Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Psychiatry
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

To die or not to die: a qualitative study of men’s suicidality in Norway

Authors: Birthe Loa Knizek, Heidi Hjelmeland

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Previous research has shown that men who adhere to traditional beliefs about masculinity have increased health risks compared to those who do not. Single marital status, unemployment, retirement, and physical illness are commonly known risk factors for male suicidal behavior. Most men struggling with these risk factors are, however, not suicidal. To find out more about what makes some men vulnerable to suicidal behavior, risk factors must be analyzed in light of men’s life history as well as the social context where they live their masculinity.

Method

We conducted semi-structured qualitative in-depth interviews with 15 men (20–76 years old) who were admitted to hospital after a suicidal act. We analyzed the data by means of qualitative content analysis with a directed approach. The analysis was directed by the participants’ reports on whether they had wanted to die or not at the time of the suicidal act. On this basis, they were divided into two groups: a “to die” and a “not to die” group. We then analyzed each group separately before comparing them.

Results

In both groups, the main reason or trigger for the suicidal act were problems in intimate relationships. These problems were complex and connected to the men’s lived masculinity, ranging from shame, or tainted masculine honor, to taking responsibility as a man for the wife. Some men pointed to pain and ennui as reasons or triggers for their suicidal act. Only one in the “not to die” group took full responsibility for the suicidal act, whereas all but one did the same in the “to die” group. The men not taking responsibility described the suicidal act as involuntary because of either alcohol or a kind of “black-out”. Not taking responsibility for the act may be a way of preserving masculine identity.

Conclusion

Relationship problems are the main reason or trigger of the suicidal act for most participants, but in very different ways, mirroring lived masculinity. The most striking finding is the uniqueness of each story, questioning the utility of standardized suicide prevention efforts.
Literature
1.
Canetto SS, Sakinovsky I. The gender paradox in suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1998;28:1–23.PubMed
2.
3.
4.
Lester D, Gunn JF III, Quinnett P. Suicide in men: how men differ from women in expressing their distress. Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher; 2014.
5.
Krysinska K, Andriessen K, Corveleyn J. Religion and spirituality in online suicide bereavement: an analysis of online memorials. Crisis. 2014;35(5):349–56.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Cleary A. Suicidal action, emotional expression, and the performance of masculinities. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:498–505.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Möller-Leimkühler AM. The gender gap in suicide and premature death or: why are men so vulnerable? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003;253:1–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Evans R, Scourfield J, Moore G. Gender relationship breakdown, and suicide risk: a review of research in western countries. J Fam Issues. 2016;37(16):2239–64.CrossRef
9.
Scourfield J, Evans R. Why might men be more at risk of suicide after a relationship breakdown? Am J Mens Health. 2015;9(5):380–4.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Seale C, Charteris-Black J. The interaction of class and gender in illness narratives. Sociology. 2008;42(3):453–69.CrossRef
11.
Gunnell D, Rasul F, Stansfeld SA, Hart CL, Davey Smith SG. Gender differences in self-reported minor mental disorder and its association with suicide. A 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew and paisley cohort. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2002;37(10):457–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Stack S. Suicide: a 15-year review of the sociological literature. Part I: cultural and economic factors. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2000;30(2):145–62.PubMed
13.
Agerbo E. Midlife suicide risk, partner’s psychiatric illness, spouse and child bereavement by suicide or other modes of death: a gender specific study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:407–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
Courtenay W. Key determinants of the health and the well-being of men and boys. Int J Mens Health. 2003;2(1):1–30.CrossRef
16.
Brownhill S, Wilhelm K, Barclay L, Schmied V. ‘Big build’: hidden depression in men. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39:921–31.PubMed
17.
Qin P, Agerbo E, Westergård-Nielsen N, Eriksson T, Mortensen PM. Gender differences in risk factors for suicide in Denmark. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;177:546–50.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Lease SH, Montes SH, Baggett LR, Sawyer RJ II, Fleming-Norwood KM, Hampton AB, Ovrebo E, Coftci A, Boyraz G. A cross-cultural exploration of masculinity and relationships in men from Turkey, Norway and the United States. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2013;44(1):84–105.CrossRef
19.
Døving R. Mannskap for likestilling [Male struggle for equality]. Aftenposten. 2006;14:6.
20.
Hjelmeland H, Knizek BL. Time to change direction in suicide research. In: O'Connor R, Pirkis J, editors. The International Handbook of Suicide Prevention. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2016. p. 696–709.CrossRef
21.
Franklin JC, Ribeiro JD, Fox KR, Bentley KH, Kleiman EM, Huang X, Musacchio KM, Jaroszewski AC, Chang BP, Nock MK. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(2):187–232.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Canetto SS. Suicidal behaviors among Muslim women. Patterns, pathways, meanings, and prevention. Crisis. 2015;36(6):447–58.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open. 2016;2:8–14.
24.
Hsieh HF, Shannon S. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–188.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;56:29–34.CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
28.
Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. Special issue: Ethnographies of Suicide, 2012, vol.36,2. Springer.
29.
30.
Canetto SS. Suicide: why are older men so vulnerable? Men Masculinities. 2017;20(1):49–70.CrossRef
31.
Joiner T. Why people die by suicide. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 2005.
32.
Chu C, Tucker RP, Patros CHG, Buchman-Schmitt JM, Stanley IH, Hom MA, Hagan CR, Rogers ML, Podlogar MC, Chiurliza B, Ringer FB, Michaels MS, Joiner TE. The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research. Psychol Bulletin. 2017; https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​bul0000123.
33.
Fleischer E. Den talende tavshed. Selvmord og selvmordsforsøg som talehandling. Viborg: Odense universitetsforlag; 2000.
34.
Staples J, Widger T. Situating suicide as an anthropological problem: ethnographic approaches to understanding self-harm and self-inflicted death. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2012;36:183–203.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Menninger K. Man against himself. New York: Harcourt; 1938.
36.
Stengel E. Suicide and attempted suicide. Oxford England: Penguin Books; 1964.
37.
38.
Farberow NL, Shneidman ES. The cry for help. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1965.
39.
Knizek BL, Hjelmeland H. A theoretical model for interpreting suicidal behaviour as communication. Theory Psychol. 2007;17(5):697–720.CrossRef
40.
Heider F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley; 1958.CrossRef
41.
Large MM, Ryan CJ. Suicide risk categorisation of psychiatric inpatients: what it might mean and why it is of no use. Australas Psychiatry. 2014;22:390–2.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Hagen J, Hjelmeland H, Knizek BL. Connecting with suicidal patients in psychiatric wards: Therapist challenges. Death Stud. 2017;41(6):360.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Hagen J, Hjelmeland H, Knizek BL. Relational Principles in the Care of Suicidal Inpatients: Experiences of Therapists and Mental Health Nurses. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2017;38(2):99.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Straume S. Selvmordsforebyggingens pris. Tidsskr Nor Psykol foren. 2014;51:242–51.
45.
Metadata
Title
To die or not to die: a qualitative study of men’s suicidality in Norway
Authors
Birthe Loa Knizek
Heidi Hjelmeland
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1843-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Psychiatry 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Computer-assisted cognitive remediation therapy increases hippocampal volume in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized controlled trial

Research article

Direct and moderating effects of personality on stigma towards mental illness

Research article

Medication adherence in patients with schizophrenia: a qualitative study of the patient process in motivational interviewing

Case report

Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders

Research article

Prevalence of depression and associated factors among older adults at ambo town, Oromia region, Ethiopia

Research article

The implementation and adherence to evidence-based protocols for psychotherapy for depression: the perspective of therapists in Dutch specialized mental healthcare