Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Symposium: 2013 Knee Society Proceedings

Total Knee Arthroplasty After High Tibial Osteotomy: No Differences Between Medial and Lateral Osteotomy Approaches

Authors: Stephen Preston, MDCM, James Howard, MD, FRCSC, Douglas Naudie, MD, FRCSC, Lyndsay Somerville, PhD, James McAuley, MD, FRCSC

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) has long been accepted as an effective treatment for unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee in young, active adults. For varus knees, the two most commonly performed valgus-producing HTOs are the lateral closing wedge and the medial opening wedge. Regardless of technique, some HTOs fail and are converted to TKA. To our knowledge, no studies have directly compared TKAs done after lateral closing-wedge osteotomies to those done after medial opening-wedge osteotomies.

Questions/purposes

We compared pain- and function-related outcomes and survivorship of TKAs in patients who previously underwent medial opening-wedge and lateral closing-wedge HTOs.

Methods

We reviewed our institutional database to identify all patients having undergone a HTO with subsequent conversion to TKA and identified 188 lateral closing-wedge HTOs and 77 medial opening-wedge HTOs. Mean followup was 88 months (range, 3–264 months) for the lateral closing-wedge HTO cohort and 59 months (range, 3–180 months) for the medial opening-wedge cohort. SF-12, WOMAC, and Knee Society Scores, as well as survivorship at 5 years, were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was completed using the independent-samples t-test.

Results

No differences were found between groups in postoperative SF-12 scores (p = 0.77 for the mental component summary score and p = 0.21 for the physical component summary score), WOMAC scores (p = 0.67), or Knee Society Scores (p = 0.80). No difference was found in survivorship between groups at 5 years.

Conclusions

Our results suggest there is no difference in functional outcomes or survivorship of TKA in patients having previously undergone medial opening-wedge and lateral closing-wedge HTOs.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Erak S, Naudie D, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Total knee arthroplasty following medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: technical issues early clinical radiological results. Knee. 2011;18:499–504.PubMedCrossRef Erak S, Naudie D, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Total knee arthroplasty following medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: technical issues early clinical radiological results. Knee. 2011;18:499–504.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fowler PJ, Tan JL, Brown GA. Medial opening wedge osteotomy: how I do it. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2000;8:32–38.CrossRef Fowler PJ, Tan JL, Brown GA. Medial opening wedge osteotomy: how I do it. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2000;8:32–38.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Bentley G. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a medium-term review. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:597–603.PubMedCrossRef Haddad FS, Bentley G. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a medium-term review. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:597–603.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Haslam P, Armstrong M, Geutjens G, Wilton TJ. Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy: long-term follow-up of matched groups. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:245–250.PubMedCrossRef Haslam P, Armstrong M, Geutjens G, Wilton TJ. Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy: long-term follow-up of matched groups. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:245–250.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hooper G, Leslie H, Burn J, Schouten R, Beci I. Oblique upper tibial opening wedge osteotomy for genu varum. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2005;17:662–673.PubMedCrossRef Hooper G, Leslie H, Burn J, Schouten R, Beci I. Oblique upper tibial opening wedge osteotomy for genu varum. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2005;17:662–673.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Karabatsos B, Mahomed NN, Maistrelli GL. Functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Can J Surg. 2002;45:116–119.PubMedCentralPubMed Karabatsos B, Mahomed NN, Maistrelli GL. Functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Can J Surg. 2002;45:116–119.PubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;375:175–184.PubMedCrossRef Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;375:175–184.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Naudie D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Bourne TJ. The Insall Award. Survivorship of the high tibial valgus osteotomy: a 10- to 22-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:18–27.PubMed Naudie D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Bourne TJ. The Insall Award. Survivorship of the high tibial valgus osteotomy: a 10- to 22-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:18–27.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Nizard R, Cardinne L, Bizot P, Witvoet J. Total knee replacement after failed tibial osteotomy: results of a matched pair study. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:847–853.PubMedCrossRef Nizard R, Cardinne L, Bizot P, Witvoet J. Total knee replacement after failed tibial osteotomy: results of a matched pair study. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:847–853.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Van Raaij TM, Reijman M, Furlan AD, Verhaar JA. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:1186–1195. Van Raaij TM, Reijman M, Furlan AD, Verhaar JA. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:1186–1195.
Metadata
Title
Total Knee Arthroplasty After High Tibial Osteotomy: No Differences Between Medial and Lateral Osteotomy Approaches
Authors
Stephen Preston, MDCM
James Howard, MD, FRCSC
Douglas Naudie, MD, FRCSC
Lyndsay Somerville, PhD
James McAuley, MD, FRCSC
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3040-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2014 Go to the issue