Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Study protocol

The Welsh study of mothers and babies: protocol for a population-based cohort study to investigate the clinical significance of defined ultrasound findings of uncertain significance

Authors: Lisa Hurt, Melissa Wright, Fiona Brook, Susan Thomas, Frank Dunstan, David Fone, Gareth John, Sue Morris, David Tucker, Marilyn Ann Wills, Lyn Chitty, Colin Davies, Shantini Paranjothy

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Improvement in ultrasound imaging has led to the identification of subtle non-structural markers during the 18 – 20 week fetal anomaly scan, such as echogenic bowel, mild cerebral ventriculomegaly, renal pelvicalyceal dilatation, and nuchal thickening. These markers are estimated to occur in between 0.6% and 4.3% of pregnancies. Their clinical significance, for pregnancy outcomes or childhood morbidity, is largely unknown. The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of seven markers in the general obstetric population and establish a cohort of children for longer terms follow-up to assess the clinical significance of these markers.

Methods/Design

All women receiving antenatal care within six of seven Welsh Health Boards who had an 18 to 20 week ultrasound scan in Welsh NHS Trusts between July 2008 and March 2011 were eligible for inclusion. Data were collected on seven markers (echogenic bowel, cerebral ventriculomegaly, renal pelvicalyceal dilatation, nuchal thickening, cardiac echogenic foci, choroid plexus cysts, and short femur) at the time of 18 – 20 week fetal anomaly scan. Ultrasound records were linked to routinely collected data on pregnancy outcomes (work completed during 2012 and 2013). Images were stored and reviewed by an expert panel.
The prevalence of each marker (reported and validated) will be estimated. A projected sample size of 23,000 will allow the prevalence of each marker to be estimated with the following precision: a marker with 0.50% prevalence to within 0.10%; a marker with 1.00% prevalence to within 0.13%; and a marker with 4.50% prevalence to within 0.27%. The relative risk of major congenital abnormalities, stillbirths, pre-term birth and small for gestational age, given the presence of a validated marker, will be reported.

Discussion

This is a large, prospective study designed to estimate the prevalence of markers in a population-based cohort of pregnant women and to investigate associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The study will also establish a cohort of children that can be followed-up to explore associations between specific markers and longer-term health and social outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Antenatal care. NICE Clinical Guideline 62. 2008, London: NICE National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Antenatal care. NICE Clinical Guideline 62. 2008, London: NICE
2.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling, Green-top Guideline No 8. 2010, London: RCOG Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling, Green-top Guideline No 8. 2010, London: RCOG
3.
go back to reference Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J, Roberts T, Martin MA: Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women’s views. Health Technol Assess. 2000, 4 (16): 29- Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J, Roberts T, Martin MA: Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women’s views. Health Technol Assess. 2000, 4 (16): 29-
4.
go back to reference Sepulveda W, Romero D: Significance of echogenic foci in the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 1998, 12: 445-449. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12060445.x.CrossRef Sepulveda W, Romero D: Significance of echogenic foci in the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 1998, 12: 445-449. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12060445.x.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lamont RF, Havutcu E, Salgia S, Adinkara P, Nicholl R: The association between isolated fetal echogenic cardiac foci on second-trimester ultrasound scan and trisomy 21 in low-risk unselected women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2004, 23: 346-351. 10.1002/uog.1018.CrossRef Lamont RF, Havutcu E, Salgia S, Adinkara P, Nicholl R: The association between isolated fetal echogenic cardiac foci on second-trimester ultrasound scan and trisomy 21 in low-risk unselected women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2004, 23: 346-351. 10.1002/uog.1018.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chitty LS, Chudleigh P, Wright E, Campbell S, Pembrey M: The significance of choroid plexus cysts in an unselected population: results of a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998, 12: 391-397. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12060391.x.CrossRefPubMed Chitty LS, Chudleigh P, Wright E, Campbell S, Pembrey M: The significance of choroid plexus cysts in an unselected population: results of a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998, 12: 391-397. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12060391.x.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Raniga S, Desai PD, Parikh H: Ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy in second trimester: are we lost?. Medscape Gen Med. 2006, 8: 9- Raniga S, Desai PD, Parikh H: Ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy in second trimester: are we lost?. Medscape Gen Med. 2006, 8: 9-
8.
go back to reference Chudleigh PM, Chitty LS, Pembrey M, Campbell S: The association of aneuploidy and mild fetal pyelectasis in an unselected population: the results of a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 17: 197-202. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00360.x.CrossRefPubMed Chudleigh PM, Chitty LS, Pembrey M, Campbell S: The association of aneuploidy and mild fetal pyelectasis in an unselected population: the results of a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 17: 197-202. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00360.x.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Al-Kouatly HB, Chasen ST, Streltzoff J, Chervenak FA: The clinical significance of fetal echogenic bowel. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 185: 1035-1038. 10.1067/mob.2001.117671.CrossRefPubMed Al-Kouatly HB, Chasen ST, Streltzoff J, Chervenak FA: The clinical significance of fetal echogenic bowel. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 185: 1035-1038. 10.1067/mob.2001.117671.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Berlin BM, Norton ME, Sugarman E, Tsipis JE, Allito BA: Cystic fibrosis and chromosome abnormalities associated with echogenic fetal bowel. Obstet Gynecol. 1999, 94: 135-138. 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00286-0.PubMed Berlin BM, Norton ME, Sugarman E, Tsipis JE, Allito BA: Cystic fibrosis and chromosome abnormalities associated with echogenic fetal bowel. Obstet Gynecol. 1999, 94: 135-138. 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00286-0.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Al-Kouatly HB, Chasen ST, Karam AK, Ahner R, Chervenak FA: Factors associated with fetal demise in fetal echogenic bowel. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 185: 1039-1043. 10.1067/mob.2001.117641.CrossRefPubMed Al-Kouatly HB, Chasen ST, Karam AK, Ahner R, Chervenak FA: Factors associated with fetal demise in fetal echogenic bowel. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 185: 1039-1043. 10.1067/mob.2001.117641.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Goetzinger KR, Cahill AG, Macones GA, Odibo AO: Echogenic bowel on second-trimester ultrasound: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 117: 1341-1348. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821aa739.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goetzinger KR, Cahill AG, Macones GA, Odibo AO: Echogenic bowel on second-trimester ultrasound: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 117: 1341-1348. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821aa739.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Antenatal Screening Wales: Choices: Recommendations for the Provision and Management of Antenatal Screening in Wales. 2002, Cardiff: National Assembly for Wales Antenatal Screening Wales: Choices: Recommendations for the Provision and Management of Antenatal Screening in Wales. 2002, Cardiff: National Assembly for Wales
14.
go back to reference Maclachlan N, Iskaros J, Chitty L: Ultrasound markers of fetal chromosomal abnormality: a survey of policies and practices in UK maternity ultrasound departments. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2000, 15: 387-390. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00122.x.CrossRef Maclachlan N, Iskaros J, Chitty L: Ultrasound markers of fetal chromosomal abnormality: a survey of policies and practices in UK maternity ultrasound departments. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2000, 15: 387-390. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00122.x.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hoskovec J, Mastrobattista JM, Johnston D, Kerrigan A, Robbins-Furman P, Wicklund CA: Anxiety and prenatal testing: do women with soft ultrasound findings have increased anxiety compared to women with other indications for testing?. Prenat Diagn. 2008, 28: 135-140. 10.1002/pd.1935.CrossRefPubMed Hoskovec J, Mastrobattista JM, Johnston D, Kerrigan A, Robbins-Furman P, Wicklund CA: Anxiety and prenatal testing: do women with soft ultrasound findings have increased anxiety compared to women with other indications for testing?. Prenat Diagn. 2008, 28: 135-140. 10.1002/pd.1935.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Viaux-Savelon S, Dommergues M, Rosenblum O, Bodeau N, Aidane E, Philippon O, Mazet P, Vibert-Guigue C, Vauthier-Brouzes D, Feldman R, Cohen D: Prenatal ultrasound screening: false positive soft markers may alter maternal representations and mother-infant interaction. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e30935-10.1371/journal.pone.0030935.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Viaux-Savelon S, Dommergues M, Rosenblum O, Bodeau N, Aidane E, Philippon O, Mazet P, Vibert-Guigue C, Vauthier-Brouzes D, Feldman R, Cohen D: Prenatal ultrasound screening: false positive soft markers may alter maternal representations and mother-infant interaction. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e30935-10.1371/journal.pone.0030935.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Antenatal Screening Wales: Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling. Policy, standards and protocols. 2008, Cardiff: Antenatal Screening Wales Antenatal Screening Wales: Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling. Policy, standards and protocols. 2008, Cardiff: Antenatal Screening Wales
19.
go back to reference Sethna F, Tennant PWG, Rankin J, Robson SC: Prevalence, natural history, and clinical outcome of mild to moderate ventriculomegaly. Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 117: 867-876. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182117471.CrossRefPubMed Sethna F, Tennant PWG, Rankin J, Robson SC: Prevalence, natural history, and clinical outcome of mild to moderate ventriculomegaly. Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 117: 867-876. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182117471.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kirk JS, Comstock CH, Fassnacht MA, Yang SS, Lee W: Routine measurement of nuchal thickness in the second trimester. J Matern Fetal Neonatal. 1992, 1: 82-86. 10.3109/14767059209161895.CrossRef Kirk JS, Comstock CH, Fassnacht MA, Yang SS, Lee W: Routine measurement of nuchal thickness in the second trimester. J Matern Fetal Neonatal. 1992, 1: 82-86. 10.3109/14767059209161895.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nyberg DA, Souter VL, El-Bastawissi A, Young S, Luthhardt F, Luthy DA: Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. 2001, 20: 1053-1063.PubMed Nyberg DA, Souter VL, El-Bastawissi A, Young S, Luthhardt F, Luthy DA: Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. 2001, 20: 1053-1063.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Welsh Assembly Government: Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation 2011. Summary Report. 2011, Cardiff: National Statistics Welsh Assembly Government: Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation 2011. Summary Report. 2011, Cardiff: National Statistics
23.
go back to reference World Health Organization: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10). 1992, Geneva: WHO World Health Organization: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10). 1992, Geneva: WHO
Metadata
Title
The Welsh study of mothers and babies: protocol for a population-based cohort study to investigate the clinical significance of defined ultrasound findings of uncertain significance
Authors
Lisa Hurt
Melissa Wright
Fiona Brook
Susan Thomas
Frank Dunstan
David Fone
Gareth John
Sue Morris
David Tucker
Marilyn Ann Wills
Lyn Chitty
Colin Davies
Shantini Paranjothy
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-164

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2014 Go to the issue