Top

Published in:

06-05-2023 | Review

Tooth automatic segmentation from CBCT images: a systematic review

Authors: Alessandro Polizzi, Vincenzo Quinzi, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Pietro Venezia, Simona Santonocito, Antonino Lo Giudice, Rosalia Leonardi, Gaetano Isola

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 7/2023

Abstract

Objectives

To describe the current state of the art regarding technological advances in full-automatic tooth segmentation approaches from 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

Materials and methods

In March 2023, a search strategy without a timeline setting was carried out through a combination of MeSH terms and free text words pooled through Boolean operators (‘AND’, ‘OR’) on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and IEEE Explore. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, cohort, case–control, cross-sectional and retrospective studies in the English language only were included.

Results

The search strategy identified 541 articles, of which 23 have been selected. The most employed segmentation methods were based on deep learning approaches. One article exposed an automatic approach for tooth segmentation based on a watershed algorithm and another article used an improved level set method. Four studies presented classical machine learning and thresholding approaches. The most employed metric for evaluating segmentation performance was the Dice similarity index which ranged from 90 ± 3% to 97.9 ± 1.5%.

Conclusions

Thresholding appeared not reliable for tooth segmentation from CBCT images, whereas convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been demonstrated as the most promising approach. CNNs could help overcome tooth segmentation’s main limitations from CBCT images related to root anatomy, heavy scattering, immature teeth, metal artifacts and time consumption. New studies with uniform protocols and evaluation metrics with random sampling and blinding for data analysis are encouraged to objectively compare the different deep learning architectures’ reliability.

Clinical relevance

Automatic tooth segmentation’s best performance has been obtained through CNNs for the different ambits of digital dentistry.

Leonardi R (2019) Cone-beam computed tomography and three-dimensional orthodontics. Where we are and future perspectives. J Orthod 46:45–48CrossRefPubMed

Nota A, Quinzi V, Floriani F, Cappelli C, Tecco S, Marzo G (2021) 3D morphometric analysis of human primary second molar crowns and its implications on interceptive orthodontics. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:6201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Leite AF, Van Gerven A, Willems H, Beznik T, Lahoud P, Gaêta-Araujo H, Vranckx M, Jacobs R (2021) Artificial intelligence-driven novel tool for tooth detection and segmentation on panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Invest 25:2257–2267CrossRef

Naumovich S, Naumovich S, Goncharenko V (2015) Three-dimensional reconstruction of teeth and jaws based on segmentation of CT images using watershed transformation. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 44:20140313CrossRef

Jiang F, Kula K, Chen J (2016) Estimating the location of the center of resistance of canines. Angle Orthod 86:365–371CrossRefPubMed

Shaheen E, Khalil W, Ezeldeen M, Van de Casteele E, Sun Y, Politis C, Jacobs R (2017) Accuracy of segmentation of tooth structures using 3 different CBCT machines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 123:123–128CrossRefPubMed

Ralph W, Jefferies J (1984) The minimal width of the periodontal space. J Oral Rehabil 11:415–418CrossRefPubMed

Brüllmann D, Schulze R (2015) Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications—what do we know today? Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 44:20140204CrossRef

Chen Y, Du H, Yun Z, Yang S, Dai Z, Zhong L, Feng Q, Yang W (2020) Automatic segmentation of individual tooth in dental CBCT images from tooth surface map by a multi-task FCN. IEEE Access 8:97296–97309CrossRef

10.

Galibourg A, Dumoncel J, Telmon N, Calvet A, Michetti J, Maret D (2017) Assessment of automatic segmentation of teeth using a watershed-based method. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 47:20170220CrossRef

11.

Evain T, Ripoche X, Atif J and Bloch I (2017) Semi-automatic teeth segmentation in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography by graph-cut with statistical shape priors. Book title. IEEE

12.

Barone S, Paoli A, Razionale AV (2016) CT segmentation of dental shapes by anatomy-driven reformation imaging and B-spline modelling. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 32:e02747CrossRef

13.

Gan Y, Xia Z, Xiong J, Li G, Zhao Q (2017) Tooth and alveolar bone segmentation from dental computed tomography images. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 22:196–204CrossRefPubMed

14.

Gao H, Chae O (2010) Individual tooth segmentation from CT images using level set method with shape and intensity prior. Pattern Recogn 43:2406–2417CrossRef

15.

Hosntalab M, Zoroofi RA, Tehrani-Fard AA, Shirani G (2008) Segmentation of teeth in CT volumetric dataset by panoramic projection and variational level set. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 3:257–265CrossRef

16.

Wang Y, Liu S, Wang G, Liu Y (2018) Accurate tooth segmentation with improved hybrid active contour model. Phys Med Biol 64:015012CrossRefPubMed

17.

Fenster A, Chiu B (2006) Evaluation of segmentation algorithms for medical imaging. Book title. IEEE

18.

Hwang J-J, Jung Y-H, Cho B-H, Heo M-S (2019) An overview of deep learning in the field of dentistry. Imaging Sci Dent 49:1–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62:e1–e34CrossRefPubMed

20.

Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536CrossRefPubMed

21.

Cui Z, Li C, Wang W (2019) Toothnet: automatic tooth instance segmentation and identification from cone beam ct images. Book title

22.

Cui Z, Fang Y, Mei L, Zhang B, Yu B, Liu J, Jiang C, Sun Y, Ma L, Huang J, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Lian C, Ding Z, Zhu M, Shen D (2022) A fully automatic AI system for tooth and alveolar bone segmentation from cone-beam CT images. Nature Commun 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29637-2

23.

Deleat-Besson R, Le C, Zhang W, Turkestani NA, Cevidanes L, Bianchi J, Ruellas A, Gurgel M, Massaro C, Del Castillo AA, Ioshida M, Yatabe M, Benavides E, Rios H, Soki F, Neiva G, Najarian K, Gryak J, Styner M, Aristizabal JF, Rey D, Alvarez MA, Bert L, Soroushmehr R, Prieto J (2021) Merging and annotating teeth and roots from automated segmentation of multimodal images. Book title

24.

Dou WH, Gao SS, Mao DQ, Dai HH, Zhang CH, Zhou YF (2022) Tooth instance segmentation based on capturing dependencies and receptive field adjustment in cone beam computed tomography. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds 33. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.2100

25.

Duan W, Chen Y, Zhang Q, Lin X, Yang X (2021) Refined tooth and pulp segmentation using U-Net in CBCT image. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 50. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200251

26.

Hsu K, Yuh DY, Lin SC, Lyu PS, Pan GX, Zhuang YC, Chang CC, Peng HH, Lee TY, Juan CH, Juan CE, Liu YJ, Juan CJ (2022) Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography. Sci Rep 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23901-7

27.

Indraswari R, Kurita T, Arifin AZ, Suciati N, Astuti ER, Navastara DA (2018) 3D region merging for segmentation of teeth on cone-beam computed tomography images. Book title

28.

Jang TJ, Kim KC, Cho HC, Seo JK (2021) A fully automated method for 3D individual tooth identification and segmentation in dental CBCT. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3086072CrossRef

29.

Jiang B, Zhang Y, Tang X, Shi H (2019) Region growing model with edge restrictions for multiple roots tooth segmentation. Book title

30.

Lahoud P, EzEldeen M, Beznik T, Willems H, Leite A, Van Gerven A, Jacobs R (2021) Artificial intelligence for fast and accurate 3-dimensional tooth segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 47:827–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.12.020CrossRefPubMed

31.

Lee S, Woo S, Yu J, Seo J, Lee J, Lee C (2020) Automated CNN-based tooth segmentation in cone-beam CT for dental implant planning. IEEE Access 8:50507–50518. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975826CrossRef

32.

Li Q, Chen K, Han L, Zhuang Y, Li J, Lin J (2020) Automatic tooth roots segmentation of cone beam computed tomography image sequences using U-net and RNN. J Xray Sci Technol 28:905–922. https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-200678CrossRefPubMed

33.

Macho P, Kurz N, Ulges A, Brylka R, Gietzen T, Schwanecke U (2018) Segmenting teeth from volumetric ct data with a hierarchical cnn-based approach. Book title

34.

Mortaheb P, Rezaeian M (2016) Metal artifact reduction and segmentation of dental computerized tomography images using least square support vector machine and mean shift algorithm. J Med Signals Sensors 6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.4103/2228-7477.175867CrossRef

35.

Qian J, Lu S, Gao Y, Tao Y, Lin J, Lin H (2021) An automatic tooth reconstruction method based on multimodal data. J Visualization 24:205–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00697-0CrossRef

36.

Rao Y, Wang Y, Meng F, Pu J, Sun J, Wang Q (2020) A symmetric fully convolutional residual network with DCRF for accurate tooth segmentation. IEEE Access 8:92028–92038. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2994592CrossRef

37.

Sabanci S, Sener E, Turhal RI, Gurses BO, Govsa F, Tekin U, Baltaci A, Boyacioglu H, Guneri P (2021) Is manual segmentation the real gold standard for tooth segmentation? A preliminary in vivo study using cone-beam computed tomography images. Meandros Med Dent J 22:263–273. https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.14632CrossRef

38.

Shaheen E, Leite A, Alqahtani KA, Smolders A, Van Gerven A, Willems H, Jacobs R (2021) A novel deep learning system for multi-class tooth segmentation and classification on cone beam computed tomography. A validation study: deep learning for teeth segmentation and classification. J Dent 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103865

39.

Trelenberg-Stoll V, Drescher D, Wolf M, Becker K (2021) Automated tooth segmentation as an innovative tool to assess 3D-tooth movement and root resorption in rodents. Head Face Med 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00254-y

40.

Wang H, Minnema J, Batenburg KJ, Forouzanfar T, Hu FJ, Wu G (2021) Multiclass CBCT image segmentation for orthodontics with deep learning. J Dent Res 100:943–949. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345211005338CrossRefPubMed

41.

Wu X, Chen H, Huang Y, Guo H, Qiu T, Wang L (2020) Center-sensitive and boundary-aware tooth instance segmentation and classification from cone-beam CT. Book title

42.

Yang Y, Xie R, Jia W, Chen Z, Yang Y, Xie L, Jiang B (2021) Accurate and automatic tooth image segmentation model with deep convolutional neural networks and level set method. Neurocomputing 419:108–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.110CrossRef

43.

Qiu B, van der Wel H, Kraeima J, Glas HH, Guo J, Borra RJ, Witjes MJH, van Ooijen P (2021) Automatic segmentation of mandible from conventional methods to deep learning—a review. J Personalized Med 11:629CrossRef

44.

Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, Souza PC, Martens W, Shahbazian M, Alonso A, Lambrichts I (2010) A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 75:265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.042CrossRefPubMed

45.

Nackaerts O, Depypere M, Zhang G, Vandenberghe B, Maes F, Jacobs R, Consortium S (2015) Segmentation of trabecular jaw bone on cone beam CT datasets. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17:1082–1091CrossRefPubMed

46.

Hapca SM, Houston AN, Otten W, Baveye PC (2013) New local thresholding method for soil images by minimizing grayscale intra-class variance. Vadose Zone J 12

47.

O’Mahony N, Campbell S, Carvalho A, Harapanahalli S, Hernandez GV, Krpalkova L, Riordan D, Walsh J (2019) Deep learning vs. traditional computer vision. Book title. Springer

48.

Zijdenbos AP, Dawant BM, Margolin RA, Palmer AC (1994) Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 13:716–724CrossRefPubMed

Title: Tooth automatic segmentation from CBCT images: a systematic review
Authors: Alessandro Polizzi
Vincenzo Quinzi
Vincenzo Ronsivalle
Pietro Venezia
Simona Santonocito
Antonino Lo Giudice
Rosalia Leonardi
Gaetano Isola
Publication date: 06-05-2023
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 7/2023
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05048-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Tooth automatic segmentation from CBCT images: a systematic review

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2023

Effectiveness of the platelet-rich fibrin in the control of pain associated with alveolar osteitis: a scoping review

Comparison of part-time and full-time mandibular advancement: enlightenment based on type H vessel coupling osteogenesis

Cerebral abscesses with odontogenic origin: a population-based cohort study

Surface modification of zirconia or lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic by laser texturing to increase the adhesion of prosthetic surfaces to resin cements: an integrative review

Oral health and 10-year cardiovascular risk in US adults: mediating role of inflammatory diet and vitamin D

3D analysis of occlusal registration through geometry embedded library matching between quadrant and full-arch digital impression