Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2018

01-06-2018 | Cardiac

Third generation dual-source CT enables accurate diagnosis of coronary restenosis in all size stents with low radiation dose and preserved image quality

Authors: Yuehua Li, Mengmeng Yu, Wenbin Li, Zhigang Lu, Meng Wei, Jiayin Zhang

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the diagnostic performance of low dose stent imaging in patients with large (≥ 3 mm) and small (< 3 mm) calibre stents by third-generation dual-source CT.

Methods

Symptomatic patients suspected of having in-stent restenosis (ISR) were prospectively enrolled. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were performed within 1 month for correlation. Binary ISR was defined as an in-stent neointimal proliferation with diameter stenosis ≥ 50%. The radiation dose and image quality of CCTA were also assessed.

Results

Sixty-nine patients with 140 stents were ultimately included for analysis. The mean total radiation dose of CCTA was 1.3 ± 0.72 mSv in all patients and 0.95 ± 0.17 mSv in patients with high pitch acquisition. The overall diagnostic accuracy of CCTA stent imaging of patient-based, lesion-based and stent-based analysis was 95.7%, 94.1% and 94.3%, respectively. Further, the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA in the small calibre stent group (diameter < 3 mm) was slightly lower than that of the large calibre stent group (diameter ≥ 3 mm) (88.5% versus 98.7%, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Third-generation dual-source CT enables accurate diagnosis of coronary ISR of both large and small calibre stents. Low radiation dose could be achieved with preserved image quality.

Key Points

• Third-generation DSCT enables accurate diagnosis of coronary ISR of all size stents.
• Low radiation dose could be achieved with preserved image quality.
• The diagnostic accuracy of CCTA of small calibre stents was 88.5%.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sousa JE, Serruys PW, Costa MA (2003) New frontiers in cardiology: drug-eluting stents: Part I. Circulation 107:2274–2279CrossRefPubMed Sousa JE, Serruys PW, Costa MA (2003) New frontiers in cardiology: drug-eluting stents: Part I. Circulation 107:2274–2279CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sousa JE, Serruys PW, Costa MA (2003) New frontiers in cardiology: drug-eluting stents: Part II. Circulation 107:2283–2289 Sousa JE, Serruys PW, Costa MA (2003) New frontiers in cardiology: drug-eluting stents: Part II. Circulation 107:2283–2289
3.
go back to reference Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ et al (2003) Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 349:1315–1323CrossRefPubMed Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ et al (2003) Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 349:1315–1323CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA et al (2004) A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 350:221–231CrossRefPubMed Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA et al (2004) A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 350:221–231CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pan J, Lu Z, Zhang J et al (2013) Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis classified by computed tomography in patients with drug-eluting stents: correlation with invasive coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 23:101–107CrossRefPubMed Pan J, Lu Z, Zhang J et al (2013) Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis classified by computed tomography in patients with drug-eluting stents: correlation with invasive coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 23:101–107CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Xu N, Zhang J, Li M et al (2014) Incidence and classification of neointimal proliferation and in-stent restenosis in post-stenting patients at 1-year interval: findings from non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur J Radiol 83:1816–1821CrossRefPubMed Xu N, Zhang J, Li M et al (2014) Incidence and classification of neointimal proliferation and in-stent restenosis in post-stenting patients at 1-year interval: findings from non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur J Radiol 83:1816–1821CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Li M, Zhang J, Zhang Q et al (2015) Coronary stent occlusion: reverse attenuation gradient sign observed at computed tomography angiography improves diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol 25:568–574CrossRefPubMed Li M, Zhang J, Zhang Q et al (2015) Coronary stent occlusion: reverse attenuation gradient sign observed at computed tomography angiography improves diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol 25:568–574CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Zhang J, Li M, Lu Z et al (2012) In vivo evaluation of stent patency by 64-slice multidetector CT coronary angiography: shall we do it or not? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:651–658CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Li M, Lu Z et al (2012) In vivo evaluation of stent patency by 64-slice multidetector CT coronary angiography: shall we do it or not? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:651–658CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Geyer LL, Glenn GR, De Cecco CN et al (2015) CT evaluation of small-diameter coronary artery stents: effect of an integrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction. Radiology 276:706–714CrossRefPubMed Geyer LL, Glenn GR, De Cecco CN et al (2015) CT evaluation of small-diameter coronary artery stents: effect of an integrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction. Radiology 276:706–714CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gassenmaier T, Petri N, Allmendinger T et al (2014) Next generation coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 27 coronary stents. Eur Radiol 24:2953–2961CrossRefPubMed Gassenmaier T, Petri N, Allmendinger T et al (2014) Next generation coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 27 coronary stents. Eur Radiol 24:2953–2961CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mangold S, Cannaó PM, Schoepf UJ et al (2016) Impact of an advanced image-based monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm on coronary stent visualization using third generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 26:1871–1878CrossRefPubMed Mangold S, Cannaó PM, Schoepf UJ et al (2016) Impact of an advanced image-based monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm on coronary stent visualization using third generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 26:1871–1878CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R et al (2006) 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 16:818–826CrossRefPubMed Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R et al (2006) 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 16:818–826CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Maurovich-Horvat P et al (2006) Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. Eur J Radiol 57:373–379CrossRefPubMed Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Maurovich-Horvat P et al (2006) Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. Eur J Radiol 57:373–379CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS et al (1999) Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 100:1872–1878CrossRefPubMed Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS et al (1999) Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 100:1872–1878CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tan SK, Yeong CH, Ng KH et al (2016) Recent update on radiation dose assessment for the state-of-the-art coronary computed tomography angiography protocols. PLoS One 11:e0161543CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tan SK, Yeong CH, Ng KH et al (2016) Recent update on radiation dose assessment for the state-of-the-art coronary computed tomography angiography protocols. PLoS One 11:e0161543CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S et al (2007) Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet 370:937–948CrossRefPubMed Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S et al (2007) Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet 370:937–948CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rathore S, Kinoshita Y, Terashima M et al (2010) A comparison of clinical presentations, angiographic patterns and outcomes of in-stent restenosis between bare metal stents and drug eluting stents. EuroIntervention 5:841–846CrossRefPubMed Rathore S, Kinoshita Y, Terashima M et al (2010) A comparison of clinical presentations, angiographic patterns and outcomes of in-stent restenosis between bare metal stents and drug eluting stents. EuroIntervention 5:841–846CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Chen MS, John JM, Chew DP et al (2006) Bare metal stent restenosis is not a benign clinical entity. Am Heart J 151:1260–1264CrossRefPubMed Chen MS, John JM, Chew DP et al (2006) Bare metal stent restenosis is not a benign clinical entity. Am Heart J 151:1260–1264CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bossi I, Klersy C, Black AJ et al (2000) In-stent restenosis: long-term outcome and predictors of subsequent target lesion revascularization after repeat balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1569–1576CrossRefPubMed Bossi I, Klersy C, Black AJ et al (2000) In-stent restenosis: long-term outcome and predictors of subsequent target lesion revascularization after repeat balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1569–1576CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1864–1894CrossRefPubMed Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1864–1894CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Morsbach F, Desbiolles L, Plass A et al (2013) Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: impact of an integrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction. Invest Radiol 48:32–40CrossRefPubMed Morsbach F, Desbiolles L, Plass A et al (2013) Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: impact of an integrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction. Invest Radiol 48:32–40CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Third generation dual-source CT enables accurate diagnosis of coronary restenosis in all size stents with low radiation dose and preserved image quality
Authors
Yuehua Li
Mengmeng Yu
Wenbin Li
Zhigang Lu
Meng Wei
Jiayin Zhang
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5256-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

European Radiology 6/2018 Go to the issue