Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2009

01-08-2009 | Original Research

The Utility of Genetic Counseling Prior to Offering First Trimester Screening Options

Authors: L. Brent Hafen, Rebecca S. Hulinsky, Sara Ellis Simonsen, Stephanie Wilder, Nancy C. Rose

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

In order to evaluate the utility of genetic counseling at the time of first trimester screening in patients with no previously identified genetic concerns, we reviewed family history data for 700 women seen for genetic counseling in Utah during 2005–2006. The mean maternal age was 35 years (Range: 16–47 years). The majority of patients seen were non-Jewish Caucasians (90.8%, 634/700). A three-generation pedigree was obtained from each woman by one of two certified genetic counselors and subsequently classified as “negative” (no birth defects/genetic disorders); “positive” (birth defect or genetic condition with a minimal/low risk of recurrence; additional evaluation/genetic testing during pregnancy not indicated); or “significant” (birth defect or genetic condition with an increased risk of recurrence; additional evaluation/genetic testing during the pregnancy indicated). About 72% (501/700) of the histories were negative, 19% (134/700) were positive, and about 9% (65/700) were significant. Among patients with significant family histories, 66% (n = 43) were women less than 35 years of age. We conclude that assessing a patient’s family history at the time of first trimester serum screening is a valuable resource for pregnancy management.
Literature
go back to reference Practice Bulletin, A.C.O.G. (2007). Screening for fetal chromosome abnormalities. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109, 217–227.CrossRef Practice Bulletin, A.C.O.G. (2007). Screening for fetal chromosome abnormalities. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109, 217–227.CrossRef
go back to reference Cleary-Goldman, J., Morgan, M. A., Malone, F. D., Robinson, J. N., D’Alton, M. E., & Schulkin, J. (2006). Screening for down syndrome: practice patterns and knowledge of obstetricians and gynecologists. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 107, 11–17.CrossRef Cleary-Goldman, J., Morgan, M. A., Malone, F. D., Robinson, J. N., D’Alton, M. E., & Schulkin, J. (2006). Screening for down syndrome: practice patterns and knowledge of obstetricians and gynecologists. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 107, 11–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohn, G. M., Miller, R. C., Gould, M., Macri, C. J., & Gimovsky, M. L. (1999). Impact of genetic counseling on primary and preventive care in obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 44, 7–10.PubMed Cohn, G. M., Miller, R. C., Gould, M., Macri, C. J., & Gimovsky, M. L. (1999). Impact of genetic counseling on primary and preventive care in obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 44, 7–10.PubMed
go back to reference Holzgreve, B., Holzgreve, W., & Golbus, M. S. (1983). The relevance of pre-amniocentesis pedigree analysis and genetic counseling. Clinical Genetics, 24, 429–433.CrossRef Holzgreve, B., Holzgreve, W., & Golbus, M. S. (1983). The relevance of pre-amniocentesis pedigree analysis and genetic counseling. Clinical Genetics, 24, 429–433.CrossRef
go back to reference Langer, A., & Kudart, E. (1990). Construction of a family pedigree in genetic counseling before amniocentesis. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 35, 715–718.PubMed Langer, A., & Kudart, E. (1990). Construction of a family pedigree in genetic counseling before amniocentesis. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 35, 715–718.PubMed
go back to reference Malone, F. D., Canick, J. A., Ball, R., Nyberg, D. A., Comstock, C. H., Bukowski, R., et al. (2005). First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome. The New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 2001–2011.CrossRef Malone, F. D., Canick, J. A., Ball, R., Nyberg, D. A., Comstock, C. H., Bukowski, R., et al. (2005). First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome. The New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 2001–2011.CrossRef
go back to reference Meschede, D., Albersmann, S., & Horst, J. (2000). The practical importance of pedigree analysis in women considering invasive prenatal diagnosis for advanced maternal age or abnormal serum screening tests. Prenatal Diagnosis, 20, 865–869.CrossRef Meschede, D., Albersmann, S., & Horst, J. (2000). The practical importance of pedigree analysis in women considering invasive prenatal diagnosis for advanced maternal age or abnormal serum screening tests. Prenatal Diagnosis, 20, 865–869.CrossRef
go back to reference Rubin, S. P., Malin, J., & Maidman, J. (1983). Genetic counseling before prenatal diagnosis for advanced maternal age: an important medical safeguard. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 62, 155–159.PubMed Rubin, S. P., Malin, J., & Maidman, J. (1983). Genetic counseling before prenatal diagnosis for advanced maternal age: an important medical safeguard. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 62, 155–159.PubMed
go back to reference Wray, M. A., Ghidini, A., Alvis, C., Hodor, J., Landy, H. J., & Poggi, S. H. (2005). The impact of first-trimester screening on AMA patients’ uptake of invasive testing. Prenatal Diagnosis, 25, 350–353.CrossRef Wray, M. A., Ghidini, A., Alvis, C., Hodor, J., Landy, H. J., & Poggi, S. H. (2005). The impact of first-trimester screening on AMA patients’ uptake of invasive testing. Prenatal Diagnosis, 25, 350–353.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Utility of Genetic Counseling Prior to Offering First Trimester Screening Options
Authors
L. Brent Hafen
Rebecca S. Hulinsky
Sara Ellis Simonsen
Stephanie Wilder
Nancy C. Rose
Publication date
01-08-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-009-9230-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2009 Go to the issue