Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Knee

Tibial base design and patient morphology affecting tibial coverage and rotational alignment after total knee arthroplasty

Authors: Chadd Clary, Luke Aram, Daren Deffenbaugh, Mark Heldreth

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To understand interactions between total knee arthroplasty tibial base design attributes, variations in tibial morphology, and the resulting tibial coverage and rotational alignment.

Methods

Tibial anthropometric measurements, including aspect ratio (medial–lateral width/anterior–posterior length) and tibial asymmetry, were taken for 14,791 total knee arthroplasty patients and compared with the ability of four different commercial tibial base designs to cover the resected plateau. The anthropometric measurements were also compared with the resulting tibial base rotation, which occurred when rotating the base to maximize coverage.

Results

All four tibial base designs resulted in similar coverage ranging from 80.2 (4.7) % to 83.8 (4.6) %. Mean tibial base rotation when placed to maximize coverage ranged from 3.7 (4.4)° (internal) to 3.8 (4.5)° (external) relative to the medial third of the tibial tubercle. More asymmetric tibiae and tibiae with a lower aspect ratios resulted in increased internal tibial base rotation.

Conclusions

The four tibial base designs assessed provided similar levels of tibial bone coverage across the patient population, despite different design features. Rotating the tibial base to maximize coverage did not significantly increase the tibial coverage, but induced variability in tibial base alignment. Certain tibial anthropometrics may predispose particular patients to internal tibial base mal-rotation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2005) Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:172–176PubMedCrossRef Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2005) Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:172–176PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bedard M, Vince KG, Redfern J, Collen SR (2011) Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2346–2355PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bedard M, Vince KG, Redfern J, Collen SR (2011) Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2346–2355PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153PubMedCrossRef Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, Mitchell W, Hoffman G, Hofmann AA (1994) Analysis of the bone surface area in resected tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:2–10PubMed Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, Mitchell W, Hoffman G, Hofmann AA (1994) Analysis of the bone surface area in resected tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:2–10PubMed
5.
go back to reference Chau R, Gulati A, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Gill HS, Murray DW (2009) Tibial component overhang following unicompartmental knee replacement—does it matter? Knee 16(5):310–313PubMedCrossRef Chau R, Gulati A, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Gill HS, Murray DW (2009) Tibial component overhang following unicompartmental knee replacement—does it matter? Knee 16(5):310–313PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Costa AJ, Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Balestro JC, Fatima M, Parker DA (2013) Can tibial coverage in total knee replacement be reliably evaluated with three-dimensional image-based digital templating? Bone Joint Res 2(1):1–8 Costa AJ, Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Balestro JC, Fatima M, Parker DA (2013) Can tibial coverage in total knee replacement be reliably evaluated with three-dimensional image-based digital templating? Bone Joint Res 2(1):1–8
7.
go back to reference Dalury DF, Pomeroy DL, Gorab RS, Adams MJ (2013) Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? J Arthroplasty 28:120–121PubMedCrossRef Dalury DF, Pomeroy DL, Gorab RS, Adams MJ (2013) Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? J Arthroplasty 28:120–121PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M (2001) Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:315–318PubMedCrossRef Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M (2001) Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:315–318PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Figgie HE, Davy DT, Heiple KG, Hart RT (1984) Load-bearing capacity of the tibial component of the total condylar knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 183:288–297PubMed Figgie HE, Davy DT, Heiple KG, Hart RT (1984) Load-bearing capacity of the tibial component of the total condylar knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 183:288–297PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hoffman AA, Murdock LE, Wyatt RWB, Alpert JP (1991) Total knee arthroplasty: two- to four-year experience using an asymmetric tibial tray and a deep trochlear-grooved femoral component. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269:78–88 Hoffman AA, Murdock LE, Wyatt RWB, Alpert JP (1991) Total knee arthroplasty: two- to four-year experience using an asymmetric tibial tray and a deep trochlear-grooved femoral component. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269:78–88
11.
go back to reference Hutter EE, Granger JF, Beal MD, Siston RA (2012) Is there a gold standard for TKA tibial component rotational alignment? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:1646–1653CrossRef Hutter EE, Granger JF, Beal MD, Siston RA (2012) Is there a gold standard for TKA tibial component rotational alignment? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:1646–1653CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Incavo SJ, Ronchetti PJ, Howe JB, Tranowski JP (1994) Tibial plateau coverage in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 229:81–85 Incavo SJ, Ronchetti PJ, Howe JB, Tranowski JP (1994) Tibial plateau coverage in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 229:81–85
13.
go back to reference Insall JN, Scott WN (2001) Surgery of the knee. Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia Insall JN, Scott WN (2001) Surgery of the knee. Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia
14.
go back to reference Jain S, Wasnik S, Hegde C, Mittal A (2014) High-flexion mobile-bearing knees: impact on patellofemoral outcomes in 159 patients. J Knee Surg 27:113–118PubMedCrossRef Jain S, Wasnik S, Hegde C, Mittal A (2014) High-flexion mobile-bearing knees: impact on patellofemoral outcomes in 159 patients. J Knee Surg 27:113–118PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kim KT, Lee S, Ko DO, Seo BS, Jung WS, Chang BK (2014) Causes of failure after total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients 55 years or younger. Knee Surg Relat Res 26(1):13–19PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kim KT, Lee S, Ko DO, Seo BS, Jung WS, Chang BK (2014) Causes of failure after total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients 55 years or younger. Knee Surg Relat Res 26(1):13–19PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lemaire P, Pioletti DP, Meyer FM, Meuli R, Dörfl J, Leyvraz PF (1997) Tibial component positioning in total knee arthroplasty: bone coverage and extensor apparatus alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:251–257PubMedCrossRef Lemaire P, Pioletti DP, Meyer FM, Meuli R, Dörfl J, Leyvraz PF (1997) Tibial component positioning in total knee arthroplasty: bone coverage and extensor apparatus alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:251–257PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mahoney OM, Kinsey T (2010) Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(5):1115–1121PubMedCrossRef Mahoney OM, Kinsey T (2010) Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(5):1115–1121PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Martin S, Saurez A, Ismaily S, Ashfaq K, Noble P, Incavo SJ (2014) Maximizing tibial coverage is detrimental to proper rotational alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:121–125PubMedCrossRef Martin S, Saurez A, Ismaily S, Ashfaq K, Noble P, Incavo SJ (2014) Maximizing tibial coverage is detrimental to proper rotational alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:121–125PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Namba RS, Cafri G, Khatod M, Inacio MCS, Brox TW, Paxton EW (2013) Risk factors for total knee arthroplasty aseptic revision. J Arthroplasty 28:122–127PubMedCrossRef Namba RS, Cafri G, Khatod M, Inacio MCS, Brox TW, Paxton EW (2013) Risk factors for total knee arthroplasty aseptic revision. J Arthroplasty 28:122–127PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nicoll D, Rowley DI (2010) Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1238–1244PubMedCrossRef Nicoll D, Rowley DI (2010) Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1238–1244PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sawaguchi N, Majima T, Ishigaki T, Mori N, Terashima T, Minami A (2010) Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty improves patella tracking and patellofemoral contact stress: in vivo measurements in the same patients. J Arthroplast 25(6):920–925CrossRef Sawaguchi N, Majima T, Ishigaki T, Mori N, Terashima T, Minami A (2010) Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty improves patella tracking and patellofemoral contact stress: in vivo measurements in the same patients. J Arthroplast 25(6):920–925CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Bolognesi MP, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Nunley RM (2013) Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplast 28:116–119CrossRef Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Bolognesi MP, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Nunley RM (2013) Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplast 28:116–119CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Stulberg BN, Dombrowski RM, Froimson M, Easley K (1995) Computed tomography analysis of proximal tibial coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 311:148–156PubMed Stulberg BN, Dombrowski RM, Froimson M, Easley K (1995) Computed tomography analysis of proximal tibial coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 311:148–156PubMed
24.
go back to reference Wernecke GC, Harris IA, Houang MTW, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2012) Comparison of tibial bone coverage of 6 knee prostheses: a magnetic resonance imaging study with controlled rotation. J Orthop Surg 20(2):143–147 Wernecke GC, Harris IA, Houang MTW, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2012) Comparison of tibial bone coverage of 6 knee prostheses: a magnetic resonance imaging study with controlled rotation. J Orthop Surg 20(2):143–147
25.
go back to reference Westerich GH, Laskin RS, Haas SB, Sculco TP (1994) Resection specimen analysis of tibial coverage in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:163–175 Westerich GH, Laskin RS, Haas SB, Sculco TP (1994) Resection specimen analysis of tibial coverage in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:163–175
Metadata
Title
Tibial base design and patient morphology affecting tibial coverage and rotational alignment after total knee arthroplasty
Authors
Chadd Clary
Luke Aram
Daren Deffenbaugh
Mark Heldreth
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3402-x

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12/2014 Go to the issue