Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2016

01-01-2016 | Symposium: 2015 Knee Society Proceedings

Time-driven Activity-based Costing More Accurately Reflects Costs in Arthroplasty Surgery

Authors: Sina Akhavan, BA, Lorrayne Ward, MBA, MPP, Kevin J. Bozic, MD, MBA

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cost estimates derived from traditional hospital cost accounting systems have inherent limitations that restrict their usefulness for measuring process and quality improvement. Newer approaches such as time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) may offer more precise estimates of true cost, but to our knowledge, the differences between this TDABC and more traditional approaches have not been explored systematically in arthroplasty surgery.

Questions/purposes

The purposes of this study were to compare the costs associated with (1) primary total hip arthroplasty (THA); (2) primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA); and (3) three surgeons performing these total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) as measured using TDABC versus traditional hospital accounting (TA).

Methods

Process maps were developed for each phase of care (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) for patients undergoing primary TJA performed by one of three surgeons at a tertiary care medical center. Personnel costs for each phase of care were measured using TDABC based on fully loaded labor rates, including physician compensation. Costs associated with consumables (including implants) were calculated based on direct purchase price. Total costs for 677 primary TJAs were aggregated over 17 months (January 2012 to May 2013) and organized into cost categories (room and board, implant, operating room services, drugs, supplies, other services). Costs derived using TDABC, based on actual time and intensity of resources used, were compared with costs derived using TA techniques based on activity-based costing and indirect costs calculated as a percentage of direct costs from the hospital decision support system.

Results

Substantial differences between cost estimates using TDABC and TA were found for primary THA (USD 12,982 TDABC versus USD 23,915 TA), primary TKA (USD 13,661 TDABC versus USD 24,796 TA), and individually across all three surgeons for both (THA: TDABC = 49%–55% of TA total cost; TKA: TDABC = 53%–55% of TA total cost). Cost categories with the most variability between TA and TDABC estimates were operating room services and room and board.

Conclusions

Traditional hospital cost accounting systems overestimate the costs associated with many surgical procedures, including primary TJA. TDABC provides a more accurate measure of true resource use associated with TJAs and can be used to identify high-cost/high-variability processes that can be targeted for process/quality improvement.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Donovan CJ, Hopkins M, Kimmel BM, Koberna S, Montie CA. How Cleveland Clinic used TDABC to improve value. Healthc Financ Manage. 2014;68:84–88.PubMed Donovan CJ, Hopkins M, Kimmel BM, Koberna S, Montie CA. How Cleveland Clinic used TDABC to improve value. Healthc Financ Manage. 2014;68:84–88.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven activity-based costing. Harv Bus Rev. 2004;82:131–138, 150. Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven activity-based costing. Harv Bus Rev. 2004;82:131–138, 150.
3.
go back to reference Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. The innovation of time-driven activity-based costing. Journal of Cost Management. 2007;21. Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. The innovation of time-driven activity-based costing. Journal of Cost Management. 2007;21.
4.
go back to reference Keehan SP, Sisko AM, Truffer CJ, Poisal JA, Cuckler GA, Madison AJ, Lizonitz JM, Smith SD. National health spending projections through 2020: economic recovery and reform drive faster spending growth. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:1594–1605.PubMedCrossRef Keehan SP, Sisko AM, Truffer CJ, Poisal JA, Cuckler GA, Madison AJ, Lizonitz JM, Smith SD. National health spending projections through 2020: economic recovery and reform drive faster spending growth. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:1594–1605.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lievens Y, van den Bogaert W, Kesteloot K. Activity-based costing: a practical model for cost calculation in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:522–535.PubMedCrossRef Lievens Y, van den Bogaert W, Kesteloot K. Activity-based costing: a practical model for cost calculation in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:522–535.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference McLaughlin N, Burke MA, Setlur NP, Niedzwiecki DR, Kaplan AL, Saigal C, Mahajan A, Martin NA, Kaplan RS. Time-driven activity-based costing: a driver for provider engagement in costing activities and redesign initiatives. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37:E3.PubMedCrossRef McLaughlin N, Burke MA, Setlur NP, Niedzwiecki DR, Kaplan AL, Saigal C, Mahajan A, Martin NA, Kaplan RS. Time-driven activity-based costing: a driver for provider engagement in costing activities and redesign initiatives. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37:E3.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference West TD, Balas EA, West DA. Contrasting RCC, RVU, and ABC for managed care decisions. A case study compares three widely used costing methods and finds one superior. Healthc Financ Manage. 1996;50:54–61.PubMed West TD, Balas EA, West DA. Contrasting RCC, RVU, and ABC for managed care decisions. A case study compares three widely used costing methods and finds one superior. Healthc Financ Manage. 1996;50:54–61.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Time-driven Activity-based Costing More Accurately Reflects Costs in Arthroplasty Surgery
Authors
Sina Akhavan, BA
Lorrayne Ward, MBA, MPP
Kevin J. Bozic, MD, MBA
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4214-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2016 Go to the issue