Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 7/2019

01-07-2019 | Original Article

Toward the development of a comprehensive cancer experience measurement framework

Authors: Carmen G. Loiselle, Doris Howell, Irene Nicoll, Margaret Fitch

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

A diagnosis of cancer and its treatment often have a profound impact on an individual’s health-related quality of life—affecting physical, psychological, social, occupational, and financial domains. Person-centered care (PCC)—defined as a respectful, responsive, and tailored approach that meets patients’ needs, values, and preferences—is becoming an integral part of comprehensive cancer care. The implementation of PCC into clinical practice provides benefits such as improvement in the quality of patient care, enhanced health-related outcomes, and significantly higher satisfaction with care. However, to guide and document more precisely the effects of PCC, various authors have argued that a more comprehensive measurement framework is needed. The primary goal of this paper is to present such an evolving framework based on extant evidence and developed in the context of a series of expert stakeholder meetings spearheaded by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) that began in 2012. Developed collaboratively, the Cancer Experience Measurement Framework goes beyond existing patient experience frameworks by focusing on four key elements and related measures: the patient perspective, the family perspective, the combined patient-family perspective, and interactions with the healthcare system. In light of current healthcare trends promoting cancer self-management, patients as partners, and patient and family engagement in care, it is imperative that we conduct ongoing assessments using shared and psychometrically sound measures to ensure sound comparisons across settings, as well as better cancer-related processes and outcomes for indivduals affected by cancer.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Cancer Care Ontario (2015) Building a culture of person-centred care in Ontario. Toronto, Ontario. https://www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx? fileId=347910. Accessed 06 Aug 2017 Cancer Care Ontario (2015) Building a culture of person-centred care in Ontario. Toronto, Ontario. https://​www.​cancercare.​on.​ca/​common/​pages/​UserFile.​aspx?​ fileId=347910. Accessed 06 Aug 2017
3.
go back to reference Lambert S, Loiselle CG (2007) Health information-seeking behaviour. Qual Health Res 17(8):1006–1019CrossRefPubMed Lambert S, Loiselle CG (2007) Health information-seeking behaviour. Qual Health Res 17(8):1006–1019CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wagner EH, Aiello Bowles EJ, Greene SM, Tuzzio L, Wiese CJ, Kirlin B, Clauser SB (2010) The quality of cancer patient experience: perspectives of patients, family members, providers and experts. Qual Saf Health Care 19:484–489PubMed Wagner EH, Aiello Bowles EJ, Greene SM, Tuzzio L, Wiese CJ, Kirlin B, Clauser SB (2010) The quality of cancer patient experience: perspectives of patients, family members, providers and experts. Qual Saf Health Care 19:484–489PubMed
5.
go back to reference Health Innovation Network (2017) What is person-centered care and why is it important? http://www.hinsouthlondon.org/system/ckeditor_assets/attachments /41/what_is_person-centred_care_and_why_is_it_important.pdf. Accessed 06 Aug 2017 Health Innovation Network (2017) What is person-centered care and why is it important? http://​www.​hinsouthlondon.​org/​system/​ckeditor_​assets/​attachments /41/what_is_person-centred_care_and_why_is_it_important.pdf. Accessed 06 Aug 2017
6.
go back to reference Moody L, Bridge E, Dhanju S, Nicholls B, Singh S (2017) Measurement of person-centered care delivery of adult oncology in Ontario, Canada. J Clin Oncol 35(8):223CrossRef Moody L, Bridge E, Dhanju S, Nicholls B, Singh S (2017) Measurement of person-centered care delivery of adult oncology in Ontario, Canada. J Clin Oncol 35(8):223CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Moody L, Nicholls B, Shamji H, Johnson N, Zwaal C, Stevens C, Biddy R, Griffin C, Laroque, Messersmith H, Singh S (2016) Bringing person-centered care to practice with CCOès guideline for person-centered care in adult oncology services. J Clin Oncol 34(7):65CrossRef Moody L, Nicholls B, Shamji H, Johnson N, Zwaal C, Stevens C, Biddy R, Griffin C, Laroque, Messersmith H, Singh S (2016) Bringing person-centered care to practice with CCOès guideline for person-centered care in adult oncology services. J Clin Oncol 34(7):65CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Calisi R, Boyko S, Vendette A, Zagar A (2016) What is person-centered care? A qualitative inquiry into oncology staff and patient and family experience of person-centered care. