Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 4/2005

01-04-2005 | Clinical Investigation

Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the TGDc-01 tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry

Authors: Annette Lösch, Alexander Scheuerle, Volker Rupp, Gerd Auffarth, Matthias Becker

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 4/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A recently developed digital tonometer for transpalpebral intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, distributed by Corneal, Inc., allows the noninvasive measurement of IOP for screening purposes.

Method

We measured the IOP of 218 eyes in 109 patients of the Interdisciplinary Uveitis Center of the University of Heidelberg with intact corneal epithelium. IOPs were measured first with the TGDc-01 tonometer, and then by means of Goldmann tonometry. IOPs were recorded by two independent examiners. The mean of three measurements obtained with the TGDc-01 was taken, whereas only one measurement was performed with the Goldmann tonometer.

Results

The mean difference between the TGDc-01 and Goldmann measurements was 3.7 mmHg. The standard deviation of the differences was ±4.06 mmHg. Thus measurements acquired with the TGDc-01 may range 4.4 mmHg above or 11.8 mmHg below the values given by Goldmann tonometry.

Conclusion

The IOP values obtained with the TGDc-01 were in poor agreement with Goldmann tonometry. We found a higher variation as well as a bias towards lower IOP values with the TGDc-01. It is a question of clinical judgement as to how far these deviating measurements can be accepted for screening purposes. Because the IOPs obtained with the TGDc-01 are generally lower and less accurate than those obtained with the Goldmann tonometer we believe that the TGDc-01 is not a reliable tool for IOP measurement in clinical routine.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed
2.
go back to reference Digital mobile tonometer for measurement of intraocular pressure through the eyelid: TGDc-01 “PRA”. Instruction booklet, Rjazan State Toolmaking Plant, 32 Kaljaeva Street, 390000 Rjazan, Russia Digital mobile tonometer for measurement of intraocular pressure through the eyelid: TGDc-01 “PRA”. Instruction booklet, Rjazan State Toolmaking Plant, 32 Kaljaeva Street, 390000 Rjazan, Russia
3.
go back to reference Draeger J, Stodtmeister R (2003) Ein “neues” Tonometer? Augenarzt 37:318–319 Draeger J, Stodtmeister R (2003) Ein “neues” Tonometer? Augenarzt 37:318–319
4.
go back to reference Mantha S, Roizen MF, Fleisher LA, Thisted R, Foss J (2000) Comparing methods of clinical measurements: reporting standards for Bland and Altman analysis. Anesth Analg 90:593–602PubMed Mantha S, Roizen MF, Fleisher LA, Thisted R, Foss J (2000) Comparing methods of clinical measurements: reporting standards for Bland and Altman analysis. Anesth Analg 90:593–602PubMed
5.
go back to reference Martin M, Pache M, Flammer J (2003) Der portable Tonometer TGDc-01 und die Goldmann- und Lufttonometrie im Vergleich - eine Pilotstudie. In: Auffarth GU, Welt R, Demeler U (eds) Transactions, 17th Congress of the German Society for Intraocular Lens Implantation and Refractive Surgery (DGII). Biermann, Cologne, pp 126–130 Martin M, Pache M, Flammer J (2003) Der portable Tonometer TGDc-01 und die Goldmann- und Lufttonometrie im Vergleich - eine Pilotstudie. In: Auffarth GU, Welt R, Demeler U (eds) Transactions, 17th Congress of the German Society for Intraocular Lens Implantation and Refractive Surgery (DGII). Biermann, Cologne, pp 126–130
Metadata
Title
Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the TGDc-01 tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry
Authors
Annette Lösch
Alexander Scheuerle
Volker Rupp
Gerd Auffarth
Matthias Becker
Publication date
01-04-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 4/2005
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-0971-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2005

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 4/2005 Go to the issue