Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4/2013

01-11-2013 | Editorial

The varieties of human dignity: a logical and conceptual analysis

Author: Daniel P. Sulmasy

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The word ‘dignity’ is used in a variety of ways in bioethics, and this ambiguity has led some to argue that the term must be expunged from the bioethical lexicon. Such a judgment is far too hasty, however. In this article, the various uses of the word are classified into three serviceable categories: intrinsic, attributed, and inflorescent dignity. It is then demonstrated that, logically and linguistically, the attributed and inflorescent meanings of the word presuppose the intrinsic meaning. Thus, one cannot conclude that these meanings are arbitrary and unrelated. This categorization and logical and linguistic analysis helps to unravel what seem to be contradictions in discourse about dignity and bioethics, and provides a hierarchy of meaning that has potential normative implications.
Footnotes
1
For the purposes of this discussion we will prescind from the very interesting philosophical questions that surround the nature of aesthetic value—e.g.,—whether humanly created beauty it is purely artefactual, or whether there are objective aesthetic norms.
 
2
If the natural kind to which ET belongs has kind-specific capacities that mark it as a member of a kind that has intrinsic dignity, then there would be at least two natural kinds in the universe that had intrinsic dignity—humans and extra-terrestrials of the ET kind. That dignity would be equal among all members of each kind and between all members of the two kinds. Yet, since that dignity depends on the kind of thing each thing is, one would not say that extra-terrestrials of the ET kind have human dignity. Rather, ET would have extra-terrestrial dignity and John Doe would have human dignity.
 
Literature
go back to reference Gewirth, A. 1998. Self-fulfillment, 159–174. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Gewirth, A. 1998. Self-fulfillment, 159–174. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Johnson, P.R. 1998. An analysis of “dignity”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19: 337–352.PubMedCrossRef Johnson, P.R. 1998. An analysis of “dignity”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19: 337–352.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jordan, M.C. 2010. Bioethics and “human dignity”. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35: 180–196.PubMedCrossRef Jordan, M.C. 2010. Bioethics and “human dignity”. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35: 180–196.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kass, L.R. 1974. Averting one’s eyes, or facing the music?: On dignity in death. Hastings Center Studies 2(2): 67–80.PubMedCrossRef Kass, L.R. 1974. Averting one’s eyes, or facing the music?: On dignity in death. Hastings Center Studies 2(2): 67–80.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Morberg Jämterud S. 2011. Human dignity after Kant: A sustainable and relational moral idea? [abstract] 25th European Conference on Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care, August 18, Zurich, Switzerland. Morberg Jämterud S. 2011. Human dignity after Kant: A sustainable and relational moral idea? [abstract] 25th European Conference on Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care, August 18, Zurich, Switzerland.
go back to reference Nordenfelt, L. 2004. The varieties of dignity. Health Care Analalysis 12(2): 69–81.CrossRef Nordenfelt, L. 2004. The varieties of dignity. Health Care Analalysis 12(2): 69–81.CrossRef
go back to reference Quill, T. 1991. Death and dignity: A case of individualized decision making. New England Journal of Medicine 324: 691–694.PubMedCrossRef Quill, T. 1991. Death and dignity: A case of individualized decision making. New England Journal of Medicine 324: 691–694.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rolston III, H. 1988. Environmental ethics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Rolston III, H. 1988. Environmental ethics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
go back to reference Schroeder, D. 2010. Dignity: one, two, three, four, five, still counting. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19(1): 118–125.PubMedCrossRef Schroeder, D. 2010. Dignity: one, two, three, four, five, still counting. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19(1): 118–125.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Singer, P. 1993. Practical ethics, 2nd ed, 274–276. New York: Cambridge University Press. Singer, P. 1993. Practical ethics, 2nd ed, 274–276. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Sulmasy, D.P. 2007. Human dignity and human worth. In Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation, ed. N. Lickiss, and J. Malpas, 9–18. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRef Sulmasy, D.P. 2007. Human dignity and human worth. In Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation, ed. N. Lickiss, and J. Malpas, 9–18. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Sulmasy, D.P. 2008. Dignity and bioethics: History, theory, and selected applications. In Humanand dignity and bioethics, ed. E.D. Pellegrino, 469–501. Washington, DC: The President’s Council on Bioethics. Sulmasy, D.P. 2008. Dignity and bioethics: History, theory, and selected applications. In Humanand dignity and bioethics, ed. E.D. Pellegrino, 469–501. Washington, DC: The President’s Council on Bioethics.
go back to reference Wiggins, D. 2001. Sameness and substance renewed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Wiggins, D. 2001. Sameness and substance renewed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Wittgenstein L. 1968. Philosophical investigations, 244–281 (trans: Anscombe, G.E.M.), 89–97. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Wittgenstein L. 1968. Philosophical investigations, 244–281 (trans: Anscombe, G.E.M.), 89–97. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Metadata
Title
The varieties of human dignity: a logical and conceptual analysis
Author
Daniel P. Sulmasy
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-012-9400-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4/2013 Go to the issue