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 47(3):309–314CrossRefPubMed Calisi R, Boyko S, Vendette A, Zagar A (2016) What is person-centered care? A qualitative inquiry into oncology staff and patient and family experience of person-centered care. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 47(3):309–314CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Staniszewska S, Boardman F, Gunn L, Roberts J, Clay D, Seers K, Brett J, Avital L, Bullock I, O’Flynn N (2014) The Warwick Patient Experiences Framework: patient-based evidence in clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 26(2):151–157CrossRefPubMed Staniszewska S, Boardman F, Gunn L, Roberts J, Clay D, Seers K, Brett J, Avital L, Bullock I, O’Flynn N (2014) The Warwick Patient Experiences Framework: patient-based evidence in clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 26(2):151–157CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cronin C (2004) Patient-centered care: an overview of definitions and concepts. Washington, DC: National Health Council (Guideline Ref ID CRONIN2004) Cronin C (2004) Patient-centered care: an overview of definitions and concepts. Washington, DC: National Health Council (Guideline Ref ID CRONIN2004)
17.
go back to reference Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco T (1993) Through the patient’s eyes: understanding and promoting patient-centered care. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco T (1993) Through the patient’s eyes: understanding and promoting patient-centered care. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass
20.
go back to reference Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, Brito JP, Boehmer K, Hasan R, Firwana B, Erwin P, Eton D, Sloan J, Montori V, Asi N, Dabrh AM, Murad MH (2014) Patient engagement in research: a systemic review. BMC Health Serv Res 14:89CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, Brito JP, Boehmer K, Hasan R, Firwana B, Erwin P, Eton D, Sloan J, Montori V, Asi N, Dabrh AM, Murad MH (2014) Patient engagement in research: a systemic review. BMC Health Serv Res 14:89CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
go back to reference Niederhauser V, Marshburn D, LaVela S (2014) Defining patient experience. Patient Exp J 1(1):7–19 Niederhauser V, Marshburn D, LaVela S (2014) Defining patient experience. Patient Exp J 1(1):7–19
27.
go back to reference Lambert SD, Loiselle CG, Macdonald ME (2009) An in-depth exploration of information seeking behaviour among individuals with cancer, part 1: understanding differential patterns of active information seeking. Cancer Nurs 32(1):11–23CrossRefPubMed Lambert SD, Loiselle CG, Macdonald ME (2009) An in-depth exploration of information seeking behaviour among individuals with cancer, part 1: understanding differential patterns of active information seeking. Cancer Nurs 32(1):11–23CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference ISPOR 13th Annual International Meeting (2008) Educational Symposia, Toronto, May 2008 ISPOR 13th Annual International Meeting (2008) Educational Symposia, Toronto, May 2008
31.
go back to reference Howell D, Fitch M, Bakker D, Green E, Sussman J, Mayo S, Mohammed S, Lee C, Doran D (2013) Core domains for a person-focused outcome measurement system in cancer (PROMS-Cancer Core) for routine care: a scoping review and Canadian Delphi Consensus. Value Health 16(1):76–87CrossRefPubMed Howell D, Fitch M, Bakker D, Green E, Sussman J, Mayo S, Mohammed S, Lee C, Doran D (2013) Core domains for a person-focused outcome measurement system in cancer (PROMS-Cancer Core) for routine care: a scoping review and Canadian Delphi Consensus. Value Health 16(1):76–87CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, Green E, Orchard K, Wang K, Liberty J (2015) Patient- reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol 26(9):1846–1858CrossRefPubMed Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, Green E, Orchard K, Wang K, Liberty J (2015) Patient- reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol 26(9):1846–1858CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Howell D, Hack TF, Green E, Fitch MI (2014) Cancer distress screening data: translating knowledge into clinical action for a quality response. Palliat Support Care 12(1):39–51CrossRefPubMed Howell D, Hack TF, Green E, Fitch MI (2014) Cancer distress screening data: translating knowledge into clinical action for a quality response. Palliat Support Care 12(1):39–51CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Gotay CC, Kawamoto CT, Bottomley A, Efficace F (2008) The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 26(8):1355–1363CrossRefPubMed Gotay CC, Kawamoto CT, Bottomley A, Efficace F (2008) The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 26(8):1355–1363CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Delbecq