Published in:
01-06-2008 | Erratum
Time-frequency analysis of heart rate variability during immediate recovery from low and high intensity exercise
Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology | Issue 3/2008
Login to get accessExcerpt
Unfortunately, the statistical differences for normalized low (LFPnu) and high frequency power (HFPnu) during a low intensity exercise (LI) session in Fig. 1 were reported incorrectly. Figure 1, as corrected, is shown below. Neither LFPnu nor HFPnu differed statistically between the stationary phases of the LI session, as correctly stated in the text.
Fig. 1
Heart rate and the FFT derived heart rate variability indices during the stationary phases of the experiment, i.e. the sitting baseline (BL), during the exercise (EXE7-10) and recovery (REC7-10) minutes seven to ten. LI low intensity exercise, HI high intensity exercise, HR heart rate, LFP low frequency power, HFP high frequency power. Statistically significant difference compared to BL at **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001, compared to EXE7-10 ††P < 0.01 and †††P < 0.001
× ![]()
…