Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Original paper

To what extent is women’s economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010

Authors: Gwenn Menvielle, Jean-Baptiste Richard, Virginie Ringa, Rosemary Dray-Spira, François Beck

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In France, larger social inequalities are reported for cervical cancer screening, based on individual practice, than for breast cancer screening for which organized screening exists. Our aim was to investigate the association between women’s economic situation and breast and cervical cancer screening.

Methods

We used data from a large French national health survey conducted in 2010. The economic situation was assessed using the number of adverse economic conditions respondents were facing, based on three variables (low income, lacking food, and perceived financial difficulties). Logistic regressions were adjusted for socioeconomic and sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare use and insurance, and health behaviors.

Results

Mammography was less frequent among women experiencing two or more adverse economic conditions, whereas Pap smear was less frequent among women experiencing at least one adverse economic condition. For both screenings, higher rates were observed among women who lived in the Paris region. Sociodemographic indicators and health behaviors were associated with Pap smear, whereas healthcare use and insurance characteristics were associated with mammography.

Conclusions

The women’s economic situation is an important determinant of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010. Alleviating economic barriers to female cancers screening should be a priority in future programs implementation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Haute Autorité de Santé (2011) La participation au dépistage du cancer du sein chez le femmes de 50 à 74 ans en France: Situation actuelle et perspectives d’évolution. [Breast cancer screening uptake among women aged 50–74 years in France: current situation and perspectives]. Haute Autorité de Santé Haute Autorité de Santé (2011) La participation au dépistage du cancer du sein chez le femmes de 50 à 74 ans en France: Situation actuelle et perspectives d’évolution. [Breast cancer screening uptake among women aged 50–74 years in France: current situation and perspectives]. Haute Autorité de Santé
3.
go back to reference Guilbert P, Peretti-Watel P, Beck F, Gautier A (2006) Baromètre cancer 2005 [cancer barometer 2005]. Inpes, Saint-Denis Guilbert P, Peretti-Watel P, Beck F, Gautier A (2006) Baromètre cancer 2005 [cancer barometer 2005]. Inpes, Saint-Denis
4.
go back to reference Duport N, Ancelle-Park R (2006) Do socio-demographic factors influence mammography use of French women? Analysis of a French cross-sectional survey. Eur J Cancer Prev 15:219–224PubMedCrossRef Duport N, Ancelle-Park R (2006) Do socio-demographic factors influence mammography use of French women? Analysis of a French cross-sectional survey. Eur J Cancer Prev 15:219–224PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Moser K, Patnick J, Beral V (2009) Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data. BMJ 338:b2025PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Moser K, Patnick J, Beral V (2009) Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data. BMJ 338:b2025PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Luengo-Matos S, Polo-Santos M, Saz-Parkinson Z (2006) Mammography use and factors associated with its use after the introduction of breast cancer screening programmes in Spain. Eur J Cancer Prev 15:242–248PubMedCrossRef Luengo-Matos S, Polo-Santos M, Saz-Parkinson Z (2006) Mammography use and factors associated with its use after the introduction of breast cancer screening programmes in Spain. Eur J Cancer Prev 15:242–248PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference von Euler-Chelpin M, Olsen AH, Njor S, Vejborg I, Schwartz W, Lynge E (2008) Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening. Int J Cancer 122:418–423CrossRef von Euler-Chelpin M, Olsen AH, Njor S, Vejborg I, Schwartz W, Lynge E (2008) Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening. Int J Cancer 122:418–423CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Damiani G, Federico B, Basso D, Ronconi A, Bianchi CB, Anzellotti GM, Nasi G, Sassi F, Ricciardi W (2012) Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 12:99PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Damiani G, Federico B, Basso D, Ronconi A, Bianchi CB, Anzellotti GM, Nasi G, Sassi F, Ricciardi W (2012) Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 12:99PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Manjer J, Janzon L (2004) Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer 108:754–760PubMedCrossRef Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Manjer J, Janzon L (2004) Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer 108:754–760PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Duport N, Serra D, Goulard H, Bloch J (2008) Which factors influence screening practices for female cancer in France? Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 56:303–313PubMedCrossRef Duport N, Serra D, Goulard H, Bloch J (2008) Which factors influence screening practices for female cancer in France? Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 56:303–313PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Palencia L, Espelt A, Rodriguez-Sanz M, Puigpinos R, Pons-Vigues M, Pasarin MI, Spadea T, Kunst AE, Borrell C (2010) Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program. Int J Epidemiol 39:757–765PubMedCrossRef Palencia L, Espelt A, Rodriguez-Sanz M, Puigpinos R, Pons-Vigues M, Pasarin MI, Spadea T, Kunst AE, Borrell C (2010) Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program. Int J Epidemiol 39:757–765PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Duport N (2012) Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French health, health care and insurance survey. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 60:421–430PubMedCrossRef Duport N (2012) Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French health, health care and insurance survey. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 60:421–430PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stuckler D, Basu S, Suhrcke M, Coutts A, McKee M (2011) Effects of the 2008 recession on health: a first look at European data. Lancet 378:124–125PubMedCrossRef Stuckler D, Basu S, Suhrcke M, Coutts A, McKee M (2011) Effects of the 2008 recession on health: a first look at European data. Lancet 378:124–125PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Després C, Dourgnon P, Fantin, R, Jusot F (2011) Le renoncement aux soins pour raisons financières: une approche économétrique [Health care renouncement for financial reasons: an econometric approach]. Questions d’économie de la santé 170 Després C, Dourgnon P, Fantin, R, Jusot F (2011) Le renoncement aux soins pour raisons financières: une approche économétrique [Health care renouncement for financial reasons: an econometric approach]. Questions d’économie de la santé 170
15.
go back to reference Beck F, Gautier A, Guignard R, Richard J (2011) Une méthode de prise en compte du dégroupage total dans le plan de sondage des enquêtes téléphoniques auprès des ménages [A method to account for full unbundled access in sampling design for telephone surveys]. In: Tremblay M, Lavallée P, El Hadj Tirari M (eds) Pratiques et Méthodes de sondage. Dunod, Collection Sciences Sup, Paris, pp. 310–314 Beck F, Gautier A, Guignard R, Richard J (2011) Une méthode de prise en compte du dégroupage total dans le plan de sondage des enquêtes téléphoniques auprès des ménages [A method to account for full unbundled access in sampling design for telephone surveys]. In: Tremblay M, Lavallée P, El Hadj Tirari M (eds) Pratiques et Méthodes de sondage. Dunod, Collection Sciences Sup, Paris, pp. 310–314
17.
go back to reference Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA (1998) The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch Intern Med 158:1789–1795PubMedCrossRef Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA (1998) The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch Intern Med 158:1789–1795PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Duport N, Ancelle-Park R, Boussac-Zarebska M, Uhry Z, Bloch J (2008) Are breast cancer screening practices associated with sociodemographic status and healthcare access? Analysis of a French cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer Prev 17:218–224PubMedCrossRef Duport N, Ancelle-Park R, Boussac-Zarebska M, Uhry Z, Bloch J (2008) Are breast cancer screening practices associated with sociodemographic status and healthcare access? Analysis of a French cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer Prev 17:218–224PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Beck F, Gautier A (2012) Baromètre cancer 2010 [cancer barometer 2010]. Inpes, Saint-Denis Beck F, Gautier A (2012) Baromètre cancer 2010 [cancer barometer 2010]. Inpes, Saint-Denis
20.
go back to reference Lagerlund M, Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Thurfjell E, Ekbom A, Lambe M (2002) Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening—a population-based register study (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 13:73–82PubMedCrossRef Lagerlund M, Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Thurfjell E, Ekbom A, Lambe M (2002) Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening—a population-based register study (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 13:73–82PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pons-Vigues M, Puigpinos-Riera R, Rodriguez-Sanz M, Serral G, Palencia L, Borrell C (2011) Preventive control of breast and cervical cancer in immigrant and native women in Spain: the role of country of origin and social class. Int J Health Serv 41:483–499PubMedCrossRef Pons-Vigues M, Puigpinos-Riera R, Rodriguez-Sanz M, Serral G, Palencia L, Borrell C (2011) Preventive control of breast and cervical cancer in immigrant and native women in Spain: the role of country of origin and social class. Int J Health Serv 41:483–499PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Grillo F, Vallee J, Chauvin P (2012) Inequalities in cervical cancer screening for women with or without a regular consulting in primary care for gynaecological health, in Paris, France. Prev Med 54:259–265PubMedCrossRef Grillo F, Vallee J, Chauvin P (2012) Inequalities in cervical cancer screening for women with or without a regular consulting in primary care for gynaecological health, in Paris, France. Prev Med 54:259–265PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kristiansen M, Thorsted BL, Krasnik A, von Euler-Chelpin M (2012) Participation in mammography screening among migrants and non-migrants in Denmark. Acta Oncol 51:28–36PubMedCrossRef Kristiansen M, Thorsted BL, Krasnik A, von Euler-Chelpin M (2012) Participation in mammography screening among migrants and non-migrants in Denmark. Acta Oncol 51:28–36PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lynge E, Olsen AH, Fracheboud J, Patnick J (2003) Reporting of performance indicators of mammography screening in Europe. Eur J Cancer Prev 12:213–222PubMedCrossRef Lynge E, Olsen AH, Fracheboud J, Patnick J (2003) Reporting of performance indicators of mammography screening in Europe. Eur J Cancer Prev 12:213–222PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rigal L, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Falcoff H, Bouyer J, Ringa V (2011) Do social inequalities in cervical cancer screening persist among patients who use primary care? The Paris prevention in general practice survey. Prev Med 53:199–202PubMedCrossRef Rigal L, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Falcoff H, Bouyer J, Ringa V (2011) Do social inequalities in cervical cancer screening persist among patients who use primary care? The Paris prevention in general practice survey. Prev Med 53:199–202PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Clark MA, Rakowski W, Ehrich B (2000) Breast and cervical cancer screening: associations with personal, spouse’s, and combined smoking status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9:513–516PubMed Clark MA, Rakowski W, Ehrich B (2000) Breast and cervical cancer screening: associations with personal, spouse’s, and combined smoking status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9:513–516PubMed
27.
28.
go back to reference Maruthur NM, Bolen SD, Brancati FL, Clark JM (2009) The association of obesity and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring) 17:375–381CrossRef Maruthur NM, Bolen SD, Brancati FL, Clark JM (2009) The association of obesity and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring) 17:375–381CrossRef
Metadata
Title
To what extent is women’s economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010
Authors
Gwenn Menvielle
Jean-Baptiste Richard
Virginie Ringa
Rosemary Dray-Spira
François Beck
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-014-0397-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Cancer Causes & Control 8/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine