Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2012

01-07-2012 | Gynecologic Oncology

The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in silicone implant-based breast reconstruction

Authors: I. Himsl, V. Drinovac, M. Lenhard, D. Stöckl, T. Weissenbacher, D. Dian

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The most frequently occurring long-term complication in implant-based breast reconstruction is fibrotic capsule formation at the recipient site, with concurrent dysesthesia and poor aesthetic results. Using porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM) as a connective tissue graft material is supposed to improve the quality and quantity of soft tissue in implant-based breast reconstruction. This study investigates the indications for and the results and the costs of using PADM for the correction or prevention of implant-associated breast deformities.

Materials and methods

This study reviewed a single surgeon’s experience in the correction or prevention of implant-associated breast deformities with PADM in breast cancer-related breast reconstruction from 2009 to 2011. A total of 23 patients (27 breasts) were included in the study. The aesthetic outcome, the incidence and the type of complication were analysed. Twenty-three women underwent breast cancer-related breast reconstruction: 19 women underwent single-breast reconstruction and four women underwent bilateral reconstruction.

Results

Of the 23 patients who underwent breast reconstruction, 18 (78%) were “satisfied” with the aesthetic and haptic outcome after implant-based reconstruction with PADM. One patient (one breast) required another breast operation because of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence during the follow-up period. PADM-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction has a satisfactory safety profile.

Conclusion

The use of PADM as an interface matrix for implant-based breast reconstruction yielded predictable and acceptable aesthetic and haptic results by preventing capsular contracture, rippling, implant malposition, soft-tissue thinning and failure of the silicone implant-based breast augmentation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arnold S, Valerie J (1997) Implant materials. In: Grabb W (ed) Plastic surgery: general principles. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 39–46 Arnold S, Valerie J (1997) Implant materials. In: Grabb W (ed) Plastic surgery: general principles. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 39–46
2.
go back to reference Skillman J, Ahmed O, Rowsell A (2000) Incidental improvement of breast capsular contracture following treatment of arthritis with glucosamine and chondroitin. Br J Plast Surg 56:454–461 Skillman J, Ahmed O, Rowsell A (2000) Incidental improvement of breast capsular contracture following treatment of arthritis with glucosamine and chondroitin. Br J Plast Surg 56:454–461
4.
go back to reference Connor J et al (2009) Retention of structural and biochemical integrity in a biological mesh supports tissue remodeling in a primate abdominal wall model. Regen Med 4:185–195PubMedCrossRef Connor J et al (2009) Retention of structural and biochemical integrity in a biological mesh supports tissue remodeling in a primate abdominal wall model. Regen Med 4:185–195PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Alizadeh (2007) Acellular dermis for repair of inferior fold malposition with impending implant exposure and rippling following 13 previous failed revisions. Dissertation University of New York Alizadeh (2007) Acellular dermis for repair of inferior fold malposition with impending implant exposure and rippling following 13 previous failed revisions. Dissertation University of New York
6.
go back to reference Uzunismail A, Duman A, Perk C (2008) The effect of acellular dermal allograft (Alloderm®) interface on silicone-related capsule formation—experimental study. Eur J Plast Surg 31:179–185CrossRef Uzunismail A, Duman A, Perk C (2008) The effect of acellular dermal allograft (Alloderm®) interface on silicone-related capsule formation—experimental study. Eur J Plast Surg 31:179–185CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN (2009) Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1735–1740PubMedCrossRef Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN (2009) Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1735–1740PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R (2008) Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg 143:1106–1110PubMedCrossRef Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R (2008) Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg 143:1106–1110PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chen CM, Disa JJ, Sacchini V, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Garcia-Etienne CA, Cordeiro PG (2009) Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1772–1780PubMedCrossRef Chen CM, Disa JJ, Sacchini V, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Garcia-Etienne CA, Cordeiro PG (2009) Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1772–1780PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Paepke S, Schmid R, Fleckner S, Paepke D, Niemeyer M, Schmalfeldt B, Jacobs VR, Kiechle M (2009) Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola skin: broadening the indications. Ann Surg 250:288–292PubMedCrossRef Paepke S, Schmid R, Fleckner S, Paepke D, Niemeyer M, Schmalfeldt B, Jacobs VR, Kiechle M (2009) Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola skin: broadening the indications. Ann Surg 250:288–292PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Burns NK, Jaffari MV, Rios CN, Mathur AB, Butler CE (2010) Non-cross linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:167–176PubMedCrossRef Burns NK, Jaffari MV, Rios CN, Mathur AB, Butler CE (2010) Non-cross linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:167–176PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zienowicz R, Karacaoglu E (2007) Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:373–381PubMedCrossRef Zienowicz R, Karacaoglu E (2007) Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:373–381PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Evans G et al (1998) Choice of technique for reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 25:311–318PubMed Evans G et al (1998) Choice of technique for reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 25:311–318PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bostwick J et al (2000) Decision in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 3:729–740 Bostwick J et al (2000) Decision in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 3:729–740
15.
go back to reference Rietjens M et al (2005) The suspension techniques to avoid the use of tissue expanders in breast reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg 54:467–472PubMedCrossRef Rietjens M et al (2005) The suspension techniques to avoid the use of tissue expanders in breast reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg 54:467–472PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in silicone implant-based breast reconstruction
Authors
I. Himsl
V. Drinovac
M. Lenhard
D. Stöckl
T. Weissenbacher
D. Dian
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2266-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2012 Go to the issue