Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1/2018

01-07-2018 | Original Article

Timing is everything: intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary or interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

Authors: Jessica Lee, John P. Curtin, Franco M. Muggia, Bhavana Pothuri, Leslie R. Boyd, Stephanie V. Blank

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the outcomes of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IP) compared with those of intravenous chemotherapy (IV) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) or primary debulking surgery (PDS).

Methods

Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated with PDS or NACT and IDS from 2006 to 2015 were identified. Comparative statistics were used to evaluate covariates, and survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log-rank tests.

Results

Sixty-six patients received NACT followed by IDS with residual disease of ≤ 1 cm; 42 of these patients (63.6%) received IP therapy; and 24 patients (36.3%) had IV therapy only after IDS. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.0 months in the IP group and 13.5 months in the IV group (p = 0.13). The estimated median overall survival (OS) was 64.0 months with IP and 50.0 months with IV (p = 0.44). During the same study period, 149 patients underwent optimal PDS after which 93 patients (62.4%) received IP and 56 patients (37.6%) were given IV chemotherapy. Patients after IP demonstrated improved survival outcomes when compared to patients after IV therapy. The median PFS was 28.0 months after IP and 16.5 months after IV (p = 0.0006), and the median OS was not reached for IP and 50.0 months after IV (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Although IP chemotherapy after PDS is associated with improved survival, IP therapy after NACT and IDS, despite high rates of completion, may not have the same degree of survival advantage over IV therapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hoskins WJ, McGuire WP, Brady MF et al (1994) The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(4):974–980CrossRefPubMed Hoskins WJ, McGuire WP, Brady MF et al (1994) The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(4):974–980CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Winter WE III, Maxwell GL, Tian C et al (2007) Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 25(24):3621–3627CrossRefPubMed Winter WE III, Maxwell GL, Tian C et al (2007) Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 25(24):3621–3627CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 363(10):943–953CrossRefPubMed Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 363(10):943–953CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M et al (2015) Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 386:249–257CrossRefPubMed Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M et al (2015) Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 386:249–257CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hinchcliff EM, Melamed M, Clemmer JT et al (2016) Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a National Cancer Data Base study. Gynecol Oncol 141(Suppl 1):28CrossRef Hinchcliff EM, Melamed M, Clemmer JT et al (2016) Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a National Cancer Data Base study. Gynecol Oncol 141(Suppl 1):28CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Alberts DS, Liu PY, Hannigan EV et al (1996) Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 335(26):1950–1955CrossRefPubMed Alberts DS, Liu PY, Hannigan EV et al (1996) Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 335(26):1950–1955CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Markman M, Bundy BN, Alberts DS et al (2001) Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 19(4):1001–1007CrossRefPubMed Markman M, Bundy BN, Alberts DS et al (2001) Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 19(4):1001–1007CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L et al (2006) Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 354(1):34–43CrossRefPubMed Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L et al (2006) Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 354(1):34–43CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Walker J, Brady MF, DiSilvestro PA et al (2016) A phase III trial of bevacizumab with IV versus IP chemotherapy for ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma: an NRG Oncology Study. Gynecol Oncol 141(Suppl 1):208 Walker J, Brady MF, DiSilvestro PA et al (2016) A phase III trial of bevacizumab with IV versus IP chemotherapy for ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma: an NRG Oncology Study. Gynecol Oncol 141(Suppl 1):208
11.
go back to reference Wright A, Cronin A, Milne DE et al (2015) Use and effectiveness of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(26):2841–2847CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wright A, Cronin A, Milne DE et al (2015) Use and effectiveness of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(26):2841–2847CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Le T, Latifah H, Jolicoeur L et al (2011) Does intraperitoneal chemotherapy benefit optimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Gynecol Oncol 121(3):451–454CrossRefPubMed Le T, Latifah H, Jolicoeur L et al (2011) Does intraperitoneal chemotherapy benefit optimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Gynecol Oncol 121(3):451–454CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Al Mutairi NJ, Le T (2014) Does modality of adjuvant chemotherapy after interval surgical debulking matter in epithelial ovarian cancer? Int J Gynecol Cancer 24(3):461–467CrossRefPubMed Al Mutairi NJ, Le T (2014) Does modality of adjuvant chemotherapy after interval surgical debulking matter in epithelial ovarian cancer? Int J Gynecol Cancer 24(3):461–467CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mueller JJ, Kelly A, Zhou Q et al (2016) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: feasibility and outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center. Gynecol Oncol 143(3):496–503CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mueller JJ, Kelly A, Zhou Q et al (2016) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: feasibility and outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center. Gynecol Oncol 143(3):496–503CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Mackay HJ, Gallagher CJ, Parulekar WR et al (2016) OV21/PETROC: a randomized gynecologic cancer intergroup (GCIG) phase II study of intraperitoneal (IP) versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In: Oral presentation presented at 2016 ASCO annual meeting, Chicago, IL Mackay HJ, Gallagher CJ, Parulekar WR et al (2016) OV21/PETROC: a randomized gynecologic cancer intergroup (GCIG) phase II study of intraperitoneal (IP) versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In: Oral presentation presented at 2016 ASCO annual meeting, Chicago, IL
16.
go back to reference Matsuo K, Eno ML, Im DD et al (2010) Chemotherapy time interval and development of platinum and taxane resistance in ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal carcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281(2):325–328CrossRefPubMed Matsuo K, Eno ML, Im DD et al (2010) Chemotherapy time interval and development of platinum and taxane resistance in ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal carcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281(2):325–328CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tewari D, Java JJ, Salani R et al (2015) Long-term survival advantage and prognostic factors associated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 33(13):1460–1466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tewari D, Java JJ, Salani R et al (2015) Long-term survival advantage and prognostic factors associated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 33(13):1460–1466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Suidan RS, Zhou Q, Iasonos A et al (2015) Prognostic significance of the number of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy cycles for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(4):599–606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Suidan RS, Zhou Q, Iasonos A et al (2015) Prognostic significance of the number of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy cycles for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(4):599–606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Katsumata N, Yasuda M, Takahashi F et al (2009) Dose-dense paclitaxel once a week in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks for advanced ovarian cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9698):1331–1338CrossRefPubMed Katsumata N, Yasuda M, Takahashi F et al (2009) Dose-dense paclitaxel once a week in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks for advanced ovarian cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9698):1331–1338CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Timing is everything: intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary or interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
Authors
Jessica Lee
John P. Curtin
Franco M. Muggia
Bhavana Pothuri
Leslie R. Boyd
Stephanie V. Blank
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3591-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine