Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

The utility of behavioral biometrics in user authentication and demographic characteristic detection: a scoping review

Authors: O. L. Finnegan, J. W. White III, B. Armstrong, E. L. Adams, S. Burkart, M. W. Beets, S. Nelakuditi, E. A. Willis, L. von Klinggraeff, H. Parker, M. Bastyr, X. Zhu, Z. Zhong, R. G. Weaver

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Background

Objective measures of screen time are necessary to better understand the complex relationship between screen time and health outcomes. However, current objective measures of screen time (e.g., passive sensing applications) are limited in identifying the user of the mobile device, a critical limitation in children’s screen time research where devices are often shared across a family. Behavioral biometrics, a technology that uses embedded sensors on modern mobile devices to continuously authenticate users, could be used to address this limitation.

Objective

The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize the current state of behavioral biometric authentication and synthesize these findings within the scope of applying behavioral biometric technology to screen time measurement.

Methods

We systematically searched five databases (Web of Science Core Collection, Inspec in Engineering Village, Applied Science & Technology Source, IEEE Xplore, PubMed), with the last search in September of 2022. Eligible studies were on the authentication of the user or the detection of demographic characteristics (age, gender) using built-in sensors on mobile devices (e.g., smartphone, tablet). Studies were required to use the following methods for authentication: motion behavior, touch, keystroke dynamics, and/or behavior profiling. We extracted study characteristics (sample size, age, gender), data collection methods, data stream, model evaluation metrics, and performance of models, and additionally performed a study quality assessment. Summary characteristics were tabulated and compiled in Excel. We synthesized the extracted information using a narrative approach.

Results

Of the 14,179 articles screened, 122 were included in this scoping review. Of the 122 included studies, the most highly used biometric methods were touch gestures (n = 76) and movement (n = 63), with 30 studies using keystroke dynamics and 6 studies using behavior profiling. Of the studies that reported age (47), most were performed exclusively in adult populations (n = 34). The overall study quality was low, with an average score of 5.5/14.

Conclusion

The field of behavioral biometrics is limited by the low overall quality of studies. Behavioral biometric technology has the potential to be used in a public health context to address the limitations of current measures of screen time; however, more rigorous research must be performed in child populations first.

Systematic review registration

The protocol has been pre-registered in the Open Science Framework database (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/92YCT).

Available only for authorised users

Domingues-Montanari S. Clinical and psychological effects of excessive screen time on children: effects of screen time on children. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017;53(4):333–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13462.CrossRefPubMed

Liu W, Wu X, Huang K, et al. Early childhood screen time as a predictor of emotional and behavioral problems in children at 4 years: a birth cohort study in China. Environ Health Prev Med. 2021;26(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-020-00926-w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Saunders TJ, Vallance JK. Screen time and health indicators among children and youth: current evidence, limitations and future directions. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017;15(3):323–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0289-3.CrossRefPubMed

Tezol O, Yildiz D, Yalcin S, et al. Excessive screen time and lower psychosocial well-being among preschool children. Arch Pediatr. 2022;29(1):61–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2021.10.003.CrossRefPubMed

Webster EK, Martin CK, Staiano AE. Fundamental motor skills, screen-time, and physical activity in preschoolers. J Sport Health Sci. 2019;8(2):114–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2018.11.006.CrossRefPubMed

Muppalla SK, Vuppalapati S, Reddy Pulliahgaru A, Sreenivasulu H. Effects of excessive screen time on child development: an updated review and strategies for management. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40608. Published online June 18, 2023.

K. Kaye L, Orben A, A. Ellis D, C. Hunter S, Houghton S. The conceptual and methodological mayhem of “screen time.” IJERPH. 2020;17(10):3661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103661.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kabali HK, Irigoyen MM, Nunez-Davis R, et al. Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children. Pediatrics. 2015;136(6):1044–50. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2151.CrossRefPubMed

Radesky JS, Schumacher J, Zuckerman B. Mobile and interactive media use by young children: the good, the bad, and the unknown. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-2251.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2018. Published online April 21, 2021. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/computer-internet-use.html#:~:text=Smartphones%20were%20present%20in%2084,ownership%20fell%20behind%20at%2063%25.

11.

Auxier B, Anderson M, Turner E. Children’s engagement with digital devices, screen time. Published online July 28, 2020.

12.

Radesky JS, Weeks HM, Ball R, et al. Young children’s use of smartphones and tablets. Pediatrics. 2020;146(1):e20193518. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3518.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Barr R, Kirkorian H, Radesky J, et al. Beyond screen time: a synergistic approach to a more comprehensive assessment of family media exposure during early childhood. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1283. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01283.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Guo N, Luk TT, Wang MP, et al. Self-reported screen time on social networking sites associated with problematic smartphone use in Chinese adults: a population-based study. Front Psychiatry. 2021;11:614061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.614061.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Sewall CJR, Bear TM, Merranko J, Rosen D. How psychosocial well-being and usage amount predict inaccuracies in retrospective estimates of digital technology use. Mob Media Commun. 2020;8(3):379–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920902830.CrossRef

16.

Understanding how digital media affects child development. NIH Eunice Kennedy shriver national institute of child health and human development. 2023. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/about/org/od/directors_corner/prev_updates/digital-media-child-development-feb2023.

17.

Perez O, Garza T, Hindera O, et al. Validated assessment tools for screen media use: a systematic review. Karakulah AS, ed. PLoS One. 2023;18(4):e0283714. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283714.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Domoff SE, Banga CA, Borgen AL, et al. Use of passive sensing to quantify adolescent mobile device usage: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary validation of the eMoodie application. Human Behav Emerg Tech. 2021;3(1):63–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.247.CrossRef

19.

Livingstone S, Mascheroni G, Dreier M, Chaudron S, Lagae K. How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: the role of income, education, and parental style. London: EU Kids Online, LSE; 2015. ISSN 2045-256X.

20.

Teh PS, Zhang N, Teoh ABJ, Chen K. A survey on touch dynamics authentication in mobile devices. Comput Secur. 2016;59:210–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2016.03.003.CrossRef

21.

Mahfouz A, Mahmoud TM, Eldin AS. A survey on behavioral biometric authentication on smartphones. J Inf Secur Applic. 2017;37:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2017.10.002.CrossRef

22.

Ibrahim TM, Abdulhamid SM, Alarood AA, et al. Recent advances in mobile touch screen security authentication methods: a systematic literature review. Comput Secur. 2019;85:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.04.008.CrossRef

23.

Meng W, Wong DS, Furnell S, Zhou J. Surveying the development of biometric user authentication on mobile phones. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials. 2015;17(3):1268–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2014.2386915.CrossRef

24.

Abdulhak SA, Abdulaziz AA. A systematic review of features identification and extraction for behavioral biometrie authentication in touchscreen mobile devices. In: 2018 20th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT). New York: IEEE; 2018. p. 68–73. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT.2018.8323648.

25.

Li F, Clarke N, Papadaki M, Dowland P. Active authentication for mobile devices utilising behaviour profiling. Int J Inf Secur. 2014;13(3):229–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-013-0209-6.CrossRef

26.

Pisani PH, Lorena AC. A systematic review on keystroke dynamics. J Braz Comput Soc. 2013;19(4):573–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13173-013-0117-7.CrossRef

27.

Kumar R, Kundu PP, Shukla D, Phoha VV. Continuous user authentication via unlabeled phone movement patterns. In: 2017 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB). New York: IEEE; 2017. p. 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2017.8272696.

28.

Davarci E, Anarim E. User identification on smartphones with motion sensors and touching behaviors. In: 2022 30th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU). New York: IEEE; 2022. p. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU55565.2022.9864837.

29.

Alzubaidi A, Kalita J. Authentication of smartphone users using behavioral biometrics. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials. 2016;18(3):1998–2026. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2537748.CrossRef

30.

Stylios I, Kokolakis S, Thanou O, Chatzis S. Behavioral biometrics & continuous user authentication on mobile devices: a survey. Inf Fusion. 2021;66:76–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.021.CrossRef

31.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Silverio-Fernández M, Renukappa S, Suresh S. What is a smart device? - a conceptualisation within the paradigm of the Internet of Things. Vis in Eng. 2018;6(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-018-0063-8.CrossRef

33.

Goggin G. Adapting the mobile phone: the iPhone and its consumption. Continuum. 2009;23(2):231–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310802710546.CrossRef

34.

Papadakis S, Alexandraki F, Zaranis N. Mobile device use among preschool-aged children in Greece. Educ Inf Technol. 2022;27(2):2717–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10718-6.CrossRef

35.

Domoff SE, Borgen AL, Foley RP, Maffett A. Excessive use of mobile devices and children’s physical health. Hum Behav Emerg Tech. 2019;1(2):169–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.145.CrossRef

36.

Davis SP, Ashayer A, Tabrizi N. Predicting sex and age using swipe-gesture data from a mobile device. In: 2020 IEEE Intl Conf on Parallel & Distributed Processing with Applications, Big Data & Cloud Computing, Sustainable Computing & Communications, Social Computing & Networking (ISPA/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom). IEEE; 2020. p. 1136-1143. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPA-BDCloud-SocialCom-SustainCom51426.2020.00169.

37.

Sun Z, Wang Y, Qu G, Zhou Z. A 3-D hand gesture signature based biometric authentication system for smartphones. Secur Comm Networks. 2016;9(11):1359–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/sec.1422.CrossRef

38.

Liu Q, Wang M, Zhao P, Yan C, Ding Z. A behavioral authentication method for mobile gesture against resilient user posture. In: 2016 3rd International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI). IEEE; 2016. p. 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSAI.2016.7810976.

39.

Maghsoudi J, Tappert CC. A behavioral biometrics user authentication study using motion data from android smartphones. In: 2016 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC). IEEE; 2016. p. 184-187. https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2016.047.

40.

Putri AN, Asnar YDW, Akbar S. A continuous fusion authentication for Android based on keystroke dynamics and touch gesture. In: 2016 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICODSE.2016.7936146.

41.

Lamiche I, Bin G, Jing Y, Yu Z, Hadid A. A continuous smartphone authentication method based on gait patterns and keystroke dynamics. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. 2019;10(11):4417–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1123-6.CrossRef

42.

Smith-Creasey M, Rajarajan M. A continuous user authentication scheme for mobile devices. In: 2016 14th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST). New York: IEEE; 2016. p .104–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2016.7906944.

43.

Shih DH, Lu CM, Shih MH. A flick biometric authentication mechanism on mobile devices. In: 2015 Internationalonal Conference on Informative and Cybernetics for Computational Social Systems (ICCSS). New York: IEEE; 2015. p. 31–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSS.2015.7281144.

44.

Zaidi AZ, Chong CY, Parthiban R, Sadiq AS. A framework of dynamic selection method for user classification in touch-based continuous mobile device authentication. J Inform Secur Applic. 2022;67:103217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2022.103217.CrossRef

45.

Soni D, Hanmandlu M, Saini HC. A Machine learning approach for user authentication using touchstroke dynamics. In: Somani AK, Srivastava S, Mundra A, Rawat S, eds. Proceedings of First International Conference on Smart System, Innovations and Computing. Vol 79. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2018. p. 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5828-8_38.

46.

Lin CC, Chang CC, Liang D, Yang CH. A new non-intrusive authentication method based on the orientation sensor for smartphone users. In: 2012 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Sofware Security and Reliability. New York: IEEE; 2012. p. 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1109/SERE.2012.37.

47.

Li G, Bours P. A novel mobilephone application authentication approach based on accelerometer and gyroscope data. In: 2018 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG). New York City: IEEE; 2018. p. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.23919/BIOSIG.2018.8553503.

48.

Smith-Creasey M, Rajarajan M. A novel scheme to address the fusion uncertainty in multi-modal continuous authentication schemes on mobile devices. In: 2019 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB). New York City; IEEE; 2019. p. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICB45273.2019.8987390.

49.

Salem A, Obaidat MS. A novel security scheme for behavioral authentication systems based on keystroke dynamics. Secur Priv. 2019;2(2):e64. https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.64.CrossRef

50.

Zhao S, Guo Z, Zhong C, Xian L, Liu Y. A novel smartphone identity authentication mechanism. In: Proceedings of the ACM Turing Celebration Conference - China. New York: ACM; 2020. p. 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393527.3393554.

51.

Qiao M, Zhang S, Sung AH, Liu Q. A novel touchscreen-based authentication scheme using static and dynamic hand biometrics. In: 2015 IEEE 39th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference. New York: IEEE; 2015. p. 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2015.133.

52.

Smith-Creasey M, Rajarajan M. A novel word-independent gesture-typing continuous authentication scheme for mobile devices. Comput Secur. 2019;83:140–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.02.001.CrossRef

53.

Alariki AA, Bt Abdul Manaf A, Khan S. A study of touching behavior for authentication in touch screen smart devices. In: 2016 International Conference on Intelligent Systems Engineering (ICISE). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1109/INTELSE.2016.7475123.

54.

Lee SH, Roh JH, Kim S, Jin SH. A study on feature of keystroke dynamics for improving accuracy in mobile environment. In: Choi D, Guilley S, eds. Information Security Applications. Vol 10144. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-31956549-1_31.

55.

Li W, Tan J, Meng W, Wang Y. A swipe-based unlocking mechanism with supervised learning on smartphones: design and evaluation. J Netw Comput Applic. 2020;165:102687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102687.CrossRef

56.

Saini BS, Singh P, Nayyar A, et al. A three-step authentication model for mobile phone user using keystroke dynamics. IEEE Access. 2020;8:125909125922. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008019.CrossRef

57.

Takahashi H, Ogura K, Bista BB, Takata T. A user authentication scheme using keystrokes for smartphones while moving. New York: IEEE; 2016.

58.

Deb D, Ross A, Jain AK, Prakah-Asante K, Prasad KV. Actions speak louder than (Pass)words: passive authentication of smartphone users via deep temporal features. In: 2019 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB). IEEE; 2019. p. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICB45273.2019.8987433.

59.

Leingang W, Gunn D, Kim JH, Yuan X, Roy K. Active authentication using touch dynamics. In: SoutheastCon 2018. New York: IEEE; 2018.p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2018.8479298.

60.

Acien A, Morales A, Fierrez J, Vera-Rodriguez R, Hernandez-Ortega J. Active detection of age groups based on touch interaction. IET Biom. 2019;8(1):101–8. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-bmt.2018.5003.CrossRef

61.

Mahbub U, Sarkar S, Patel VM, Chellappa R. Active user authentication for smartphones: A challenge data set and benchmark results. In: 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2016.7791155.

62.

Guarino A, Lemeri N, Malandrino D, Zaccagnino R, Capo C. Adam or Eve? Automatic users’ gender classification via gestures analysis on touch devices. Neural Comput Applic. 2022;34(21):18473–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07454-4.CrossRef

63.

Wang S, Yuan J, Wen J. Adaptive phone orientation method for continuous authentication based on mobile motion sensors. In: 2019 IEEE 31st International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). New York: IEEE; 2019. p. 1623–1627. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2019.00236.

64.

Davarci E, Soysal B, Erguler I, Aydin SO, Dincer O, Anarim E. Age group detection using smartphone motion sensors. In: 2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO). New York: IEEE; 2017. p. 2201–2205. https://doi.org/10.23919/EUSIPCO.2017.8081600.

65.

Chakraborty B, Nakano K, Tokoi Y, Hashimoto T. An approach for designing low cost deep neural network based biometric authentication model for smartphone user. In: TENCON 2019 - 2019 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON). New York: IEEE; 2019. p. 772–777. https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2019.8929241.

66.

Antal M, Szabo LZ. An Evaluation of One-class and two-class classification algorithms for keystroke dynamics authentication on mobile devices. In: 2015 20th International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science. New York: IEEE; 2015. p. 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCS.2015.16.

67.

Roy A, Halevi T, Memon N. An HMM-based multi-sensor approach for continuous mobile authentication. In: MILCOM 2015 - 2015 IEEE Military Communications Conference. New York: IEEE; 2015. p. 1311–1316. https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2015.7357626.

68.

Salem A, Zaidan D, Swidan A, Saifan R. Analysis of strong password using keystroke dynamics authentication in touch screen devices. In: 2016 Cybersecurity and Cyberforensics Conference (CCC). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2016.11.

69.

Roy S, Roy U, Sinha DD. Analysis of typing pabern in identifying sop biometric information and its impact in user recognition. In: Chandra P, Giri D, Li F, Kar S, Jana DK, eds. Information Technology and Applied Mathematics. Vol 699. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2019. p. 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7590-2_5.

70.

Lee W. Analyzing motion of touching screen for inferring user characteristics. In: 2021 Twelfth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN). New York: IEEE; 2021. p. 78–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUFN49451.2021.9528699.

71.

Buriro A, Crispo B, Conti M. AnswerAuth: a bimodal behavioral biometric-based user authentication scheme for smartphones. J Inform Secur Applic. 2019;44:89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2018.11.008.CrossRef

72.

Praher C, Sonntag M. Applicability of keystroke dynamics as a biometric security feature for mobile touchscreen devices with virtualised keyboards. IJICS. 2016;8(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICS.2016.075311.CrossRef

73.

Baran M, Siwik L, Rzecki K. Application of elastic principal component analysis to person recognition based on screen gestures. In: Rutkowski L, Scherer R, Korytkowski M, Pedrycz W, Tadeusiewicz R, Zurada JM, eds. Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. Vol 11508. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20912-4_50.

74.

Ali Z, Payton J, Sritapan V. At your fingertips: considering finger distinctness in continuous touch-based authentication for mobile devices. In: 2016 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 272–275. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW.2016.29.

75.

Guerra-Casanova J, Sánchez-Ávila C, Bailador G, de Santos SA. Authentication in mobile devices through hand gesture recognition. Int J Inf Secur. 2012;11(2):65–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-012-0154-9.CrossRef

76.

Primo A. Keystroke-based continuous authentication while listening to music on your smart-phone. In: 2017 IEEE 8th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON). New York: IEEE; 2017. p. 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON.2017.8249029.

77.

Yang Y, Guo B, Wang Z, Li M, Yu Z, Zhou X. BehaveSense: continuous authentication for security-sensitive mobile apps using behavioral biometrics. Ad Hoc Netw. 2019;84:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.09.015.CrossRef

78.

Wolff M. Behavioral biometric identification on mobile devices. In: Schmorrow DD, Fidopiastis CM, eds. Foundations of Augmented Cognition. Vol 8027. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 783–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39454-6_84.

79.

Tse KW, Hung K. Behavioral biometrics scheme with keystroke and swipe dynamics for user authentication on mobile platform. In: 2019 IEEE 9th Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE). New York: IEEE; 2019. p. 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAIE.2019.8743995.

80.

Antal M, Szabó LZ. Biometric authentication based on touchscreen swipe patterns. Proc Technol. 2016;22:862–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.061.CrossRef

81.

Laghari A, Waheed-ur-Rehman, Memon ZA. Biometric authentication technique using smartphone sensor. In: 2016 13th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 381–384. https://doi.org/10.1109/IBCAST.2016.7429906.

82.

Tolosana R, Vera-Rodriguez R, Fierrez J, Morales A. BioTouchPass demo: handwriben passwords for touchscreen biometrics. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. New York: ACM; 2019. p. 1023–1025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343031.3350578.

83.

Ray A, Hou D, Schuckers S, Barbir A. Continuous authentication based on hand micro-movement during smartphone form filling by seated human subjects: In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy. Setubal, Portugal: SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications; 2021. p. 424–431. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010225804240431.

84.

Ambol S, Rashad S. Continuous authentication of smartphone users using machine learning. In: 2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON). New York: IEEE; 2020. p. 0056–0062. https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON51285.2020.9298040.

85.

Garbuz A, Epishkina A, Kogos K. Continuous authentication of smartphone users via swipes and taps analysis. In: 2019 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC). New York: IEEE; 2019. p. 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC49498.2019.9108780.

86.

Dybczak J, Nawrocki P. Continuous authentication on mobile devices using behavioral biometrics. In: 2022 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing (CCGrid). New York: IEEE; 2022. p. 1028–1035. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid54584.2022.00125.

