Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Published in: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

Traditional uses of wild and tended plants in maintaining ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes of the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa

Author: Alfred Maroyi

Published in: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many communities in developing countries rely on ecosystem services (ESs) associated with wild and cultivated plant species. Plant resources provide numerous ESs and goods that support human well-being and survival. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize wild and tended plant species, and also investigate how local communities in the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa perceive ESs associated with plant resources.

Methods

The study was conducted in six local municipalities in the Eastern Cape Province, between March 2016 and September 2021. Data on socio-economic characteristics of the participants, useful plants harvested from the wild and managed in home gardens were documented by means of questionnaires, observation and guided field walks with 196 participants. The ESs were identified using a free listing technique.

Results

A total of 163 plant species were recorded which provided 26 cultural, regulating and provisioning ESs. Provisioning ESs were the most cited with at least 25 plant species contributing towards generation of cash income, food, traditional and ethnoveterinary medicines. Important species recorded in this study with relative frequency of citation (RFC) values > 0.3 included Alepidea amatymbica, Allium cepa, Aloe ferox, Artemisia afra, Brassica oleracea, Capsicum annuum, Cucurbita moschata, Hypoxis hemerocallidea, Opuntia ficus-indica, Spinacia oleracea, Vachellia karroo and Zea mays.

Conclusion

Results of this study highlight the importance of plant resources to the well-being of local communities in the Eastern Cape within the context of provision of essential direct and indirect ESs such as food, medicinal products, construction materials, fodder, regulating, supporting and cultural services. The ESs are the basis for subsistence livelihoods in rural areas, particularly in developing countries such as South Africa. Therefore, such body of knowledge can be used as baseline data for provision of local support for natural resource management initiatives in the province and other areas of the country.
Literature
1.
Ouédraogo I, Nacoulma BMI, Hahn K, Thiombiano A. Assessing ecosystem services based on indigenous knowledge in southeastern Burkina Faso (West Africa). Int J Biodiv Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. 2014;10:313–21.
2.
Bidak LM, Kamal SA, Halmy MWA, Heneidy SZ. Goods and services provided by native plants in desert ecosystems: Examples from the northwestern coastal desert of Egypt. Global Ecol Cons. 2015;3:433–47.
3.
Mensah S, Veldtman R, Assogbadjo AE, Ham C, Kakaï RG, Seifert T. Ecosystem service importance and use vary with socio-environmental factors: a study from household-surveys in local communities of South Africa. Ecosyst Serv. 2017;23:1–8.
4.
Ahammad R, Stacey N, Sunderland TCH. Use and perceived importance of forest ecosystem services in rural livelihoods of Chittagong Hill Tracts. Bangladesh Ecosyst Serv. 2019;35:87–98.
5.
Thorn JPR, Thornton TF, Helfgott A, Willis KJ. Indigenous uses of wild and tended plant biodiversity maintain ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes of the Terai Plains of Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16:33.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Kimpouni V, Nzila JDD, Watha-Ndoudy N, Madzella-Mbiemo MI, Mouhamed SY, Kampe J-P: Exploring Local People’s Perception of Ecosystem Services in Djoumouna Periurban Forest, Brazzaville, Congo. Int J Forestry Res 2021, Volume 2021, Article ID 6612649.
7.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment): Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Washington DC: Island Press; 2003.
8.
Calvet-Mir L, Gómez-Baggethun E, Reyes-García V. Beyond food production: ecosystem services provided by home gardens: a case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, Northeastern Spain. Ecol Econ. 2012;74:153–60.
9.
Camps-Calvet M, Langemeyer J, Calvet-Mir L, Gómez-Baggethun E. Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain: Insights for policy and planning. Environ Sci Policy. 2016;62:14–23.
10.
Ladino G, Ospina-Bautista F, Estévez Varón J, Jerabkova L, Kratina P. Ecosystem services provided by bromeliad plants: a systematic review. Ecol Evol. 2019;9:7360–72.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Barrios E, Valencia V, Jonsson M, Brauman A, Hairiah K, Mortimer PE, Okubo S. Contribution of trees to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. 2018;14:1–16.
12.
Hartter J. Resource use and ecosystem services in a forest park landscape. Soc Nat Resour. 2010;23:207–23.
13.
Kalaba F, Quinn C, Dougill A. Contribution of forest provisioning ecosystem services to rural livelihoods in the Miombo woodlands of Zambia. Popul Environ. 2013;35:159–82.
14.
Kalaba FK, Quinn CH, Dougill AJ. The role of forest provisioning ecosystem services in coping with household stresses and shocks in Miombo woodlands, Zambia. Ecosyst Serv. 2013;5:143–8.
15.
Lakerveld RP, Lele S, Crane TA, Fortuin KPJ, Springate-Baginski O. The social distribution of provisioning forest ecosystem services: Evidence and insights from Odisha, India. Ecosyst Serv. 2015;14:56–66.
16.
De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complexity. 2010;7:260–72.
17.
Balvanera P, Uriarte M, Almeida-Leñero L, Altesor A, DeClerck F, Gardner T, et al. Ecosystem services research in Latin America: the state of the art. Ecosyst Serv. 2012;2:56–70.
18.
Ferraro PJ, Lawlory K, Mullanz KL, Pattanayak SK. Forest figures: ecosystem services valuation and policy evaluation in developing countries. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 2012;6:20–44.
19.
Howe C, Suich H, van Gardingen P, Rahman A, Mace GM. Elucidating the pathways between climate change, ecosystem services and poverty alleviation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2013;5:102–7.
20.
Grantham R, Lau J, Mills DJ, Cumming GS. Social and temporal dynamics mediate the distribution of ecosystem service benefits from a small-scale fishery. Ecosyst People. 2022;18:15–30.
21.
Bennett EM, Cramer W, Begossi A, Cundill G, Díaz S, Egoh BN, et al. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: Three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2015;2015(14):76–85.
22.
Bennett EM, Chaplin-Kramer R. Science for the sustainable use of ecosystem services. F1000Research 2016;5:2622.
23.
Rieb JT, Chaplin-Kramer R, Daily GC, Armsworth PR, Böhning-Gaese K, Bonn A, et al. When, where, and how nature matters for ecosystem services: challenges for the next generation of ecosystem service models. Bioscience. 2017;67:820–33.
24.
Chan KMA, Satterfield T. The maturation of ecosystem services: Social and policy research expands, but whither biophysically informed valuation? People Nat. 2020;2:1–40.
25.
Mandle L, Shields-Estrada A, Chaplin-Kramer R, Mitchell MGE, Bremer LL, Gourevitch JD, et al. Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science. Nat Sustain. 2021;4:161–9.
26.
Isaacs R, Tuell J, Fiedler A, Gardiner M, Landis D. Maximizing arthropod-mediated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: the role of native plants. Front Ecol Environ. 2009;7:196–203.
27.
Lavorel S, Grigulis K, Lamarque P, Colace MP, Garden D, Girel J, et al. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J Ecol. 2011;99:135–47.
28.
Quijas S, Jackson LE, Maass M, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, Balvanera P. Plant diversity and generation of ecosystem services at the landscape scale: expert knowledge assessment. J Appl Ecol. 2012;49:929–40.
29.
Suso MJ, Bebeli PJ, Christmann S, Mateus C, Negri V, Pinheiro de Carvalho MAA, Torricelli R, Veloso MM: Enhancing legume ecosystem services through an understanding of plant–pollinator interplay. Front Plant Sci 2016, 7:333.
30.
Faucon MP, Houben D, Lambers H. Plant functional traits: soil and ecosystem services. Trends Plant Sci. 2017;22:385–94.PubMed
31.
Lautenbach S, Mupepele A, Dormann CF, Lee H, Schmidt S, Scholte SSK, et al. Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation. Reg Environ Change. 2019;19:2151–72.
32.
33.
Huq N, Pedroso R, Bruns A, Ribbe L, Huq S. Changing dynamics of livelihood dependence on ecosystem services at temporal and spatial scales: an assessment in the southern wetland areas of Bangladesh. Ecol Indic. 2020;110:105855.
34.
35.
Khapoya V. Bantustans in South Africa: the role of the multinational corporations. J Eastern Afr Res Dev. 1980;10:28–49.
36.
ECSECC (Eastern Cape Socio Economic Consultative Council): Eastern Cape socio-economic atlas 2012: A visual tour of the Eastern Cape physical and social terrain; 2012. http://​www.​ecsecc.​org. Accessed on 6 October 2021.
37.
Westaway A. Rural poverty in the Eastern Cape Province: Legacy of apartheid or consequence of contemporary segregation? Dev Southern Afr. 2012;29:115–25.
38.
Thornton A. Pastures of plenty? Land rights and community-based agriculture in Peddie, a former homeland town in South Africa. Appl Geogr. 2009;29:12–20.
39.
Hebinck P, Lent P. Livelihoods and landscape: the people of Guquka and Koloni and their resources. Leiden/Boston: Brill Academic Publishers; 2007.
40.
Shackleton CM, Timmermans HG, Nongwe N, Hamer N, Palmer RCG. Direst-use value of non-timber forest products from two areas on the Transkei Wild Coast. Agrekon. 2007;46:135–55.
41.
Mucina L, Rutherford MC: The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelizia 19. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute; 2006.
42.
Jari B, Fraser GCG. Influence of institutional and technical factors on market choices of smallholder farmers in the Kat River Valley. In: van Schalkwyk HD, Groenewald JA, Fraser GCG, Obi A, van Tilburg A, editors. Unlocking markets to smallholders: lessons from South Africa. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Press; 2012. p. 59–89.
43.
Manyevere A, Muchaonyerwa P, Laker MC, Mnkeni PNS. Farmers’ perspectives with regard to crop production: An analysis of Nkonkobe municipality, South Africa. J Agr Rural Dev Trop Subtrop. 2014;115:41–53.
44.
Palmer R, Timmermans H, Fay D. From conflict to negotiation: nature-based development on South Africa’s Wild Coast. Grahamstown: Human Science Research Council; 2000.
45.
Hamann M, Tuinder V. Introducing the Eastern Cape: a quick guide to its history, diversity and future challenges. Stockholm: Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University; 2012.
46.
Maroyi A. Diversity of use and local knowledge of wild and cultivated plants in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017;13:43.PubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Atyosi Z, Ramarumo LJ, Maroyi A. Alien plants in the Eastern Cape province in South Africa: perceptions of their contributions to livelihoods of local communities. Sustainability. 2019;11:5043.
48.
Thinyane Z, Maroyi A. Non-timber forest products (NTFPs): A viable option for livelihood enhancement in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. Biol Sci. 2019;19:248–58.
49.
Thinyane Z, Maroyi A. Medicinal plants used by the inhabitants of Alfred Nzo District Municipality in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. J Pharm Nutr Sci. 2019;9:157–66.
50.
Maroyi A. Ethnobotanical study of wild and cultivated vegetables in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. Biodiversitas. 2020;21:3982–9.
51.
Maroyi A. Diversity of edible plants in home gardens of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Ecol Environ Cons. 2021;27:378–85.
52.
Ngcaba P, Maroyi A. Home gardens in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa: a promising approach to enhance household food security and well-being. Biodiversitas. 2021;22:4045–53.
53.
Bridson D, Foreman . The herbarium handbook; Kew, Royal Botanic Gardens: Richmond, UK; 1998.
54.
Victor JE, Koekemoer M, Fish L, Smithies SJ, Mössmer M. Herbarium essentials: The southern African herbarium user manual. National Botanical Institute: Pretoria, South Africa; 2004.
55.
Bieling C, Plieninger T, Pirker H, Vogl CR. Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: An empirical exploration with short interviews. Ecol Econ. 2014;105:19–30.
56.
de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ. 2002;41:393–408.
57.
Germishuizen G, Meyer NL, Steenkamp Y, Keith M. A checklist of South African plants. Pretoria: Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report (SABONET) No. 41; 2003.
58.
59.
60.
Etikan I, Alkassim R, Abubakar S. Comparison of snowball sampling and sequential sampling technique. Biometric Biostat Int J. 2015;3:1–2.
61.
Waters J. Snowball sampling: a cautionary tale involving a study of older drug users. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2015;18:367–80.
62.
Faruque MO, Uddin SB, Barlow JW, Hu S, Dong S, Cai Q, Li X, Hu X. Quantitative ethnobotany of medicinal plants used by indigenous communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:40.PubMedPubMedCentral
63.
Ahmad M, Sultana S, Fazl-i-Hadi S, Hadda TB, Rashid S, et al. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in high mountainous region of Chail valley (district Swat-Pakistan). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10:36.PubMedPubMedCentral
64.
65.
Hammer K, Khoshbakht K. A domestication assessment of the big five plant families. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2015;62:665–89.
66.
Akinnifesi FK, Sileshi G, da Costa J, de Moura EG, da Silva RF, Ajayi OC, et al. Floristic composition and canopy structure of home-gardens in São Luís city, Maranhão State, Brazil. J Hortic Forestry. 2010;2:72–86.
67.
Midgley SJ, Pinyopusarerk K, Harwood CE, Doran JC. Exotic plant species in Vietnam’s economy: The contributions of Australian trees. Working Paper 1997/4, Research School of Asia-Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia; 1996.
68.
Small E. Top 100 exotic food plants. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011.
69.
70.
Dutta S, Hossain MK, Hossain MA, Chowdhury P. Exotic plants and their usage by local communities in the Sitakunda Botanical Garden and Eco-Park, Chittagong. Bangladesh For Res. 2015;4:136.
71.
Shanavas A, Kumar BM. Fuelwood characteristics of tree species in the homegardens of Kerala, India. Agroforest Syst. 2003;58:11–24.
72.
Tabuti JR, Dhillion SS, Lye KA. Firewood use in Bulamgi County, Uganda: species selection, harvesting and consumption patterns. Biomass Bioenergy. 2003;25:581–96.
73.
Maroyi A. Ethnomedicinal uses of exotic plant species in south-central Zimbabwe. Indian J Trad Knowl. 2018;17:71–7.
74.
Semenya SS, Maroyi A. Exotics plants used therapeutically by Bapedi traditional healers for respiratory infections and related symptoms in the Limpopo province, South Africa. Indian J Trad Knowl. 2018;17:663–71.
75.
McGaw LJ, Omokhua-Uyi AG, Finnie JF, Van Staden J. Invasive alien plants and weeds in South Africa: a review of their applications in traditional medicine and potential pharmaceutical properties. J Ethnopharmacol. 2022;283:114564.PubMed
76.
Niemiera AX, Von Holle B. Invasive plant species and the ornamental horticulture industry. In Inderjit (Ed.), Management of invasive weeds (pp. 167–187). New York, NY: Springer, USA; 2009.
77.
Humair F, Kueffer C, Siegrist M. Are non-native plants perceived to be more risky? Factors influencing horticulturists’ risk perceptions of ornamental plant species. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e102121.PubMedPubMedCentral
78.
Staab M, Pereira-Peixoto MH, Klein A-M. Exotic garden plants partly substitute for native plants as resources for pollinators when native plants become seasonally scarce. Oecologia. 2020;194:465–80.PubMedPubMedCentral
79.
Mekonen T, Giday M, Kelbessa E. Ethnomedicinal study of home garden plants in Sebeta-Awas District of the Oromia Region of Ethiopia to assess use, species diversity and management practices. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015;11:64–76.PubMedPubMedCentral
80.
Tadesse E, Abdulkedir A, Khamzina A, Son Y, Noulekoun F. Contrasting species diversity and values in home gardens and traditional parkland agroforestry systems in Ethiopian sub-humid lowlands. Forests. 2019;10:266.
81.
Kahane R, Hodgkin T, Jaenicke H, Hoogendoorn C, Hermann M, Keatinge JDH, d’Arros Hughes J, Padulosi S, Looney N. Agrobiodiversity for food security, health and income. Agron Sustain Dev. 2013;33:671–93.
82.
Caballero-Serrano V, Onaindia M, Alday JG, Caballero D, Carrasco JC, McLaren B, Amigo J. Plant diversity and ecosystem services in Amazonian homegardens of Ecuador. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016;225:116–25.
83.
George MV, Christopher G. Structure, diversity and utilization of plant species in tribal homegardens of Kerala, India. Agroforest Syst. 2020;94:297–307.
84.
Froneman S, Kapp PA. An exploration of the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of Xhosa men concerning traditional circumcision. Afr J Primary Health Care Fam Med. 2017;9:a1454.
85.
Prusente S, Khuzwayo N, Sikweyiya Y. Exploring factors influencing integration of traditional and medical male circumcision methods at Ingquza Hill Local Municipality, Eastern Cape: A socio-ecological perspective. Afr J Primary Health Care Fam Med. 2019;11:a1948.
86.
Maroyi A. Use of herbal formulations for the treatment of circumcision wounds in Eastern and Southern Africa. Plant Sci Today. 2021;8:517–27.
87.
Sandhu HS, Wratten SD, Cullen R. The role of supporting ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable farmland. Ecol Complexity. 2010;7:302–10.
88.
Sandhu HS, Wratten SD, Cullen R. Organic agriculture and ecosystem services. Environ Sci Policy. 2010;13:1–7.
89.
Swinton SM, Lupi F, Robertson GP, Hamilton SK. Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ. 2007;64:245–52.
90.
Cuni-Sanchez A, Imani G, Bulonvu F, Batumike R, Baruka G, Burgess ND, Klein JA, Marchant R. Social perceptions of forest ecosystem services in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Hum Ecol. 2019;47:839–53.
91.
Landreth N, Saito O. An ecosystem services approach to sustainable livelihoods in the homegardens of Kandy, Sri Lanka. Aust Geogr. 2015;45:355–73.
92.
Zaldivar ME, Rocha OJ, Castro E, Barrantes R. Species diversity of edible plants grown in homegardens of Chibchan Amerindians from Costa Rica. Hum Ecol. 2002;30:301–16.
93.
Wu J. Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landsc Ecol. 2013;28:999–1023.
94.
Reed J, van Vianen J, Foli S, Clendenning J, Yang K, MacDonald M, Petrokofsky G, Padoch C, Sunderland T. Trees for life: the ecosystem service contribution of trees to food production and livelihoods in the tropics. For Policy Econ. 2017;84:62–71.
95.
Ghuman S, Ncube B, Finnie JF, McGaw LJ, Coopoosamy RM, Van Staden J. Antimicrobial activity, phenolic content, and cytotoxicity of medicinal plant extracts used for treating dermatological diseases and wound healing in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:320.PubMedPubMedCentral
96.
Louw CAM, Regnier TJC, Korsten L. Medicinal bulbous plants of South Africa and their traditional relevance in the control of infectious diseases. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;82:147–54.PubMed
97.
Van Wyk B-E, Van Oudtshoorn B, Gericke N. Medicinal plants of South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: Briza Publications; 2013.
98.
Ndayizeye G, Imani G, Nkengurutse J, Irampagarikiye R, Ndihokubwayo N, Niyongabo F, Cuni-Sanchez A. Ecosystem services from mountain forests: Local communities’ views in Kibira National Park, Burundi. Ecosyst Serv. 2020;45:101171.
99.
Raimondo D, von Staden L, Foden W, Victor JE, Helme NA, Turner RC, Kamundi DA, Manyama PA. Red list of South African plants. Pretoria: Strelitzia 25, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria;2009.
Metadata
Title
Traditional uses of wild and tended plants in maintaining ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes of the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa
Author
Alfred Maroyi
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1746-4269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-022-00512-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 1/2022 Go to the issue

Research

The fading popularity of a local ecological calendar from Brunei Darussalam, Borneo

Research

Traditional knowledge of edible plants used as flavoring for fish-grilling in Southeast Guizhou, China

Research

Ethnomedicinal landscape: distribution of used medicinal plant species in Nepal

Research

Ethnobotanical investigation of medicinal plants in Buska Mountain range, Hamar district, Southwestern Ethiopia

Research

Sociocultural drivers of mycological knowledge: insights from Wixarika and Mestizo groups in western Mexico

Research

Ethnobotany of wild edible plants in multiethnic areas of the Gansu–Ningxia–Inner Mongolia junction zone