Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2020

01-02-2020 | Tooth Extraction | Original Article

Dimensional changes following alveolar ridge preservation in the posterior area using bovine-derived xenografts and collagen membrane compared to spontaneous healing: a 6-month randomized controlled clinical trial

Authors: Vincenzo Iorio-Siciliano, Luca Ramaglia, Andrea Blasi, Paolo Bucci, Paolo Nuzzolo, Francesco Riccitiello, Michele Nicolò

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To assess dimensional changes following alveolar ridge preservation using bovine-derived xenograft with 10% collagen and collagen membrane compared to ridge preservation by means of bovine-derived xenograft particles and collagen membrane or spontaneous healing in posterior sites.

Materials and methods

Forty subjects with 40 posterior teeth or roots candidate to extraction and presenting integrity of alveolar bone walls were randomly allocated into three groups. Patients of test group were treated by ridge preservation technique using bovine-derived xenograft with 10% collagen and collagen membrane; patients of control group 1 were treated by means of bovine-derived xenograft particles and collagen membrane while in patients of control group 2, no grafting was performed. Changes in vertical and horizontal bone dimensions were compared at baseline and after 6-month observation time.

Results

Statistically significant differences between baseline and 6 month were observed in all groups in terms of vertical and horizontal bone resorption (p < 0.001), except for vertical resorption in control group 2. After 6-month intergroup comparisons showed not statistically significant changes between test and control groups in terms of alveolar bone changes (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Within the limits of this study, the sites grafted using bovine-derived xenograft with 10% collagen in combination with a collagen membrane showed no statistical differences in terms of vertical and horizontal bone resorption compared to control groups.

Clinical relevance

Ridge preservation in posterior area failed to show clinically relevant benefits in sites presenting integrity of alveolar bone walls and adequate buccal bone wall thickness.
Literature
1.
Cardaropoli G, Araujo MG, Lindhe J (2003) Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 30:809–818PubMed
2.
Nevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, Friedland B, Schenk RK, Parma-Benfenati S, Simion M, Tinti C, Wagenberg B (2006) A study on the fate of buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 26:19–29PubMed
3.
Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP (2012) A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 23 (suppl. 5:1–21PubMed
4.
Araujo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, Sukekava F (2015a) Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn? Periodontol 68:122–134
5.
Discepoli N, Vignoletti F, Laino L, deSanctis M, Munoz F, Sanz M (2013) Early healing of alveolar process after tooth extraction: an experimental study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 40:638–644PubMed
6.
Arujo MG, Lindhe J (2005) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:212–218
7.
Pietrokovski J, Massler M (1967) Alveolar ridge remodeling following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent 26:119–129
8.
Shropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T (2003) Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extration: a clinical and radiographic 12-months prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 23:313–323
9.
Hammerle CH, Araujo MG, Simion M, Osteology Consensus Group 2011 (2012) Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(suppl 5):80–82PubMed
10.
Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, Scheets JP (2003) Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 74:990–999PubMed
11.
Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U (2008a) Xenograft vs extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol 79:1370–1377PubMed
12.
Crespi R, Cappare P, Gherlone E (2009) Magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite compared to calcium sulfate in the healing of human extraction sockets: radiographic and histomorphometric evaluation at 3 months. J Periodontol 80:210–218PubMed
13.
Wood RA, Mealey BL (2012) Histologic comparison of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized vs demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. J Periodontol 83:328–336
14.
Thalmair T, Fickl S, Schneider D, Hinze M, Wachtel H (2013) Dimensional alterations of extraction sites after different alveolar ridge preservation techniques-a volumetric study. J Clin Periodontol 40:721–727PubMed
15.
Coomes AM, Mealey BL, Huynh-Ba G, Barboza-Arguello C, Moore WS, Cochran DL (2014) Buccal bone formation after flapless extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2/absorbable collagen carrier and collagen sponge alone. J Periodontol 85:525–535PubMed
16.
Cardaropoli G, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L (2015) Evaluation of dental implants placed in preserved and non-preserved post-extraction ridges. A 12-month postloading study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 35:677–685PubMed
17.
Matarasso S, Salvi GE, Iorio-Siciliano V, Cafiero C, Blasi A, Lang NP (2009) Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-months prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry. Clin Oral Implant Res 20:1092–1098
18.
Iorio-Siciliano V, Marzo G, Blasi A, Cafiero C, Mignogna M, Nicolò M (2014) Soft and hard tissue modifications at immediate transmucosal implants (with laser-lock microtextured collar) placed into fresh extraction sites: a 6-month prospective study with surgical re-entry. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 34:541–549PubMed
19.
Ramaglia L, Sbordone C, Saviano R, Martuscelli R, Sbordone L (2015) Marginal masticatory mucosa dimension changes in immediate post-extractive implants: a 2 years prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implant Res 26:1495–1502
20.
Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Hayacibara R, Sukekava F, Lindhe J (2005) Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced-augmented and non-augmented defects in the alveolar ridge. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:435–440PubMed
21.
Fickl S, Schneider D, Zhur O, Hinze M, Ender A, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB (2009a) Dimensional change of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. J Clin Periodontol 36:442–448PubMed
22.
Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachel H, Kebshull M, Hurzeler MB (2009b) Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation with additional buccal overbuilding. A study in beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 36:898–904PubMed
23.
Milani S, Del Pozzo R, Rasperini G, Sforza C, Dellavia C (2016) Deproteinized bovine bone remodeling pattern in alveolar socket: a clinical immunohistological evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 27:295–302PubMed
24.
Iorio-Siciliano V, Blasi A, Nicolò M, Iorio-Siciliano A, Riccitiello F, Ramaglia L (2017) Clinical outcomes of socket preservation using bovine-derived xenograft collagen and collagen membrane post-tooth extraction: a 6-month randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 37:e–290-e296
25.
Araujo M, Linder E, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J (2008) The influence of Bio-Oss Collagen on healing of an extraction socket: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 28:123–135PubMed
26.
Araujo M, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J (2010) Dynamics of Bio-Oss Collagen incorporation in fresh extraction wounds: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 21:55–64PubMed
27.
Araujo M, Lindhe J (2009a) Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss Collagen. A 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:433–440PubMed
28.
Sbordone C, Toti P, Martuscelli R, Guidetti F, Ramaglia L, Sbordone L (2016) Retrospective volume analysis of bone remodeling after tooth extraction with and without deproteinized bovine bone mineral insertion. Clin Oral Implants Res 27:1152–1159PubMed
29.
Ten Heggler MJ, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA (2011) Effect of socket preservation therapies following extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 22:779–788
30.
Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo P, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M (2012) Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(suppl 5):28–38
31.
Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, MacBeth N, Petrie A, Donos N (2015) Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: group 4: therapeutic concepts &methods. Clin Oral Implants Res 26(suppl 11):180–201PubMed
32.
Heitz F, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Lang NP (2004 Nov) Effects of post-surgical cleansing protocols on early plaque control in periodontal and/or periimplant wound healing. J Clin Periodontol 31(11):1012–1018PubMed
33.
Scheyer ET, Heard R, Janakievski J, Mandelaris G, Nevins ML, Pickering SR, Richardson CR, Pope B, Toback G, Velasquez D, Nagursky H (2016) A randomized ,controlled, multicenter clinical trial of post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation. J Clin Periodontol 43:1188–1199 doi.111/jcpe12623PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
35.
Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, De Maria A, Gaveglio L (2018) Alveolar ridge preservation using tridimensional collagen matrix and deproteinized bovine bone mineral in the esthetic area: a CBCT and histologic human pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 38(suppl):s29–s35. https://​doi.​org/​10.​11607/​prd.​3702 CrossRefPubMed
36.
Barone A, Ricci M, Tonelli P, Santini S, Covani U (2013) Tissue change of extraction sockets in humans: a comparison of spontaneous healing vs ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing. J Periodontol 24:1231–1237
37.
Wang RE, Lang NP (2012) Ridge preservation after tooth extraction. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(suppl 6):147–156PubMed
38.
Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, Stark PC, Griffin T (2011) Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and bioresorbable membrane with and without primary wound clousure: a comparative clinical trial. J Periodontol 82:377–387PubMed
39.
Scala A, Lang NP, Schweikert MT, de Oliveira JA, Rangel-Garcia I Jr, Botticelli D (2014) Sequential healing of open extraction sockets. An experimental study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 25:288–295PubMed
40.
41.
42.
Wu IH, Bakhshalian N, Galaustian R, Naini RB, Min S, Freire M, Zadeh HH (2019) Retrospective analysis of the outcome of ridge preservation with anorganic bovine bone mineral: marginal bone level at implants placed following healing of grafted extraction sockets. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 39:131–140. https://​doi.​org/​10.​11607/​prd.​3308 CrossRefPubMed
43.
44.
45.
Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D (2009) Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24(suppl):260–271PubMed
46.
Barone A, Toti P, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Derchi G, Covani U (2014) Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation technique: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 85:14–23PubMed
47.
Araujo M, Lindhe J (2009b) Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:545–549PubMed
48.
Caneva M, Botticelli D, Salata LA, Bressan E, Lang NP (2010) Flap vs flapless surgical approach at immediate implants : a histomorphometric study in dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 21:1314–1319PubMed
49.
Araujo MG, da Silva JC, de Mendonca AF, Lindhe J (2015b) Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh alveolar sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Res 26:407–412
50.
Shneider D, Schmidlin PR, Philipp A, Annem BM, Ronay V, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Jung RE (2014) Labial soft tissue volume evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 41:612–617
51.
Flugge T, Nelson K, Nack C, Stricker A, Nahles S (2015) 2-Dimensional changes of soft tissue profile of augmented and non-augmented human extraction sockets: a randomized pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 42:390–397PubMed
52.
Sbordone C, Toti P, Ramaglia L, Guidetti F, Sbordone L, Martuscelli R (2014) A 5-year clinical and computerized tomographic implant follow-up in sinus-lifted maxillae and native bone. Clinical Oral Implants Res 25:1056–1064
53.
Martuscelli R, Toti P, Sbordone L, Guidetti F, Ramaglia L, Sbordone C (2014) Five-year outcome of bone remodelling around implants in the maxillary sinus: assessment of differences between implants placed in autogenous inlay bone blocks and in ungrafted maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:1117–1126PubMed
54.
Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachel H, Stappert CF, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB (2008a) Dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge contour after different socket preservation techniques. J Clin Periodontol 35:906–913PubMed
55.
Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachel H, Bolzer W, Hurzeler MB (2008b) Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 19:1111–1118PubMed
56.
Ramaglia L, Saviano R, Matarese G, Cassandro F, Williams RC, Isola G (2018) Histologic evaluation of soft and hard tissue healing following alveolar ridge preservation with deproteinized bovine bone mineral covered with xenogenic collagen matrix. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 38:737–745PubMed
Metadata
Title
Dimensional changes following alveolar ridge preservation in the posterior area using bovine-derived xenografts and collagen membrane compared to spontaneous healing: a 6-month randomized controlled clinical trial
Authors
Vincenzo Iorio-Siciliano
Luca Ramaglia
Andrea Blasi
Paolo Bucci
Paolo Nuzzolo
Francesco Riccitiello
Michele Nicolò
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02979-w

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2020 Go to the issue

Original Article

Distribution of sodium hypochlorite throughout the mesial root canal system of mandibular molars after adjunctive irrigant activation procedures: a micro-computed tomographic study

Original Article

Comprehensive assessment of dental behaviour and oral status in patients with tongue piercing—results of a cross-sectional study

Original Article

Fracture load of three-unit full-contour fixed dental prostheses fabricated with subtractive and additive CAD/CAM technology

Original Article

Severe periodontitis is linked with increased peripheral levels of sTWEAK and PTX3 in chronic migraineurs

Original Article

Effect of a novel quaternary ammonium silane cavity disinfectant on cariogenic biofilm formation

Original Article

Prevalence of traumatic crown injuries in German adolescents