87.

Murmuria R, Stavrou A, Barbará D, Fleck D. Continuous authentication on mobile devices using power consumption, touch gestures and physical movement of users. In: Bos H, Monrose F, Blanc G, eds. Research in Attacks, Intrusions, and Defenses. Vol 9404. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26362-5_19.

88.

Karanikiotis T, Papamichail MD, Chatzidimitriou KC, Oikonomou NCI, Symeonidis AL, Saripalle SK. Continuous implicit authentication through touch traces modelling. In: 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS). New York: IEEE; 2020. p. 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS51102.2020.00026.

89.

Zhao X, Feng T, Shi W. Continuous mobile authentication using a novel graphic touch gesture feature. In: 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS). IEEE; 2013. p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2013.6712747.

90.

Zhao X, Feng T, Lu X, Shi W, Kakadiaris IA. Continuous mobile authentication using user-phone interaction. Inst Eng Technol. 2017;3:209–33. https://doi.org/10.1049/PBSE003E_ch8.

91.

Leyfer K, Spivak A. Continuous user authentication by the classification method based on the dynamic touchscreen biometrics. In: 2019 24th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT). New York City IEEE; 2019. p. 228–234. https://doi.org/10.23919/FRUCT.2019.8711941.

92.

Herath HMCKB, Dulanga KGC, Tharindu NVD, Ganegoda GU. Continuous user authentication using keystroke dynamics for touch devices. In: 2022 2nd International Conference on Image Processing and Robotics (ICIPRob). New York: IEEE; 2022. p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIPRob54042.2022.9798728.

93.

94.

Barlas Y, Basar OE, Akan Y, Isbilen M, Alptekin GI, Incel OD. DAKOTA: continuous authentication with behavioral biometrics in a mobile banking application. In: 2020 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK). New York: IEEE; 2020. p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/UBMK50275.2020.9219365.

95.

Incel OD, Gunay S, Akan Y, et al. DAKOTA: sensor and touch screen-based continuous authentication on a mobile banking application. IEEE Access. 2021;9:38943–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3063424.CrossRef

96.

Hernandez-Ortega J, Morales A, Fierrez J, Acien A. Detecting age groups using touch interaction based on neuromotor characteristics. Electron Lea. 2017;53(20):1349–50. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2017.0492.CrossRefADS

97.

Nguyen TV, Sae-Bae N, Memon N. DRAW-A-PIN: authentication using finger-drawn PIN on touch devices. Comput Secur. 2017;66:115–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.01.008.CrossRef

98.

Al-Showarah SA. Dynamic recognition for user age-group classification using hand-writing based finger on smartphones. In: 2019 10th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS). New York: IEEE; 2019. p. 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/IACS.2019.8809083.

99.

Ng’ang’a A, Musuva PMW. Enhancing accuracy in a touch operation biometric system: a case on the android pabern lock scheme. Mobile Inform Syst. 2020;2020:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4165457.CrossRef

100.

Ray-Dowling A, Hou D, Schuckers S, Barbir A. Evaluating multi-modal mobile behavioral biometrics using public datasets. Comput Secur. 2022;121:102868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102868.CrossRef

101.

Buriro A, Gupta S, Crispo B. Evaluation of motion-based touch-typing biometrics for online banking. In: 2017 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG). New York: IEEE; 2017. p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.23919/BIOSIG.2017.8053504.

102.

Ouadjer Y, Adnane M, Bouadjenek N. Feature importance evaluation of smartphone touch gestures for biometric authentication. In: 2020 2nd International Workshop on Human-Centric Smart Environments for Health and Well-Being (IHSH). New York: IEEE; 2021. p. 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1109/IHSH51661.2021.9378750.

103.

Suharsono A, Liang D. Hand stability based features for touch behavior smartphone authentication. In: 2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention (ICKII). New York: IEEE; 2020. p. 167–170. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICKII50300.2020.9318982.

104.

Barra S, Fenu G, De Marsico M, Castiglione A, Nappi M. Have you permission to answer this phone? In: 2018 International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF). New York: IEEE; 2018. p. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWBF.2018.8401563.

105.

Mallet J, Pryor L, Dave R, Seliya N, Vanamala M, Sowells-Boone E. Hold on and swipe: a touch-movement based continuous authentication schema based on machine learning. In: 2022 Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning (CACML). New York: IEEE; 2022. p. 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1109/CACML55074.2022.00081.

106.

Abate AF, Nappi M, Ricciardi S. I-Am: implicitly authenticate me—person authentication on mobile devices through ear shape and arm gesture. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Syst. 2019;49(3):469–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2017.2698258.CrossRef

107.

Cheng Y, Ji X, Li X, et al. Identifying child users via touchscreen interactions. ACM Trans Sen Netw. 2020;16(4):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3403574.CrossRef

108.

Alqarni MA, Chauhdary SH, Malik MN, Ehatisham-ul-Haq M, Azam MA. Identifying smartphone users based on how they interact with their phones. Hum Cent Comput Inf Sci. 2020;10(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-020-0212-7.CrossRef

109.

Rao KR, Anne VPK, Sai Chand U, Alakananda V, Navya Rachana K. Inclination and pressure based authentication for touch devices. In: Satapathy SC, Avadhani PS, Udgata SK, Lakshminarayana S, eds. ICT and Critical Infrastructure: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Convention of Computer Society of India- Vol I. Vol 248. Advances in intelligent systems and computing. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2014. p. 781–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03107-1_86.

110.

Coakley MJ, Monaco JV, Tappert CC. Keystroke biometric studies with short numeric input on smartphones. In: 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2016.7791181.

111.

Gautam P, Dawadi PR. Keystroke biometric system for touch screen text input on android devices optimization of equal error rate based on medians vector proximity. In: 2017 11th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA). New York: IEEE; 2017. p. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/SKIMA.2017.8294136.

112.

Deng Y, Zhong Y. Keystroke dynamics advances for mobile devices using deep neural network. In: Zhong Y, Deng Y, eds. Gate to computer science and research. Vol 2. 1st ed. Thrace, Greece: Science Gate Publishing P.C.; 2015. p. 59–70. https://doi.org/10.15579/gcsr.vol2.ch4.

113.

Roh J hyuk, Lee SH, Kim S. Keystroke dynamics for authentication in smartphone. In: 2016 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 1155–1159. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC.2016.7763394.

114.

Acien A, Morales A, Vera-Rodriguez R, Fierrez J. Keystroke mobile authentication: performance of long-term approaches and fusion with behavioral profiling. In: Morales A, Fierrez J, Sánchez JS, Ribeiro B, eds. Paaern recognition and image analysis. Vol 11868. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31321-0_2.

115.

Sun L, Cao B, Wang J, et al. Kollector: detecting fraudulent activities on mobile devices using deep learning. IEEE Trans on Mobile Comput. 2021;20(4):1465–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2020.2964226.CrossRef

116.

Peralta RT, Rebguns A, Fasel IR, Barnard K. Learning a policy for gesture-based active multi-touch authentication. In: Marinos L, Askoxylakis I, eds. Human Aspects of information security, privacy, and trust. Vol 8030. Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3642-39345-7_7.

117.

Stragapede G, Vera-Rodriguez R, Tolosana R, Morales A, Acien A, Le Lan G. Mobile behavioral biometrics for passive authentication. Paaern Recog Leaers. 2022;157:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2022.03.014.CrossRefADS

118.

Liang X, Zou F, Li L, Yi P. Mobile terminal identity authentication system based on behavioral characteristics. Int J Distrib Sens Netw. 2020;16(1):155014771989937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147719899371.CrossRef

119.

Li C, Jing J, Liu Y. Mobile user authentication-turn it to unlock. In: 2021 6th International Conference on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. New York: ACM; 2021. p. 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460569.3460577.

120.

Corpus KR, Gonzales RJDL, Morada AS, Vea LA. Mobile user identification through authentication using keystroke dynamics and accelerometer biometrics. In: Proceedings of the international conference on mobile Software engineering and systems. New York: ACM; 2016. p. 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897073.2897111.

121.

Akhtar Z, Buriro A, Crispo B, Falk TH. Multimodal smartphone user authentication using touchstroke, phone-movement and face patterns. In: 2017 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP). New York: IEEE; 2017. p. 1368–1372. https://doi.org/10.1109/GlobalSIP.2017.8309185.

122.

Song Y, Cai Z, Zhang ZL. Multi-touch authentication using hand geometry and behavioral information. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). New York: IEEE; 2017. p. 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2017.54.

123.

Primo A, Phoha VV. Music and images as contexts in a context-aware touch-based authentication system. In: 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS). New York: IEEE; 2015. p. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358779.

124.

Phillips ME, Stepp ND, Cruz-Albrecht J, De Sapio V, Lu TC, Sritapan V. Neuromorphic and early warning behavior-based authentication for mobile devices. In: 2016 IEEE Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2016.7568965.

125.

Li N, Liu J, Li Q, Luo X, Duan J. Online signature verification based on biometric features. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 5527–5534. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.683.

126.

Haberfeld C, Hossain MS, Lancor L. Open code biometric tap pad for smartphones. J Inform Secur Applic. 2021;57:102688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102688.CrossRef

127.

Tharwat A, Ibrahim A, Gaber T, Hassanien AE. Personal Identification based on mobile-based keystroke dynamics. In: Hassanien AE, Tolba MF, Shaalan K, Azar AT, eds. Proceedings of the international conference on advanced intelligent systems and informatics 2018. Vol 845. Advances in intelligent systems and computing. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99010-1_42.

128.

Tang C, Cui Z, Chu M, Lu Y, Zhou F, Gao S. Piezoelectric and machine learning based keystroke dynamics for highly secure user authentication. IEEE Sensors J. 2022:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3141872.

129.

Mahfouz A, Mahmoud TM, Sharaf Eldin A. A behavioral biometric authentication framework on smartphones. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York: ACM; 2017. p. 923–925. https://doi.org/10.1145/3052973.3055160.

130.

Hernandez-Ortega J, Morales A, Fierrez J, Acien A. Predicting age groups from touch patterns based on neuromotor models. In: 8th International Conference of Pattern Recognition Systems (ICPRS 2017). Institution of Engineering and Technology; Stevenage, United Kingdom, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2017.0135.

131.

Miguel-Hurtado O, Stevenage SV, Bevan C, Guest R. Predicting sex as a sop-biometrics from device interaction swipe gestures. Pattern Recog Leaers. 2016;79:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2016.04.024.CrossRefADS

132.

Wang S, Yuan J, Chen S. Quality-based score level fusion for continuous authentication with motion sensor and face. In: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Cryptography, Security and Privacy. New York: ACM; 2020. p. 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377644.3377647.

133.

Inguanez F, Ahmadi S. Securing smartphones via typing heat maps. In: 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Berlin (ICCEBerlin). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE-Berlin.2016.7684753.

134.

Zhu H, Hu J, Chang S, Lu L. ShakeIn: secure user authentication of smartphones with single-handed shakes. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput. 2017;16(10):2901–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2017.2651820.CrossRef

135.

Bo C, Zhang L, Li XY, Huang Q, Wang Y. SilentSense: silent user identification via touch and movement behavioral biometrics. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing & Networking - MobiCom ’13. New York: ACM Press; 2013. p. 187. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500423.2504572.

136.

Gunn DJ, Roy K, Bryant K. Simulated cloud authentication based on touch dynamics with SVM. In: 2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). New York: IEEE; 2018. p. 639-644. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2018.8628762.

137.

Wang Z, Zhou N, Chen F, et al. Smart_Auth: user identity authentication based on smartphone motion sensors. In: 2021 6th International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC). New York: IEEE; 2021. p. 480–485.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIVC52351.2021.9526964.

138.

Abate AF, Nappi M, Ricciardi S. Smartphone enabled person authentication based on ear biometrics and arm gesture. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 003719–003724. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2016.7844812.

139.

Acien A, Morales A, Vera-Rodriguez R, Fierrez J. Smartphone sensors for modeling human-computer interaction: general outlook and research datasets for user authentication. In: 2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC). New York: IEEE; 2020. p. 1273–1278. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.00-81.

140.

Anusas-amornkul T. Strengthening password authentication using keystroke dynamics and smartphone sensors. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Communication and Management. New York: ACM; 2019. p. 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357419.3357425.

141.

Temper M, Tjoa S. The applicability of fuzzy rough classifier for continuous person authentication. In: 2016 International Conference on Software Security and Assurance (ICSSA). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSA.2016.10.

142.

Roy S, Roy U, Sinha DD. The probability of predicting personality traits by the way user types on touch screen. Innov Syst Softw Eng. 2019;15(1):27–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-018-0317-6.CrossRef

143.

Shrestha B, Mohamed M, Tamrakar S, Saxena N. Theft-resilient mobile wallets: transparently authenticating NFC users with tapping gesture biometrics. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference on Computer Security Applications. New York: ACM; 2016 p. 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1145/2991079.2991097.

144.

Cascone L, Nappi M, Narducci F, Pero C. Touch keystroke dynamics for demographic classification. Pattern Recog Leaers. 2022;158:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2022.04.023.CrossRefADS

145.

Temper M, Tjoa S, Kaiser M. Touch to authenticate — continuous biometric authentication on mobile devices. In: 2015 1st International Conference on Software Security and Assurance (ICSSA). New York: IEEE; 2015. p. 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSA.2015.016.

146.

Frank M, Biedert R, Ma E, Martinovic I, Song D. Touchalytics: on the applicability of touchscreen input as a behavioral biometric for continuous authentication. New York: IEEE; 2012. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1207.6231.

147.

Watanabe Y, Houryu A, Fujita T. Toward introduction of immunity-based model to continuous behavior-based user authentication on smart phone. Proc Comput Sci. 2013;22:1319–27.CrossRef

148.

Volaka HC, Alptekin G, Basar OE, Isbilen M, Incel OD. Towards continuous authentication on mobile phones using deep learning models. Proc Comput Sci. 2019;155:177–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.08.027.CrossRef

149.

Brown J, Raval A, Anwar M. Towards passive authentication using inertia variations: an experimental study on smartphones. In: 2020 Second Internationalonal Conference on Transdisciplinary AI (TransAI). New York: IEEE; 2020. p. 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/TransAI49837.2020.00019.

150.

Sharma V, Enbody R. User authentication and identification from user interface interactions on touch-enabled devices. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks. New York: ACM; 2017. p. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098243.3098262.

151.

Kroeze CJ, Malan KM. User authentication based on continuous touch biometrics. SACJ. Cape Town, South Africa. 2016;28(2). https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v28i2.374.

152.

Filippov AI, Iuzbashev AV, Kurnev AS. User authentication via touch pattern recognition based on isolation forest. In: 2018 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus). New York: IEEE; 2018. p. 1485–1489. https://doi.org/10.1109/EIConRus.2018.8317378.

153.

Karakaya N, Alptekin GI, İncel ÖD. Using behavioral biometric sensors of mobile phones for user authentication. Proc Comput Sci. 2019;159:475–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.202.CrossRef

154.

Serwadda A, Phoha VV, Wang Z. Which verifiers work?: A benchmark evaluation of touch-based authentication algorithms. In: 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS). New York: IEEE; 2013. p. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2013.6712758.

155.

Buriro A, Crispo B, Delfrari F, Wrona K. Hold and sign: a novel behavioral biometrics for smartphone user authentication. In: 2016 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW). IEEE; 2016. p. 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW.2016.20.

156.

Shen C, Yu T, Yuan S, Li Y, Guan X. Performance analysis of motion-sensor behavior for user authentication on smartphones. Sensors. 2016;16(3):345. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16030345.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralADS

157.

Stylios I, Skalkos A, Kokolakis S, Karyda M. BioPrivacy: a behavioral biometrics continuous authentication system based on keystroke dynamics and touch gestures. ICS. 2022;30(5):687–704. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-12-2021-0212.CrossRef

158.

Papi E, Koh WS, McGregor AH. Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: a systematic review. J Biomech. 2017;64:186–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.037.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

159.

Nguyen T, Roy A, Memon N. Kid on the phone! Toward automatic detection of children on mobile devices. Comput Secur. 2019;84:334–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.04.001.CrossRef

160.

Wang Z, Chen F, Zhou N, et al. Identity authentication based on dynamic touch behavior on smartphone. In: 2021 6th International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC). IEEE; 2021. p. 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIVC52351.2021.9527023.

161.

Thompson N, McGill TJ, Wang X. “Security begins at home”: determinants of home computer and mobile device security behavior. Comput Secur. 2017;70:376–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.07.003.CrossRef

162.

Bo C, Zhang L, Jung T, Han J, Li XY, Wang Y. Continuous user identification via touch and movement behavioral biometrics. In: 2014 IEEE 33rd International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC). IEEE; 2014. p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCC.2014.7017067.

163.

Bo C, Zhang L, Li XY, Huang Q, Wang Y. SilentSense: silent user identification via touch and movement behavioral biometrics. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing & Networking - MobiCom ’13. ACM Press; 2013. p. 187. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500423.2504572.

164.

Stylios I, Kokolakis S, Skalkos A, Chatzis S. BioGames: a new paradigm and a behavioral biometrics collection tool for research purposes. ICS. 2022;30(2):243–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-12-2020-0196.CrossRef

165.

Papamichail MD, Chatzidimitriou KC, Karanikiotis T, Oikonomou NCI, Symeonidis AL, Saripalle SK. Behavioral biometrics dataset towards continuous implicit authentication. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2598135. Published online March 19, 2019.

166.

Murmuria R, Stavrou A, Barbará D, Fleck D. Continuous authentication on mobile devices using power consumption, touch gestures and physical movement of users. In: Bos H, Monrose F, Blanc G, eds. Research in Attacks, Intrusions, and Defenses. Vol 9404. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26362-5_19.

167.

Teh PS, Teoh ABJ, Yue S. A survey of keystroke dynamics biometrics. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/408280.CrossRef

168.

Shen C, Li Y, Chen Y, Guan X, Maxion RA. Performance analysis of multi-motion sensor behavior for active smartphone authentication. IEEE Trans Inform Forensic Secur. 2018;13(1):48–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2017.2737969.CrossRef

169.

Tablets in the U.S. - statistics and facts. Statista. Published online May 23, 2023. https://www.statista.com/topics/2927/tablets-in-the-us/#topicOverview.

170.

Counterpoint Quarterly. Global smartphone shipments market data (Q4 2021 - Q3 2023). https://www.counterpointresearch.com/insights/global-smartphone-share/.

171.

Parker H, Burkart S, Reesor-Oyer L, et al. Feasibility of measuring screen time, activity, and context among families with preschoolers: intensive longitudinal pilot study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(9):e40572. https://doi.org/10.2196/40572.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

172.

Welk GJ, Bai Y, Lee JM, Godino J, Saint-Maurice PF, Carr L. Standardizing analytic methods and reporting in activity monitor validation studies. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(8):1767–80. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001966.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

173.

Menghini L, Cellini N, Goldstone A, Baker FC, de Zambotti M. A standardized framework for testing the performance of sleep-tracking technology: step-by-step guidelines and open-source code. Sleep. 2021;44(2):zsaa170. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa170.CrossRefPubMed

Title: The utility of behavioral biometrics in user authentication and demographic characteristic detection: a scoping review
Authors: O. L. Finnegan
J. W. White III
B. Armstrong
E. L. Adams
S. Burkart
M. W. Beets
S. Nelakuditi
E. A. Willis
L. von Klinggraeff
H. Parker
M. Bastyr
X. Zhu
Z. Zhong
R. G. Weaver
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02451-1

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The utility of behavioral biometrics in user authentication and demographic characteristic detection: a scoping review

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Systematic review registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Systematic review registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Systematic review using a spiral approach with machine learning

Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with antidepressant medications for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Children with autism spectrum disorder in high technology medicine environments; a qualitative systematic review of parental perspectives

Building capacity for network meta-analysis in Sub-Saharan Africa: reflections and future direction

Assessing risk of bias in the meta-analysis of round 1 of the Health Care Innovation Awards

Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool)