Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Original Article - Brain Tumors

Estimation of the resting motor threshold (RMT) in transcranial magnetic stimulation using relative-frequency and threshold-hunting methods in brain tumor patients

Authors: Melina Engelhardt, Heike Schneider, Theresa Gast, Thomas Picht

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Application of transcranial magnetic stimulation is often based on the resting motor threshold. The aim of this study was to validate recent findings on the advantage of resting motor threshold estimation using adaptive threshold-hunting algorithms over the Rossini-Rothwell method in a clinical sample and healthy subjects.

Methods

Resting motor thresholds in 115 patients with a brain tumor and 10 healthy subjects were assessed using the Rossini-Rothwell method and compared to an adaptive threshold-hunting algorithm. In healthy subjects, this measurement was repeated twice to capture test-retest reliability of both methods. Efficiency of both methods was assessed by comparing the number of pulses needed for resting motor threshold estimation.

Results

There was no significant difference between the Rossini-Rothwell method and the adaptive threshold-hunting algorithm in patients and healthy controls with limits of agreement between ± 12 V/m. There was a strong intraclass correlation and both methods showed a good test-retest reliability. However, the adaptive threshold-hunting algorithm was significantly faster.

Conclusions

The adaptive threshold-hunting algorithm was more efficient in assessing the resting motor threshold, while reaching comparable results as the Rossini-Rothwell method. Thus, our results support the advantage of adaptive threshold-hunting algorithms to determine the resting motor threshold also in a clinical sample.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ah Sen CB, Fassett HJ, El-Sayes J, Turco CV, Hameer MM, Nelson AJ (2017) Active and resting motor threshold are efficiently obtained with adaptive threshold hunting. PLoS One 12(10):1–9CrossRef Ah Sen CB, Fassett HJ, El-Sayes J, Turco CV, Hameer MM, Nelson AJ (2017) Active and resting motor threshold are efficiently obtained with adaptive threshold hunting. PLoS One 12(10):1–9CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Awiszus F (2011) Fast estimation of transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold: is it safe? Brain Stimul 4(1):50–57CrossRef Awiszus F (2011) Fast estimation of transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold: is it safe? Brain Stimul 4(1):50–57CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310 Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310
5.
go back to reference Engelhardt M, Picht T (2019) 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex: impact on excitability and task performance in healthy subjects. J Neurol Surg Part A. In Press Engelhardt M, Picht T (2019) 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex: impact on excitability and task performance in healthy subjects. J Neurol Surg Part A. In Press
6.
go back to reference Groppa S, Oliviero A, Eisen A, et al (2012) A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 123(5):858–882 Groppa S, Oliviero A, Eisen A, et al (2012) A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 123(5):858–882
8.
go back to reference Möller C, Arai N, Lücke J, Ziemann U (2009) Clinical neurophysiology hysteresis effects on the input – output curve of motor evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 120(5):1003–1008 Möller C, Arai N, Lücke J, Ziemann U (2009) Clinical neurophysiology hysteresis effects on the input – output curve of motor evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 120(5):1003–1008
9.
go back to reference Picht T, Schmidt S, Brandt S, Frey D, Hannula H, Neuvonen T, Karhu J, Vajkoczy P, Suess O (2011) Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 69(3):581–589 Picht T, Schmidt S, Brandt S, Frey D, Hannula H, Neuvonen T, Karhu J, Vajkoczy P, Suess O (2011) Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 69(3):581–589
10.
go back to reference Picht T, Strack V, Schulz J, Zdunczyk A, Frey D, Schmidt S, Vajkoczy P (2012) Assessing the functional status of the motor system in brain tumor patients using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Acta Neurochir 154(11):2075–2081 Picht T, Strack V, Schulz J, Zdunczyk A, Frey D, Schmidt S, Vajkoczy P (2012) Assessing the functional status of the motor system in brain tumor patients using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Acta Neurochir 154(11):2075–2081
11.
go back to reference Rosenstock T, Kulchytska N, Grittner U, Vajkoczy P, Picht T, Acker G, Schwarzer V (2017) Risk stratification in motor area–related glioma surgery based on navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation data. J Neurosurg 126(April):1227–1237 Rosenstock T, Kulchytska N, Grittner U, Vajkoczy P, Picht T, Acker G, Schwarzer V (2017) Risk stratification in motor area–related glioma surgery based on navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation data. J Neurosurg 126(April):1227–1237
12.
go back to reference Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A (2009) Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 120(12):2008–2039 Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A (2009) Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 120(12):2008–2039
13.
go back to reference Rossini P, Barker A, Berardelli A (1994) Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 91:79–92 Rossini P, Barker A, Berardelli A (1994) Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 91:79–92
14.
go back to reference Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Berardelli A, Eisen A, Rossini P, Paulus W (1999) Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The international federation of clinical neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52:97–103 Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Berardelli A, Eisen A, Rossini P, Paulus W (1999) Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The international federation of clinical neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52:97–103
15.
go back to reference Ruohonen J, Ilmoniemi RJ (1999) Modeling of the stimulating field generation in TMS. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 51:30–40 Ruohonen J, Ilmoniemi RJ (1999) Modeling of the stimulating field generation in TMS. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 51:30–40
16.
go back to reference Silbert BI, Patterson HI, Pevcic DD, Windnagel KA, Thickbroom GW (2013) A comparison of relative-frequency and threshold-hunting methods to determine stimulus intensity in transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 124(4):708–712 Silbert BI, Patterson HI, Pevcic DD, Windnagel KA, Thickbroom GW (2013) A comparison of relative-frequency and threshold-hunting methods to determine stimulus intensity in transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 124(4):708–712
17.
go back to reference Sollmann N, Bulubas L, Tanigawa N, Zimmer C, Meyer B, Krieg SM (2017) The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. BMC Neurosci 18(1):1–15 Sollmann N, Bulubas L, Tanigawa N, Zimmer C, Meyer B, Krieg SM (2017) The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. BMC Neurosci 18(1):1–15
18.
go back to reference Sollmann N, Tanigawa N, Bulubas L, Sabih J, Zimmer C, Ringel F, Meyer B, Krieg SM (2017) Clinical factors underlying the inter-individual variability of the resting motor threshold in navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation motor mapping. Brain Topogr 30(1):98–121 Sollmann N, Tanigawa N, Bulubas L, Sabih J, Zimmer C, Ringel F, Meyer B, Krieg SM (2017) Clinical factors underlying the inter-individual variability of the resting motor threshold in navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation motor mapping. Brain Topogr 30(1):98–121
19.
go back to reference Tranulis C, Guéguen B, Pham-Scottez A, Vacheron MN, Cabelguen G, Costantini A, Valero G, Galinovski A (2006) Motor threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation: comparison of three estimation methods. Neurophysiol Clin 36(1):1–7 Tranulis C, Guéguen B, Pham-Scottez A, Vacheron MN, Cabelguen G, Costantini A, Valero G, Galinovski A (2006) Motor threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation: comparison of three estimation methods. Neurophysiol Clin 36(1):1–7
20.
go back to reference Wassermann EM (2002) Variation in the response to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the general population. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1165–1171 Wassermann EM (2002) Variation in the response to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the general population. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1165–1171
Metadata
Title
Estimation of the resting motor threshold (RMT) in transcranial magnetic stimulation using relative-frequency and threshold-hunting methods in brain tumor patients
Authors
Melina Engelhardt
Heike Schneider
Theresa Gast
Thomas Picht
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03997-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

Acta Neurochirurgica 9/2019 Go to the issue