167 patients (54 % TTE). TTE approach yields a lower anastomotic leak rate (9.8 %; IQR 6.0–12.2 %) than THE (12 %; IQR 11.6–22.1 %; OR 0.56 [0.34–0.92]), without any significant difference in leak associated mortality (7.1 % TTE vs. 4.6 % THE: OR 1.83 [0.39–8.52]). There was no difference in overall 30-day mortality (3.9 % TTE vs. 4.3 % THE; OR 0.86 [0.66–1.13]) and morbidity (59.0 % TTE vs. 66.6 % THE; OR 0.76 [0.37–1.59]).

Discussion

Based on meta-analysis, TTE is associated with a lower leak rate and does not result in higher morbidity or mortality than THE. The previously assumed higher rate of transthoracic anastomotic leak-associated mortality is overstated, thus supporting surgeon discretion and other factors to influence the choice of thoracic versus cervical anastomosis.
Literature
1.
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global Cancer Statistics. Ca Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Boshier PR, Anderson O, Hanna GB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):894–906.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(1):306–13.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Bolton JS, Teng S. Transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus: does it matter? Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2002;11(2):365–75.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Colvin H, Dunning J, Khan OA. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for distal esophageal cancer: which is superior? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12(2):265–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Kayani B, Jarral OA, Athanasiou T, Zacharakis E. Should oesophagectomy be performed with cervical or intrathoracic anastomosis? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;14(6):821–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Wei MT, Zhang YC, Deng XB, Yang TH, He YZ, Wang ZQ. Transthoracic vs transhiatal surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(29):10183–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Yuan Y, Zeng X, Hu Y, Xie T, Zhao Y. Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:CD008446.
9.
Barbat JH. Thoracic esophagectomy: report of a Case. Cal State J Med. 1913;6:225–7.
10.
Sweet RH. Subtotal esophagectomy with high intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis in the treatment of extensive cicatricial obliteration of the esophagus. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1946;83:417–27.PubMed
11.
Lewis I. The Surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus; with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg. 1946;34:18–31.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Orringer M, Sloan H. Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978;76(5):643–54.PubMed
13.
Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, McCarter MD, Phillips JD, DeCamp MM, Sherman KL, et al. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Hospitals. Arch Surg. 2012;147(11):1009–16.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Hankins JR, Attar S, Coughlin TR, Miller JE, Hebel JR, Suter CM, et al. Carcinoma of the esophagus: a comparison of the results of transhiatal versus transthoracic resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;47:700–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Shahian DM, Neptune WB, Ellis FH, Watkins E. Transthoracic versus extrathoracic esophagectomy: mortality morbidity, and long-term survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;41(3):237–46.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Moon MR, Schulte WJ, Haasler GB, Condon RE. Transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Arch Surg. 1992;127:951–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak - a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol. 1992;49:163–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Vigneswaran WT, Trastek VF, Pairolero Pc, Deschamps C, Daly RC, Allen MS. Transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:838–46.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, Zieren U, Pichlmaier H. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1990;77:845–57.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Urschel JD. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg. 1995;169:634–40.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Maher MM, Lucey BC, Boland G, Gervais DA, Mueller PR. The role of interventional radiology in the treatment of mediastinal collections caused by esophageal anastomotic leaks. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:649–53.CrossRef
23.
Rosch J, Keller FS, Kaufman JA. The birth, early years, and future of interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:841–53.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Knyrim K, Wagner H-J, Bethge N, Keymling M, Vakil N. A controlled trial of an exansile metal stent for palliation of esophageal obstruction due to inoperable cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1302–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Nguyen NT, Rudersdorf PD, Smith BR, Reavis K, Nguyen X-MT, Santos MJ. Managment of gastrointestinal leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: conventional treatments vs. endoscopic stenting. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:1952–60.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Hunberbein M, Stroszcynski C, Moesta KT, Schlag PM. Treatment of thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy with self-expanding plastic stents. Ann Surg. 2004;240(5):800–7.
27.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–70.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA Extension Statment for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2005;162:777–84.CrossRef
29.
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-ananlysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses 2014. July 7, 2015.
31.
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Mahid S, Hornung C, Minor K, Turina M, Galandiuk S. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis for the surgeon scientist. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1315–24.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Bhat MA, Dar MA, Lone GN, Dar AM. Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(5):1857–62.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Chou SH, Chuang HY, Huang MF, Lee CH, Yau HM. A prospective comparison of transthoracic and transhiatal resection for esophageal carcinoma in Asians. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56(91-92):707–10.PubMed
35.
Chou SH, Kao EL, Chuang HY, Wang WM, Wu DC, Huang MF. Transthoracic or transhiatal resection for middle- and lower-third esophageal carcinoma? Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2005;21(1):9–14.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Dai JG, Zhang ZY, Min JX, Huang XB, Wang JS. Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 2011;149(3):404–10.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Danila N, Lupascu C, Andronic M, Costache M, Dumitas O, Plesa A, et al. Esophagectomy in esophageal cancer - is there an optimal approach? Chirurgia (Bucur). 2014;109(5):600–3.PubMed
38.
Farran Teixidor L, Llop Talaveron J, Galan Guzman M, Aranda Danso H, Miro Martin M, Bettonica Larranaga C, et al. Surgical outcomes of esophageal cancer resection since the development of an Oesophagogastric Tumour Board. Cir Esp. 2013;91(8):517–23CrossRefPubMed
39.
Feng MX, Wang H, Zhang Y, Tan LJ, Xu ZL, Qun W. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-control study of thoracoscope versus mediastinoscope assistance. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6):1573–8.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Goan YG, Chang HC, Hsu HK, Chou YP. An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31(3):536–44.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Grotenhuis BA, van Heijl M, Zehetner J, Moons J, Wijnhoven BP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Surgical management of submucosal esophageal cancer: extended or regional lymphadenectomy? Ann Surg. 2010;252(5):823–30.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Homesh NA, Alsabahi AA, Al-Agmar MH, Alwashaly AA, Valenzuela RE, Alhadid MA, et al. Transhiatal versus transthoracic resection for oesophageal carcinoma in Yemen. Singapore Med J. 2006;47(1):54–9.PubMed
43.
Juloori A, Tucker SL, Komaki R, Liao Z, Correa AM, Swisher SG, et al. Influence of preoperative radiation field on postoperative leak rates in esophageal cancer patients after trimodality therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9(4):534–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(6):1919–26.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Kawoosa NU, Dar AM, Sharma ML, Ahangar AG, Lone GN, Bhat MA, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: experience from a single tertiary care institution. World J Surg. 2011;35(6):1296–302.CrossRefPubMed
46.
McCahill LE, May M, Morrow JB, Khandavalli S, Shabahang B, Kemmeter P, et al. Esophagectomy outcomes at a mid-volume cancer center utilizing prospective multidisciplinary care and a 2-surgeon team approach. Am J Surg. 2014;207(3):380–6; discussion 5-6.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Neagoe RM, Sala D, Voidazan S, Bancu S, Kiss L, Suciu H. Transthoracic versus Transhiatal esophagectomy: a permanent dilemma. our 15-year experience. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013;108(6):780–7.PubMed
48.
Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, Allen MS, Cassivi SD, Wigle DA, et al. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(4):1154–60; discussion 60-1.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Robertson SA, Skipworth RJ, Clarke DL, Crofts TJ, Lee A, de Beaux AC, et al. Ventilatory and intensive care requirements following oesophageal resection. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88(4):354–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Safranek PM, Sujendran V, Baron R, Warner N, Blesing C, Maynard ND. Oxford experience with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection for esophageal adenocarcinomas and squamous cell tumors. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(3):201–6.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Sarela AI, Tolan DJ, Harris K, Dexter SP, Sue-Ling HM. Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer: a mortality-free experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(3):516–23.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Sundaram A, Geronimo JC, Willer BL, Hoshino M, Torgersen Z, Juhasz A, et al. Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(1):168–76.CrossRefPubMed
53.
van Heijl M, van Wijngaarden AK, Lagarde SM, Busch OR, van Lanschot JJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Intrathoracic manifestations of cervical anastomotic leaks after transhiatal and transthoracic oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97(5):726–31.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Akiyama S, Kodera Y, Koike M, Kasai Y, Hibi K, Ito K, et al. Small incisional esophagectomy with endoscopic assistance: evaluation of a new technique. Surg. 2001;31(4):378–82.
55.
Arlow RL, Moore DF, Chen C, Langenfeld J, August DA. Outcome-volume relationships and transhiatal esophagectomy: minimizing “failure to rescue”. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2014;8(1):9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Meguid RA, Weiss ES, Chang DC, Brock MV, Yang SC. The effect of volume on esophageal cancer resections: what constitutes acceptable resection volumes for centers of excellence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(1):23–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
58.
Milstein A, Galvin R, DelBlanco S, Salber P, Buck C. Improving the Safety of Health Care: The Leapfrog Initiative. Effective Clin Prac. 2000;3:313–7.
59.
Bosch DJ, Muijs CT, Mul VE, Beukema JC, Hospers GA, Burgerhof JG, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative course after curative-intent transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(2):605–11.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Martin LW, Swisher SG, Hofstetter W, Correa AM, Mehran RJ, Rice DC, et al. Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality. Ann Surg. 2005;242(3):392–9; discussion 9-402.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Transthoracic Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy: Current Trends
Authors
Carrie E. Ryan, MS
Alessandro Paniccia, MD
Robert A. Meguid, MD, MPH
Martin D. McCarter, MD
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5417-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2017 Go to the issue

Melanomas

Outcome of Melanoma Patients Who Did Not Proceed to Sentinel Node Biopsy After Preoperative Lymphoscintigraphy

Breast Oncology

Axillary Ultrasound: For All, for None, to Diagnose Positive Nodes, or to Support Avoiding Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Altogether

Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

Impact of the Introduction of Calcimimetics on Timing of Parathyroidectomy in Secondary and Tertiary Hyperparathyroidism

Breast Oncology

Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: An American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology Focused Guideline Update

Melanomas

Metastasectomy Following Immunotherapy with Adoptive Cell Transfer for Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Gastrointestinal Oncology

Identification of Candidates for Early Discharge After Gastrectomy