AL, VandeVen AH (1971) A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J Appl Behav Sci 7:466–491CrossRef Delbecq AL, VandeVen AH (1971) A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J Appl Behav Sci 7:466–491CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Howell D, Fitch MI, Green E, Sussman J, Doran D (2013) Core domains for a person-focused outcome measurement system in Cancer (PROMS-Cancer Care): a scoping review and Canadian Delhi Consensus. Value Health 16(1):76–87CrossRefPubMed Howell D, Fitch MI, Green E, Sussman J, Doran D (2013) Core domains for a person-focused outcome measurement system in Cancer (PROMS-Cancer Care): a scoping review and Canadian Delhi Consensus. Value Health 16(1):76–87CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Coulter A (2007) Evidence on the effectiveness of strategies to improve patients’ experiences of cancer care. Picker Institute Europe, Oxford Coulter A (2007) Evidence on the effectiveness of strategies to improve patients’ experiences of cancer care. Picker Institute Europe, Oxford
39.
go back to reference Balik B (2012) Patient- and family-centeredness: growing a sustainable culture. Healthc Q 15(Special Issue):10–12CrossRefPubMed Balik B (2012) Patient- and family-centeredness: growing a sustainable culture. Healthc Q 15(Special Issue):10–12CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Mead N, Bower P (2002) Patient-centered consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 48(1):51–61CrossRefPubMed Mead N, Bower P (2002) Patient-centered consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 48(1):51–61CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW et al (2000) The impact of patient centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 49(9):796–804PubMed Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW et al (2000) The impact of patient centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 49(9):796–804PubMed
42.
go back to reference Howell D, Liu G (2012) Can routine collection of patient reported outcome data actually improve person-centered health? Healthc Pap 11(4):42–47CrossRef Howell D, Liu G (2012) Can routine collection of patient reported outcome data actually improve person-centered health? Healthc Pap 11(4):42–47CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Leung YW, Brown C, Perez Cosio A, Dobriyal A, Malik N, Pat V, Irwin M, Liu G, Howell D (2016) Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) item banks for routine surveillance of sleep and fatigue problems in ambulatory care. Cancer 122(18):2906–2917CrossRefPubMed Leung YW, Brown C, Perez Cosio A, Dobriyal A, Malik N, Pat V, Irwin M, Liu G, Howell D (2016) Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) item banks for routine surveillance of sleep and fatigue problems in ambulatory care. Cancer 122(18):2906–2917CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Black N, Varaganum M, Hutchings A (2014) Relationship between patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in elective surgery. BMJ Qual Saf 23(7):534–542CrossRefPubMed Black N, Varaganum M, Hutchings A (2014) Relationship between patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in elective surgery. BMJ Qual Saf 23(7):534–542CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Osborne RH, Elsworth GR, Whitfield K (2007) The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): an outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns 66(2):192–201 Osborne RH, Elsworth GR, Whitfield K (2007) The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): an outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns 66(2):192–201
47.
go back to reference Gottlieb LN (2012) Strengths-based nursing care: Health and healing for person and family. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company Gottlieb LN (2012) Strengths-based nursing care: Health and healing for person and family. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company
48.
go back to reference Christens BD (2012) Toward relational empowerment. Am J Community Psychol 50:114-128 Christens BD (2012) Toward relational empowerment. Am J Community Psychol 50:114-128
50.
go back to reference Development and Validation of the Picker Ambulatory Oncology Survey Instrument in Canada (2003) Lincoln, NE: National Research Corporation Development and Validation of the Picker Ambulatory Oncology Survey Instrument in Canada (2003) Lincoln, NE: National Research Corporation
Metadata
Title
Toward the development of a comprehensive cancer experience measurement framework
Authors
Carmen G. Loiselle
Doris Howell
Irene Nicoll
Margaret Fitch
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4529-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 7/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine