Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 5/2017

Open Access 01-10-2017 | Review Article

The XprESS Multi-Sinus Dilation System for the Treatment of Chronic Sinusitis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance

Authors: Michelle Jenks, Iain Willits, Emily Eaton Turner, Neil Hewitt, Mick Arber, Helen Cole, Joyce Craig, Andrew Sims

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The XprESS multi-sinus dilation system (XprESS) is a minimally invasive alternative to functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) used in the treatment of people with chronic or recurrent acute sinusitis refractory to medical treatment. The manufacturer of XprESS, Entellus Medical, claims the technology is as effective as FESS in improving quality of life and is associated with quicker recovery times and reduced costs. The Medical Technologies Advisory Committee (MTAC) at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) selected XprESS for evaluation. Nine trials published in 13 papers were correctly identified by the company as relevant to the decision problem, including one randomised controlled trial (REMODEL study). From this evidence, the company concluded that XprESS is as beneficial as FESS for a range of clinical endpoints. The External Assessment Centre (EAC) agreed with the company’s conclusion in a subgroup of patients, but judged that the evidence did not generalise to patients within the NHS fully. The company constructed a de novo costing model. XprESS generated cost-savings of £1302 per patient compared with FESS. The EAC critiqued and updated the model’s inputs, with differences in results driven by changes in assumptions on procedure duration, length of hospital stay and the proportion of procedures undertaken in an outpatient setting under local anaesthetic. Although cost-incurring in the base case, XprESS generated cost savings under certain scenarios. The MTAC reviewed the evidence and supported the case for adoption, issuing positive draft recommendations. After public consultation NICE published this as Medical Technologies Guidance 30.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Campbell B, Campbell M. NICE medical technologies guidance: a novel and rigorous methodology to address a new health technology assessment challenge. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012;10(5):295–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campbell B, Campbell M. NICE medical technologies guidance: a novel and rigorous methodology to address a new health technology assessment challenge. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012;10(5):295–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, et al. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. Rhinol Suppl. 2012;23:1–298. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, et al. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. Rhinol Suppl. 2012;23:1–298.
5.
go back to reference Philpott C, Hopkins C, Erskine S, et al. The burden of revision sinonasal surgery in the UK—data from the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Epidemiology Study (CRES): a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;5:e006680.CrossRef Philpott C, Hopkins C, Erskine S, et al. The burden of revision sinonasal surgery in the UK—data from the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Epidemiology Study (CRES): a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;5:e006680.CrossRef
6.
12.
go back to reference Bikhazi N, Light J, Truitt T, Schwartz M, Cutler J, Remodel Study Investigators. Standalone balloon dilation versus sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014;28(4):323–9. doi:10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4064.CrossRefPubMed Bikhazi N, Light J, Truitt T, Schwartz M, Cutler J, Remodel Study Investigators. Standalone balloon dilation versus sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014;28(4):323–9. doi:10.​2500/​ajra.​2014.​28.​4064.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chandra RK, Kern RC, Cutler JL, Welch KC, Russell PT. REMODEL larger cohort with long-term outcomes and meta-analysis of standalone balloon dilation studies. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(1):44–50. doi:10.1002/lary.25507.CrossRefPubMed Chandra RK, Kern RC, Cutler JL, Welch KC, Russell PT. REMODEL larger cohort with long-term outcomes and meta-analysis of standalone balloon dilation studies. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(1):44–50. doi:10.​1002/​lary.​25507.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cutler J, Bikhazi N, Light J, Truitt T, Schwartz M, Investigators RS. Standalone balloon dilation versus sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27(5):416–22. doi:10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3970.CrossRefPubMed Cutler J, Bikhazi N, Light J, Truitt T, Schwartz M, Investigators RS. Standalone balloon dilation versus sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27(5):416–22. doi:10.​2500/​ajra.​2013.​27.​3970.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cutler J, Truitt T, Atkins J, Winegar B, Lanier B, Schaeffer BT, et al. First clinic experience: patient selection and outcomes for ostial dilation for chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1(6):460–5. doi:10.1002/alr.20069.CrossRefPubMed Cutler J, Truitt T, Atkins J, Winegar B, Lanier B, Schaeffer BT, et al. First clinic experience: patient selection and outcomes for ostial dilation for chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1(6):460–5. doi:10.​1002/​alr.​20069.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Stankiewicz J, Tami T, Truitt T, Atkins J, Winegar B, Cink P, et al. Impact of chronic rhinosinusitis on work productivity through one-year follow-up after balloon dilation of the ethmoid infundibulum. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1(1):38–45. doi:10.1002/alr.20008.CrossRefPubMed Stankiewicz J, Tami T, Truitt T, Atkins J, Winegar B, Cink P, et al. Impact of chronic rhinosinusitis on work productivity through one-year follow-up after balloon dilation of the ethmoid infundibulum. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1(1):38–45. doi:10.​1002/​alr.​20008.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Stankiewicz J, Truitt T, Atkins J, Winegar B, Cink P, Raviv J, et al. Two-year results: transantral balloon dilation of the ethmoid infundibulum. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012;2(3):199–206. doi:10.1002/alr.21024.CrossRefPubMed Stankiewicz J, Truitt T, Atkins J, Winegar B, Cink P, Raviv J, et al. Two-year results: transantral balloon dilation of the ethmoid infundibulum. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012;2(3):199–206. doi:10.​1002/​alr.​21024.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Levine SB, Truitt T, Schwartz M, Atkins J. In-office stand-alone balloon dilation of maxillary sinus ostia and ethmoid infundibula in adults with chronic or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis: a prospective, multi-institutional study with-1-year follow-up. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;122(11):665–71.CrossRefPubMed Levine SB, Truitt T, Schwartz M, Atkins J. In-office stand-alone balloon dilation of maxillary sinus ostia and ethmoid infundibula in adults with chronic or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis: a prospective, multi-institutional study with-1-year follow-up. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;122(11):665–71.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Brodner D, Nachlas N, Mock P, Truitt T, Armstrong M, Pasha R, et al. Safety and outcomes following hybrid balloon and balloon-only procedures using a multifunction, multisinus balloon dilation tool. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(8):652–8. doi:10.1002/alr.21156.CrossRefPubMed Brodner D, Nachlas N, Mock P, Truitt T, Armstrong M, Pasha R, et al. Safety and outcomes following hybrid balloon and balloon-only procedures using a multifunction, multisinus balloon dilation tool. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(8):652–8. doi:10.​1002/​alr.​21156.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gould J, Alexander I, Tomkin E, Brodner D. In-office, multisinus balloon dilation: 1-year outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, open label trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014;28(2):156.CrossRefPubMed Gould J, Alexander I, Tomkin E, Brodner D. In-office, multisinus balloon dilation: 1-year outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, open label trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014;28(2):156.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Entellus Medical, Cartographer FinESS Registry Study. Bethesda: US National Library of Medicine; 2009. Entellus Medical, Cartographer FinESS Registry Study. Bethesda: US National Library of Medicine; 2009.
24.
go back to reference Entellus Medical, Cartographer Sinus Balloon Dilation in Pediatric Patients. Bethesda: US National Library of Medicine; 2014. Entellus Medical, Cartographer Sinus Balloon Dilation in Pediatric Patients. Bethesda: US National Library of Medicine; 2014.
28.
29.
go back to reference Ference EH, Schroeder JW Jr, Qureshi H, Conley D, Chandra RK, Tan BK, et al. Current utilization of balloon dilation versus endoscopic techniques in pediatric sinus surgery [Erratum appears in Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Aug;153(2):310–1; PMID: 26198863]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(5):852–60. doi:10.1177/0194599814545442.CrossRefPubMed Ference EH, Schroeder JW Jr, Qureshi H, Conley D, Chandra RK, Tan BK, et al. Current utilization of balloon dilation versus endoscopic techniques in pediatric sinus surgery [Erratum appears in Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Aug;153(2):310–1; PMID: 26198863]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(5):852–60. doi:10.​1177/​0194599814545442​.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Sorgeloose T, Demaire C, Stueve M. Budget impact analysis of balloon sinuplasty versus classic functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Using a budget impact model to identify country specific market access strategy. Value Health. 2012;15(7):A348. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.868.CrossRef Sorgeloose T, Demaire C, Stueve M. Budget impact analysis of balloon sinuplasty versus classic functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Using a budget impact model to identify country specific market access strategy. Value Health. 2012;15(7):A348. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2012.​08.​868.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Dalziel K, Stein K, Round A, Garside R, Royle P. Systematic review of endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyps. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(17):iii, 1–159. Dalziel K, Stein K, Round A, Garside R, Royle P. Systematic review of endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyps. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(17):iii, 1–159.
37.
go back to reference Department of Health. NHS reference costs 2011–12. London: Department of Health; 2012. Department of Health. NHS reference costs 2011–12. London: Department of Health; 2012.
38.
go back to reference Zilvetti M, Puttick M, Parameswaran R, McWhinnie D. Day surgery and national tariff: is there room for economic sense? J One Day Surg. 2009;19(3):64–7. Zilvetti M, Puttick M, Parameswaran R, McWhinnie D. Day surgery and national tariff: is there room for economic sense? J One Day Surg. 2009;19(3):64–7.
39.
go back to reference Department of Health. NHS reference costs 2014–15. London: Department of Health; 2015. Department of Health. NHS reference costs 2014–15. London: Department of Health; 2015.
Metadata
Title
The XprESS Multi-Sinus Dilation System for the Treatment of Chronic Sinusitis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
Authors
Michelle Jenks
Iain Willits
Emily Eaton Turner
Neil Hewitt
Mick Arber
Helen Cole
Joyce Craig
Andrew Sims
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-017-0337-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 5/2017 Go to the issue