Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 5/2013

01-07-2013 | Original Article

Timing of shoulder arthroplasty in comminuted proximal humerus fracture, how much does it matter?

Author: Amr Mohamed Abdelhady

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Shoulder hemiarthroplasty is a salvage treatment for comminuted fracture of the humerus especially in elderly patients. Several factors contribute to the final outcome like bone quality and tuberosity reposition. Timing of the surgery is considered one of these factors. This study was done to assess the effect of delaying the surgery up to 2 weeks on the final outcome. This retrospective study was done on 33 patients with four-part fracture of the humerus, divided into two groups, group 1 (17 patients) who had surgery within the first 3 days after trauma, and group 2 (16 patients) who had surgery within the second week after injury. Operations were done by the same surgeon, same technique, and same implant. Constant score was used to assess the final follow-up, and there was a significant better result for group one especially in the items of range of movements and power.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Neer CS II (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Part II. Treatment of three and four part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1090–1103PubMed Neer CS II (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Part II. Treatment of three and four part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1090–1103PubMed
2.
go back to reference Antunã SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2008) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:202–209PubMedCrossRef Antunã SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2008) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:202–209PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M et al (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for acute fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicenter study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:217–219PubMedCrossRef Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M et al (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for acute fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicenter study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:217–219PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM et al (2003) Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1215–1223PubMedCrossRef Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM et al (2003) Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1215–1223PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Krishnan SG, Bennion PW, Reineck JR, Burkhead WZ (2008) Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture: restoration of the gothic arch. Orthop Clin N Am 39:441–450CrossRef Krishnan SG, Bennion PW, Reineck JR, Burkhead WZ (2008) Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture: restoration of the gothic arch. Orthop Clin N Am 39:441–450CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L et al (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:401–412PubMedCrossRef Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L et al (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:401–412PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Movin T, Sjoden GO, Ahrengart L (1998) Poor function after shoulder replacement in fracture patients. A retrospective evaluation of 29 patients followed for 2–12 years. Acta Orthop Scand 69:392–396PubMedCrossRef Movin T, Sjoden GO, Ahrengart L (1998) Poor function after shoulder replacement in fracture patients. A retrospective evaluation of 29 patients followed for 2–12 years. Acta Orthop Scand 69:392–396PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Prakash U, McGurty DW, Dent JA (2002) Hemiarthroplasty for severe fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:428–430PubMedCrossRef Prakash U, McGurty DW, Dent JA (2002) Hemiarthroplasty for severe fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:428–430PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hughes M, Neer CS (1975) Glenohumeral joint replacement and postoperative rehabilitation. Phys Ther 55:850–858PubMed Hughes M, Neer CS (1975) Glenohumeral joint replacement and postoperative rehabilitation. Phys Ther 55:850–858PubMed
10.
go back to reference Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed
11.
go back to reference Bosch U, Skutek M, Fremerey RW, Tscherne H (1998) Outcome after primary and secondary hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7:479–484PubMedCrossRef Bosch U, Skutek M, Fremerey RW, Tscherne H (1998) Outcome after primary and secondary hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7:479–484PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Abdelhady AM (2010) Shoulder arthroplasty as a treatment for sequelae of proximal humeral fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 20:607–611CrossRef Abdelhady AM (2010) Shoulder arthroplasty as a treatment for sequelae of proximal humeral fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 20:607–611CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Huard J, Li Y, Fu F (2002) Muscle injury and repair: current trends in research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:822–832PubMed Huard J, Li Y, Fu F (2002) Muscle injury and repair: current trends in research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:822–832PubMed
14.
go back to reference Li Y, Cummins J, Huard J (2001) Muscle injury and repair. Curr Opin Orthop 12:409–415CrossRef Li Y, Cummins J, Huard J (2001) Muscle injury and repair. Curr Opin Orthop 12:409–415CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Filippin LI, Moreira AJ, Marroni NP, Xavier RM (2009) Nitric oxide and repair of skeletal muscle injury. Nitric Oxide 21(3–4):157–163PubMedCrossRef Filippin LI, Moreira AJ, Marroni NP, Xavier RM (2009) Nitric oxide and repair of skeletal muscle injury. Nitric Oxide 21(3–4):157–163PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lehto M, Jarvinen M, Nelimarkka O (1986) Scar formation after skeletal muscle injury: a histological and autoradiographical study in rats. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 104:366–370PubMedCrossRef Lehto M, Jarvinen M, Nelimarkka O (1986) Scar formation after skeletal muscle injury: a histological and autoradiographical study in rats. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 104:366–370PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chan YS, Li Y, Foster W, Horaguchi T, Somogyi G, Fu FH, Huard J (2003) Antifibrotic effects of surramine in injured skeletal muscle after laceration. J Appl Physiol 95:771–780PubMed Chan YS, Li Y, Foster W, Horaguchi T, Somogyi G, Fu FH, Huard J (2003) Antifibrotic effects of surramine in injured skeletal muscle after laceration. J Appl Physiol 95:771–780PubMed
Metadata
Title
Timing of shoulder arthroplasty in comminuted proximal humerus fracture, how much does it matter?
Author
Amr Mohamed Abdelhady
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1025-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 5/2013 Go to the issue