Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2008

Open Access 01-01-2008 | Teaching Tips

Tips for Teachers of Evidence-based Medicine: Making Sense of Diagnostic Test Results Using Likelihood Ratios

Authors: W. Scott Richardson, MD, Mark C. Wilson, MD, MPH, Sheri A. Keitz, MD, PhD, Peter C. Wyer, MD, EBM Teaching Scripts Working Group

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Excerpt

Now is an exciting time to be or become a diagnostician. More diagnostic tests, including portions of the medical interview and physical examination, are being studied rigorously for their accuracy, precision, and usefulness in practice,1,2 and this research is increasingly being systematically reviewed and synthesized.3,4 Diagnosticians are gaining increasing access to this research evidence, raising hope that this knowledge will inform their diagnostic decisions and improve their patients’ clinical outcomes.5 For patients to benefit fully from this accumulating knowledge, the diagnosticians serving them must be able to reason probabilistically, to understand how test results can revise disease probability to confirm or exclude disorders, and to integrate this reasoning with other types of knowledge and diagnostic thinking.68
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Knottnerus JA, ed. The Evidence Base of Clinical Diagnosis. London, UK: BMJ Books; 2002. Knottnerus JA, ed. The Evidence Base of Clinical Diagnosis. London, UK: BMJ Books; 2002.
2.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. for the STARD Group. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:40–4.PubMed Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. for the STARD Group. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:40–4.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Irwig L, Tosteson ANA, Gatsonis C, et al. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:667–76.PubMed Irwig L, Tosteson ANA, Gatsonis C, et al. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:667–76.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context. London, UK: BMJ Books; 2001:248–82.CrossRef Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context. London, UK: BMJ Books; 2001:248–82.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Richardson WS. Evidence-based diagnosis: more is needed. Evid-Based Med. 1997;2:70–71. EBM Note. Richardson WS. Evidence-based diagnosis: more is needed. Evid-Based Med. 1997;2:70–71. EBM Note.
6.
go back to reference Kassirer JP. Diagnostic reasoning. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:893–900.PubMed Kassirer JP. Diagnostic reasoning. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:893–900.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB, eds. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, 3/e. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill-Livingstone; 2005. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB, eds. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, 3/e. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill-Livingstone; 2005.
8.
go back to reference Richardson WS. Integrating evidence into clinical diagnosis. Ch. 6. In: Montori VM, ed. Evidence-Based Endocrinology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2006:69–89. Richardson WS. Integrating evidence into clinical diagnosis. Ch. 6. In: Montori VM, ed. Evidence-Based Endocrinology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2006:69–89.
9.
go back to reference Richardson WS. We should overcome the barriers to evidence-based clinical diagnosis. J Clin Epi. 2007;60:217–27.CrossRef Richardson WS. We should overcome the barriers to evidence-based clinical diagnosis. J Clin Epi. 2007;60:217–27.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Reid MC, Lane DA, Feinstein AR. Academic calculations versus clinical judgments: Practicing physicians’ use of quantitative measures of test accuracy. Am J Med. 1998;104(4):374–80.PubMedCrossRef Reid MC, Lane DA, Feinstein AR. Academic calculations versus clinical judgments: Practicing physicians’ use of quantitative measures of test accuracy. Am J Med. 1998;104(4):374–80.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 4: Likelihood ratios. BMJ. 2004;329:168–9.PubMedCrossRef Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 4: Likelihood ratios. BMJ. 2004;329:168–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios. Lancet. 2005;365:1500–5.PubMedCrossRef Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios. Lancet. 2005;365:1500–5.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Perera R, Heneghan C. Making sense of diagnostic test likelihood ratios. ACP J Club. 2007 Mar–Apr;146(2):A8–A9. Editorial.PubMed Perera R, Heneghan C. Making sense of diagnostic test likelihood ratios. ACP J Club. 2007 Mar–Apr;146(2):A8–A9. Editorial.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Sotos JG. Simplified calculations using likelihood ratios. ACP J Club. 2007 Mar–Apr;146(2):A10. Editorial.PubMed Sotos JG. Simplified calculations using likelihood ratios. ACP J Club. 2007 Mar–Apr;146(2):A10. Editorial.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Wyer PC, Keitz S, Hatala R, Hayward R, Barratt A, Montori V, Wooltorton E, Guyatt GH. Tips for learning and teaching evidence-based medicine: introduction to the series. CMAJ 2004;171(4):347–348. Commentary.PubMed Wyer PC, Keitz S, Hatala R, Hayward R, Barratt A, Montori V, Wooltorton E, Guyatt GH. Tips for learning and teaching evidence-based medicine: introduction to the series. CMAJ 2004;171(4):347–348. Commentary.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Patterson C, Ali M, et al. Diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia in the elderly. Am J Med. 1990;88:205–9.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt GH, Patterson C, Ali M, et al. Diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia in the elderly. Am J Med. 1990;88:205–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fagan TJ. Nomogram for Bayes’ theorem. N Engl J Med 1975;293:257.PubMed Fagan TJ. Nomogram for Bayes’ theorem. N Engl J Med 1975;293:257.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Tips for Teachers of Evidence-based Medicine: Making Sense of Diagnostic Test Results Using Likelihood Ratios
Authors
W. Scott Richardson, MD
Mark C. Wilson, MD, MPH
Sheri A. Keitz, MD, PhD
Peter C. Wyer, MD
EBM Teaching Scripts Working Group
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0330-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2008 Go to the issue

Reflection

Goats

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine